Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GDPR Compliant Collection of Therapist-Patient-Dialogues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.12360 v1 pith:GIXYLI7W submitted 2022-11-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datadialoguescollectiondisordersgatheringlanguagelimitationspart
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

According to the Global Burden of Disease list provided by the World Health Organization (WHO), mental disorders are among the most debilitating disorders.To improve the diagnosis and the therapy effectiveness in recent years, researchers have tried to identify individual biomarkers. Gathering neurobiological data however, is costly and time-consuming. Another potential source of information, which is already part of the clinical routine, are therapist-patient dialogues. While there are some pioneering works investigating the role of language as predictors for various therapeutic parameters, for example patient-therapist alliance, there are no large-scale studies. A major obstacle to conduct these studies is the availability of sizeable datasets, which are needed to train machine learning models. While these conversations are part of the daily routine of clinicians, gathering them is usually hindered by various ethical (purpose of data usage), legal (data privacy) and technical (data formatting) limitations. Some of these limitations are particular to the domain of therapy dialogues, like the increased difficulty in anonymisation, or the transcription of the recordings. In this paper, we elaborate on the challenges we faced in starting our collection of therapist-patient dialogues in a psychiatry clinic under the General Data Privacy Regulation of the European Union with the goal to use the data for Natural Language Processing (NLP) research. We give an overview of each step in our procedure and point out the potential pitfalls to motivate further research in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EmoTrace: An Emotion Trajectory-Centered Framework for Psychological Support Dialogue Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A seeker-emotion-trajectory framework with schemas and EFT counselor control yields a 1,114-dialogue corpus and a fine-tuned model that score higher on emotional richness and empathy than prior counseling datasets and bots.

Pith tools