Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Disentangling Target Lines from Interlopers and Continuum with Neural Networks: A SPHEREx Intensity Mapping Case Study

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A neural network trained on multi-channel auto- and cross-power spectra can recover the target H-alpha line's angular power spectrum from simulated SPHEREx maps to within a few percent, even when interloper lines and continuum contaminate t

desk verdict A competent proof-of-concept for NN component separation in LIM power spectra; the unmeasured cross-component spectra may bias the headline few-percent accuracies. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02414 v1 pith:GIKIUXO3 submitted 2025-09-02 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM

Marina S. Cagliari , Zucheng Gao , Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords line-intensitymappinginterloperlinescontinuumsubtractioncomponentseparationangularpowerspectrumneuralnetworkSPHERExmoment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Line-intensity mapping surveys the universe through the collective glow of unresolved galaxies, but a single observed frequency band can mix several emission lines from different redshifts (interlopers) plus a bright continuum, so the target line's power is buried. This paper claims that a neural network, fed the auto- and cross-angular power spectra of a target channel and matched interloper channels, can undo that mixing at the level of the power spectrum itself, even when the relative amplitudes of the components are unknown. In simulated SPHEREx deep-field maps, the network recovers the target Hα power spectrum to within 2.5% without continuum and within 6% with a bright continuum present. It does not reliably recover the fainter interloper lines once continuum is included, and its errors follow a brightness hierarchy. The payoff, if the method holds up on real data, is that astrophysical and cosmological conclusions drawn from targeted lines would no longer be hostage to interloper and continuum contamination.

What carries the argument

A moment network — a dense neural network that outputs both first and second moments (mean and uncertainty) of the quantities of interest — trained with a loss function modified by a sum-to-unity constraint. In each ℓ-bin, the recovered component corrections are forced to add up to the total contaminated spectrum, encoding the physical prior that the components' auto-spectra exhaust the observed power because cross-correlations between lines at widely separated redshifts are negligible. The input vector combines auto-spectra of the target channel and matched interloper channels with their cross-spectra, plus a cross-spectrum with a continuum-dominated channel when continuum is present; these

What would settle it

Measure the inter-component cross-angular power spectra in the same SPHEREx-like simulations for target channel 27 (e.g., Hα×[O II], Hα×[O III], Hα×continuum) and compare them with the auto-spectra over the ℓ bins used in training. If any cross-spectrum contributes more than a few percent of the total, the sum-to-unity constraint encodes the wrong target and the reported recovery accuracies should degrade; if the cross-terms are sub-percent, the constraint is vindicated. A second check: retrain the network without the constraint and compare the recovered component spectra.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In its own terms, the paper establishes a proof of concept that component separation for line-intensity mapping can be performed directly on angular power spectra, without needing to know the relative amplitudes of the target line, interlopers, and continuum. The network outputs correction factors that convert the contaminated spectrum in the target channel into each component's spectrum, plus estimates of the interloper amplitude scalings and their uncertainties. Its main positive result is that the target Hα spectrum is recovered at the 2.5% level in the lines-only case and at the 2–6% level when continuum is present, depending on scatter, while the interlopers are only partially recoverab

Load-bearing premise

The training target assumes the components' cross-correlations are negligible, so the recovered component spectra are forced to sum exactly to the total map spectrum; the paper asserts this rather than measuring it, and if the cross-terms are non-negligible the recovered spectra are biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the simulated setups, surveys targeting bright lines like Hα can expect percent-level recovery of the target power spectrum even when interloper amplitudes are uncertain by up to a factor of 20 and pixel-level scatter is present.
  • Cross-channel correlations are the load-bearing input: with 0.2 dex scatter, adding multi-channel information improves interloper scaling-factor MSE by one to two orders of magnitude over single-channel input.
  • Component recovery accuracy is set by relative brightness, so fainter target lines or brighter interlopers would sit at the unreliable end of the method's performance.
  • A continuum-dominated cross-channel input improves interloper recovery (MSE down roughly 15% for [O II] and 40% for [O III]), and the method benefits further when PCA-like cleaning reduces the continuum amplitude.
  • The network's uncertainty estimates on interloper scalings are often overconfident (reduced chi-squared above unity in many configurations), so quoted error bars on recovered interloper amplitudes should be treated with caution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sum-to-unity constraint is the hinge: the paper asserts that cross-component correlations are negligible because lines come from widely separated redshifts, but never measures them; computing Cℓ for pairs like Hα×[O III] or Hα×continuum in the target channel would directly test whether the training target is unbiased.
  • The brightness-hierarchy result suggests a natural stress test: make an interloper brighter than the target — the paper restricts scalings so interlopers never exceed Hα — and the method would likely fail for the target, which is the situation some real surveys face.
  • The same architecture and loss could be ported to the 3D power spectrum or to other intensity-mapping experiments with matched channels, where the cross-channel prior would do the same work.
  • Because the paper's uncertainty model is a single amplitude scaling per interloper, real data with redshift-dependent interloper populations would likely require richer nuisance parameters and would probably degrade the reported accuracies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper adapts a moment neural-network framework, previously used for galaxy-clustering interloper removal, to line-intensity mapping component separation at the level of the angular power spectrum. Hα is the target line; [O II] and [O III] are interlopers; extragalactic continuum is included in part of the analysis. The network is trained on simulated SPHEREx-like maps with variable interloper amplitude scalings and pixel-level log-normal scatter, using either single-channel auto-spectra or multi-channel auto- and cross-spectra. A sum-to-unity penalty in the loss enforces that the recovered component auto-spectra sum to the total observed auto-spectrum. In the line-only case the network recovers Hα to about 2.5% or better and partially corrects the interloper spectra; when continuum is included, continuum and Hα are recovered to about 2% and 6%, respectively, while the interloper spectra are not reliably recovered at nominal continuum levels. The authors frame the study as a proof of concept and explicitly list extensions needed before application to data.

