Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Rigorous Derivation of the Wave Kinetic Equation for $\beta$-FPUT System

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For the reduced $\beta$-FPUT lattice with random initial data, the paper proves that expected mode energies follow the wave kinetic equation up to sub-kinetic times, with high probability as $N \to \infty$.

desk verdict A genuinely new and technically serious derivation of the WKE for a reduced beta-FPUT lattice, but the main theorem as printed does not follow from the proof because the collision operator omits the squared interaction kernel that the derivation produces. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02948 v2 pith:GDR6QTUE submitted 2025-06-03 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Boyang Wu This is my paper
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q8237K6082C05
keywords wavekineticequationFermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingouchainbeta-FPUTmodellimitFeynmandiagramexpansionphaserenormalizationturbulenceternarytree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the wave kinetic equation — the effective statistical description of weakly nonlinear dispersive waves — correctly predicts the second-moment dynamics of a reduced $\beta$-FPUT chain, the classic Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou lattice of coupled masses with a quartic nonlinearity that famously fails to thermalize promptly. Working in the joint limit of a long chain ($N \to \infty$) and weak nonlinearity ($\beta = N^{-\gamma} \to 0$, $0 < \gamma < 1$), it shows that for random initial data of the form $b_k(0) = \sqrt{n_{\mathrm{in}}(k)}\,\eta_k$ with i.i.d. centered unit-variance random variables $\eta_k$, one has $E|b(k,t)|^2 = n_{\mathrm{in}}(k) + \frac{t}{T_{\mathrm{kin}}} K(n_{\mathrm{in}})(k) + o_{\ell^\infty_k}(t/T_{\mathrm{kin}})$ with probability at least $1 - N^{-A}$, for all times $N^{0+} \le t \le T = N^{-\epsilon}\min(N, N^{5\gamma/4})$. If correct, this establishes the kinetic (thermalization) time scale $T_{\mathrm{kin}} = N^{2\gamma}/(4\pi)$ as the unit in which the wave kinetic description takes hold for the reduced model, a first rigorous step toward the thermalization problem that motivated the original FPUT experiment. The two technical novelties are the treatment of the genuinely sinusoidal dispersion $\omega_k = 2\sin(\pi k)$, and a deterministic phase renormalization that cancels divergent interactions without destroying the random pairing structure the argument relies on.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a ternary-tree (Feynman diagram) expansion of the solution combined with a deterministic phase renormalization. The nonlinear shift $\tilde\omega_k(t) = \omega_k A(t)$ is defined implicitly through a scalar ODE for $A(s)$ chosen so that the expected parts of the degenerate sums $k_1 = k$ and $k_3 = k$ cancel; because the shift factorizes through the dispersion relation, all renormalized phases share the single argument $\omega_n (Ts + A(s))$. Since only the expectation is removed, degenerate nodes survive, which forces the paper's enhanced structures — enhanced ternary trees, enhanced couples, and enhanced molecules — in which children of degenerate nodes are not completely paired. Correlation estimates reduce to counting wave-vector decorations of molecules, controlled by splicing out irregular chains with small gaps, by a preprocessing step (Operation $(-1)$) that deletes degenerate atoms while preserving connectivity, and by the operation-count inequalities $m_0 \le m_3 - 1$ and $m_2 \le 3m_3 - 3$ that relate bridge operations to two-vector counts ($\lesssim N T^{-1/2}$) and three-vector counts ($\lesssim N^2 T^{-1} \log T$). A general integral estimate bounds the oscillatory time integrals of the renormalized phases under $\dot A_{\ge} \lesssim \beta T$ and $\ddot A_{\ge} \lesssim \beta T^{9/5}$, which is why the time horizon is restricted to $T < \beta^{-5/4}$.

