Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 126 references

The ionizing photons that make the inner circumgalactic medium glow come from star formation in the central galaxy, not from shocks or the ultraviolet background.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-01 15:33 UTC pith:GDVV4FWY

load-bearing objection New MaNGA dataset shows inner-CGM Hα correlates with SFR but the causal claim 'star formation powers it' outruns the evidence; the 5Re boundary is the load-bearing assumption and it is not yet secured. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18385 v1 pith:GDVV4FWY submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.GA

Star formation powers optical line emission from the CGM

Huanian Zhang , Lizhi Xie , Zhijie Qu , Dennis Zaritsky , Luis C. Ho , Min Bao , Fabio Fontanot , Michaela Hirschmann
show 4 more authors
Chenxu Liu Gabriella De Lucia Enci Wang Haoyan Zheng
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords circumgalactic mediumH-alpha emissionstar formation rateLyman continuum escapeintegral field spectroscopygalaxy halosionizationfeedback
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This study analyzes optical emission-line maps of 72 normal, low-redshift galaxies observed with integral-field spectroscopy. It finds that H-alpha, [O II], and [O III] surface brightness at radii of 5–10 effective radii—the inner circumgalactic medium—correlates strongly with the galaxy's star formation rate (Pearson r = 0.74) but not with its stellar mass (r = 0.018). The ultraviolet background alone is too faint to produce the observed flux, and shock ionization is argued to be unlikely. A photon budget shows that a 1–2% escape fraction of Lyman-continuum photons from central star-forming regions can supply the required ionizing photons. The most likely source of the inner CGM's line emission is therefore star formation in the central galaxy.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the optical line emission observed from the inner circumgalactic medium (the region between 5 and 10 effective radii, roughly 0.1–0.25 virial radii) of normal galaxies is powered by ionizing photons escaping from the star-forming regions in the central galaxy. This is supported by two quantitative results. First, H-alpha surface brightness at 5 Re correlates with star formation rate (r = 0.74, p = 3.54e-7) and specific star formation rate (r = 0.64), but shows no significant correlation with stellar mass (r = 0.018, p = 0.92). Second, for a star-forming galaxy with SFR ~ 1 M_sun/yr, the observed H-alpha flux at 5 Re requires ~1.9 x 10^51 Lyman-continuum phot

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the escape of Lyman-continuum photons from the host galaxy's star-forming disk into the halo. The paper identifies a disk-halo boundary at ~5 Re, justified via the 90%-light radius (mean R90/Re = 2.78, so 2R90 ~ 5.6 Re) and the observation that H II regions in nearby galaxies are confined within 2R90. Along with this boundary, the key quantitative tools are (i) the strong linear correlation between H-alpha surface brightness at 5–10 Re and SFR/sSFR, and (ii) a photon-budget comparison between the LyC production rate inferred from SFR (with an assumed 1–2% escape fraction) and the LyC photon rate required by the observed H-alpha luminosity. The authors use [O III]/[O

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on the assumption that the emission measured at 5–10 effective radii comes from the circumgalactic medium itself, not from the galaxy's extended star-forming disk, scattered disk light, or the wings of the point-spread function.

What would settle it

A direct check would be to obtain deep, high-spatial-resolution spectroscopy of a few of these galaxies to search for the signature of extended H II regions, scattered light, or PSF wings at 5–10 Re. Specifically, if one could measure the velocity field of the emission at those radii and find that it rotates coherently with the disk (rather than showing a roughly stationary or outflowing halo component), the disk-origin alternative would be favored. Alternatively, a spatially resolved measurement of the Balmer decrement (H-alpha/H-beta) at 5–10 Re could distinguish recombination from scattered

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If correct, the line emission from the inner CGM of normal galaxies can be used as a direct tracer of the ionizing photon escape from the central galaxy, effectively measuring the escape fraction across a broad range of galaxy properties.
  • The absence of a correlation with stellar mass implies that the amount of cool, line-emitting gas in the inner CGM at these radii is regulated by current star formation activity rather than by the integrated galaxy mass.
  • The observed break in slope at 1–2 Re and the shallower slopes at low SFR indicate that feedback processes shape the inner CGM, with the accumulated star formation history reflected in the gas distribution.
  • The large discrepancy between the cool-gas–SFR predictions of two current theoretical models means that CGM emission-line surveys can serve as a discriminating test for subgrid models of star formation and feedback.
  • The inferred escape fractions (1–2%, up to ~35% in extreme starbursts) have implications for the ionizing photon budget of the universe and for reionization, since they quantify how many photons leak from star-forming galaxies into the intergalactic medium.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to measure the same relation in edge-on versus face-on galaxies: if escaping photons from the central disk are the source, the emission should be roughly isotropic or slightly limb-brightened, not concentrated along the disk plane, which would also help separate true CGM emission from scattered light.
  • The 1–2% escape fraction inferred here is global; spatially resolved spectroscopy of the inner CGM could map the escape fraction as a function of azimuth and radius, testing whether 'leaky chimneys' associated with star-forming complexes are the dominant escape channels.
  • If the SFR–surface-brightness correlation is confirmed at even larger radii (beyond 10 Re), it may be possible to relate CGM emission directly to the ionizing photon budget available for reionization at low redshift and to calibrate LyC photon production efficiencies in normal galaxies.
  • The non-detection of H-alpha in quenched galaxies, despite one simulation's prediction of cool gas at large radii, suggests that either the cool gas in such halos is not ionized (e.g., shielded from the UV background) or the simulation overproduces the cool gas reservoir; this could be tested observationally with deeper, blind surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. Using MaNGA integral-field data for 72 low-redshift galaxies whose IFU footprints extend to at least 5 Re, the authors construct H-alpha, [O II], and [O III] surface-brightness radial profiles and measure line emission in annuli at 5, 7.5, and 10 Re. They report a break at 1-2 Re, an SFR-dependent slope beyond the break, and strong correlations between the 5-10 Re H-alpha (and [O II]/[O III]) surface brightness and galaxy SFR/sSFR (Pearson r=0.74, p=3.54e-7 at 5 Re), with no significant correlation with stellar mass. A photon-budget argument is used to argue that escaping ionizing photons from central star formation (1-2% escape fraction) can account for the CGM flux. The paper also compares cool-gas surface densities in GAEA and TNG simulations with the observed correlations.