Significance. If the reported accuracy holds under realistic conditions, the method would be a useful, relatively cheap component-separation tool for LIM analyses of surveys such as SPHEREx. The paper is transparent about its failures, particularly the poor interloper recovery in the presence of continuum, and it releases public code, which is a definite strength. The experiments cover a reasonable range of astrophysical uncertainties, including amplitude scaling and pixel-level scatter, and the finding that multi-channel information is essential when scatter is present is clearly demonstrated. However, the headline few-percent accuracy claims rest on a sum-to-unity constraint whose consistency with the simulations is asserted but not verified, and the results are obtained without an instrument model and, for most configurations, from a single network training. These gaps make the quantitative claims provisional rather than established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (7) and §2.2] The sum-to-unity constraint is imposed on the recovered component auto-spectra, but the paper never measures the cross-component power spectra that this constraint neglects. For the continuum runs, Hα and continuum are assigned to the same dark-matter halos at z≈1.13, so the Hα–continuum cross-spectrum is expected to be nonzero. If 2C_cross is not negligible relative to the total auto-spectrum, then the true component auto-spectra do not sum to the observed total auto-spectrum, and the training labels (Eq. 6) are inconsistent with the penalty term in Eq. (7). The network must then trade off matching the true labels against satisfying the constraint, which can bias the recovered Hα and continuum spectra. The claim that the cross-terms are negligible is asserted in §4.1 but never quantified. Please report the cross-spectra in the simulations, e.g., C^{Hα×cont}/C^{Hα} and C^{Hα×[O III]}/C^{
  2. [§2 and §5] No instrument model is applied: the simulation has no beam, line-spread function, spectral sampling, or noise. The method's advantage in the scatter case comes from cross-channel correlations, and the line-spread function directly controls how line emission leaks across SPHEREx channels and how the cross-spectra are shaped. A 'SPHEREx-like' case study without these effects does not yet establish that the claimed 2–6% accuracy survives in actual SPHEREx conditions. The authors acknowledge this only indirectly in the conclusions; the abstract and title should be tempered, or an instrument-response treatment should be added in a follow-up. At minimum, state clearly in the abstract that the results are for noiseless, beamless simulated maps.
  3. [§5, first paragraph] Most headline numbers are based on a single network training per configuration. The text notes that multiple initializations were checked in one representative setup, but the reported 2% continuum and 6% Hα residuals in the 0.2-dex continuum case, and the 1% and 3% numbers in the reduced-scatter case, come from single trainings. Since the quantitative claims are the central result, please provide seed-averaged metrics (mean and scatter over at least a few initializations) for all configurations, or explicitly label the single-training numbers and avoid presenting them as the method's expected performance.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 3] The no-scatter, single-channel χ²_red entry is printed as '3,56∗'; this should be '3.56∗' or the intended value, and the European decimal comma should be made consistent with the rest of the paper.
  2. [Eq. (11)] The notation for the mean correction error is confusing: earlier in §4.1, y denotes the network output vector and by is used for predictions in the loss, but in Eq. (11) y and by appear on the right-hand side without a clear statement of which is the true label and which is the prediction. Please define both symbols explicitly.
  3. [References] Some references are duplicated (e.g., Silva et al. 2015 appears twice in the bibliography) and several 'in prep.' or 'in prep.' citations are used for load-bearing simulation details (Z. Gao et al. in prep.). Please ensure the simulation paper is available or provide enough detail here for reproducibility.
  4. [§4.2] The normalization in Eq. (8) uses min/max over the full dataset, which is applied before the train/validation/test split is mentioned. It would be cleaner to state explicitly that the normalization is fit on the training set only to avoid information leakage into the test metrics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: supervised ML recovery measured against simulated labels; the sum-to-unity term is a physical prior, not a tautology.