What would settle it

Two checks would settle the claim. First, enumerate all enhanced molecules of small order (say 2, 3, and 4) that contain degenerate atoms, apply the Operation $(-1)$ preprocessing, and verify the inequalities $m_0 \le m_3 - 1$ and $m_2 \le 3m_3 - 3$; a single counterexample would invalidate Proposition 5.11 and hence the main theorem. Second, simulate (R-FPUT) at $\beta = N^{-\gamma}$ for moderate $N$ (a few hundred to a few thousand) with random phases, average over many samples, and test whether $\sup_k \left| E|b(k,t)|^2 - n_{\mathrm{in}}(k) - \frac{t}{T_{\mathrm{kin}}} K(n_{\mathrm{in}})(k) \right| / (t/T_{\mathrm{kin}})$ tends to zero for $t$ up to $N^{-\epsilon}\min(N, N^{5\gamma/4})$; a persistent deviation beyond the claimed $o(1)$ would contradict Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1, a convergence statement for the reduced evolution equation (R-FPUT), obtained from the $\beta$-FPUT system by removing the non-resonant terms. For a smooth initial spectrum $n_{\mathrm{in}} \in C^\infty(\mathbb{T} \to [0,\infty))$, scaling $\beta = N^{-\gamma}$ with $\gamma \in (0,1)$, and random initial data (DAT), the expected mode energies satisfy $E|b(k,t)|^2 = n_{\mathrm{in}}(k) + \frac{t}{T_{\mathrm{kin}}} K(n_{\mathrm{in}})(k) + o_{\ell^\infty_k}(t/T_{\mathrm{kin}})$ uniformly in $k$, for every $N^{0+} \le t \le T = N^{-\epsilon}\min(N, N^{5\gamma/4})$, on an event of probability at least $1 - N^{-A}$ with $A \ge 40$. Here $K$ is the quartic collision operator of the wave kinetic equation and $T_{\mathrm{kin}} = N^{2\gamma}/(4\pi)$ is the kinetic time. Stated plainly: the Fourier-mode energy distribution of the reduced chain follows the four-wave kinetic equation, at leading order, on a time scale that is sub-kinetic yet grows as a positive power of the thermalization time.

Load-bearing premise

The entire proof rests on one bookkeeping premise: the wave-vector counting algorithm developed for the one-dimensional MMT model extends without loss to the enhanced molecules with degenerate atoms that the phase renormalization leaves behind — in particular the inequalities $m_0 \le m_3 - 1$ and $m_2 \le 3m_3 - 3$ asserted in Proposition 5.11 by appeal to the same proof as in the prior work (the preprocessing Operation $(-1)$ of Section 5.3 is sketched, and the verification for enhanced molecules is stated rather than fully reproduced). If that counting fails, the couple bound and with it Theorem 1.1 fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The expected mode-energy spectrum of the reduced $\beta$-FPUT model is governed by the wave kinetic equation for all times up to $T = N^{-\epsilon}\min(N, N^{5\gamma/4})$, with an error that is small in $\ell^\infty_k$ relative to the kinetic correction $t/T_{\mathrm{kin}}$.
  • The kinetic time $T_{\mathrm{kin}} = N^{2\gamma}/(4\pi)$ emerges as the unit of the thermalization scale under the joint weak-nonlinearity, large-box limit, for every $\gamma \in (0,1)$.
  • Exact resonances contribute only lower-order terms; the leading correction comes from quasi-resonant four-wave interactions, displayed explicitly as the collision operator $K(n_{\mathrm{in}})$ through the convergence of a sinc-kernel to a Dirac delta.
  • The deterministic phase renormalization removes the divergent interactions while keeping the random pairing structure intact, and the paper states the resulting framework is transferable to other anharmonic lattices and discrete nonlinear Klein–Gordon chains.
  • Higher iterates and the remainder are controlled with high probability via a contraction mapping argument, giving the probability bound $1 - N^{-A}$ with $A \ge 40$ uniformly in the horizon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same counting machinery to the full (unreduced) FPUT system via a normal-form step would give a kinetic statement about the original 1955 problem; on the sub-kinetic horizon established here, the prediction is that recurrences still dominate and thermalization corrections remain a small, explicitly computable term.
  • Since the renormalized phase is $\omega_k (Ts + A(s))$, the effective time in the resonant integrals is $t + A(t)$ rather than $t$; a numerical check of whether spectra match the kinetic prediction better at the shifted time would probe the renormalization directly.
  • The ceiling $T \lesssim \beta^{-5/4}$ (a sub-kinetic, $T_{\mathrm{kin}}^{5/8}$-type horizon) is inherited from the lack of five-vector counting bounds in one dimension, so reaching the full kinetic time likely requires new counting arguments rather than sharper integral estimates.
  • The theorem's error term is $o_{\ell^\infty}(t/T_{\mathrm{kin}})$ with no explicit rate; any quantitative statement about how large $N$ must be for the kinetic law to be visible would go beyond the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims a rigorous derivation of the wave kinetic equation for a reduced beta-FPUT model (R-FPUT), in the kinetic limit N to infinity with beta = N^{-gamma}, gamma in (0,1), for times up to T=N^{-epsilon} min(N,N^{5gamma/4}). Theorem 1.1 asserts that, with probability at least 1-N^{-A}, the second moments E|b(k,t)|^2 equal nin(k)+(t/Tkin)K(nin)(k) up to o_{ell^infty_k}(t/Tkin), where K is the collision operator written in (KIN). The proof is built on ternary-tree expansions, a deterministic phase renormalization via an ODE for A(s), enhanced trees/couples, molecule counting adapted from Vassilev [43], and a contraction argument for the remainder. The final step identifies the leading diagrammatic sum S_k with the kinetic contribution.