Significance. If robust, this is a valuable result: a large, uniform IFU sample mapping the transition between the disk and the inner CGM would establish that star formation, rather than stellar mass or UV background, regulates the cool ionized gas at 5-10 Re, and would provide a new observational constraint for subgrid feedback models. The paper uses publicly available MaNGA data, provides reproducibility details, and tests the SFR correlation with independent MPA-JHU and GSWLC catalogs. The GAEA/TNG comparison, although qualitative, is a useful demonstration of model dispersion. However, this significance is conditional on the disk-halo boundary and contamination controls; the causal claim currently rests on inference and is explicitly qualified by the authors' own shock caveat.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods: Transition to the CGM] The 5Re disk-halo boundary is the load-bearing assumption that separates CGM emission from disk emission. The three justifications do not secure it. The concentration argument gives 2R90 about 5.6Re, so the annulus 4.5-5.5Re is inside the radius to which Zaritsky & Christlein (2007) find HII regions, not outside it. The EW toy model is fitted to only 38 of 72 galaxies; the remaining 34 are low-sSFR systems without measurable EW profiles, so the model does not constrain the high-SFR galaxies where extended-disk or PSF-wing contamination would be strongest. No PSF-wing, scattering, or inclination test is provided. Since any of these contamination channels would also produce an f_Halpha-SFR correlation, the Fig. 2 result alone cannot establish the CGM origin. Please add a per-galaxy break-radius analysis, PSF-wing subtraction tests, and an investigation of whether the 5Re flux depends on in
  2. [Section 2.1 and Methods (second example galaxy)] The BPT discriminant is internally inconsistent. Section 2.1 states that the BPT diagrams for two galaxies lie in the star-forming region and uses this as the third argument against shocks. Methods, however, says for the second galaxy that line ratios at r>12 kpc are 'consistent with hard ionizing sources such as AGNs or heat shocks.' Because only two galaxies have radially resolved BPT data, this contradiction removes the only direct ionization diagnostic beyond 5Re. The subsequent concession that shocks 'cannot be definitively ruled out' is appropriate, but the abstract's causal claim ('Star formation powers...') is stronger than the evidence allows; it needs either additional ionization diagnostics at 5-10Re or a more carefully bounded conclusion.
  3. [Section 2.1 photon budget] The photon-budget argument shows consistency, not causation. The 1.9e51 s^-1 figure is the LyC recombination rate required by the observed Halpha flux under Case B; the 1.4-2.7e51 s^-1 from SFR times (1-2%) shows that central star formation can supply enough photons. Shocks, cooling radiation, or scattered central disk photons would also satisfy the same photon budget. The text seems to acknowledge this in the shock-discussion paragraph, but then concludes that star formation 'fully account[s] for the observed emission line fluxes.' Please rescope the conclusion or provide a quantitative test that distinguishes the candidate mechanisms (e.g., He I/He II ratios, [O I]/Halpha, or a comparison of the predicted and observed slope of f_Halpha versus SFR under each mechanism).
  4. [Section 2.2, Table 1 and DAP SFRs] The x-axis SFRs partially share a tracer with the y-axis because the MaNGA DAP SFRs include Halpha-based estimates. The GSWLC SED-based SFR test is a good check, but the paper reports only that parameters are consistent within 1 sigma, with b1 deviating at 1.5-2.5 sigma. Please provide the GSWLC/MPA-JHU-only slopes and correlation coefficients for all three radii, and ideally show the Figure 2 panels with these alternative SFRs. This would make the claimed independence of the correlation from the shared tracer quantitatively transparent.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Equation (2) and Figure 1 caption] There is a typo 'asympotic' for 'asymptotic' in the display near Eq. (2). The Figure 1 caption refers to 'mean stacked radial profiles' while the text discusses both mean and median stacks; please clarify which quantity is plotted.
  2. [Section 2.1, IRAS 08339+6517] The adopted Hbeta/Halpha=0.3 for IRAS 08339+6517 is rough. Please state explicitly how much the object's placement in Figure 2 changes for a plausible range of this ratio (e.g., 0.3-0.5), given that the literature comparison is used as supporting evidence.
  3. [Methods: Transition to the CGM] The sentence 'There is no evidence for disk emission line sources outside of about 5Re' is too strong. The cited Zaritsky & Christlein (2007) sample is small and does not span the full mass/SFR range of the present sample; a softer wording such as 'in the cited galaxy sample' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No material circularity: the central f_Halpha-SFR correlation is an independent empirical result, cross-checked with SED-based SFRs and external MUSE data; self-citations and O32-based budget checks are supporting, not definitional.

