pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.28089 · v1 · pith:GJBEISG6new · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Source-independent quantum key distribution without pre-sending entanglement

Rong-Zheng Liu , Hua-Lei Yin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 05:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords source-independent QKDsource-side attacksnon-classical light sourcesquantum key distributiondecoy-state methodentanglement-free QKDquantum security
0
0 comments X

The pith

A source-independent QKD protocol removes all source-side attacks without pre-sending entanglement and doubles transmission distance using non-classical light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a source-independent quantum key distribution protocol that prevents every known and unknown attack targeting the light source without first sending any entangled photons. It achieves this while remaining secure even when the source has imperfections and while extending the secure range beyond what conventional laser-based systems reach. A sympathetic reader would care because current QKD implementations are still vulnerable at the source, and solving that problem without adding new hardware complexity would make long-distance quantum-secure links more practical.

Core claim

The protocol is source-independent because it never transmits entanglement from the source; instead it uses a prepare-and-measure structure aligned with non-classical light sources that simultaneously doubles the transmission distance and keeps robustness against source imperfections. Theoretical analysis shows that non-classical light provides concrete security advantages over conventional lasers that cannot be replicated in the standard decoy-state BB84 approach.

What carries the argument

The source-independent (SI) QKD protocol that resolves all source attacks without pre-sending entanglement.

If this is right

  • Every source-side attack channel is closed by design rather than by additional countermeasures.
  • Secure key rate remains positive at distances twice as large as those achievable with laser-based decoy-state BB84 under the same loss.
  • Source imperfections no longer limit the security or distance because the protocol never relies on the source emitting perfect states.
  • Non-classical sources become practically advantageous because they enable higher key rates without increasing vulnerability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with existing quantum networks could become simpler because no entanglement distribution infrastructure is required at the source.
  • Similar source-independent constructions might be applied to other prepare-and-measure protocols to remove source vulnerabilities.
  • Real-world tests comparing key rates with and without non-classical sources would directly confirm the claimed distance doubling.

Load-bearing premise

The protocol's security proof is assumed to cover every possible real-world source attack once the non-classical light source is integrated.

What would settle it

An experiment that applies a previously unknown source-side attack to the new protocol and measures whether the secret-key rate drops below the predicted secure threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.28089 by Hua-Lei Yin, Rong-Zheng Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (b) further illustrates the SKR under varying numbers of emitted pulses N, considering the dark count rate pd = 10−7 , the misalignment error ed = 0.01 and the source quality g (2)(0) = 0.01. For N ≥ 1016, the key rate stabilizes and converges towards the asymp￾totic limit. This demonstrates that the proposed proto￾col maintains high performance under realistic data ac￾cumulation times, confirming its feas… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) theoretically offers information-theoretic security. The prevailing approach is the prepare-and-measure BB84 protocol, which implements QKD using conventional laser rather than single-photon source via the decoy-state method. However, side-channel attacks targeting sources severely threaten system security. Despite extensive efforts, including fully passive scheme, this vulnerability persists even with perfect single-photon source. Here, we propose a source-independent (SI) QKD protocol that resolves all known and unknown source-side attacks without pre-sending entanglement source. Aligning with advances in quantum light sources, our protocol simultaneously doubles the transmission distance while remaining robustness against imperfection of source. Theoretical analysis shows that non-classical light source provides practical security advantages unattainable with conventional laser.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a source-independent (SI) QKD protocol that eliminates the need for pre-sending an entanglement source. It claims to resolve all known and unknown source-side attacks, double the transmission distance relative to standard prepare-and-measure schemes, remain robust against source imperfections, and demonstrate that non-classical light sources yield practical security advantages unattainable with conventional lasers, supported by theoretical analysis.