Significance. If the argument is correct, this is a substantial step: it would give the first rigorous derivation of a wave kinetic equation for a one-dimensional anharmonic lattice with a non-polynomial dispersion relation, up to sub-kinetic times, and it introduces a deterministic phase renormalization that avoids the difficulties of random phase shifts. The work is also explicit in relying on prior results of [43] and in adapting the counting machinery to enhanced molecules. However, the theorem as printed is not supported by the proof because the collision operator stated in (KIN) omits the squared interaction kernel that the proof actually uses; the central statement therefore needs a correction before the result can be assessed as established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.2, Eq. (KIN), and §7, Eqs. (7.6)–(7.9)] The collision operator K(phi)(xi) in (KIN) is defined with integrand phi_xi phi_xi1 phi_xi2 phi_xi3 (1/phi_xi - 1/phi_xi1 + 1/phi_xi2 - 1/phi_xi3) delta(omega1-omega2+omega3-omega), with no interaction kernel |T|^2. In the proof of Theorem 1.1, however, the leading contribution S_k is computed in (7.6)–(7.7) as a sum over k1-k2+k3=k containing factors |T_{k,1,2,3}|^2, including the displayed degenerate-node variants, and in (7.9) this sum is identified with (t/Tkin)K(nin)(k). Since T_{k,1,2,3} is not constant, this identification is valid only if the definition of K contains the same squared kernel. As printed, the asymptotic formula in Theorem 1.1 does not follow from the proof. The definition of K in (KIN) must be corrected to include the factor |T_{xi,xi1,xi2,xi3}|^2 on the resonance manifold; this is a load-bearing issue in the central claim, not a cosmetic defect.
  2. [§5.3–5.4 and Proposition 5.11, Eq. (5.12)/(1.19)] The transfer of the counting algorithm from [43] to the enhanced molecules after Operation(-1) is asserted rather than proved. Proposition 5.11 is the key step that yields the inequality m2 <= 3m3 - 3 used in Proposition 5.12 and hence in the proof of Proposition 3.3. Its proof relies on the edge count (5.13) and the chi-equations (5.14)–(5.15) holding after all degenerate atoms are removed, including the cases in which a new connected component is created. The paper does not demonstrate that Operation(-1) preserves these counts in all enhanced configurations, nor that the loss factors recorded in Remark 5.10 are compatible with the two-vector and three-vector operations counted in Proposition 5.11. Since the whole couple bound Proposition 3.3 depends on this inequality, the main theorem requires an explicit verification that the enhanced-molecule structure after preprocessing satisfies the same inequalities as in [43].
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1.2] The displayed identity T=N^{-epsilon} min(N,N^{5gamma/4})=N^{-epsilon} Tkin^{5/8} is not correct for gamma in (4/5,1): in that range min(N,N^{5gamma/4})=N, while Tkin^{5/8} ~ N^{5gamma/4}, which is larger. The statement should either restrict the identity to gamma<4/5 or state the asymptotics up to the min expression.
  2. [Eqs. (7.6)–(7.7)] The notation "×sum" in (7.6) and (7.7) is nonstandard and makes the summation domain ambiguous; please replace it with an explicit sum over (k1,k2,k3) with k1-k2+k3=k and the exclusion k1,k3≠k2 stated in the summation subscript.
  3. [Definition 2.13] Definition 2.13 first states that kv=0 when v has degree 4, but the subsequent paragraph on k-decorations states kv=0 when v has degree 2 or 4. Please reconcile the two conditions.
  4. [§3.1, Proposition 3.1] The proof of Proposition 3.1 uses the assumptions T<beta^{-5/4} and beta T^{4/5}<1; the paper should state explicitly that, under beta=N^{-gamma} and T=N^{-epsilon} min(N,N^{5gamma/4}), both conditions hold, with beta T^{4/5}≤N^{-4epsilon/5}, before applying the proposition in the bootstrap argument for Proposition 3.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WKE derivation is a direct perturbation expansion with a constructed phase shift, and the main cited tools are external results rather than fitted inputs or self-defined predictions.

