pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02067 · v1 · pith:GMFTSW7Anew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for a leptoquark in events with a hadronically decaying τ-lepton and missing transverse momentum using pp collisions at sqrt{s}=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 11:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords leptoquarkATLAStau leptonmissing transverse momentumvector leptoquarkproton-proton collisions13 TeVRun 2
0
0 comments X

The pith

No excess above the Standard Model background is observed in a search for leptoquarks decaying to tau leptons and missing momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a search for leptoquark production in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, looking specifically at events containing a hadronically decaying tau lepton plus missing transverse momentum. Data corresponding to 140 inverse femtobarns collected by ATLAS during Run 2 are compared to Standard Model predictions. No deviation from background expectations is found. The analysis sets 95% confidence level limits on the couplings of a benchmark U1 vector leptoquark model for leptoquark masses between 1.5 and 3.0 TeV, covering both resonant and non-resonant production modes.

Core claim

No excess above the Standard Model background prediction is observed. Limits are set on the couplings in the benchmark U1 vector-leptoquark model at 95% confidence level for masses between 1.5 TeV and 3.0 TeV.

What carries the argument

The final-state selection requiring one hadronically decaying tau lepton and large missing transverse momentum, applied to 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV ATLAS data, to constrain resonant and t-channel leptoquark exchange.

If this is right

  • The U1 vector leptoquark is excluded for certain coupling values across the 1.5-3.0 TeV mass range at 95% CL.
  • Both resonant single production and non-resonant t-channel exchange are constrained simultaneously in the same dataset.
  • The result applies directly to models where the leptoquark couples to third-generation fermions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future higher-luminosity runs could extend the mass reach or tighten coupling limits if backgrounds remain under control.
  • Complementary searches in other final states (e.g., with electrons or muons) would test whether any hypothetical signal is generation-specific.
  • The same dataset and selection could be reinterpreted for other new-physics scenarios that produce tau plus missing momentum.

Load-bearing premise

The simulated Standard Model backgrounds and the signal efficiencies for the U1 leptoquark model accurately represent the data, so that any real signal would appear as a visible excess.

What would settle it

An observed event yield significantly above the predicted background in the signal region after all selection criteria, inconsistent with the quoted uncertainties, would falsify the no-excess result.

read the original abstract

A search for leptoquark signals is performed in final states with a hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton and missing transverse momentum, using data from proton--proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during Run 2 (2015--18), corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis is designed to probe both resonant production and non-resonant $t$-channel exchange of the leptoquark, covering a wide range of coupling scenarios. No excess above the Standard Model background prediction is observed. Limits are set on the couplings in the benchmark $U_1$ vector-leptoquark model at 95% confidence level for masses between 1.5 TeV and 3.0 TeV.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for leptoquarks in the final state with a hadronically decaying tau lepton and missing transverse momentum, using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp collision data recorded by ATLAS during Run 2. The analysis targets both resonant production and non-resonant t-channel exchange in the benchmark U1 vector-leptoquark model. No excess above the Standard Model background prediction is observed, and 95% CL limits are set on the leptoquark couplings for masses between 1.5 and 3.0 TeV.

Significance. If the background modeling (MC plus data-driven) and signal efficiencies hold, the result supplies competitive constraints on third-generation leptoquark scenarios in a channel that is directly sensitive to tau couplings. The large dataset and explicit coverage of both production mechanisms add value beyond existing searches. The null outcome is consistent with Standard Model expectations and follows the standard ATLAS methodology for such analyses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope and results of the analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

