Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Future of Open Human Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.16961 v2 pith:GI4KNT65 submitted 2024-08-15 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords feedbackopenhumanecosystemchallengeslanguagemodelsapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Human feedback on conversations with language language models (LLMs) is central to how these systems learn about the world, improve their capabilities, and are steered toward desirable and safe behaviors. However, this feedback is mostly collected by frontier AI labs and kept behind closed doors. In this work, we bring together interdisciplinary experts to assess the opportunities and challenges to realizing an open ecosystem of human feedback for AI. We first look for successful practices in peer production, open source, and citizen science communities. We then characterize the main challenges for open human feedback. For each, we survey current approaches and offer recommendations. We end by envisioning the components needed to underpin a sustainable and open human feedback ecosystem. In the center of this ecosystem are mutually beneficial feedback loops, between users and specialized models, incentivizing a diverse stakeholders community of model trainers and feedback providers to support a general open feedback pool.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Leaderboard Illusion

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chatbot Arena's rankings are systematically distorted by undisclosed private testing, selective score reporting, and data access asymmetries that favor large proprietary providers.

  2. How Individual Traits and Language Styles Shape Preferences In Open-ended User-LLM Interaction: A Preliminary Study

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    People prefer different chatbot writing styles depending on their own personality and trust in LLMs, according to two preliminary regression-based studies.

Pith tools