full rationale

No circular reduction appears in the derivation chain. Theorem 1.1's target is E|b(k,t)|^2, expanded via the ternary-tree formula (2.39) and the split c = c^{≤n} + R; the phase shift ~ω_k is defined by the ODE (2.15)-(2.20) and shown to have global solutions, not fitted to the target quantity being predicted. The kinetic term is obtained by summing the order-2 couples (7.6)-(7.7) and taking a continuum limit through Corollary 4.2; it is not an input to the model. The central combinatorial estimates (Propositions 3.3 and 3.4) are proved via the counting lemmas in Propositions 4.1 and 4.3 together with an adapted algorithm from [43]; although the adaptation to enhanced molecules is asserted with a sketched proof (Section 5.3 and Proposition 5.11) and is a verification gap, the cited [43] results are external prior theorems and are not a self-citation that defines the conclusion. The more serious issue flagged by a skeptic—the omission of the squared interaction kernel |T_{k,1,2,3}|^2 in (KIN) while equations (7.6)-(7.7) contain it—is an inconsistency between the printed definition of K and the proof's computation, not a circularity: the theorem's operator is not constructed from, or fitted to, the proof's summands. Thus no step in the paper exhibits Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim for the reduced equation rests on the random-phase distribution, the transfer of the [43] counting algorithm to enhanced molecules, and smoothness of the initial spectrum. No number is fitted to data; the phase renormalization is an auxiliary construction. The fully stated theorem as printed is weakened by a missing interaction kernel in the WKE definition.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The reduced evolution equation R-FPUT, obtained by deleting non-resonant terms from the full beta-FPUT normal-form equation (1.11), is the model studied.
    Theorem 1.1 is stated for R-FPUT only; the equivalence to full beta-FPUT is deferred to future work in Section 1.5.
  • domain assumption Initial data are i.i.d. complex Gaussian or uniform-on-circle random phases, so Isserlis pairing and hypercontractivity apply.
    The diagrammatic expansion and high-probability estimates in Sections 2.5 and 6 depend on these distributional assumptions.
  • ad hoc to paper The counting algorithm and Proposition 5.11 from [43] transfer to enhanced molecules after the Operation(-1) preprocessing.
    Sections 5.3 through 5.5 assert the same molecule structure and inequalities as in [43] without a full re-derivation; a failure would invalidate the couple bounds.
  • standard math Gaussian hypercontractivity for random phase variables, as stated in Lemma 6.3 and cited from [56], holds for the unit-circle phases used in this paper.
    This estimate is used to upgrade second-moment bounds to high-probability bounds on the operator L in Proposition 3.4.
  • domain assumption The initial spectrum nin is smooth, nonnegative, and independent of N.
    Smoothness is needed for the integral approximation in (7.8) and for the regularity hypotheses in the main estimates.
invented entities (1)
  • Deterministic phase renormalization function ~omega_k(s)=omega_k A(s)
    purpose: Cancels divergent degenerate phase contributions in the tree expansion by defining A through the ODE in Section 2.3.
    This is a proof device with no empirical handle outside the paper. The final theorem is stated for the unrenormalized amplitude b_k, so A is an auxiliary construct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rigorous Derivation of the Wave Kinetic Equation for $\beta$-FPUT System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDR6QTUE

@misc{pith2026250602948,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rigorous Derivation of the Wave Kinetic Equation for $\beta$-FPUT System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDR6QTUE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02948}
}
abstract

Wave kinetic theory has been suggested as a way to understand the longtime statistical behavior of the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou (FPUT) system, with the aim of determining the thermalization time scale. The latter has been a major problem since the model was introduced in the 1950s. In this thesis we establish the wave kinetic equation for a reduced evolution equation obtained from the $\beta$-FPUT system by removing the non-resonant terms. We work in the kinetic limit $N\to \infty$ and $\beta\to 0$ under the scaling laws $\beta=N^{-\gamma}$ with $0<\gamma<1$. The result holds up to the sub-kinetic time scale $T=N^{-\epsilon}\min\bigl(N,N^{5\gamma/4}\bigr)=N^{-\epsilon}T_{\mathrm{kin}}^{5/8}$ for $\epsilon\ll 1$, where $T_{\mathrm{kin}}$ represents the kinetic (thermalization) timescale. The novelties of this work include the treatment of non-polynomial dispersion relations, and the introduction of a robust phase renormalization argument to cancel dangerous divergent interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02948 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. A ternary tree of scale 4 with root (r, +) and three branching nodes ni , each with three children mj , lj , or pj labeled by their signs. For each ternary tree T , we define b T k (t)’s by the following equation inductively: b • k (t) = q nin(k)ηk(ϱ) (2.1) i ˙ b T k (t) = β N X k1−k2+k3=k Tk,1,2,3b T1 k1 (t)b T2 k2 ∗ (t)b T3 k3 (t)e iΩkt , (2.2) where we define: Ωk,1,2,3 = Ωk := ωk − ωk1 + ωk2 − ωk3 , And we use T2… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. An enhanced ternary tree in which the branching node (n2, −) is a degenerate node, such that kl2 = kl ∗ c and kn2 = klc . Definition 2.4. (Couples) A couple Q consists of two trees T + and T −, each labeled with opposite signs, together with a partition P of the set of leaves L + ∪ L− into (n + 1) disjoint two-element subsets, where n = n(T +) + n(T −) is called the order of the couple. The partition P must satisfy … view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. An enhanced couple with leaves paired in the same color. Note that the leaves l ∗ c and l2 cannot be paired together by Definition 2.5. Then we can prove the following proposition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: An example of an enhanced couple and its corresponding en￾hanced molecule. A (kv, αv)-decoration of M assigns an integer kℓ ∈ ZN ∩(0, 1) to each bond ℓ ∈ M, in such a way that for each atom v, X ℓ∼v ζv,ℓ kℓ = kv, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2_4.png]
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Operation (−1) on a degenerate atom v (diamond) with parent vp and neighbors v ∗ c , v2 and vc. Left: original configuration with P C and LP bonds; dashed stubs indicate external connections. Right: after removing the degenerate atom v and all the bonds connected, vp…
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: All types of couples Q without degenerate nodes of order n = 2. Note that the second term can be bounded by O  N−γ/2 ⟨ΩkT⟩  using A˙(s) ≲ βT, A¨(s) ≲ (βT) 3 (using the tight bound from (5.25)) and Proposition 3.1. Then using the fact that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/…
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. Figure 7.2: All types of enhanced couples Q with degenerate nodes of order n = 2. Note that there must be two degenerate nodes in the enhanced couple to achieve admissible pairings. = 1 iΩk ′T ˆ s 0 e i(Ωk+Ωk′ )(T s1+A(s1))ds1 − ˆ s 0 e iΩk(T s1+A(s1))ds1 ! − ˆ s 0 e iΩk(T s1+A(…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sharp decay thresholds in weighted $L^\infty$ for wave kinetic equations with power-law dispersion

