pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1002.2581 · v1 · submitted 2010-02-12 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 19:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords POWHEGNLO calculationsparton showersMonte Carlo programsQCD matchingevent generatorshigh-energy physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The POWHEG BOX is a general code framework that lets users add next-to-leading-order calculations to shower Monte Carlo programs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the POWHEG BOX as a reusable software structure for matching NLO QCD calculations to parton shower simulations. It lays out the required theoretical pieces, the internal code layout, and the specific inputs a user must supply for any chosen process. The aim is to turn the POWHEG matching procedure into a standard tool that theorists can apply without rebuilding the matching logic each time. A reader would expect this to let NLO-accurate predictions reach a wider set of collider processes with less duplicated effort.

Core claim

In this work the authors illustrate the POWHEG BOX, a general computer code framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs according to the POWHEG method. The framework supplies the theoretical ingredients, shows how the code is organized, and describes exactly what inputs a user must provide to use it for a given process.

What carries the argument

The POWHEG BOX, a modular code framework that packages the POWHEG NLO-to-shower matching algorithm so that only process-specific matrix elements, Born kinematics, and related functions need to be supplied by the user.

If this is right

  • Any process can be treated at NLO accuracy once its matrix elements and phase-space mappings are provided.
  • The matching procedure prevents double-counting between the fixed-order NLO term and the parton-shower resummation.
  • General matching code is separated from process-specific pieces, allowing reuse across reactions.
  • Generated events carry NLO accuracy for inclusive observables while the shower supplies higher-order corrections for exclusive kinematics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modular split could speed up implementation of other matching schemes beyond POWHEG.
  • Standardized user inputs might make it easier to compare results across different shower programs.
  • The framework could serve as a template for extending matching to NNLO once analogous general methods exist.

Load-bearing premise

The POWHEG matching method can be written once in a general form that remains correct for any process as long as the user supplies the required process-dependent inputs.

What would settle it

Applying the framework to Drell-Yan production and finding that the generated NLO cross sections or distributions differ from established analytic results or prior dedicated POWHEG implementations.

read the original abstract

In this work we illustrate the POWHEG BOX, a general computer code framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs according to the POWHEG method. Aim of this work is to provide an illustration of the needed theoretical ingredients, a view of how the code is organized and a description of what a user should provide in order to use it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper illustrates the POWHEG BOX, a general computer code framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs according to the POWHEG method. It provides the theoretical ingredients (including the POWHEG Sudakov construction, phase-space mappings, and damping factors), describes the code organization, and specifies the exact user inputs required (Born, virtual, and real matrix elements together with the Born phase space).

Significance. If the supplied interface correctly implements the matching for arbitrary processes when users provide accurate inputs, the POWHEG BOX would be a significant contribution by offering a reusable, standardized tool that reduces the effort needed to achieve NLO accuracy in parton-shower simulations, thereby improving the precision of Monte Carlo predictions used in collider phenomenology.

major comments (1)
  1. The manuscript describes the required user interface and theoretical components but supplies no concrete implementation example or numerical test case (even for a simple process such as Drell-Yan or Higgs production) that would demonstrate correct NLO matching when the specified inputs are supplied. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a general, reusable framework.
minor comments (1)
  1. The notation used for the damping factors and phase-space mappings would benefit from an explicit equation or pseudocode snippet to improve clarity for users implementing new processes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, the positive assessment of the POWHEG BOX framework, and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The manuscript describes the required user interface and theoretical components but supplies no concrete implementation example or numerical test case (even for a simple process such as Drell-Yan or Higgs production) that would demonstrate correct NLO matching when the specified inputs are supplied. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a general, reusable framework.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit worked example would strengthen the presentation of the framework. The current manuscript deliberately focuses on the general theoretical ingredients, code organization, and precise user interface (Born, virtual, real matrix elements and Born phase space) so that it can serve as a reusable reference for arbitrary processes. Concrete implementations and numerical validations for processes such as Drell-Yan and Higgs production are already contained in the public POWHEG BOX code distribution and have been documented in separate publications that use the framework. To directly address the referee’s concern, we will add a new short section to the revised manuscript that supplies the complete set of user inputs for Higgs production via gluon fusion, together with a brief description of the resulting POWHEG Sudakov and a sample comparison of NLO+shower results against fixed-order NLO. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in framework description

