Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Presenting a new approach in security in inter-vehicle networks (VANET)

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper promises a new approach to inter-vehicle network security, but its body is a survey that catalogs architecture, security requirements, and attack classes without defining a new mechanism.

desk verdict The title promises a new security approach, but the paper never presents one—the body is an unfocused, citation-heavy survey with no method, model, or evaluation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19002 v1 pith:GF73OBEY submitted 2024-11-28 cs.CR

Davoud Yousefi , Farhang Farhad , Mehran Abed , Soheil Gavidel This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CR
keywords vehicularadhocnetworksVANETsecurityinter-vehiclecommunicationrequirementsdenialofserviceauthenticationprivacyattacktaxonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper's title promises a new approach to security in inter-vehicle networks, but the body is a survey rather than a proposal. It assembles a picture of VANET architecture—vehicles with on-board units, roadside infrastructure, and vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure links—and then catalogs security requirements and attack types. A sympathetic reader comes away with a checklist of constraints that any VANET security solution must satisfy: authentication, confidentiality, privacy, real-time delivery, and resistance to denial-of-service, credibility, and eavesdropping attacks. No new protocol, identity, or mechanism is defined, so the contribution is organizational rather than technical.

What carries the argument

The organizing object is the VANET reference architecture: on-board units (the vehicle's communication hardware), application units (in-car service devices), roadside units (fixed infrastructure), and the two communication modes V2V and V2I. The paper uses this architecture as a spatial map for where security mechanisms must apply, and it pairs the architecture with a requirements list (authentication, confidentiality, privacy, real-time limits, validation, data consistency) and an attack taxonomy to structure the survey.

What would settle it

Look up references [3], [8], [17], [21], [23], and [25] and check whether they concern inter-vehicle networks; if they do not, the sentences attached to them lack the support the paper claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that inter-vehicle networks cannot be deployed safely without meeting a set of security requirements—message and source authentication, confidentiality, driver privacy, real-time message delivery, validation, and data consistency—and that the main threats are denial-of-service, credibility, and reliability/eavesdropping attacks. It presents this as a map of the problem space rather than as a proof or a protocol. The paper also asserts that the high mobility of vehicles and the instability of communication links make routing security an intrinsic part of the overall security challenge.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cited sources genuinely support the VANET facts reported here, from architecture details to security objectives and attack classifications.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the listed security requirements are correct, a VANET deployed without authentication and message-validation mechanisms would be unsafe against altered, discarded, or delayed safety messages.
  • If the attack taxonomy is correct, defenses must separately counter denial-of-service, credibility attacks, and eavesdropping; no single encryption scheme covers all three classes.
  • If the architecture description is correct, on-board and roadside units must support real-time message processing while still applying cryptographic validation.
  • If high mobility and link instability are as described, routing and security mechanisms need to be designed together rather than treated as independent concerns.
  • The requirements list could serve as a checklist against which proposed VANET security protocols are measured.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The gap between the title and the body suggests that a genuine 'new approach' would need to specify a concrete mechanism—for example, an authentication scheme, a trust metric, or a key-distribution method—which the survey never names.
  • A useful extension would be to turn the security-requirements list into a formal evaluation checklist and benchmark existing VANET authentication protocols against it, measuring latency, privacy, and message overhead.
  • One testable consequence of the survey's framing is that any practical VANET security solution must trade off driver privacy against source identification; the paper does not say how that trade-off should be resolved.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper, as titled and abstracted, claims to present a new approach to security in inter-vehicle networks (VANET). The body, however, is a high-level and poorly organized summary of VANET architecture, communication types, components, applications, security requirements, and attack categories. It contains no new protocol, algorithm, formal model, threat model, derivation, or experimental evaluation. The 'Findings' subsection (Section III.A) lists applications and general statements rather than any technical contribution. The conclusion similarly summarizes general themes and calls for future work. In short, the manuscript does not deliver the promised new security approach and instead reads as an unedited, largely generic overview of VANET security topics.