full rationale

The paper's core result is an empirical supervised-learning benchmark. The network is trained on simulated maps in which the component angular power spectra and interloper scaling factors are known, and it is evaluated on held-out maps from the same simulation pipeline. The recovery errors are computed with Eq. (11) (MCE) against the true simulated labels, not encoded in the loss or input. Eq. (6) defines the regression target as C_comp/C_contam; Eq. (7) minimizes the distance to these labels. The sum-to-unity term in Eq. (7) is a physical consistency prior: it coincides with the label definition only in the limit of negligible cross-spectra. The paper states in §4.1: 'Strictly, one should also include cross–correlation terms between components; however, because the lines arise from widely separated redshifts, these terms are negligible compared to the auto-correlations.' This is an unmeasured modeling assumption and a legitimate robustness concern—especially because the continuum and Hα trace the same halos—but a wrong or misspecified prior is not a circular argument; it does not make the predicted Hα spectrum equal to the input by construction. The self-citations (Cagliari et al. 2025 for the moment-network architecture; Gao et al. in prep. for the simulations) are present, but the architecture is anchored to independent external references (Jeffrey & Wandelt 2020; Villaescusa-Navarro et al. 2022), the simulations are built on public N-body/SED ingredients (Hidden Valley, UniverseMachine, FSPS), and no uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is imported to force the result. The few-percent accuracy claims are therefore not circular, though their robustness depends on the untested smallness of component cross-spectra.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The correction vectors and moment-network outputs are data constructs, not new particles, forces, or dimensions. The free parameters are the amplitude scalings, scatter levels, continuum rescaling, and loss weight that define the simulated test space.

free parameters (4)
  • Interloper amplitude scaling factors f_[O II], f_[O III] = Sobol draws in [0.1, 2]
    Chosen to avoid interlopers brighter than the target H-alpha; the network is trained to predict them, and the range is a test-design choice that shapes all reported accuracies.
  • Pixel-level log-normal scatter sigma = 0, 0.1, 0.2 dex
    Hand-chosen values intended to model astrophysical scatter in the intensity-luminosity relation; results depend strongly on this choice.
  • Continuum rescaling factor for PCA-cleaned scenario = 0.15 map rescale (0.02 in power spectrum)
    Ad hoc value meant to mimic percent-level residuals after PCA cleaning; not derived from an actual PCA analysis of the maps.
  • Loss weight lambda for unity-sum constraint = 0.05
    Hyperparameter chosen by hand to balance the physical constraint against data terms in the loss function.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cross-correlations between line and continuum components in the total angular power spectrum are negligible.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 to justify the sum-to-unity constraint in the loss; if false, the constraint biases recovered component spectra.
  • domain assumption The UniverseMachine + FSPS simulation pipeline faithfully represents SPHEREx deep-field line and continuum emission, including SED shapes and redshift evolution.
    All training and test data come from this pipeline (Section 2.2); real data with different SED shapes could break the method.
  • domain assumption Instrument effects (beam, line-spread function, spectral sampling, noise) can be neglected.
    Stated in Section 2: 'we do not apply an instrument model'; the reported accuracies are for noiseless, unresolved maps.
  • domain assumption Only H-alpha, [O II], [O III] lines and extragalactic continuum contribute significantly in the target channel; higher-order interloper lines and Galactic continuum are negligible.
    Section 2.2 and the footnote: Galactic continuum is neglected because it dominates only at ell < 10^3; higher-order interloper matches are described as fainter and ignored (Section 3.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disentangling Target Lines from Interlopers and Continuum with Neural Networks: A SPHEREx Intensity Mapping Case Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GIKIUXO3

@misc{pith2026250902414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disentangling Target Lines from Interlopers and Continuum with Neural Networks: A SPHEREx Intensity Mapping Case Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GIKIUXO3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02414}
}
abstract