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Four-wave kinetic equations with dispersion |p|^a and kernel growth |p|^{2β} in 3D are locally well-posed in weighted L∞ exactly above the decay threshold s_c = 4β + 3 − a/2, with ill-posedness below.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [43]

    One-dimensional wave kinetic theory

    Katja D. Vassilev. “One-dimensional wave kinetic theory”. 2024. arXiv:2408.13693 [math.AP]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Studies of the nonlinear problems I

    E. Fermi, P. Pasta, S. Ulam, and M. Tsingou. “Studies of the nonlinear problems I”. In:Los Alamos preprint LA-1940 (1955). doi: 10.2172/4376203

    doi:10.2172/4376203 1955

  3. [2]

    Exact discrete res- onances in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam–Tsingou system

    Miguel D Bustamante, Kevin Hutchinson, Yuri V Lvov, and Miguel Onorato. “Exact discrete res- onances in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam–Tsingou system”. In:Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation73 (2019), pp. 437–471.doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.03.004

    doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.03.004 2019

  4. [3]

    Dimostrazione che in generale un sistema meccanico normale È QUASI—ergodico

    Enrico Fermi. “Dimostrazione che in generale un sistema meccanico normale È QUASI—ergodico”. In: Il Nuovo Cimento (1911-1923)25 (1923), pp. 267–269.doi: 10.1007/BF02959600

    doi:10.1007/bf02959600 1923

  5. [4]

    Collected Papers:(Note E Memorie)

    Enrico Fermi. Collected Papers:(Note E Memorie). Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, 1962

    work page 1962

  6. [5]

    Counter-propagating waves on fluid surfaces and the contin- uum limit of the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam model

    Guido Schneider and C. Eugene Wayne. “Counter-propagating waves on fluid surfaces and the contin- uum limit of the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam model”. In:Equadiff 99: (In 2 Volumes). World Scientific, 2000, pp. 390–404. doi: 10.1142/9789812792617_0075

    doi:10.1142/9789812792617_0075

  7. [6]

    Interaction of

    Norman J. Zabusky and Martin D. Kruskal. “Interaction of "solitons" in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states”. In:Physical Review Letters15.6 (1965), p. 240.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLe tt.15.240. RIGOROUS DERIV ATION OF THE W A VE KINETIC EQUATION FOR β-FPUT SYSTEM 51

    doi:10.1103/physrevle 1965

  8. [7]

    Statistical Properties of a Nonlinear String

    Felix M. Izrailev and Boris V. Chirikov. “Statistical Properties of a Nonlinear String”. In:Doklady Akademii Nauk166.1 (1966), pp. 57–59

    work page 1966

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Stochastic instability of non-linear oscillations

    George M. Zaslavski˘ ı and Boris V. Chirikov. “Stochastic instability of non-linear oscillations”. In:Soviet Physics Uspekhi14.5 (1972), p. 549.doi: 10.1070/PU1972v014n05ABEH004669

    1972 doi

  2. [9]