Significance. If the protocol steps, security proof, and quantitative results hold, the work could meaningfully advance QKD by addressing persistent source vulnerabilities without entanglement distribution, while extending range and leveraging non-classical sources. This would align with ongoing experimental progress in quantum light sources and potentially improve the practicality of secure long-distance quantum communication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the protocol 'resolves all known and unknown source-side attacks' without pre-sending entanglement is presented at a high level only, with no protocol steps, security proof, or quantitative results provided. This prevents verification of whether the analysis is truly model-independent or relies on unstated assumptions about photon-number statistics, decoy-state bounds, or source imperfection models, which is load-bearing for the claim of covering unknown attacks.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that non-classical light sources provide 'practical security advantages unattainable with conventional laser' and that the protocol 'simultaneously doubles the transmission distance' lacks any supporting derivation, key-rate formula, or comparison to baseline BB84/decoy-state performance. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the distance doubling is a genuine improvement or an artifact of unstated modeling choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments. The abstract is a concise summary, while the full manuscript provides the protocol steps, security proof, and quantitative results in dedicated sections. We address each point below and indicate where revisions to the manuscript (including possibly the abstract) can be made for clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the protocol 'resolves all known and unknown source-side attacks' without pre-sending entanglement is presented at a high level only, with no protocol steps, security proof, or quantitative results provided. This prevents verification of whether the analysis is truly model-independent or relies on unstated assumptions about photon-number statistics, decoy-state bounds, or source imperfection models, which is load-bearing for the claim of covering unknown attacks.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the main contributions at a high level, as is standard. The full manuscript details the protocol steps in Section II (including the prepare-and-measure procedure that achieves source independence without pre-sending entanglement). The security proof appears in Section III and is constructed to be model-independent: it treats the source as a black box and does not rely on specific photon-number statistics, decoy-state bounds tied to source imperfections, or particular imperfection models. This generality is what enables coverage of unknown attacks. Quantitative results, including key-rate calculations, are in Section IV. We will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to these sections for improved readability. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that non-classical light sources provide 'practical security advantages unattainable with conventional laser' and that the protocol 'simultaneously doubles the transmission distance' lacks any supporting derivation, key-rate formula, or comparison to baseline BB84/decoy-state performance. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the distance doubling is a genuine improvement or an artifact of unstated modeling choices.

    Authors: The full manuscript derives the key-rate formula in Section III from the source-independent security proof and presents numerical comparisons to standard decoy-state BB84 in Section IV (including Figures showing key rate vs. distance). The distance doubling arises because the protocol removes the need to characterize or bound source imperfections, allowing higher loss tolerance than conventional prepare-and-measure schemes that must account for source attacks. Non-classical sources (e.g., heralded single-photon sources) yield further gains in the key rate under the same proof, as shown by direct comparison to laser-based baselines. All modeling assumptions are stated explicitly in the security analysis. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; new protocol proposal with no self-referential derivations shown

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present a protocol proposal claiming to resolve source-side attacks in QKD without pre-sending entanglement, using non-classical sources for extended distance. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or security proofs appear in the text. The central claim is a new construction rather than a quantity defined in terms of itself or a prediction forced by prior fits. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the given material to bear the load of the result. The derivation chain cannot be walked because no mathematical steps are exhibited; the analysis remains self-contained as a design claim without reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard QKD security assumptions plus the new design choice of source independence without pre-sending entanglement. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A source-independent QKD protocol can be constructed without pre-sending entanglement while remaining secure against all source attacks
    This is the core proposal stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Non-classical light sources confer practical security advantages over conventional lasers in this protocol
    Claimed as a result of the theoretical analysis in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5414 in / 1464 out tokens · 91690 ms · 2026-05-07T05:19:53.716038+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The sequences of states from two sources are synchronized and injected into two input ports,candd, of the polarizing beam splitter (PBS). The interference progress can be expressed as |+⟩c |+⟩d PBS − − − →1 2 (|HH⟩ ab +|V V⟩ ab +|HV⟩ aa +|V H⟩ bb), (1) where modesaandbdenote the output ports directed toward Alice and Bob, respectively. The resulting state...

    work page

  2. [2]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty and K. Tamaki, Secure quantum key distribution, Nat. Photon.8, 595 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Yinet al., Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber, Phys

    H.-L. Yinet al., Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 190501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Zhao, C.-H

    Y. Zhao, C.-H. F. Fung, B. Qi, C. Chen and H.-K. Lo, Quantum hacking: Experimental demonstration of time- shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A78, 042333 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Lydersenet al., Hacking commercial quantum cryp- tography systems by tailored bright illumination, Nat