Line-intensity mapping (LIM) traces the large-scale distribution of matter by measuring fluctuations in aggregate line emission from unresolved galaxies and the intergalactic medium, providing a powerful probe of both astrophysics and cosmology. However, interpreting LIM data is limited by our ability to disentangle the signal of a target spectral line from continuum emission and interloper lines, which are emissions from other redshifts that fall within the observed frequency band. Astrophysical modeling uncertainties further complicate matters, leaving the relative amplitudes of the map components poorly understood. In this paper, we present a neural-network (NN) approach to separate the three map components at the level of the angular power spectrum, explicitly accounting for uncertainties in their relative amplitudes. As test cases, we generate SPHEREx-like maps with variable interloper line luminosities across multiple frequency channels, with and without pixel-wise scatter and continuum contributions. We find that cross-channel correlations are essential for robust NN performance when scatter is present. The NN exhibits a hierarchy in residual errors: brighter components yield smaller residuals, and the dimmest the highest. Without continuum emission, the network recovers the target power spectrum to within $2.5\%$, while partially correcting the interloper spectra. With continuum included, the NN accurately reconstructs the power spectra of the continuum and target line, within $2\%$ and $6\%$, respectively, but fails to recover those of the interlopers. Reducing pixel-level scatter further improves performance, lowering residual errors to $1\%$ (continuum) and $3\%$ (target line).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02414 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The design of the lightcone. We only select dark matter halos within the black dash-dotted line. 0 200 400 600 Continuum Hα [O III] [O II] 0 250 500 0 200 400 600 0 250 500 0 250 500 0 250 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 I[Jy/sr] 0 200 400 I[Jy/sr] 0 50 100 150 I[Jy/sr] 0 20 40 I[Jy/sr] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulated intensity maps in SPHEREx channel 27, for continuum-only (first column), Hα (second column), [O III] (third column), and [O II] (fourth column). The top row shows the baseline maps; the bottom row applies pixel-wise log-normal scatter with σ = 0.2 dex. See section 2.3 for details. 2.2. Intensity Maps To include the interlopers and extra-galactic contin￾uum, we assign a full spectral energy distribution (SE… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The redshifts of lines in target channels and matched channels. The blue, green, and orange bands are the redshift bins of Hα, [O II], and [O III] in several spectral channels. mary pairs: at higher-order matches, the relevant inter￾lopers shift to progressively higher redshift and fainter intensity, and the required channels approach or leave the instrument bandpass. When continuum emission is included, we adopt th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean correction error of angular spectra in the single-channel, line-only, no-scatter case. The shaded area indicates the 0.5% error threshold for Hα (left), the 2.5% one for [O II] (middle) and [O III] (right). The error bars correspond to the mean of the predicted un…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as figure 4, but using multi-channel information. error bars. In Tables 2 and 3, we marked with ∗ the χ 2 red values that we computed removing the samples with an inferred second moment lower than 10−3 as we deem these predictions unreliable. We observe that in th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as figure 4 for the multi-channel analysis of line-only sample including a scatter of 0.2 dex. The shaded area corresponds to the 2.5% error threshold for Hα (left) and the 5% one for [O II] (middle) and [O III] (right). interlopers, the [O III] power spectrum is …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as figure 4 for the multi-channel analysis of the line-plus-continuum sample with scatter of 0.2 dex. The shaded area corresponds to the 2.5% error threshold for Hα (top left) and the continuum (bottom right), and the 5% one for [O II] (top right) and [O III] (bot…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as figure 7 for the multi-channel analysis of the line-plus-continuum sample with reduced scatter of 0.1 dex. fact that the contaminant line emissions are no longer overwhelmed by the continuum. The network remains overconfident, especially in [O II]. As for the M…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as figure 7 for the multi-channel analysis of the line-plus-continuum sample with reduced scatter and down scaled continuum. tinuum cross-correlation as input. The network corrects the continuum within 1%, Hα within 3%, and cannot properly correct [O II]. 6. CONCL…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as figure 7 for the multi-channel plus cross continuum analysis of the line-plus-continuum sample with reduced scatter. chi-square, which is a diagnostic for second–moment es￾timates, shows configuration-dependent miscalibration, which largely disappears when sca…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reading Between the Lines: Forward Modeling Dust, Continuum, and Spectral Cleaning for Multi-Line Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a SAM-based mock, multi-line intensity-mapping cross-power spectra show dust acts as a line-pair- and redshift-dependent suppression, and PCA cleaning with about 20 modes best balances line recovery against cont...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    9#] <NM-

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Ade, P. A. R., et al. 2020, title The Experiment for Cryogenic Large-aperture Intensity Mapping (EXCLAIM) , J. Low Temp. Phys., 199, 1027, 10.1007/s10909-019-02320-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-019-02320-5 2020

  5. [5]

    H., Hearin, A

    Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. 2019, title UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 3143–3194, 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 2019

  6. [6]

    L., Breysse, P

    Bernal, J. L., Breysse, P. C., Gil-Mar \' n, H., & Kovetz, E. D. 2019 a , title User s guide to extracting cosmological information from line-intensity maps , Phys. Rev. D, 100, 123522, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123522

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.123522 2019

  7. [7]

    L., Breysse, P

    Bernal, J. L., Breysse, P. C., & Kovetz, E. D. 2019 b , title Cosmic Expansion History from Line-Intensity Mapping , Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 251301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.251301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.251301 2019

  8. [8]

    L., Caputo, A., & Kamionkowski, M

    Bernal, J. L., Caputo, A., & Kamionkowski, M. 2021 a , title Strategies to Detect Dark-Matter Decays with Line-Intensity Mapping , Phys. Rev. D, 103, 063523, 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063523

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063523 2021

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    L., Caputo, A., Villaescusa-Navarro, F., & Kamionkowski, M

    Bernal, J. L., Caputo, A., Villaescusa-Navarro, F., & Kamionkowski, M. 2021 b , title Searching for the Radiative Decay of the Cosmic Neutrino Background with Line-Intensity Mapping , Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 131102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.131102

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    L., & Kovetz, E

    Bernal, J. L., & Kovetz, E. D. 2022, title Line-intensity mapping: theory review with a focus on star-formation lines , Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 30, 5, 10.1007/s00159-022-00143-0

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    2022, title CONCERTO: High-fidelity simulation of millimeter line emissions of galaxies and [CII] intensity mapping , Astron

    Bethermin, M., et al. 2022, title CONCERTO: High-fidelity simulation of millimeter line emissions of galaxies and [CII] intensity mapping , Astron. Astrophys., 667, A156, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243888

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    C., & Alexandroff , R

    Breysse , P. C., & Alexandroff , R. M. 2019, title Observing AGN feedback with CO intensity mapping , , 490, 260, 10.1093/mnras/stz2534

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Kovetz, E

    Breysse, P. C., Kovetz, E. D., & Kamionkowski, M. 2016, title The high redshift star-formation history from carbon-monoxide intensity maps , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 457, L127, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw005

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    C., & Rahman, M

    Breysse, P. C., & Rahman, M. 2017, title Feeding cosmic star formation: Exploring high-redshift molecular gas with CO intensity mapping , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 468, 741, 10.1093/mnras/stx451