full rationale

The paper's core claim - Halpha surface brightness at 5-10 Re correlates with SFR (r=0.74) and not stellar mass (r=0.018) - is a direct measurement from MaNGA data, not a derived or renamed quantity. SFRs come from the DAP catalog, which is partly Halpha-based, but the authors explicitly repeat the correlation using MPA-JHU and GSWLC SED-based SFRs and find all parameters consistent within 1 sigma, so the x-axis is not forced by the y-axis. The LyC budget (1.9e51 vs 1.4-2.7e51 s^-1) uses escape fractions taken from an external O32-f_esc calibration (Izotov et al. 2018; Flury et al. 2022), not from fitting the Halpha data; it is therefore a consistency estimate, and while O32 is measured in the same gas, the calibration itself is independent of this paper's targets. The 5Re boundary is chosen from 0.05 rvir scaling plus 2R90~5.6Re, Zaritsky & Christlein's HII-region limit, and a toy EW model; these arguments are open to challenge (5Re lies inside 2R90; the EW model is fit to only 38/72 galaxies), but they are robustness/correctness concerns, not definitions that bake in the SFR correlation. The BPT evidence is weakened by the Methods statement that the second example galaxy's ratios at r>12 kpc are 'consistent with hard ionizing sources such as AGNs or heat shocks', which sits uneasily with the Section 2.1 assertion that both BPT examples lie in the star-forming region, and Section 2.1 itself admits shocks cannot be definitively ruled out; these admissions reduce confidence in the causal attribution but do not make the empirical correlation circular. Self-citations (refs 8, 11-18, 30, 100) supply earlier stacking conventions and an MUSE comparison point, but the central measurement and external benchmarks (GSWLC, literature starburst, GAEA/TNG) are independent. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on: (1) the empirical 5 Re boundary definition, (2) the O32-to-escape-fraction calibration from external surveys, and (3) the stellar-population synthesis assumption for the LyC photon budget. The simulations comparison additionally assumes a quadratic relation between emission and gas surface density. These are all calibrations or modeling choices from prior literature, not derived in this paper.

free parameters (5)
  • Intrinsic scatter sigma_p in regression = 0.2 dex (fixed, not fitted)
    Prescribed fixed value in the MCMC likelihood to account for astrophysical dispersion; affects the reported slope uncertainties.
  • H-beta/H-alpha ratio for IRAS 08339+6517 = 0.3
    Adopted to convert the literature H-beta surface brightness to H-alpha for one comparison galaxy; a rough Case B value.
  • Mass-dependent velocity windows = +/-150 to +/-375 km/s
    Chosen by stellar-mass bin for emission-line extraction; the paper states results are insensitive to small changes.
  • Equivalent-width toy model parameters (A_disk, R_d, A_CGM) = Fitted per galaxy; <R_d/Re>=1.61+/-0.17
    Two-component disk+CGM model (Eq. 2) fitted to the data; used to argue disk emission ends before 5 Re.
  • 5 Re disk-halo boundary = 5 Re (~11.4 kpc)
    Chosen empirically from 0.05 r_vir scaling and the 2R90 argument; if wrong, the inner-CGM classification is contaminated by disk emission.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Case B recombination converts H-alpha luminosity to LyC photon rate
    Used in the LyC photon budget; standard nebular physics (Osterbrock & Ferland 2006, Hummer & Storey 1987).
  • domain assumption Kroupa IMF and solar-metallicity stellar population for N_LyC(SFR)
    Used to estimate ionizing photon output from SFR; authors note the sample is subsolar, so the estimate is conservative.
  • domain assumption O32-to-escape-fraction scaling relations (Izotov+18, Flury+22) apply at 5-10 Re
    The quoted escape fractions (1-2%, up to 35%) are derived from this external calibration; the authors caution the scatter is 1-2 dex.
  • domain assumption Emission beyond 5 Re originates from CGM gas, not extended disk HII regions
    Supported by 2R90~5.6 Re, the EW toy model, and Zaritsky & Christlein (2007), but not definitive for all 72 galaxies.
  • domain assumption The UV background model (Faucher-Giguere 2020) is correct
    Used to argue the UVB alone cannot explain the observed H-alpha; a stronger UVB would weaken this argument.
  • domain assumption Emission-line surface brightness is proportional to the square of the cool-gas surface density
    Explicitly assumed in the GAEA/TNG comparison (§2.3) to connect simulated gas density to observed emission.
  • domain assumption Dust extinction in the CGM is negligible (~0.03 mag)
    Fluxes are not corrected for extinction; based on Menard+10/Peek+15 estimates for circumgalactic dust.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Star formation powers optical line emission from the CGM." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDVV4FWY