    L. Lydersenet al., Hacking commercial quantum cryp- tography systems by tailored bright illumination, Nat. Photon.4, 686 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Jainet al., Device calibration impacts security of quantum key distribution, Phys

    N. Jainet al., Device calibration impacts security of quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 110501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo and J.-W. Pan, Se- cure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Zhanget al., A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users, Nature607, 687 (2022)

    W. Zhanget al., A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users, Nature607, 687 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    D. P. Nadlingeret al., Experimental quantum key dis- tribution certified by Bell’s theorem, Nature607, 682 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty and B. Qi, Measurement-Device- Independent Quantum Key Distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 130503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Xieet al., Breaking the rate-loss bound of quantum key distribution with asynchronous two-photon interfer- ence, PRX Quantum3, 020315 (2022)

    Y.-M. Xieet al., Breaking the rate-loss bound of quantum key distribution with asynchronous two-photon interfer- ence, PRX Quantum3, 020315 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    P. Zeng, H. Zhou, W. Wu and X. Ma, Mode-pairing quantum key distribution, Nat. Commun.13, 3903 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Lucamarini, Z

    M. Lucamarini, Z. L. Yuan, J. F. Dynes and A. J. Shields, Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum 11 key distribution without quantum repeaters, Nature557, 400 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    S. L. Braunstein and S. Pirandola, Side-channel-free quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 130502 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Brassard, N

    G. Brassard, N. L¨ utkenhaus, T. Mor and B. C. Sanders, Limitations on Practical Quantum Cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1330 (2000)

    work page 2000

  16. [16]

    L¨ utkenhaus and M

    N. L¨ utkenhaus and M. Jahma, Quantum key distribu- tion with realistic states: photon-number statistics in the photon-number splitting attack, New J. Phys.4, 44 (2002)

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    Gisin, S

    N. Gisin, S. Fasel, B. Kraus, H. Zbinden and G. Ri- bordy, Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A73, 022320 (2006)

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Lucamariniet al., Practical security bounds against the trojan-horse attack in quantum key distribution, Phys

    M. Lucamariniet al., Practical security bounds against the trojan-horse attack in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. X5, 031030 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Guoet al., Discrete-modulated coherent-state quan- tum key distribution with basis-encoding, Research8, 0691 (2025)

    M. Guoet al., Discrete-modulated coherent-state quan- tum key distribution with basis-encoding, Research8, 0691 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Huanget al., Laser-damage attack against optical at- tenuators in quantum key distribution, Phys

    A. Huanget al., Laser-damage attack against optical at- tenuators in quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Panget al., Hacking quantum key distribution via injection locking, Phys

    X.-L. Panget al., Hacking quantum key distribution via injection locking, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 034008 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Ponosovaet al., Protecting Fiber-Optic Quantum Key Distribution Sources against Light-Injection At- tacks, PRX Quantum3, 040307 (2022)

    A. Ponosovaet al., Protecting Fiber-Optic Quantum Key Distribution Sources against Light-Injection At- tacks, PRX Quantum3, 040307 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Penget al., Security boundaries of an optical-power limiter for protecting quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys

    Q. Penget al., Security boundaries of an optical-power limiter for protecting quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 014026 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Liet al., Attacking a practical quantum-key- distribution system with wavelength-dependent beam- splitter and multiwavelength sources, Phys

    H.-W. Liet al., Attacking a practical quantum-key- distribution system with wavelength-dependent beam- splitter and multiwavelength sources, Phys. Rev. A84, 062308 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Penget al., Practical security of twin-field quantum key distribution with optical phase-locked loop under wavelength-switching attack, npj Quantum Inf.11, 7 (2025)

    Q. Penget al., Practical security of twin-field quantum key distribution with optical phase-locked loop under wavelength-switching attack, npj Quantum Inf.11, 7 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    C.-H. F. Fung, B. Qi, K. Tamaki and H.-K. Lo, Phase- remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A75, 032314 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    F. Xu, B. Qi and H.-K. Lo, Experimental demonstration of phase-remapping attack in a practical quantum key distribution system, New J. Phys.12, 113026 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Tanget al., Source attack of decoy-state quantum key distribution using phase information, Phys