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    C., et al

    Breysse, P. C., et al. 2022, title COMAP Early Science. VII. Prospects for CO Intensity Mapping at Reionization , Astrophys. J., 933, 188, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63c9

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Brown , T., & Wilson , C. D. 2019, title Extreme CO Isotopologue Line Ratios in ULIRGS: Evidence for a Top-heavy IMF , , 879, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2246

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    S., Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., & Villaescusa-Navarro, F

    Cagliari, M. S., Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., & Villaescusa-Navarro, F. 2025, title Correcting for interloper contamination in the power spectrum with neural networks , 2504.06919

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Chang , T.-C., Pen , U.-L., Bandura , K., & Peterson , J. B. 2010, title An intensity map of hydrogen 21-cm emission at redshift z -0.5ex 0.8 , Nature, 466, 463, 10.1038/nature09187

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    2019, title Tomography of the Cosmic Dawn and Reionization Eras with Multiple Tracers , , 51, 282, 10.48550/arXiv.1903.11744

    Chang , T.-C., Beane , A., Dore , O., et al. 2019, title Tomography of the Cosmic Dawn and Reionization Eras with Multiple Tracers , , 51, 282, 10.48550/arXiv.1903.11744

    2019 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    B., Harker , G., et al

    Chapman , E., Abdalla , F. B., Harker , G., et al. 2012, title Foreground removal using FASTICA: a showcase of LOFAR-EoR , , 423, 2518, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21065.x

    2012

  13. [21]

    C., et al

    Chapman, S. C., et al. 2022, title CCAT-prime: the 850 GHz camera for prime-cam on FYST , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 12190, 77, 10.1117/12.2630628

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Chen, C., & Pullen, A. R. 2022, title Removing interlopers from intensity mapping probes of primordial non-Gaussianity , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 512, 4262, 10.1093/mnras/stac743

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    M., & Cooray , A

    Cheng , Y.-T., Chang , T.-C., Bock , J., Bradford , C. M., & Cooray , A. 2016, title Spectral Line De-confusion in an Intensity Mapping Survey , ApJ, 832, 165, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/165

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Cheng, Y.-T., Chang, T.-C., & Bock, J. J. 2020, title Phase-space Spectral Line Deconfusion in Intensity Mapping , Astrophys. J., 901, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb023

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Chang, T.-C., & Dore, O

    Cheng, Y.-T., Wandelt, B. D., Chang, T.-C., & Dore, O. 2023, title Data-driven Cosmology from Three-dimensional Light Cones , Astrophys. J., 944, 151, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb350

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Chang, T.-C., & Dor \'e , O

    Cheng, Y.-T., Wang, K., Wandelt, B. D., Chang, T.-C., & Dor \'e , O. 2024, title Bayesian Multi-line Intensity Mapping , Astrophys. J., 971, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad57b9

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    A., et al

    Cleary, K. A., et al. 2021, title COMAP Early Science: I. Overview , 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63cc

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    2016, title Probing high-redshift galaxies with Ly intensity mapping , Mon

    Comaschi, P., & Ferrara, A. 2016, title Probing high-redshift galaxies with Ly intensity mapping , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 455, 725, 10.1093/mnras/stv2339

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    2016, title Observational challenges in Ly intensity mapping , Mon

    Comaschi, P., Yue, B., & Ferrara, A. 2016, title Observational challenges in Ly intensity mapping , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 463, 3193, 10.1093/mnras/stw2198

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    2020, title A wide field-of-view low-resolution spectrometer at APEX: Instrument design and scientific forecast , , 642, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038456

    CONCERTO Collaboration , Ade , P., Aravena , M., et al. 2020, title A wide field-of-view low-resolution spectrometer at APEX: Instrument design and scientific forecast , , 642, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038456

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Conroy , C., & Gunn , J. E. 2010, title The Propagation of Uncertainties in Stellar Population Synthesis Modeling. III. Model Calibration, Comparison, and Evaluation , ApJ, 712, 833, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    Conroy, C., White, M., & Gunn, J. E. 2009, title THE PROPAGATION OF UNCERTAINTIES IN STELLAR POPULATION SYNTHESIS MODELING. II. THE CHALLENGE OF COMPARING GALAXY EVOLUTION MODELS TO OBSERVATIONS, The Astrophysical Journal, 708, 58–70, 10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/58

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    2016, title Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper , 1602.05178

    Cooray, A., et al. 2016, title Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper , 1602.05178

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    2018, title Searching for Decaying and Annihilating Dark Matter with Line Intensity Mapping , Phys

    Creque-Sarbinowski, C., & Kamionkowski, M. 2018, title Searching for Decaying and Annihilating Dark Matter with Line Intensity Mapping , Phys. Rev. D, 98, 063524, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063524

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    T., Bock , J

    Crites , A. T., Bock , J. J., Bradford , C. M., et al. 2014, title The TIME-Pilot intensity mapping experiment , in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9153, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation...