@misc{pith2026260718385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Star formation powers optical line emission from the CGM},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDVV4FWY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18385}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Using integral field spectroscopy, we explore the disk-halo interface, or the inner circumgalactic medium (CGM), of individual galaxies by constructing and analyzing emission-line maps for a large sample (72) of normal, low-redshift galaxies spanning three orders of magnitude in stellar mass and four orders in star formation rate (SFR). We find a steep turnover occurring at $(1-2) R_e$ in the H$\alpha$, [O {\small II}], and [O {\small III}] line emission radial profiles. Beyond this radius, the slope of the line emission radial profiles becomes shallower as the SFR of the central galaxy decreases, which might reflect the strength of the feedback processes. The line emission fluxes at large radius ($(5-10) R_e$ or $\sim (0.1-0.25)r_{\rm vir}$) correlate with the galaxy's SFR, but not with its stellar mass. These findings suggest that ionizing photons escaping from star-forming regions in the central galaxy account for the observed emission line fluxes from the inner CGM, with escape fractions inferred from the [O {\small III}] and [O {\small II}] ratio. Different state-of-the-art theoretical models do not agree on the predicted dependence of cool gas on the SFR of the central galaxies, highlighting the importance of CGM emission line measurements to distinguish between different subgrid models for star formation and feedback processes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    P. S. Behroozi, C. Conroy, R. H. Wechsler, A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting the Stellar Mass-Halo Mass Relation for 0<z<4,ApJ717, 379-403 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    S. S. McGaugh, J. M. Schombert, W. J. G. de Blok, M. J. Zagursky, The Baryon Content of Cosmic Structures,ApJL708, L14-L17 (2010). 24 8h10m11s 10s 09s 33◦53′00′′ 52′50′′ 40′′ 30′′ R.A. (J2000) Decl. (J2000) Re −3 −2 −1 0 1 log(f[O II][10−17erg cm−2s−1arcsec−2]) 8h10m11s 10s 09s 33◦53′00′′ 52′50′′ 40′′ 30′′ R.A. (J2000) Decl. (J2000) Re −3 −2 −1 0 1 log(fH...

    2010

  3. [3]

    Tumlinson, M

    J. Tumlinson, M. S. Peeples, J. K. Werk, The Circumgalactic Medium,ARA&A55, 389- 432 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    P ´eroux, J

    C. P ´eroux, J. C. Howk, The Cosmic Baryon and Metal Cycles,ARA&A58, 363-406 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Faucher-Gigu `ere, S

    C.-A. Faucher-Gigu `ere, S. P. Oh, Key Physical Processes in the Circumgalactic Medium, ARA&A61, 131-195 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Tumlinson, C

    J. Tumlinson, C. Thom, J. K. Werk, J. X. Prochaska, T. M. Tripp, N. Katz, R. Dav ´e, B. D. Oppenheimer, J. D. Meiring, A. B. Ford, J. M. O’Meara, M. S. Peeples, K. R. Sembach, D. H. Weinberg, The COS-Halos Survey: Rationale, Design, and a Census of Circumgalactic Neutral Hydrogen,ApJ777, 59 (2013). 25 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 log([N II] λ6583/Hα) −0.5 ...

    2013

  7. [7]

    J. K. Werk, J. X. Prochaska, J. Tumlinson, M. S. Peeples, T. M. Tripp, A. J. Fox, N. Lehner, C. Thom, J. M. O’Meara, A. B. Ford, R. Bordoloi, N. Katz, N. Tejos, B. D. Oppenheimer, R. Dav ´e, D. H. Weinberg, The COS-Halos Survey: Physical Conditions and Baryonic Mass in the Low-redshift Circumgalactic Medium,ApJ792, 8 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, G. Zhu, B. M ´enard, D. W. Hogg, Hydrogen Emission from the Ionized Gaseous Halos of Low-redshift Galaxies,ApJ833, 276 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Alam,et al., The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III,ApJS219, 12 (2015)

    S. Alam,et al., The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III,ApJS219, 12 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Ahumada, C

    R. Ahumada, C. Allende Prieto, A. Almeida, F. Anders, Anderson, The 16th Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: First Release from the APOGEE-2 Southern Survey and Full Release of eBOSS Spectra,ApJS249, 3 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, P. Behroozi, Emission from the Ionized Gaseous Halos of Low- redshift Galaxies and Their Neighbors,ApJ861, 34 (Paper II) (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, J. Werk, P. Behroozi, Emission Line Ratios for the Circumgalactic Medium and the “Bimodal” Nature of Galaxies,ApJL866, L4 (Paper III) (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, P. Behroozi, J. Werk, On the Effect of Environment on Line Emis- sion from the Circumgalactic Medium,ApJ880, 28 (Paper IV) (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Yang, D. Zaritsky, P. Behroozi, J. Werk, HαEmission and the Dependence of the Circumgalactic Cool Gas Fraction on Halo Mass,ApJ880, 33 (Paper V) (2020). 26

    2020

  15. [15]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Fang, D. Zaritsky, P. Behroozi, J. Werk, X. Yang, Observing the Effects of Galaxy Interactions on the Circumgalactic Medium,ApJL893, L3 (Paper VI) (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, K. P. Olsen, P. Behroozi, J. Werk, R. Kennicutt, L. Xie, X. Yang, T. Fang, G. De Lucia, M. Hirschmann, F. Fontanot, An Empirical Determination of the Dependence of the Circumgalactic Mass Cooling Rate and Feedback Mass Loading Factor on Galactic Stellar Mass,ApJ916, 101 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, The Anisotropic Circumgalactic Medium of Massive Early-type Galaxies,ApJ941, 18 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Zhang, M