    The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem: a status report

    Giovanni Gallavotti. The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem: a status report. Vol. 728. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2007.doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72995-2

    2007 doi

  3. [10]

    ProofofNishida’sconjectureonanharmoniclattices

    BobRink.“ProofofNishida’sconjectureonanharmoniclattices”.In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 261.3 (2006), pp. 613–627.doi: 10.1007/s00220-005-1451-1

    2006 doi

  4. [11]

    Results on normal forms for FPU chains

    Andreas Henrici and Thomas Kappeler. “Results on normal forms for FPU chains”. In:Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics278.1 (2008), pp. 145–177.doi: 10.1007/s00220-007-0387-z

    2008 doi

  5. [12]

    Route to thermalization in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam system

    Miguel Onorato, Lara Vozella, Davide Proment, and Yuri V. Lvov. “Route to thermalization in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam system”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112.14 (2015), pp. 4208–4213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404397112

    2015 doi

  6. [13]

    The two-stage dynamics in the Fermi-Pasta- Ulam problem: From regular to diffusive behavior

    A. Ponno, H. Christodoulidi, Ch. Skokos, and S. Flach. “The two-stage dynamics in the Fermi-Pasta- Ulam problem: From regular to diffusive behavior”. In:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Non- linear Science21.4 (2011), p. 043127.doi: 10.1063/1.3658620

    2011 doi

  7. [14]

    The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem in the thermodynamic limit: Scaling laws of the energy cascade

    Antonio Ponno. “The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem in the thermodynamic limit: Scaling laws of the energy cascade”. In:Chaotic Dynamics and Transport in Classical and Quantum Systems182 (2005), pp. 431–440. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-2947-0_20

    2005 doi

  8. [15]

    Anharmonic Chain with Lennard-Jones Interac- tion

    P. Bocchieri, A. Scotti, B. Bearzi, and A. Loinger. “Anharmonic Chain with Lennard-Jones Interac- tion”. In:Phys. Rev. A2 (5 1970), pp. 2013–2019.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.2.2013

    1970 doi

  9. [16]

    On the specific heat of Fermi–Pasta–Ulam systems and their glassy behavior

    Andrea Carati and Luigi Galgani. “On the specific heat of Fermi–Pasta–Ulam systems and their glassy behavior”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics94.5 (1999), pp. 859–869.doi: 10.1023/A:1004531032623

    1999 doi

  10. [17]

    On the definition of temperature in FPU systems

    A. Carati, P. Cipriani, and L. Galgani. “On the definition of temperature in FPU systems”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics115.3 (2004), pp. 1101–1112.doi: 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000022378.52789.b6

    2004

  11. [18]

    Localization of energy in FPU chains

    Luisa Berchialla, Luigi Galgani, and Antonio Giorgilli. “Localization of energy in FPU chains”. In: Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems11.4 (2004), p. 855.doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.11.855

    2004 doi

  12. [19]

    On metastability in FPU

    Dario Bambusi and Antonio Ponno. “On metastability in FPU”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics 264.2 (2006), pp. 539–561.doi: 10.1007/s00220-005-1488-1

    2006 doi

  13. [20]

    An averaging theorem for Hamiltonian dynamical systems in the thermodynamic limit

    A Carati. “An averaging theorem for Hamiltonian dynamical systems in the thermodynamic limit”. In: Journal of Statistical Physics128.4 (2007), pp. 1057–1077.doi: 10.1007/s10955-007-9332-y

    2007 doi

  14. [21]

    Some analytic results on the FPU paradox

    D. Bambusi, A. Carati, A. Maiocchi, and A. Maspero. “Some analytic results on the FPU paradox”. In: Hamiltonian Partial Differential Equations and Applications. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015, pp. 235–254.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2950-4_8

    2015 doi

  15. [22]

    Zur kinetischen Theorie der Wärmeleitung in Kristallen

    R. Peierls. “Zur kinetischen Theorie der Wärmeleitung in Kristallen”. In:Annalen der Physik395.8 (1929), pp. 1055–1101.doi: 10.1002/andp.19293950803

    1929 doi

  16. [23]

    Theory of a weakly turbulent plasma

    A.A. Vedenov. “Theory of a weakly turbulent plasma”. In:Reviews of Plasma Physics(1967), pp. 229–

    1967

  17. [24]

    On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. I. General theory

    K. Hasselmann. “On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. I. General theory”. In: J. Fluid Mech.12 (1962), pp. 481–500.issn: 0022-1120,1469-7645.doi: 10.1017/S0022112062000373

    1962 doi

  18. [25]

    On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. II. Conservation the- orems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility