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    2021, title Microwave spectro-polarimetry of matter and radiation across space and time , Exper

    Delabrouille, J., et al. 2021, title Microwave spectro-polarimetry of matter and radiation across space and time , Exper. Astron., 51, 1471, 10.1007/s10686-021-09721-z

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Di Matteo , T., Perna , R., Abel , T., & Rees , M. J. 2002, title Radio Foregrounds for the 21 Centimeter Tomography of the Neutral Intergalactic Medium at High Redshifts , , 564, 576, 10.1086/324293

    2002 doi

  30. [38]

    W., Ashby, M

    Doré, O., Werner, M. W., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2018, Science Impacts of the SPHEREx All-Sky Optical to Near-Infrared Spectral Survey II: Report of a Community Workshop on the Scientific Synergies Between the SPHEREx Survey and Other Astronomy Observatories, arXiv, 10.48550/A...

    2018 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    M., et al

    Feder, R. M., et al. 2025, title CIBER 4th flight fluctuation analysis: Measurements of near-IR auto- and cross-power spectra on arcminute to sub-degree scales , 2501.17933

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gao, Z., Dor \'e , O., & Chang, T. in prep., title A realistic study of continuum contamination to line intensity mapping with SPHEREx , A realistic study of continuum contamination to line intensity mapping with SPHEREx

  33. [41]

    2021, title The Hobby Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) Survey Design, Reductions, and Detections* , Astrophys

    Gebhardt, K., et al. 2021, title The Hobby Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) Survey Design, Reductions, and Detections* , Astrophys. J., 923, 217, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    2012, title Intensity Mapping of the [C II] Fine Structure Line during the Epoch of Reionization , , 745, 49, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/49

    Gong , Y., Cooray , A., Silva , M., et al. 2012, title Intensity Mapping of the [C II] Fine Structure Line during the Epoch of Reionization , , 745, 49, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/49

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    B., et al

    Gong, Y., Cooray, A., Silva, M. B., et al. 2017, title Intensity Mapping of H , H , [O II], and [O III] Lines at z < 5, The Astrophysical Journal, 835, 273, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/273

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Jeffrey, N., & Wandelt, B. D. 2020, title Solving high-dimensional parameter inference: marginal posterior densities & Moment Networks , in 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems . 2011.05991

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    S., & Bird, S

    Karkare, K. S., & Bird, S. 2018, title Constraining the Expansion History and Early Dark Energy with Line Intensity Mapping , Phys. Rev. D, 98, 043529, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043529

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    S., Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Keating, G

    Karkare, K. S., Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Keating, G. K., Breysse, P., & Chung, D. T. 2022 a , title Snowmass 2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Cosmology with Millimeter-Wave Line Intensity Mapping , in Snowmass 2021 . 2203.07258

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S., et al

    Karkare, K. S., et al. 2022 b , title SPT-SLIM: A Line Intensity Mapping Pathfinder for the South Pole Telescope , J. Low Temp. Phys., 209, 758, 10.1007/s10909-022-02702-2

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    K., Marrone, D

    Keating, G. K., Marrone, D. P., Bower, G. C., & Keenan, R. P. 2020, title An Intensity Mapping Detection of Aggregate CO Line Emission at 3 mm , Astrophys. J., 901, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb08e

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    K., Marrone, D

    Keating, G. K., Marrone, D. P., Bower, G. C., et al. 2016, title COPSS II: The molecular gas content of ten million cubic megaparsecs at redshift z = 3 , Astrophys. J., 830, 34, 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/34

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    P., & Ba, J

    Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. 2014, title Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 1412.6980

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C., Lidz , A., et al

    Kovetz , E., Breysse , P. C., Lidz , A., et al. 2019, title Astrophysics and Cosmology with Line-Intensity Mapping , , 51, 101, 10.48550/arXiv.1903.04496

    2019 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    D., et al

    Kovetz, E. D., et al. 2017, title Line-Intensity Mapping: 2017 Status Report , 1709.09066

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    in prep., title Euclid preparation

    Lee, S., et al. in prep., title Euclid preparation. TBD. The impact of redshift interlopers on the power spectrum , Euclid preparation. TBD. The impact of redshift interlopers on the power spectrum

  46. [54]

    Y., Wechsler, R

    Li, T. Y., Wechsler, R. H., Devaraj, K., & Church, S. E. 2016, title Connecting CO Intensity Mapping to Molecular Gas and Star Formation in the Epoch of Galaxy Assembly , Astrophys. J., 817, 169, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/169

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    2016, title On Removing Interloper Contamination from Intensity Mapping Power Spectrum Measurements , , 825, 143, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/143

    Lidz , A., & Taylor , J. 2016, title On Removing Interloper Contamination from Intensity Mapping Power Spectrum Measurements , , 825, 143, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/143

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    Liu, A., & Shaw, J. R. 2020, title Data Analysis for Precision 21 cm Cosmology , Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 132, 062001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab5bfd

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    2011, title A method for 21 cm power spectrum estimation in the presence of foregrounds , , 83, 103006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103006

    Liu , A., & Tegmark , M. 2011, title A method for 21 cm power spectrum estimation in the presence of foregrounds , , 83, 103006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103006

    2011 doi

  50. [58]

    2009, title An improved method for 21-cm foreground removal , , 398, 401, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15156.x

