Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Causal discovery for time series with latent confounders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.03427 v1 pith:GEVJUI5A submitted 2022-09-07 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords causallpcmcialgorithmdatadependenciesdiscoveryfindperforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reconstructing the causal relationships behind the phenomena we observe is a fundamental challenge in all areas of science. Discovering causal relationships through experiments is often infeasible, unethical, or expensive in complex systems. However, increases in computational power allow us to process the ever-growing amount of data that modern science generates, leading to an emerging interest in the causal discovery problem from observational data. This work evaluates the LPCMCI algorithm, which aims to find generators compatible with a multi-dimensional, highly autocorrelated time series while some variables are unobserved. We find that LPCMCI performs much better than a random algorithm mimicking not knowing anything but is still far from optimal detection. Furthermore, LPCMCI performs best on auto-dependencies, then contemporaneous dependencies, and struggles most with lagged dependencies. The source code of this project is available online.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Implicit Causal World Models from Multi-Agent Demonstrations

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Random action noise improves multi-agent world-model OOD accuracy, but the paper's own common-cause analysis shows the causal graph contributes little at matched data.

Pith tools