Significance. If the paper were a careful survey, it could in principle provide a useful background reference, but it does not meet that standard either: the terminology is inconsistent, the citation base is largely unreliable, and no new synthesis is offered. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible experiments, or parameter-free derivations to credit. The claimed contribution, a 'new approach in security,' is never operationalized, so there is no testable claim whose validity could be assessed. Consequently, the significance of the manuscript in its current form is negligible for a research venue; at most it could serve as a rough draft for a broader survey, and only after substantial rewriting and re-sourcing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section I. INTRODUCTION] The title and abstract promise a 'new approach in security in inter-vehicle networks,' but no such approach is ever defined in the manuscript. Sections II and III provide general descriptions of VANET architecture, communication types, and security requirements, yet there is no algorithm, protocol, formal security model, threat model, or evaluation anywhere in the text. The central claim of the paper is therefore unsupported; the manuscript is a survey, not a research contribution as advertised.
  2. [Section II. VENT NETWORK] The terminology is internally inconsistent and unexplained: the network is variously called 'VENT,' 'WANT,' 'VANET,' 'van,' and 'case networks' within consecutive paragraphs, and the technical content is not verifiable. In addition, the sentence 'The 75MHz bandwidth is allocated in the 925/5-850/5 GHz band' appears garbled (presumably the intended band is 5.850–5.925 GHz), and the text contains the incomplete fragment 'Rusted.' These issues obscure even the descriptive facts the paper tries to state.
  3. [References in Sections III.A–III.G] The citation base does not support the factual claims. Several references are topically unrelated, including financial fraud detection papers [3], [8], [17], [21], [23], [25], and numerous resource-allocation or mobile-network papers by the same authors ([2], [7], [10], [13], [14], [16], [18], [20], [27], [29], [31]–[34], [37]). Because many of the security statements in Sections III.A–III.G rest on these citations, the manuscript's factual grounding is not established, and the reader cannot distinguish supported statements from unsupported assertions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title page] The author numbering is inconsistent: '1st Davoud Yousefi, 2nd Farhang Farhad, 3st Mehran Abed, 4nd Soheil Gavidel' mixes ordinal suffixes; these should be uniform, e.g., '1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th.'
  2. [Section II] The phrase 'The 75MHz bandwidth is allocated in the 925/5-850/5 GHz band' should be corrected to '5.850–5.925 GHz' (or to the exact intended frequency band) to avoid an obviously erroneous reading.
  3. [Section II] The sentence fragment 'Rusted.' appears to be a leftover and should be deleted or completed.
  4. [Section III] The captions 'Figure 2.1' and 'Figure 2.2' refer to figures that are not visible in the manuscript; the actual figures and their source attributions should be included.
  5. [References] Reference [40] is empty, and reference [5] is listed twice with different bibliographic details; the in-text citation '[12-14]' in Section III.D maps to references [12], [13], and [14], which are not about RSU operations.
  6. [Throughout] The acronyms VANET, VENT, WANT, and 'case networks' are used interchangeably; the manuscript should adopt a single standard term and define all acronyms at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No derivation chain exists in this survey, so no circularity; title/body mismatch and misapplied self-citations are integrity concerns, not circularity.

full rationale

This paper contains no derivation chain: there are no equations, no algorithms, no formal models, and no evaluations, so there is no result that could be equivalent to an input by construction. The closest candidates are the extensive self-citations (e.g., [29]–[34], [31], [32]) in the security requirements and physical-security sections, but those sections state generic VANET requirements (non-repudiation, privacy, availability, authentication) whose content does not depend on the cited papers; the citations are topically misapplied rather than load-bearing. The title promises "a new approach in security in inter-vehicle networks," but the body only summarizes architecture, applications, security requirements, and attack types; that is an absent contribution, not circular reasoning. Because no claim is derived from or reduced to its own inputs, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes no quantitative claims, so there are no fitted parameters or invented entities. Its implicit assumptions are background beliefs about VANET security mechanisms and about the reliability of its references; both are questionable given the citation list.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption VANET security can be achieved through established mechanisms such as digital signatures, public key infrastructure, and trusted hardware.
    Stated in Sections III-F and III-L without proof or comparison; treated as accepted background.
  • domain assumption The cited references accurately support the factual statements in the text.
    Many cited works are unrelated to VANETs (financial fraud, NOMA), so this assumption is not met; the survey's ground truth is unverified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Presenting a new approach in security in inter-vehicle networks (VANET)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GF73OBEY

@misc{pith2026241119002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Presenting a new approach in security in inter-vehicle networks (VANET)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GF73OBEY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19002}
}
read the original abstract

Nowadays, inter-vehicle networks are a viable communication scenario that greatly contributes to daily work, and its issues are gaining more and more attention every day. These days, space networks are growing and developing. There are numerous new uses for this new kind of network communication. One of the most significant daily programs in the world today is road traffic. For human growth, passenger and freight transportation is essential. Thus, fresh advancements in the areas of improved safety features, environmentally friendly fuel, etc., are developed daily. In order to improve safety and regulate traffic, a new application program is used. However, because of their stringent security standards, these initiatives have an impact on traffic safety. Since driving is one of the things that necessitates traffic safety, this area needs to be made more secure. Providing trustworthy driving data is crucial to achieving this goal, aside from the automated portion of the operation. Drivers would greatly benefit from accurate weather descriptions or early warnings of potential dangers (such as traffic bottlenecks or accidents). Inter-vehicle networks, a novel form of information technology, are being developed for this reason. Keywords: inter-vehicle network, transportation and security