    K. Hasselmann. “On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. II. Conservation the- orems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility”. In:J. Fluid Mech.15 (1963), pp. 273–281.issn: 0022- 1120,1469-7645. doi: 10.1017/S0022112063000239

    1963 doi

  19. [26]

    Zakharov, Victor S

    Vladimir E. Zakharov, Victor S. L’vov, and Gregory Falkovich.Kolmogorov Spectra of Turbulence I: Wave Turbulence. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-50052-7

    2012 doi

  20. [27]

    Weak turbulence in media with a decay spectrum

    Vladimir E. Zakharov. “Weak turbulence in media with a decay spectrum”. In:Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics6.4 (1965), pp. 22–24.doi: 10.1007/BF01565814

    1965 doi

  21. [28]

    Nazarenko

    S. Nazarenko. Wave Turbulence. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.isbn: 9783642159435. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15942-8

    2011 doi

  22. [29]

    The weakly nonlinear large-box limit of the 2D cu- bic nonlinear Schrödinger equation

    Erwan Faou, Pierre Germain, and Zaher Hani. “The weakly nonlinear large-box limit of the 2D cu- bic nonlinear Schrödinger equation”. In:J. Amer. Math. Soc.29.4 (2016), pp. 915–982. issn: 0894- 0347,1088-6834. doi: 10.1090/jams/845. 52 BOYANG WU

    2016 doi

  23. [30]

    Analysis of (CR) in higher dimension

    T. Buckmaster, Pierre Germain, Zaher Hani, and Jalal Shatah. “Analysis of (CR) in higher dimension”. In: Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN4 (2019), pp. 1265–1280.issn: 1073-7928,1687-0247. doi: 10.1093/im rn/rnx156

    2019 doi

  24. [31]

    Effective dynamics of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on large domains

    T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, and J. Shatah. “Effective dynamics of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on large domains”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71.7 (2018), pp. 1407–1460. issn: 0010- 3640,1097-0312. doi: 10.1002/cpa.21749

    2018 doi

  25. [32]

    Onset of the wave turbulence description of the longtime behavior of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation

    T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, and J. Shatah. “Onset of the wave turbulence description of the longtime behavior of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation”. In:Invent. Math.225.3 (2021), pp. 787–855. issn: 0020-9910,1432-1297. doi: 10.1007/s00222-021-01039-z

    2021 doi

  26. [33]

    On the Boltzmann equation for weakly nonlinear wave equations

    Herbert Spohn. “On the Boltzmann equation for weakly nonlinear wave equations”. In:Boltzmann’s legacy. ESI Lect. Math. Phys. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2008, pp. 145–159.isbn: 978-3-03719-057-9. doi: 10.4171/057-1/10

    2008 doi

  27. [34]

    Linear Boltzmann equation as the weak coupling limit of a random Schrödinger equation

    László Erdös and Horng-Tzer Yau. “Linear Boltzmann equation as the weak coupling limit of a random Schrödinger equation”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.53.6 (2000), pp. 667–735.issn: 0010-3640,1097-

    2000

  28. [35]

    Quantum diffusion of the random Schrödinger evolution in the scaling limit

    László Erdös, Manfred Salmhofer, and Horng-Tzer Yau. “Quantum diffusion of the random Schrödinger evolution in the scaling limit”. In:Acta Math.200.2 (2008), pp. 211–277.issn: 0001-5962,1871-2509. doi: 10.1007/s11511-008-0027-2

    2008 doi

  29. [36]

    On the derivation of the wave kinetic equation for NLS

    Yu Deng and Zaher Hani. “On the derivation of the wave kinetic equation for NLS”. In:Forum Math. Pi 9 (2021), Paper No. e6, 37.issn: 2050-5086. doi: 10.1017/fmp.2021.6

    2021 doi

  30. [37]

    On the derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation

    Charles Collot and Pierre Germain. “On the derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math.78.4 (2025), pp. 856–909.issn: 0010-3640,1097-0312. doi: 10.1002/cpa .22232

    2025 doi

  31. [38]

    Derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation: longer time scales

    Charles Collot and Pierre Germain. “Derivation of the homogeneous kinetic wave equation: longer time scales”. 2020. arXiv:2007.03508 [math.AP]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation

    Yu Deng and Zaher Hani. “Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation”. In:Invent. Math.233.2 (2023), pp. 543–724. issn: 0020-9910,1432-1297. doi: 10.1007/s00222-023-01189-2

    2023 doi

  33. [40]

    Derivation of the wave kinetic equation: full range of scaling laws

    Yu Deng and Zaher Hani. “Derivation of the wave kinetic equation: full range of scaling laws”. 2023. arXiv: 2301.07063 [math.AP]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Long time justification of wave turbulence theory