    H. Zhang, M. Li, D. Zaritsky, The Anisotropic Circumgalactic Medium of Sub-L* Galax- ies,ApJ974, 148 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Bacon, M

    R. Bacon, M. Accardo, L. Adjali, H. Anwand, S. Bauer, I. Biswas, J. Blaizot, D. Boudon, S. Brau-Nogue, J. Brinchmann, P. Caillier, L. Capoani, C. M. Carollo, T. Contini, P. Coud- erc, E. Daguis ´e, S. Deiries, B. Delabre, S. Dreizler, J. Dubois, M. Dupieux, C. Dupuy, E. Emsellem, T. Fechner, A. Fleischmann, M. Franc ¸ois, G. Gallou, T. Gharsa, A. Glin- de...

    2010

  20. [20]

    Dutta, M

    R. Dutta, M. Fossati, M. Fumagalli, M. Revalski, E. K. Lofthouse, D. Nelson, G. Papini, M. Rafelski, S. Cantalupo, F. Arrigoni Battaia, P. Dayal, A. Longobardi, C. P ´eroux, L. J. Prichard, J. X. Prochaska, Metal line emission from galaxy haloes at z≈1,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society522, 535-558 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Dutta, M

    R. Dutta, M. Fumagalli, M. Fossati, M. Rafelski, M. Revalski, F. Arrigoni Battaia, V . D’Odorico, C. P´eroux, L. J. Prichard, A. M. Swinbank, Metal line emission around z<1 galaxies,Astron. & Astroph.691, A236 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Y . Guo, R. Bacon, N. F. Bouch´e, L. Wisotzki, J. Schaye, J. Blaizot, A. Verhamme, S. Can- talupo, L. A. Boogaard, J. Brinchmann, M. Cherrey, H. Kusakabe, I. Langan, F. Leclercq, J. Matthee, L. Michel-Dansac, I. Schroetter, M. Wendt, Bipolar outflows out to 10 kpc for massive galaxies at redshift z≈1,Nature624, 53-56 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Pessa, L

    I. Pessa, L. Wisotzki, T. Urrutia, J. Pharo, R. Augustin, N. F. Bouch ´e, A. Feltre, Y . Guo, D. Kozlova, D. Krajnovic, H. Kusakabe, F. Leclercq, H. Salas, J. Schaye, A. Verhamme, 27 A galactic outflow traced by its extended Mg II emission out to a∼30 kpc radius in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field with MUSE,Astron. & Astroph.691, A5 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    J. Zabl, N. F. Bouch ´e, L. Wisotzki, J. Schaye, F. Leclercq, T. Garel, M. Wendt, I. Schroet- ter, S. Muzahid, S. Cantalupo, T. Contini, R. Bacon, J. Brinchmann, J. Richard, MusE GAs FLOw and Wind (MEGAFLOW) VIII. Discovery of a MgII emission halo probed by a quasar sightline,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society507, 4294-4315 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    J. N. Burchett, K. H. R. Rubin, J. X. Prochaska, A. L. Coil, R. R. Vaught, J. F. Hennawi, Circumgalactic Mg II Emission from an Isotropic Starburst Galaxy Outflow Mapped by KCWI,ApJ909, 151 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    D. S. N. Rupke, A. Coil, J. E. Geach, C. Tremonti, A. M. Diamond-Stanic, E. R. George, R. C. Hickox, A. A. Kepley, G. Leung, J. Moustakas, G. Rudnick, P. H. Sell, A 100- kiloparsec wind feeding the circumgalactic medium of a massive compact galaxy,Nature 574, 643-646 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    N. M. Nielsen, D. B. Fisher, G. G. Kacprzak, J. Chisholm, D. C. Martin, B. Re- ichardt Chu, K. M. Sandstrom, R. J. Rickards Vaught, An emission map of the disk- circumgalactic medium transition in starburst IRAS 08339+6517,Nature Astronomy8, 1602-1609 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    E. C. Herenz, J. Inoue, H. Salas, B. Koenigs, C. Moya-Sierralta, J. M. Cannon, M. Hayes, P. Papaderos, G. ¨Ostlin, A. Bik, A. Le Reste, H. Kusakabe, A. Monreal-Ibero, J. Puschnig, A∼15 kpc outflow cone piercing through the halo of the blue compact metal-poor galaxy SBS 0335-052E,Astron. & Astroph.670, A121 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Lokhorst, R

    D. Lokhorst, R. Abraham, I. Pasha, P. van Dokkum, S. Chen, T. Miller, S. Danieli, J. Greco, J. Zhang, A. Merritt, C. Conroy, A Giant Shell of Ionized Gas Discovered near M82 with the Dragonfly Spectral Line Mapper Pathfinder,ApJ927, 136 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Zaritsky, A MUSE source-blind survey for emission from the circumgalactic medium,Science Advances10, eadp8629 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Bundy, M

    K. Bundy, M. A. Bershady, D. R. Law, R. Yan, N. Drory, N. MacDonald, D. A. Wake, B. Cherinka, J. R. S ´anchez-Gallego, A.-M. Weijmans, D. Thomas, C. Tremonti, K. Masters, L. Coccato, A. M. Diamond-Stanic, A. Arag ´on-Salamanca, V . Avila-Reese, C. Badenes, J. Falc ´on-Barroso, F. Belfiore, D. Bizyaev, G. A. Blanc, J. Bland-Hawthorn, M. R. Blanton, J. R. B...