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An analysis of the combination of feature selection and machine learning methods for an accurate and timely detection of lung cancer

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 1.0 of 10

    A disjointed review-style preprint that asserts chi-squared feature selection improves lung cancer detection accuracy but provides no experimental evidence for its central claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [3]

    Nematia, Z., Mohammadia, A., Bayata, A., & Mirzaeib, A. (2024). Predicting fraud in financial statements using supervised methods: An analytical comparison. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 15(8), 259-272

    2024

  2. [8]

    Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2024). The impact of financial ratio reduction on supervised methods' ability to detect financial statement fraud. Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal

    2024

  3. [17]

    Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2024). Fraud Risk Prediction in Financial Statements through Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, and Particle Swarm Optimization. Iranian Journal of Finance, 8(1), 98-130

    2024

  4. [21]

    Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2024). Metaheuristic and Data Mining Algorithms -based Feature Selection Approach for Anomaly Detection. IETE Journal of Research, 1-15

    work page 2024

  5. [23]

    Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2025). Fraud Prediction in Financial Statements through Comparative Analysis of Data Mining Methods. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 10(38), 151-166

    2025

  6. [25]

    Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2023). Financial Ratios and Efficient Classification Algorithms for Fraud Risk Detection in Financial Statements. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics

    2023

  7. [7]

    M., Barari, M., & Zarrabi, H

    Somarin, A. M., Barari, M., & Zarrabi, H. (2018). Big data based self -optimization networking in next generation mobile networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 101(3), 1499-1518

    work page 2018

  8. [10]

    Mirzaei, A. (2022). A novel approach to QoS‐aware resource allocation in NOMA cellular HetNets using multi‐ layer optimization. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34(21), e7068

    work page 2022

  9. [13]

    Mirzaei, A., Barari, M., & Zarrabi, H. (2019). Efficient resource management for non -orthogonal multiple access: A novel approach towards green hetnets. Intelligent Data Analysis, 23(2), 425-447

    2019

  10. [14]

    - Mirzaei, A., & Rahimi, A. (2019). A Novel Approach for Cluster Self -Optimization Using Big Data Analytics. Information Systems & Telecommunication, 50

    work page 2019

  11. [16]

    J., & Mirzaei, A

    Rad, K. J., & Mirzaei, A. (2022). Hierarchical capacity management and load balancing for HetNets using multi - layer optimisation methods. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 41(1), 44-57

    work page 2022

  12. [18]

    Mirzaei, A. (2021). QoS -aware Resource Allocation for Live Streaming in Edge -Clouds Aided HetNets Using Stochastic Network Calculus

    work page 2021

  13. [20]

    M., Nosrati, M., Barari, M., & Zarrabi, H

    Somarin, A. M., Nosrati, M., Barari, M., & Zarrabi, H. (2016). A new Joint Radio Resource Management scheme in heterogeneous wireless networks based on handover. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège

    work page 2016

  14. [27]

    Tarif, M., Mirzaei, A., & Nouri -Moghaddam, B. (2024). Optimizing RPL Routing Using Tabu Search to Improve Link Stability and Energy Consumption in IoT Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06702

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  15. [29]

    & Mirzapour, R

    Yousefi, D., Yari, H., Osouli, F., Ebrahimi, M., Esmalifalak, S., Johari, M., ... & Mirzapour, R. Energy Efficient Computation Offloading and Virtual Connection Control in. learning (DL), 44, 43

  16. [31]

    Ziaeddini, A., Mohajer, A., Yousefi, D., Mirzaei, A., & Gonglee, S. (2022). An optimized multi -layer resource management in mobile edge computing networks: a joint computation offloading and caching solution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15487

    arXiv 2022

  17. [34]

    Narimani, Y., Zeinali, E., & Mirzaei, A. (2025). A new approach in fault tolerance in control level of SDN. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 16(5), 69-76

    work page 2025

  18. [37]

    Duan, H., & Mirzaei, A. (2023). Adaptive Rate Maximization and Hierarchical Resource Management for Underlay Spectrum Sharing NOMA HetNets with Hybrid Power Supplies. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1-17

    2023

Show all 38 references
  1. [1]

    and Sures, R

    Samara, g, Al -salihy, w.A.H. and Sures, R. (2010). security Analysis of vehicular Ad hoc Networks (Vanet Network Applications protocols and services (NETA PPS). Secod International conference on. pp:55-60

    2010

  2. [4]

    and Tomar, G.S

    Kumar Chaurasia, B, Verma, Sh. and Tomar, G.S. (2011). Attacks on Anonymity in VANET. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Systems