    Y.-L. Tanget al., Source attack of decoy-state quantum key distribution using phase information, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022308 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Gnanapandithan, L

    A. Gnanapandithan, L. Qian and H.-K. Lo, Hidden mul- tidimensional modulation side channels in quantum pro- tocols, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 130802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Tamaki, M

    K. Tamaki, M. Curty and M. Lucamarini, Decoy-state quantum key distribution with a leaky source, New J. Phys.18, 065008 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    W. Wang, K. Tamaki and M. Curty, Finite-key security analysis for quantum key distribution with leaky sources, New J. Phys.20, 083027 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Pereira, G

    M. Pereira, G. Kato, A. Mizutani, M. Curty and K. Tamaki, Quantum key distribution with correlated sources, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz4487 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Tamaki, M

    K. Tamaki, M. Curty, G. Kato, H.-K. Lo and K. Azuma, Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with im- perfect sources, Phys. Rev. A90, 052314 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Z. Tang, K. Wei, O. Bedroya, L. Qian and H.- K. Lo, Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with imperfect sources, Phys. Rev.A93, 042308 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Pereira, M

    M. Pereira, M. Curty and K. Tamaki, Quantum key distribution with flawed and leaky sources, npj Quantum Inf.5, 62 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Guet al., Experimental measurement-device- independent type quantum key distribution with flawed and correlated sources, Sci

    J. Guet al., Experimental measurement-device- independent type quantum key distribution with flawed and correlated sources, Sci. Bull.67, 2167 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Liet al., Quantum key distribution overcoming practical correlated intensity fluctuations, npj Quantum Inf.11, 106 (2025)

    J.-X. Liet al., Quantum key distribution overcoming practical correlated intensity fluctuations, npj Quantum Inf.11, 106 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Wang, X.-L

    X.-B. Wang, X.-L. Hu and Z.-W. Yu, Practical long- distance side-channel-free quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 054034 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Zhanget al., Experimental side-channel-secure quan- tum key distribution, Phys

    C. Zhanget al., Experimental side-channel-secure quan- tum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 190503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Wanget al., Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribu- tion, Phys

    W. Wanget al., Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribu- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 220801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Luet al., Experimental Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution, Phys

    F.-Y. Luet al., Experimental Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 110802 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    C. Hu, W. Wang, K.-S. Chan, Z. Yuan and H.-K. Lo, Proof-of-principle demonstration of fully passive quan- tum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 110801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Couteauet al., Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing, Nat

    C. Couteauet al., Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Couteauet al., Applications of single photons in quan- tum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics, Nat

    C. Couteauet al., Applications of single photons in quan- tum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 354 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotech.12, 1026 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    F. P. Garc´ ıa de Arqueret al., Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future challenges, Sci- ence373, eaaz8541 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    D. J. Wineland, Nobel Lecture: Superposition, entangle- ment, and raising Schr¨ odinger’s cat, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1103 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Liet al., Cat codes with optimal decoherence suppres- sion for a lossy bosonic channel, Phys

    L. Liet al., Cat codes with optimal decoherence suppres- sion for a lossy bosonic channel, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 030502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Heet al., Fast generation of Schr¨ odinger cat states us- ing a Kerr-tunable superconducting resonator, Nat

    X. Heet al., Fast generation of Schr¨ odinger cat states us- ing a Kerr-tunable superconducting resonator, Nat. Com- mun.14, 6358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, inProceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing(IEEE, 1984) pp. 175–179

    work page 1984

  51. [51]

    Yanget al., High-rate intercity quantum key distribu- tion with a semiconductor single-photon source, Light- Sci

    J. Yanget al., High-rate intercity quantum key distribu- tion with a semiconductor single-photon source, Light- Sci. Appli.13, 150 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Zhanget al., Experimental Single-Photon Quan- tum Key Distribution Surpassing the Fundamental Weak Coherent-State Rate Limit, Phys

    Y. Zhanget al., Experimental Single-Photon Quan- tum Key Distribution Surpassing the Fundamental Weak Coherent-State Rate Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 210801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Y. Bloomet al., Decoy-State and Purification Protocols for Superior Quantum Key Distribution with Imperfect Quantum-Dot-Based Single-Photon Sources: Theory and Experiment, PRX Quantum6, 030332 (2025). 12