full rationale

The manuscript presents the POWHEG BOX as a reusable code framework that packages the existing POWHEG matching method. It supplies the required theoretical ingredients (Sudakov construction, phase-space mappings, damping factors), describes code organization, and specifies the exact user-supplied inputs (Born, virtual, real matrix elements, Born phase space). These elements are defined and illustrated directly in the paper without any derivation that reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. Prior POWHEG literature is cited as the foundational method, but the framework's generality claim rests on the explicit interface and implementation details provided here, which remain independently verifiable by users supplying accurate matrix elements. No step equates a prediction to its own input or imports uniqueness solely from overlapping-author prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the prior POWHEG method as its core matching procedure. No free parameters, new entities, or additional axioms are identifiable from the abstract alone.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The POWHEG method correctly matches NLO hard-process calculations to parton showers without double-counting.
    The entire framework is built upon this established method as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5353 in / 1095 out tokens · 52877 ms · 2026-05-12T19:54:23.186096+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 32 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for single vector-like quark production in opposite-sign dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    No excess observed in search for vector-like top quark T to tH in opposite-sign dilepton final states; 95% CL upper limits on sigma times BR range from 2.0 pb at 600 GeV to 0.1 pb at 1000 GeV.

  2. Proton Structure from Neural Simulation-Based Inference at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Neural simulation-based inference on unbinned top-quark pair data at 13 TeV yields improved gluon PDF precision over traditional binned analyses while incorporating experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

  3. Multiplicative matching of neutral current deep-inelastic scattering processes at next-to-leading order in PYTHIA 8

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A multiplicative matching scheme reweights Born-level events in PYTHIA 8 so the first parton shower emission follows the real NLO matrix element, improving agreement with HERA DIS data.

  4. Simultaneous measurements of $N$-subjettiness observables in jets from gluons and light-flavour quarks, and in decays of boosted W bosons and top quarks

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS reports a simultaneous measurement of 25 N-subjettiness observables in 1-, 2-, and 3-prong jets, unfolded to stable particles with particle-level correlations for QCD modeling.

  5. Evidence of ZZ$\gamma$ production and observation of $4\ell\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    First evidence for ZZ gamma production at 3.7 sigma and observation of 4 lepton gamma at 5.0 sigma in CMS data at 13 TeV, with measured fiducial cross sections consistent with predictions.

  6. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    hep-ph 2014-05 accept novelty 7.0

    MadGraph5_aMC@NLO automates tree-level, NLO, shower-matched, and merged cross-section computations for collider processes in a unified flexible framework.

  7. NLO QCD and parton-shower effects for Higgs-boson production in association with a hard photon via vector-boson fusion

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD plus parton-shower matched implementation for VBF Higgs plus photon production, with studies showing small shower effects on Higgs observables and larger effects on sub-leading jets.

  8. Multiplicative matching of neutral current deep-inelastic scattering processes at next-to-leading order in PYTHIA 8

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new multiplicative NLO matching strategy for neutral-current DIS in PYTHIA 8 improves agreement with HERA reduced cross-section measurements and lowers uncertainties compared to unmatched simulations.

  9. Search for associated production of a Higgs boson and two vector bosons via vector boson scattering at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CMS excludes κ_VV outside 0.40-1.60 at 95% CL and constrains κ_2W and κ_2Z using VBS events with a boosted Higgs to bb decay.

  10. Search for heavy resonances decaying into four-lepton final states via light bosons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess observed in four-lepton events from heavy resonances, setting upper limits on production cross sections for dilepton masses 0.4-15 GeV using novel merged-object techniques.

