Comment on "Observation of two-dimensional Anderson localisation of ultracold atoms"
Reviewed by Pithpith:GFWQIE72open to challenge →
classification
cond-mat.quant-gas
cond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph
keywords
andersonexperimentallocalisationadditionalanalysisargueartefactsarticle
read the original abstract
Here I provide additional experimental information and criticise the analysis, modelling, interpretation and claims presented in the recent paper [Nature Communications 11, 4942 (2020)]. I argue that the authors have no clear experimental evidence of Anderson localisation (as they claim) and their numerical simulations are very far indeed from reproducing the experiment, as stated in their article. Furthermore, some effects that are ascribed to real physical mechanisms are revealed to be simply artefacts.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.