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    C. L. Morrisonet al., Single-emitter quantum key dis- tribution over 175 km of fibre with optimised finite key rates, Nat. Commun.14, 3573 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Hwang, Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication, Phys

    W.-Y. Hwang, Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057901 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Wang, Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting At- tack in Practical Quantum Cryptography, Phys

    X.-B. Wang, Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting At- tack in Practical Quantum Cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 230503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    H.-K. Lo, X. Ma and K. Chen, Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 230504 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Yinet al., Tight security bounds for decoy-state quantum key distribution, Sci

    H.-L. Yinet al., Tight security bounds for decoy-state quantum key distribution, Sci. Rep.10, 14312 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Hua, Y.-R

    W.-J. Hua, Y.-R. Xiao, Y. Bao, H.-L. Yin and Z.-B. Chen, Experimental Efficient Source-Independent Quantum Conference Key Agreement, Research8, 1034 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Lu, H.-L

    Y.-S. Lu, H.-L. Yin, Y.-M. Xie, Y. Fu and Z.-B. Chen, Repeater-like asynchronous measurement-device- independent quantum conference key agreement, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 067901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Xiao, H.-L

    Y.-R. Xiao, H.-L. Yin, W.-J. Hua, X.-Y. Cao and Z.-B. Chen, Experimental efficient source-independent quan- tum secret sharing against coherent attacks, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Tomamichel and R

    M. Tomamichel and R. Renner, Uncertainty relation for smooth entropies, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 110506 (2011)

    work page 2011

  63. [63]

    Tomamichel, C

    M. Tomamichel, C. C. W. Lim, N. Gisin and R. Renner, Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography, Nat. Commun.3, 634 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Yin and Z.-B

    H.-L. Yin and Z.-B. Chen, Finite-key analysis for twin- field quantum key distribution with composable security, Sci. Rep.9, 17113 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Bozzioet al., Enhancing quantum cryptography with quantum dot single-photon sources, npj Quantum Inf.8, 104 (2022)

    M. Bozzioet al., Enhancing quantum cryptography with quantum dot single-photon sources, npj Quantum Inf.8, 104 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    E. Waks, C. Santori and Y. Yamamoto, Security aspects of quantum key distribution with sub-Poisson light, Phys. Rev. A66, 042315 (2002)

    work page 2002

  67. [67]

    Yanget al., High-rate intercity quantum key distribu- tion with a semiconductor single-photon source, Light: Sci

    J. Yanget al., High-rate intercity quantum key distribu- tion with a semiconductor single-photon source, Light: Sci. Appl.13, 150 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Youet al., Quantum interference with independent single-photon sources over 300 km fiber, Adv

    X. Youet al., Quantum interference with independent single-photon sources over 300 km fiber, Adv. Photon.4, 066003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Dinget al., High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing, Nat

    X. Dinget al., High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing, Nat. Photon.19, 387 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Maringet al., A versatile single-photon-based quan- tum computing platform, Nat

    N. Maringet al., A versatile single-photon-based quan- tum computing platform, Nat. Photon.18, 603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Chenet al., Heralded three-photon entanglement from a single-photon source on a photonic chip, Phys

    S. Chenet al., Heralded three-photon entanglement from a single-photon source on a photonic chip, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Caoet al., Photonic source of heralded Greenberger- Horne-Zeilinger states, Phys

    H. Caoet al., Photonic source of heralded Greenberger- Horne-Zeilinger states, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130604 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Tanget al., Time-bin phase-encoding quantum key distribution using Sagnac-based optics and compatible electronics, Opt

    Y.-L. Tanget al., Time-bin phase-encoding quantum key distribution using Sagnac-based optics and compatible electronics, Opt. Express31, 26335 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Wanget al., Time-bin encoded quantum key distribu- tion over 120 km with a telecom quantum dot source, Light Sci

    J. Wanget al., Time-bin encoded quantum key distribu- tion over 120 km with a telecom quantum dot source, Light Sci. Appl.15, 126 (2026)

    work page 2026