  11. Search for a new heavy resonance decaying to a top quark and a neutral scalar boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 6.0

    No excess found in search for T' to top plus phi; excludes T' masses 0.85-1.3 TeV at 95% CL for SM Higgs case with 5% width, and sets cross-section limits as low as 0.1 fb.

  12. Particle transformers for identifying Lorentz-boosted Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of W bosons

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PaRT achieves >50% tagging efficiency for boosted H->WW jets at 1% background efficiency, decorrelated from jet mass, with data-to-simulation scale factors of 0.9-1.0 on 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV collisions.

  13. Dijet invariant mass of charged-particle jets in pp and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The first measurement of charged-particle dijet invariant mass spectra shows no significant nuclear modification in p-Pb collisions at low masses.

  14. Search for soft unclustered energy patterns produced in association with a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess is observed in leptonic W/Z plus high-multiplicity soft-particle events, setting limits on Higgs to SUEP decays across a range of model parameters.

  15. Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.

  16. Search for light charged Higgs bosons decaying to charm and strange quarks in $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ events in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence found for light charged Higgs bosons in ttbar events; upper limits set on B(t to H±b) of 0.07-1.12% at 95% CL for masses 40-160 GeV assuming 100% decay to cs.

  17. Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    A simultaneous fit to multiple ATLAS datasets constrains 48 SMEFT Wilson coefficients and matches subsets to 2HDM and heavy-vector models, finding consistency with the Standard Model.

  18. Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson couplings to vector bosons and fermions using the $\gamma\gamma$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated constraints from the full Run 2 dataset show no evidence for anomalous Higgs couplings in gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production modes decaying to two photons.

  19. Search for charginos and neutralinos with $B-L$ $R$-parity violating decays in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    No evidence for charginos and neutralinos in R-parity violating Higgs-decay channels; masses 150-1100 GeV excluded at 95% CL assuming equal lepton branching fractions.

  20. Study of $t\bar{t}$ threshold effects in $e\mu$ differential distributions measured in $\sqrt{s}=13$\,TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    ATLAS data on eμ invariant mass and angle distributions in 13 TeV collisions are better described by ttbar models that include color-singlet quasi-bound states near threshold, with fits showing over 3 sigma evidence a...

  21. Improved results on Higgs boson pair production in the 4b final state

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CMS sets an observed upper limit of 4.4 on the HH signal strength μ_HH in the 4b final state at 13.6 TeV, improving prior LHC results by more than a factor of two in the resolved topology.

  22. Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into a bottom quark-antiquark pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New upper limits exclude mediator masses up to 4.5 TeV for a 50 GeV dark Higgs and up to 2.5 TeV for 150 GeV in a spin-1 mediator dark matter model, the most stringent to date for these masses.

  23. Search for quantum black holes in lepton+jet final states using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    No significant excess of high-mass lepton+jet events is observed in 164 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collisions, setting 95% CL upper limits on quantum black hole production cross-section times branching ratio that reach a ...

  24. Search for the single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a W boson and a b quark using single-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    No significant excess observed in search for vector-like quark single production to Wb, setting 95% CL upper limits on κ_W as low as 0.086 near 1.4 TeV mass and excluding masses below 2.4 TeV at κ_W=0.2.

  25. An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    hep-ph 2014-10 accept novelty 4.0

    PYTHIA 8.2 is a mature C++ event generator that combines hard processes, parton showers, multiparton interactions, and string fragmentation into a complete simulation framework for high-energy collisions.

  26. Search for new physics in triple boson production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using the effective field theory approach

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    No excess in VVV production; bounds set on c_W/Λ² (-0.13 to 0.12 TeV^{-2}) and c_Hq3/Λ² (-0.24 to 0.21 TeV^{-2}) at 95% CL.

  27. Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Develops uncertainty-aware fragmentation functions PQ5Q1.1 for all-charm pentaquarks using multimodal perturbative and nonperturbative modeling for collider predictions.

  28. Threshold Top-Quark Pair-Production: Cross Sections and Key Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Near-threshold top-quark pair production cross section at 13 TeV LHC is 11.67 pb with +1.43/-1.47 pb uncertainty, including NRQCD Green's function effects and comparison to POWHEG-BOX.

