Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Graphs, Constraints, and Search for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.09880 v2 pith:GIFPEKJQ submitted 2022-10-18 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords searchreasoningabstractionargacorpuscorrectgraphgraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) aims at benchmarking the performance of general artificial intelligence algorithms. The ARC's focus on broad generalization and few-shot learning has made it difficult to solve using pure machine learning. A more promising approach has been to perform program synthesis within an appropriately designed Domain Specific Language (DSL). However, these too have seen limited success. We propose Abstract Reasoning with Graph Abstractions (ARGA), a new object-centric framework that first represents images using graphs and then performs a search for a correct program in a DSL that is based on the abstracted graph space. The complexity of this combinatorial search is tamed through the use of constraint acquisition, state hashing, and Tabu search. An extensive set of experiments demonstrates the promise of ARGA in tackling some of the complicated object-centric tasks of the ARC rather efficiently, producing programs that are correct and easy to understand.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ConceptSearch: Towards Efficient Program Search Using LLMs for Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC)

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ConceptSearch uses LLM-generated programs with concept-based scoring to solve 29/50 ARC training tasks and speed up search by up to 30% versus pixel-distance scoring.

  2. Abductive Symbolic Solver on Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A knowledge-graph-based abductive symbolic solver predicts ARC output grid size and color set with reported accuracies of 90.5% and 74.75%, but without trivial baselines or a disclosed evaluation split.

Pith tools