    Yu Deng and Zaher Hani. “Long time justification of wave turbulence theory”. 2024. arXiv:2311.10082 [math.AP]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Long time derivation of the Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics

    Yu Deng, Zaher Hani, and Xiao Ma. “Long time derivation of the Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics”. 2024. arXiv:2408.07818 [math.AP]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Stages of Energy Transfer in the FPU Model

    Joseph A. Biello, Peter R. Kramer, and Yury Lvov. “Stages of Energy Transfer in the FPU Model”

  37. [45]

    Application of weak turbulence theory to FPU model

    Peter R Kramer, Joseph A Biello, and Yury Lvov. “Application of weak turbulence theory to FPU model”. In:Conference Publications2003.Special (2003), pp. 482–491.issn: 0133-0189. doi: 10.3934 /proc.2003.2003.482

    2003

  38. [46]

    Universal route to thermalization in weakly-nonlinear one-dimensional chains

    Lorenzo Pistone, Sergio Chibbaro, Miguel Bustamante, Yuri L’vov, and Miguel Onorato. “Universal route to thermalization in weakly-nonlinear one-dimensional chains”. In:Mathematics in Engineering 1.4 (2019), pp. 672–698.issn: 2640-3501. doi: 10.3934/mine.2019.4.672

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    Double scaling in the relaxation time in theβ-Fermi-Pasta-Ulam- Tsingou model

    Yuri V Lvov and Miguel Onorato. “Double scaling in the relaxation time in theβ-Fermi-Pasta-Ulam- Tsingou model”. In:Physical Review Letters120.14 (2018), p. 144301.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.1 20.144301

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    Coexistence of Ballistic and Fourier Regimes in theβ Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou Lattice

    Giovanni Dematteis, Lamberto Rondoni, Davide Proment, Francesco De Vita, and Miguel Onorato. “Coexistence of Ballistic and Fourier Regimes in theβ Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou Lattice”. In:Physical Review Letters125.2 (2020), p. 024101.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.024101

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    Anomalous conduction in one-dimensional particle lattices: Wave-turbulence approach

    Francesco De Vita, Giovanni Dematteis, Raffaele Mazzilli, Davide Proment, Yuri V Lvov, and Miguel Onorato. “Anomalous conduction in one-dimensional particle lattices: Wave-turbulence approach”. In: Physical Review E106.3 (2022), p. 034110.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.034110

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Anomalous energy transport in the FPU-β chain

    Jani Lukkarinen and Herbert Spohn. “Anomalous energy transport in the FPU-β chain”. In:Commu- nications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences 61.12 (2018), pp. 1753–1786.doi: 10.1002/cpa.20243. RIGOROUS DERIV ATION ...

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    Multi-wave resonances in the diatomic α-FPUT system

    A. Pezzi, G. Deng, Y. Lvov, M. Lorenzo, and M. Onorato. “Multi-wave resonances in the diatomic α-FPUT system”. In:Chaos, Solitons & Fractals192 (2025), p. 116005.doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025 .116005

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    Quasiperiodicity in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou problem revisited: An ap- proach using ideas from wave turbulence

    Santhosh Ganapa. “Quasiperiodicity in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou problem revisited: An ap- proach using ideas from wave turbulence”. In:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 33.9 (2023). doi: 10.1063/5.0154157

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Six-wave systems in one-dimensional wave turbulence

    Jason Paul Laurie. “Six-wave systems in one-dimensional wave turbulence”. Ph.D. thesis. Sept. 2010. url: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2484130~S15

    2010

  46. [54]

    4-wave dynamics in kinetic wave tur- bulence

    Sergio Chibbaro, Giovanni Dematteis, and Lamberto Rondoni. “4-wave dynamics in kinetic wave tur- bulence”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena362 (2018), pp. 24–59.doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2017 .09.001

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    On the wave turbulence theory of 2D gravity waves, II: propagation of randomness

    Yu Deng, Alexandru Ionescu, and Fabio Pusateri. “On the wave turbulence theory of 2D gravity waves, II: propagation of randomness”. 2025. arXiv:2504.14304 [math.AP]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A pedestrian approach to the invariant Gibbs measures for the 2-d defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations

    Tadahiro Oh and Laurent Thomann. “A pedestrian approach to the invariant Gibbs measures for the 2-d defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations”. In:Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput.6.3 (2018), pp. 397–445.issn: 2194-0401,2194-041X. doi: 10.1007/s40072-018-0112-2. Depar...

    2018 doi

  49. [276]

    doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7799-7_3

    doi

  50. [312]

    doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(200006)53:6<667::AID-CPA1>3.0.CO;2-5

    doi

  51. [2002]

    arXiv: nlin/0210008 [nlin.CD]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.