This is a standard experimental search paper reporting a null result and 95% CL limits from direct comparison of ATLAS collision data to independently simulated SM backgrounds plus data-driven estimates. No equations or statistical procedures reduce the claimed limits to quantities fitted from the signal region itself; background normalizations and signal efficiencies are constrained in control regions and validated externally to the search, satisfying the self-contained benchmark with no load-bearing self-citation chains or self-definitional steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of Standard Model background modeling and detector simulation, both drawn from prior literature rather than derived within the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • leptoquark mass and coupling scan points
    The paper evaluates limits across a grid of masses and couplings; these values are chosen for the benchmark rather than fitted to the current data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model background predictions are accurate in the selected final state
    Invoked to interpret the absence of excess as a constraint on new physics.
  • domain assumption Detector response and reconstruction efficiencies are correctly modeled in simulation
    Required to translate observed yields into limits on signal strength.
invented entities (1)
  • U1 vector leptoquark no independent evidence
    purpose: Benchmark model used to interpret the search results
    The particle is postulated in the theoretical literature; the paper tests its existence but supplies no independent evidence for it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5688 in / 1409 out tokens · 41626 ms · 2026-06-28T11:58:03.212336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    BABAR Collaboration,Evidence for an Excess of¯𝐵→𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 101802, arXiv:1205.5442 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    BABAR Collaboration, Measurement of an excess of¯𝐵→𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 072012, arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Belle Collaboration,Measurement of the branching ratio of¯𝐵→𝐷 (∗) 𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 relative to ¯𝐵→𝐷 (∗) ℓ− ¯𝜈ℓ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 072014, arXiv:1507.03233 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Belle Collaboration, Measurement of the𝜏lepton Polarization and𝑅(𝐷∗)in the Decay ¯𝐵→𝐷 ∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏, Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 211801, arXiv:1612.00529 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Belle Collaboration,Measurement of the𝜏lepton polarization and𝑅(𝐷 ∗)in the decay ¯𝐵→𝐷 ∗𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏 with one-prong hadronic𝜏decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 012004, arXiv:1709.00129 [hep-ex]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Belle Collaboration,Measurement ofR (𝐷)andR (𝐷 ∗)with a Semileptonic Tagging Method, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 161803, arXiv:1910.05864 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Belle II Collaboration,Test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of𝑅(𝐷∗)using hadronic B tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 072020, arXiv:2401.02840 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Belle II Collaboration,Test of lepton flavor universality with measurements of𝑅(𝐷 +) and 𝑅(𝐷 ∗+) using semileptonic B tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 032010, arXiv:2504.11220 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of the Ratio of Branching FractionsB (¯𝐵0 →𝐷 ∗+𝜏− ¯𝜈𝜏)/B ( ¯𝐵0 →𝐷 ∗+𝜇− ¯𝜈𝜇), Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 111803, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 115, 159901 (2015)], arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    LHCb Collaboration,Measurement of the Ratios of Branching FractionsR (𝐷∗)andR (𝐷 0), Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 111802, arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality using𝐵0 →𝐷 ∗− 𝜏+𝜈𝜏 decays with hadronic𝜏channels, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 012018, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 109, 119902 (2024)], arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    LHCb Collaboration, Measurement of the Branching Fraction Ratios𝑅(𝐷+)and𝑅(𝐷 ∗+)Using Muonic𝜏Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 061801, arXiv:2406.03387 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Amhis et al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and𝜏-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur

    Y. Amhis et al.,Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and𝜏-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 226, the latest update is available athttps://hflav- eos.web.cern.ch/hflav-eos/semi/ckm25/html/RDsDsstar/RDRDs.html, arXiv:1909.12524 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam,Lepton number as the fourth “color”, Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 275, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 703–703 (1975)]

    1974

  15. [15]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.32(1974) 438

    1974

  16. [16]

    Buchmüller, R

    W. Buchmüller, R. Rückl and D. Wyler,Leptoquarks in lepton-quark collisions, Phys. Lett. B191(1987) 442, [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 448, 320–320 (1999)]

    1987

  17. [17]

    Buchmüller and D

    W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler,Constraints on SU(5)-type leptoquarks, Phys. Lett. B177(1986) 377

    1986

  18. [18]

    Buttazzo, A

    D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations, JHEP11(2017) 044, arXiv:1706.07808 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Angelescu, D

    A. Angelescu, D. Bečirević, D. A. Faroughy and O. Sumensari, Closing the window on single leptoquark solutions to the𝐵-physics anomalies, JHEP10(2018) 183, arXiv:1808.08179 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Angelescu, D