    2011

  3. [5]

    Mirzaei, A., & Najafi Souha, A. (2021). Towards optimal configuration in MEC Neural networks: deep learning - based optimal resource allocation. Wireless Personal Communications, 121(1), 221-243

    2021

  4. [6]

    and Perrig, A

    Parno, B. and Perrig, A. (2005). Challenges in Securing Vehicular Networks. Proc. FourthWorkshop Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets IV)

    2005

  5. [9]

    Certificate Revocation List Distribution in Vehicular Communication Systems,

    Papadimitratos, P, Mezzour, G. and Hubaux, J.P. (2008).“Certificate Revocation List Distribution in Vehicular Communication Systems,” In The Fifth ACM International Workshop on VehiculAr Internetworking (VANET2008). pp 86 - 87

    2008

  6. [11]

    Jahandideh, Y., & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Allocating Duplicate Copies for IoT Data in Cloud Computing based on Harmony Search Algorithm. IETE Journal of Research, 1 - 14

    2021

  7. [12]

    and Fang, Y

    [5] Sun, J, Zhang, Ch, Zhang, Y. and Fang, Y. (2010). An Identity- Based Security System for User Privacy in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks; IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems. 21(9)

    2010

  8. [15]

    (2013), “Survey of vehicular Ad hoc networks routing protocol “, International journal of innovation and applied studies, Volume 3 , No

    [6] Altayeb M Mahghoub. (2013), “Survey of vehicular Ad hoc networks routing protocol “, International journal of innovation and applied studies, Volume 3 , No. 3,pp:829-835

    2013

  9. [19]

    (2008) Now -Network on Wheels: Project Objectives, Technology and Achievements In the 5th Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent Transportation

    Festag,A., Noecker, G. (2008) Now -Network on Wheels: Project Objectives, Technology and Achievements In the 5th Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent Transportation

    2008

  10. [22]

    Zu H. ,Li. M.,(2013), Studies on urban vehicular ad-hoc networks, Springer briefs in computer scinces,p:123

    2013

  11. [24]

    IP address configuration in VANET using centralized DHCP

    Brijesh Kadri Mohandas, Ramiro Liscano, “IP address configuration in VANET using centralized DHCP”, IEEE, 2008

    2008

  12. [26]

    C.,and Cimini, L.J.;( 2011)Location-aware Cooperative Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks

    Xiao, Y., Guan, Y., Chen, W.,. C.,and Cimini, L.J.;( 2011)Location-aware Cooperative Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)

    2011

  13. [28]

    Operational inferences on VANETs in 802.16e and 802.11p with improved performance by Congestion Alert

    R. Bhakthavathsalam, Starakjeet Nayak, “Operational inferences on VANETs in 802.16e and 802.11p with improved performance by Congestion Alert”, Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2011 IEEE

    2011

  14. [30]

    Hozouri, A., Mirzaei, A., RazaghZadeh, S., & Yousefi, D. (2023). An overview of VANET vehicular networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06555

    2023 arXiv

  15. [32]

    Mikaeilvand, S. K. A. N., Yousefi, D., Nouri -Moghaddam, B., Jahanbakhsh, S., & Mirzaei, A. Monitoring the vigilance of employees in high -risk production lines using a voice recognition technology

  16. [33]

    Scheduling algorithm for bidirectional LPT

    Hozouri, A., EffatParvar, M., Yousefi, D., & Mirzaei, A. Scheduling algorithm for bidirectional LPT

  17. [35]

    VANETs AND ITS RELATED ISSUES: AN EXTENSIVE SURVEY

    JATAU ISAAC KATUKA, MUHAMMAD SHAFIE ABD. LATIFF, “VANETs AND ITS RELATED ISSUES: AN EXTENSIVE SURVEY”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2014. Vol. 66 No.2

    2014

  18. [36]

    Data communication inVANETs: Survey, applications and challenges

    ] Felipe C, Leandro V, Azzedine B, Guilherme M, Aline V and Antonio L, “Data communication inVANETs: Survey, applications and challenges”, Ad Hoc Networks, Elsevier, 2016, 44 (C), pp.90 - 103

    2016

  19. [38]

    Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Survey on Security issues and challenges

    Lavanya Sharma, Sunil Kumar Bharti, Dileep Kumar Yadav, “Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Survey on Security issues and challenges”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 6, Special Issue 2, February 2017

    2017

  20. [39]

    and Barka, E

    Al falasi, h. and Barka, E. (2011). Revocation in VANET Asurvey, inno vations in information technology (IIT). Internation conference on. Pp 214-219. [40]

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.