Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Upper Bound on Knots in Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.09448 v2 pith:GEHOQUI6 submitted 2016-11-29 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords neuralnetworksboundupperknotsmathbbnumberlinear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Neural networks with rectified linear unit activations are essentially multivariate linear splines. As such, one of many ways to measure the "complexity" or "expressivity" of a neural network is to count the number of knots in the spline model. We study the number of knots in fully-connected feedforward neural networks with rectified linear unit activation functions. We intentionally keep the neural networks very simple, so as to make theoretical analyses more approachable. An induction on the number of layers $l$ reveals a tight upper bound on the number of knots in $\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^p$ deep neural networks. With $n_i \gg 1$ neurons in layer $i = 1, \dots, l$, the upper bound is approximately $n_1 \dots n_l$. We then show that the exact upper bound is tight, and we demonstrate the upper bound with an example. The purpose of these analyses is to pave a path for understanding the behavior of general $\mathbb{R}^q \to \mathbb{R}^p$ neural networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Free-Knots Kolmogorov-Arnold Network: On the Analysis of Spline Knots and Advancing Stability

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A free-knot variant of Kolmogorov-Arnold networks reports higher accuracy with fewer parameters than fixed-grid KAN, but its central smoothing regularizer is mathematically inert and the knot bound proof is not rigorous.

Pith tools