    A. Angelescu, D. Bečirević, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo and O. Sumensari, Single leptoquark solutions to the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 055017, arXiv:2103.12504 [hep-ph]. 19

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for leptoquarks decaying into the b𝜏final state in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10(2023) 001, arXiv:2305.15962 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration,A measurement of the high-mass𝜏¯𝜏production cross-section at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on new particles and couplings, JHEP10(2025) 054, arXiv:2503.19836 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for singly and pair-produced leptoquarks coupling to third-generation fermions in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B819(2021) 136446, arXiv:2012.04178 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for a third-generation leptoquark coupled to a𝜏lepton and a𝑏quark through single, pair, and nonresonant production in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP05(2024) 311, arXiv:2308.07826 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    CMS Collaboration,Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in𝜏𝜏final states in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP07(2023) 073, arXiv:2208.02717 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for new physics in the𝜏 lepton plus missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP09(2023) 051, arXiv:2212.12604 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

    2008

  28. [28]

    CMS Collaboration,The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST3(2008) S08004

    2008

  29. [29]

    M. Endo, S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, M. Takeuchi and R. Watanabe, Non-resonant new physics search at the LHC for the b→c𝜏𝜈anomalies, JHEP02(2022) 106, arXiv:2111.04748 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    M. J. Baker, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori and M. König, High-𝑝 𝑇 signatures in vector–leptoquark models, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 334, arXiv:1901.10480 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori and M. Neubert, Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies, JHEP08(2021) 050, arXiv:2103.16558 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Aebischer, G

    J. Aebischer, G. Isidori, M. Pesut, B. A. Stefanek and F. Wilsch, Confronting the vector leptoquark hypothesis with new low- and high-energy data, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 153, arXiv:2210.13422 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]. 20

    arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the missing transverse momentum triggers for the ATLAS detector during Run-2 data taking, JHEP08(2020) 080, arXiv:2005.09554 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

    arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Lönnblad and S

    L. Lönnblad and S. Prestel,Matching tree-level matrix elements with interleaved showers, JHEP03(2012) 019, arXiv:1109.4829 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Schumann and F

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03(2008) 038, arXiv:0709.1027 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  48. [48]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv:1207.5030 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Catani, F

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  50. [50]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Frixione, G

    S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    Frixione, P

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

    2001

  57. [57]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    2003

  59. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration,AtlFast3: The Next Generation of Fast Simulation in ATLAS, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.6(2022) 7, arXiv:2109.02551 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Emulating the impact of additional proton–proton interactions in the ATLAS simulation by presampling sets of inelastic Monte Carlo events, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.6(2022) 3, arXiv:2102.09495 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Werner, F.-M

    K. Werner, F.-M. Liu and T. Pierog, Parton ladder splitting and the rapidity dependence of transverse momentum spectra in deuteron–gold collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C74(2006) 044902, arXiv:hep-ph/0506232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    Pierog, I

    T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko and K. Werner,EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Local Hadronic Calibration, ATL-LARG-PUB-2009-001-2, 2008, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1112035

    arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Reconstruction, Identification, and Calibration of hadronically decaying tau leptons with the ATLAS detector for the LHC Run 3 and reprocessed Run 2 data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-044, 2022,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2827111

    arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron reconstruction and identification in the ATLAS experiment using the 2015 and 2016 LHC proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV , Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 639, arXiv:1902.04655 [physics.ins-det]. 22

    arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv:1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2015

  71. [71]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv:2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 686, arXiv:2212.07338 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Tagging and suppression of pileup jets with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-018, 2014,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1700870

    arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Transforming jet flavour tagging at ATLAS, Nature Commun.17(2026) 541, arXiv:2505.19689 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction and its significance with the ATLAS detector using140fb−1 of √𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 606, arXiv:2402.05858 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    2018

  80. [80]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Reconstruction, Energy Calibration, and Identification of Hadronically Decaying Tau Leptons in the ATLAS Experiment for Run-2 of the LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-045, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2064383

    arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.