    2015

  32. [32]

    Drory, N

    N. Drory, N. MacDonald, M. A. Bershady, K. Bundy, J. Gunn, D. R. Law, M. Smith, R. Stoll, C. A. Tremonti, D. A. Wake, R. Yan, A. M. Weijmans, N. Byler, B. Cherinka, F. Cope, A. Eigenbrot, P. Harding, D. Holder, J. Huehnerhoff, K. Jaehnig, T. C. Jansen, M. Klaene, A. M. Paat, J. Percival, C. Sayres, The MaNGA Integral Field Unit Fiber Feed System for the S...

    2015

  33. [33]

    M ´enard, R

    B. M ´enard, R. Scranton, M. Fukugita, G. Richards, Measuring the galaxy-mass and galaxy-dust correlations through magnification and reddening,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society405, 1025-1039 (2010)

    2010

  34. [34]

    J. E. G. Peek, B. M´enard, L. Corrales, Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of Low-redshift Galaxies,ApJ813, 7 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. Macri, B. Bucciarelli, M. G. Lattanzi, J. W. MacK- enty, J. B. Bowers, W. Zheng, A. V . Filippenko, C. Huang, R. I. Anderson, Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Impli- cations for the Hubble Constant,ApJ861, 126 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Akrami, F

    Planck Collaboration, Y . Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:1807.06205 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    L. J. Kewley, D. C. Nicholls, R. S. Sutherland, Understanding Galaxy Evolution Through Emission Lines,ARA&A57, 511-570 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    J. M. Comerford, J. Negus, F. M ¨uller-S´anchez, M. Eracleous, D. Wylezalek, T. Storchi- Bergmann, J. E. Greene, R. S. Barrows, R. Nevin, N. Roy, A. Stemo, A Catalog of 406 AGNs in MaNGA: A Connection between Radio-mode AGNs and Star Formation Quenching,ApJ901, 159 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    J. A. Baldwin, M. M. Phillips, R. Terlevich, Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects,PASP93, 5-19 (1981)

    1981

  40. [40]

    L. J. Kewley, M. A. Dopita, Using Strong Lines to Estimate Abundances in Extragalactic H II Regions and Starburst Galaxies,ApJS142, 35-52 (2002)

    2002

  41. [41]

    Leitet, N

    E. Leitet, N. Bergvall, M. Hayes, S. Linn ´e, E. Zackrisson, Escape of Lyman continuum radiation from local galaxies. Detection of leakage from the young starburst Tol 1247-232, Astron. & Astroph.553, A106 (2013). 29

    2013

  42. [42]

    Green Pea

    A. E. Jaskot, M. S. Oey, The Origin and Optical Depth of Ionizing Radiation in the “Green Pea” Galaxies,ApJ766, 91 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Y . I. Izotov, D. Schaerer, G. Worseck, N. G. Guseva, T. X. Thuan, A. Verhamme, I. Orli- tov´a, K. J. Fricke, J1154+2443: a low-redshift compact star-forming galaxy with a 46 per cent leakage of Lyman continuum photons,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society474, 4514-4527 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    S. R. Flury, A. E. Jaskot, H. C. Ferguson, G. Worseck, K. Makan, J. Chisholm, A. Saldana- Lopez, D. Schaerer, S. R. McCandliss, X. Xu, B. Wang, M. S. Oey, N. M. Ford, T. Heckman, Z. Ji, M. Giavalisco, R. Amor´ın, H. Atek, J. Blaizot, S. Borthakur, C. Carr, M. Castellano, S. De Barros, M. Dickinson, S. L. Finkelstein, B. Fleming, F. Fontanot, T. Garel, A. ...

    2022

  45. [45]

    S. F. S ´anchez, J. K. Barrera-Ballesteros, E. Lacerda, A. Mej´ıa-Narvaez, A. Camps-Fari˜na, G. Bruzual, C. Espinosa-Ponce, A. Rodr ´ıguez-Puebla, A. R. Calette, H. Ibarra-Medel, V . Avila-Reese, H. Hernandez-Toledo, M. A. Bershady, M. Cano-Diaz, A. M. Munguia- Cordova, SDSS-IV MaNGA: pyPipe3D Analysis Release for 10,000 Galaxies,ApJS262, 36 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    E. L. Wright, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, A. K. Mainzer, M. E. Ressler, R. M. Cutri, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Padgett, R. S. McMillan, M. Skrutskie, S. A. Stanford, M. Cohen, R. G. Walker, J. C. Mather, D. Leisawitz, T. N. Gautier, III, I. McLean, D. Benford, C. J. Lonsdale, A. Blain, B. Mendez, W. R. Irace, V . Duval, F. Liu, D. Royer, I. Heinrichsen, ...