    Liu , A., Tegmark , M., Bowman , J., Hewitt , J., & Zaldarriaga , M. 2009, title An improved method for 21-cm foreground removal , , 398, 401, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15156.x

    2009

  51. [59]

    2013, title A comparison of approaches in fitting continuum SEDs , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13, 420, 10.1088/1674-4527/13/4/005

    Liu , Y., Madlener , D., Wolf , S., & Wang , H.-C. 2013, title A comparison of approaches in fitting continuum SEDs , Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13, 420, 10.1088/1674-4527/13/4/005

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    Maas, A. L. 2013, title Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models, in Semantic Scholar. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16489696

    2013

  53. [61]

    2015, title Predicting the intensity mapping signal for multi-J CO lines , , 2015, 028, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/028

    Mashian , N., Sternberg , A., & Loeb , A. 2015, title Predicting the intensity mapping signal for multi-J CO lines , , 2015, 028, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/028

    2015 doi

  54. [62]

    McQuinn , M., Zahn , O., Zaldarriaga , M., Hernquist , L., & Furlanetto , S. R. 2006, title Cosmological Parameter Estimation Using 21 cm Radiation from the Epoch of Reionization , , 653, 815, 10.1086/505167

    2006 doi

  55. [63]

    2019, title Intensity mapping with neutral hydrogen and the Hidden Valley simulations, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019, 024–024, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/024

    Modi, C., Castorina, E., Feng, Y., & White, M. 2019, title Intensity mapping with neutral hydrogen and the Hidden Valley simulations, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019, 024–024, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/024

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Bellini, E., & Keating, G. K. 2024, title Probing Dark Energy and Modifications of Gravity with Ground-based millimeter-wavelength Line Intensity Mapping , Astrophys. J., 965, 19, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2078

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., & Keating, G. K. 2019, title Line intensity mapping with [CII] and CO(1-0) as probes of primordial non-Gaussianity , Astrophys. J., 872, 126, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd36

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    K., & Fialkov, A

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Keating, G. K., & Fialkov, A. 2019, title Probing Cosmic Origins with CO and [CII] Emission Lines , Astrophys. J. Lett., 870, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf813

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    K., Karkare, K

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Keating, G. K., Karkare, K. S., Crites, A., & Choudhury, S. R. 2022 a , title Neutrino Properties with Ground-based Millimeter-wavelength Line Intensity Mapping , Astrophys. J., 926, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3edd

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    K., & Castorina, E

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, A., Nikakhtar, F., Keating, G. K., & Castorina, E. 2022 b , title Precision tests of CO and CII power spectra models against simulated intensity maps , JCAP, 02, 026, 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/026

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    P., & Mack , K

    Oh , S. P., & Mack , K. J. 2003, title Foregrounds for 21-cm observations of neutral gas at high redshift , , 346, 871, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07133.x

    2003

  62. [70]

    R., & Loeb, A

    Pritchard, J. R., & Loeb, A. 2012, title 21-cm cosmology , Rept. Prog. Phys., 75, 086901, 10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901

    2012 doi

  63. [71]

    R., Chang , T.-C., Dor \'e , O., & Lidz , A

    Pullen , A. R., Chang , T.-C., Dor \'e , O., & Lidz , A. 2013, title Cross-correlations as a Cosmological Carbon Monoxide Detector , , 768, 15, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/15

    2013 doi

  64. [72]

    R., Dore, O., & Bock, J

    Pullen, A. R., Dore, O., & Bock, J. 2014, title Intensity Mapping across Cosmic Times with the Ly Line , Astrophys. J., 786, 111, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/111

    2014 doi

  65. [73]

    Raissi , M., Perdikaris , P., & Karniadakis , G. E. 2019, title Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686, 10.1016/j.jcp.2...

    2019 doi

  66. [74]

    2025, title Euclid preparation

    Risso, I., et al. 2025, title Euclid preparation. The impact of redshift interlopers on the two-point correlation function analysis , 2505.04688

    2025

  67. [75]

    2024, title Cross-correlation Techniques to Mitigate the Interloper Contamination for Line Intensity Mapping Experiments , Astrophys

    Roy, A., & Battaglia, N. 2024, title Cross-correlation Techniques to Mitigate the Interloper Contamination for Line Intensity Mapping Experiments , Astrophys. J., 969, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4a29

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    G., Cooray , A., & Knox , L

    Santos , M. G., Cooray , A., & Knox , L. 2005, title Multifrequency Analysis of 21 Centimeter Fluctuations from the Era of Reionization , , 625, 575, 10.1086/429857

    2005 doi

  69. [77]

    L., Kovetz, E

    Sato-Polito, G., Bernal, J. L., Kovetz, E. D., & Kamionkowski, M. 2020, title Antisymmetric cross-correlation of line-intensity maps as a probe of reionization , Phys. Rev. D, 102, 043519, 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043519

    2020 doi

  70. [78]

    2021 a , title Multi-tracer intensity mapping: Cross-correlations, Line noise & Decorrelation , JCAP, 05, 068, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/068

    Schaan, E., & White, M. 2021 a , title Multi-tracer intensity mapping: Cross-correlations, Line noise & Decorrelation , JCAP, 05, 068, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/068

