Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Time Series Forecasting with LLMs: Understanding and Enhancing Model Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10835 v5 pith:GEBKGELD submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsseriestimeforecastinglanguagemodelsbeendatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been applied in many fields and have developed rapidly in recent years. As a classic machine learning task, time series forecasting has recently been boosted by LLMs. Recent works treat large language models as \emph{zero-shot} time series reasoners without further fine-tuning, which achieves remarkable performance. However, there are some unexplored research problems when applying LLMs for time series forecasting under the zero-shot setting. For instance, the LLMs' preferences for the input time series are less understood. In this paper, by comparing LLMs with traditional time series forecasting models, we observe many interesting properties of LLMs in the context of time series forecasting. First, our study shows that LLMs perform well in predicting time series with clear patterns and trends, but face challenges with datasets lacking periodicity. This observation can be explained by the ability of LLMs to recognize the underlying period within datasets, which is supported by our experiments. In addition, the input strategy is investigated, and it is found that incorporating external knowledge and adopting natural language paraphrases substantially improve the predictive performance of LLMs for time series. Overall, our study contributes insight into LLMs' advantages and limitations in time series forecasting under different conditions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GREAT: Guiding Query Generation with a Trie for Recommending Related Search about Video at Kuaishou

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-based item-to-query recommender with trie-constrained decoding, plus a new dataset, reports modest gains over baselines in Kuaishou's related-search scenario.

  2. Integrating Traditional Technical Analysis with AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Based Approach to Stock Market Forecasting

    cs.CE 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-based multi-agent system that identifies Elliott Wave patterns achieved 44-89% directional accuracy on six US stocks, with deep reinforcement learning backtesting improving accuracy on most but not all test cases.

  3. Technology-assisted Personalized Yoga for Better Health -- Challenges and Outlook

    cs.HC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A vision statement for personalized yoga decision support whose claimed content cannot be verified, because the supplied full text is a different paper on maritime drift prediction.

  4. ElliottAgents: A Natural Language-Driven Multi-Agent System for Stock Market Analysis and Prediction

    cs.CE 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A natural-language multi-agent system combines Elliott Wave pattern detection with LLM dialogue and DRL backtesting to generate stock predictions, supported only by small selected experiments.

Pith tools