    2010

  47. [47]

    Mainzer, J

    A. Mainzer, J. Bauer, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. M. Cutri, J. Dailey, P. Eisenhardt, R. S. McMillan, E. Wright, R. Walker, R. Jedicke, T. Spahr, D. Tholen, R. Alles, R. Beck, H. Brandenburg, T. Conrow, T. Evans, J. Fowler, T. Jarrett, K. Marsh, F. Masci, H. Mc- Callon, S. Wheelock, M. Wittman, P. Wyatt, E. DeBaun, G. Elliott, D. Elsbury, T. Gautier, IV , S. ...

    2011

  48. [48]

    Contini, B

    T. Contini, B. Epinat, N. Bouch ´e, J. Brinchmann, L. A. Boogaard, E. Ventou, R. Bacon, J. Richard, P. M. Weilbacher, L. Wisotzki, D. Krajnovi ´c, J. B. Vielfaure, E. Emsellem, 30 H. Finley, H. Inami, J. Schaye, M. Swinbank, A. Gu ´erou, T. Martinsson, L. Michel- Dansac, I. Schroetter, M. Shirazi, G. Soucail, Deep MUSE observations in the HDFS. Morpho-kin...

    2016

  49. [49]

    Bacon, J

    R. Bacon, J. Brinchmann, J. Richard, T. Contini, A. Drake, M. Franx, S. Tacchella, J. Ver- net, L. Wisotzki, J. Blaizot, N. Bouch´e, R. Bouwens, S. Cantalupo, C. M. Carollo, D. Car- ton, J. Caruana, B. Cl ´ement, S. Dreizler, B. Epinat, B. Guiderdoni, C. Herenz, T. O. Husser, S. Kamann, J. Kerutt, W. Kollatschny, D. Krajnovic, S. Lilly, T. Martinsson, L. ...

    2015

  50. [50]

    Margon, S

    B. Margon, S. F. Anderson, M. Mateo, M. Fich, P. Massey, An Exceptionally Bright, Compact Starburst Nucleus,ApJ334, 597 (1988)

    1988

  51. [51]

    ´A. R. L´opez-S´anchez, C. Esteban, J. Garc´ıa-Rojas, Star formation and stellar populations in the Wolf-Rayet(?) luminous compact blue galaxy IRAS 08339+6517,Astron. & As- troph.449, 997-1017 (2006)

    2006

  52. [52]

    D. B. Fisher, A. D. Bolatto, K. Glazebrook, D. Obreschkow, R. G. Abraham, G. G. Kacprzak, N. M. Nielsen, Extreme Variation in Star Formation Efficiency across a Com- pact, Starburst Disk Galaxy,ApJ928, 169 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    J. G. Baker, D. H. Menzel, Physical Processes in Gaseous Nebulae. III. The Balmer Decre- ment.,ApJ88, 52 (1938)

    1938

  54. [54]

    D. G. Hummer, P. J. Storey, Recombination-line intensities for hydrogenic ions. I - Case B calculations for H I and He II,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society224, 801-820 (1987)

    1987

  55. [55]

    D. E. Osterbrock, G. J. Ferland,Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei (2006)

    2006

  56. [56]

    R. J. Bouwens, R. Smit, I. Labb ´e, M. Franx, J. Caruana, P. Oesch, M. Stefanon, N. Ras- appu, The Lyman-Continuum Photon Production Efficiencyξ ion of z∼4-5 Galaxies from IRAC-based HαMeasurements: Implications for the Escape Fraction and Cosmic Reionization,ApJ831, 176 (2016)

    2016

  57. [57]

    Leitherer, T

    C. Leitherer, T. M. Heckman, Synthetic Properties of Starburst Galaxies,ApJS96, 9 (1995)

    1995

  58. [58]

    Haardt, P

    F. Haardt, P. Madau, Radiative Transfer in a Clumpy Universe. IV . New Synthesis Models of the Cosmic UV/X-Ray Background,ApJ746, 125 (2012). 31

    2012

  59. [60]

    M. G. Allen, B. A. Groves, M. A. Dopita, R. S. Sutherland, L. J. Kewley, The MAPPINGS III Library of Fast Radiative Shock Models,ApJS178, 20-55 (2008)

    2008

  60. [61]

    B. T. Draine,Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium(2011)

    2011

  61. [62]

    Faucher-Gigu `ere, A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society493, 1614-1632 (2020)

    C.-A. Faucher-Gigu `ere, A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society493, 1614-1632 (2020)

    2020

  62. [63]

    Fumagalli, F

    M. Fumagalli, F. Haardt, T. Theuns, S. L. Morris, S. Cantalupo, P. Madau, M. Fossati, A measurement of the z = 0 UV background from Hαfluorescence,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society467, 4802-4816 (2017)

    2017

  63. [64]

    M. A. Dopita, R. S. Sutherland, Effects of Preionization in Radiative Shocks. II. Applica- tion to the Herbig-Haro Objects,ApJS229, 35 (2017)

    2017

  64. [65]

    Kroupa, On the variation of the initial mass function,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society322, 231-246 (2001)

    P. Kroupa, On the variation of the initial mass function,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society322, 231-246 (2001)

    2001

  65. [66]

    Kauffmann, T

    G. Kauffmann, T. M. Heckman, S. D. M. White, S. Charlot, C. Tremonti, J. Brinchmann, G. Bruzual, E. W. Peng, M. Seibert, M. Bernardi, M. Blanton, J. Brinkmann, F. Castander, I. Cs ´abai, M. Fukugita, Z. Ivezic, J. A. Munn, R. C. Nichol, N. Padmanabhan, A. R. Thakar, D. H. Weinberg, D. York, Stellar masses and star formation histories for 10 5 galaxies fro...