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    2021 b , title Astrophysics & Cosmology from Line Intensity Mapping vs Galaxy Surveys , JCAP, 05, 067, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/067

    Schaan, E., & White, M. 2021 b , title Astrophysics & Cosmology from Line Intensity Mapping vs Galaxy Surveys , JCAP, 05, 067, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/067

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    R., Karkare, K

    Scott, B. R., Karkare, K. S., & Bird, S. 2023, title A forecast for large-scale structure constraints on Horndeski gravity with CO line intensity mapping , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 523, 4895, 10.1093/mnras/stad1501

    2023 doi

  73. [81]

    Shmueli, G., Libanore, S., & Kovetz, E. D. 2025, title Toward a multitracer neutrino mass measurement with line-intensity mapping , Phys. Rev. D, 111, 063512, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063512

    2025 doi

  74. [83]

    B., Santos, M

    Silva, M. B., Santos, M. G., Cooray, A., & Gong, Y. 2015, title Prospects for Detecting C II Emission During the Epoch of Reionization , Astrophys. J., 806, 209, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/209

    2015 doi

  75. [85]

    B., Santos , M

    Silva , M. B., Santos , M. G., Gong , Y., Cooray , A., & Bock , J. 2013 b , title Intensity Mapping of Ly Emission during the Epoch of Reionization , , 763, 132, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/132

    2013 doi

  76. [86]

    B., Kovetz, E

    Silva, M. B., Kovetz, E. D., Keating, G. K., et al. 2021, title Mapping large-scale-structure evolution over cosmic times , Exper. Astron., 51, 1593, 10.1007/s10686-021-09755-3

    2021 doi

  77. [87]

    2022, title Cosmological Constraints on the Global Star Formation Law of Galaxies: Insights From Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Intensity Mapping , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2205.09354

    Sun , G. 2022, title Cosmological Constraints on the Global Star Formation Law of Galaxies: Insights From Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Intensity Mapping , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2205.09354. 2205.09354

    2022 arXiv

  78. [88]

    P., et al

    Sun , G., Moncelsi , L., Viero , M. P., et al. 2018, title A Foreground Masking Strategy for [C II] Intensity Mapping Experiments Using Galaxies Selected by Stellar Mass and Redshift , , 856, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3e3

    2018 doi

  79. [89]

    2023, title CONCERTO: Extracting the power spectrum of the [C II ] emission line , Astron

    Van Cuyck, M., et al. 2023, title CONCERTO: Extracting the power spectrum of the [C II ] emission line , Astron. Astrophys., 676, A62, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346270

    2023 doi

  80. [90]

    M., et al

    Vieira, J., Aguirre, J., Bradford, C. M., et al. 2020, The Terahertz Intensity Mapper (TIM): a Next-Generation Experiment for Galaxy Evolution Studies, 2009.14340

    2020 arXiv

  81. [91]

    2022, title The CAMELS Multifield Data Set: Learning the Universe s Fundamental Parameters with Artificial Intelligence , Astrophys

    Villaescusa-Navarro, F., et al. 2022, title The CAMELS Multifield Data Set: Learning the Universe s Fundamental Parameters with Artificial Intelligence , Astrophys. J. Supp., 259, 61, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5ab0

    2022 doi

  82. [92]

    Visbal , E., & Loeb , A. 2010, title Measuring the 3D clustering of undetected galaxies through cross correlation of their cumulative flux fluctuations from multiple spectral lines , JCAP, 2010, 016, 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/11/016

    2010 doi

  83. [93]

    R., & Switzer, E

    Yang, S., Pullen, A. R., & Switzer, E. R. 2019, title Evidence for C II diffuse line emission at redshift z 2.6 , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 489, L53, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz126

    2019 doi

  84. [94]

    2015, title Intensity mapping of [C II] emission from early galaxies , Mon

    Yue, B., Ferrara, A., Pallottini, A., Gallerani, S., & Vallini, L. 2015, title Intensity mapping of [C II] emission from early galaxies , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 450, 3829, 10.1093/mnras/stv933

    2015 doi

  85. [95]

    R., & Hernquist , L

    Zaldarriaga , M., Furlanetto , S. R., & Hernquist , L. 2004, title 21 Centimeter Fluctuations from Cosmic Gas at High Redshifts , , 608, 622, 10.1086/386327

    2004 doi

  86. [96]

    2020, title Robust Intensity Mapping Analysis against Foregrounds for the Epoch of Reionization , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2009.02765, 10.48550/arXiv.2009.02765

    Zhou , M., Tan , J., & Mao , Y. 2020, title Robust Intensity Mapping Analysis against Foregrounds for the Epoch of Reionization , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2009.02765, 10.48550/arXiv.2009.02765

    2020 doi arXiv

  87. [97]

    2021, title Antisymmetric Cross-correlation between H I and CO Line Intensity Maps as a New Probe of Cosmic Reionization , Astrophys

    Zhou, M., Tan, J., & Mao, Y. 2021, title Antisymmetric Cross-correlation between H I and CO Line Intensity Maps as a New Probe of Cosmic Reionization , Astrophys. J., 909, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/abda45

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.