    2003

  66. [67]

    Kauffmann, T

    G. Kauffmann, T. M. Heckman, S. D. M. White, S. Charlot, C. Tremonti, E. W. Peng, M. Seibert, J. Brinkmann, R. C. Nichol, M. SubbaRao, D. York, The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 10 5 low-redshift galax- ies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society341, 54-69 (2003)

    2003

  67. [68]

    Gallazzi, S

    A. Gallazzi, S. Charlot, J. Brinchmann, S. D. M. White, C. A. Tremonti, The ages and metallicities of galaxies in the local universe,MNRAS362, 41-58 (2005)

    2005

  68. [69]

    C. A. Tremonti, T. M. Heckman, G. Kauffmann, J. Brinchmann, S. Charlot, S. D. M. White, M. Seibert, E. W. Peng, D. J. Schlegel, A. Uomoto, M. Fukugita, J. Brinkmann, The Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Insights from 53,000 Star-forming Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,ApJ613, 898-913 (2004)

    2004

  69. [70]

    Brinchmann, S

    J. Brinchmann, S. Charlot, S. D. M. White, C. Tremonti, G. Kauffmann, T. Heckman, J. Brinkmann, The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Uni- verse,MNRAS351, 1151-1179 (2004). 32

    2004

  70. [71]

    Salim, J

    S. Salim, J. C. Lee, S. Janowiecki, E. da Cunha, M. Dickinson, M. Boquien, D. Burgarella, J. J. Salzer, S. Charlot, GALEX-SDSS-WISE Legacy Catalog (GSWLC): Star Formation Rates, Stellar Masses, and Dust Attenuations of 700,000 Low-redshift Galaxies,ApJS 227, 2 (2016)

    2016

  71. [72]

    Salim, M

    S. Salim, M. Boquien, J. C. Lee, Dust Attenuation Curves in the Local Universe: Demo- graphics and New Laws for Star-forming Galaxies and High-redshift Analogs,ApJ859, 11 (2018)

    2018

  72. [73]

    De Lucia, F

    G. De Lucia, F. Fontanot, L. Xie, M. Hirschmann, Tracing the Quenching Journey across Cosmic Time,arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:2401.06211 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [74]

    Weinberger, V

    R. Weinberger, V . Springel, L. Hernquist, A. Pillepich, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor, D. Nel- son, S. Genel, M. V ogelsberger, J. Naiman, P. Torrey, Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society465, 3291-3308 (2017)

    2017

  74. [75]

    Springel, R

    V . Springel, R. Pakmor, A. Pillepich, R. Weinberger, D. Nelson, L. Hernquist, M. V ogels- berger, S. Genel, P. Torrey, F. Marinacci, J. Naiman, First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety475, 676-698 (2018)

    2018

  75. [76]

    Nelson, G

    D. Nelson, G. Kauffmann, A. Pillepich, S. Genel, V . Springel, R. Pakmor, L. Hernquist, R. Weinberger, P. Torrey, M. V ogelsberger, F. Marinacci, The abundance, distribution, and physical nature of highly ionized oxygen O VI, O VII, and O VIII in IllustrisTNG, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society477, 450-479 (2018)

    2018

  76. [77]

    J. P. Naiman, A. Pillepich, V . Springel, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, P. Torrey, M. V ogelsberger, R. Pakmor, D. Nelson, F. Marinacci, L. Hernquist, R. Weinberger, S. Genel, First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magne- sium and europium,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society477, 1206-1224 (2018)

    2018

  77. [78]

    Marinacci, M

    F. Marinacci, M. V ogelsberger, R. Pakmor, P. Torrey, V . Springel, L. Hernquist, D. Nel- son, R. Weinberger, A. Pillepich, J. Naiman, S. Genel, First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society480, 5113-5139 (2018)

    2018

  78. [79]

    Pillepich, V

    A. Pillepich, V . Springel, D. Nelson, S. Genel, J. Naiman, R. Pakmor, L. Hernquist, P. Tor- rey, M. V ogelsberger, R. Weinberger, F. Marinacci, Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society473, 4077-4106 (2018). 33

    2018

  79. [80]

    soft” ionizing sources such as massive stars (HII re- gion) and “hard

    which is available athttps://www.tng-project.org/data/. In this study, we use TNG100 from the TNG project. The side length of the simulation box is 106.5 Mpc. The baryon mass resolution is1.4×10 6 M⊙, the gravitational softening length of the dark matter and stars is 0.7 kpc atz= 0, and the minimum gas cell radius is 185 pc. We compute the effective tempe...

  80. [81]

    Pillepich, D

    A. Pillepich, D. Nelson, L. Hernquist, V . Springel, R. Pakmor, P. Torrey, R. Weinberger, S. Genel, J. P. Naiman, F. Marinacci, M. V ogelsberger, First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society475, 648-675 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.