  29. Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of initiatives to make LHC Monte Carlo event generations available as open data to minimize redundant simulations and resource use.

  30. Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector

    physics.ins-det 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    ATLAS Inner Detector track and vertex reconstruction maintains high efficiency, good resolution, and low fake rates for up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interactions in Run 2 and Run 3 data and simulations.

  31. The FASER experiment at the Large Hadron Collider

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    FASER is now running at the LHC and has started delivering first collider-based neutrino data along with searches for new light particles.

  32. A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    hep-ph 2022-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper provides a detailed physics and user manual for the PYTHIA 8.3 Monte Carlo event generator used in high-energy physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 31 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo alg orithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, [ hep-ph/0409146]

  2. [2]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method , JHEP 11 (2007) 070, [ 0709.2092]

  3. [3]

    Nason and G

    P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for Z pair hadroproduction, JHEP 08 (2006) 077, [ hep-ph/0606275]

  4. [4]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction , JHEP 09 (2007) 126, [ 0707.3088]. – 55 –

  5. [5]

    Latunde-Dada, S

    O. Latunde-Dada, S. Gieseke, and B. Webber, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for e+e− annihilation to hadrons , JHEP 02 (2007) 051, [ hep-ph/0612281]

  6. [6]

    Latunde-Dada, Applying the POWHEG method to top pair production and decays at the ILC, Eur

    O. Latunde-Dada, Applying the POWHEG method to top pair production and decays at the ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C58 (2008) 543–554, [ 0806.4560]

  7. [7]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG , JHEP 07 (2008) 060, [ 0805.4802]

  8. [8]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Richardson, and J. Tully, A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading Order Monte Carlo Simulation of Drell-Yan Vector Boson Production , JHEP 10 (2008) 015, [ 0806.0290]

  9. [9]

    Papaefstathiou and O

    A. Papaefstathiou and O. Latunde-Dada, NLO production of W ′ bosons at hadron colliders using the MC@NLO and POWHEG methods , JHEP 07 (2009) 044, [ 0901.3685]

  10. [10]

    NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG , JHEP 04 (2009) 002, [ 0812.0578]

  11. [11]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Richardson, and J. Tully, A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading Order Monte Carlo Simulation for Higgs Boson Production , JHEP 04 (2009) 116, [ 0903.4345]

  12. [12]

    NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions , JHEP 09 (2009) 111, [ 0907.4076]

  13. [13]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, NLO Z + 1 jet production matched with shower in POWHEG, . To appear soon

  14. [14]

    NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    P. Nason and C. Oleari, NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG , 0911.5299

  15. [15]

    Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations

    S. Frixione and B. R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 06 (2002) 029, [ hep-ph/0204244]

  16. [16]

    HERWIG 6.5: an event generator for Hadron Emission Reactions With Interfering Gluons (including supersymmetric processes)

    G. Corcella et al. , HERWIG 6: An event generator for hadron emission reactions w ith interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes) , JHEP 01 (2001) 010, [hep-ph/0011363]

  17. [17]

    Corcella et al

    G. Corcella et al. , Herwig 6.5 release note , hep-ph/0210213

  18. [18]

    PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, Pythia 6.4 physics and manual , JHEP 05 (2006) 026, [ hep-ph/0603175]

  19. [19]

    Frederix, T

    R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, and N. Greiner, Automation of the Dipole Subtraction Method in MadGraph/MadEvent, JHEP 09 (2008) 122, [ 0808.2128]

  20. [20]

    Hasegawa, S

    K. Hasegawa, S. Moch, and P. Uwer, AutoDipole – Automated generation of dipole subtraction terms – , 0911.4371

  21. [21]

    Binoth et al

    T. Binoth et al. , A proposal for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tool s and one-loop programs, 1001.1307

  22. [22]

    Hahn and M

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one-loop calculations in four and D dimensions , Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153–165, [ hep-ph/9807565]

  23. [23]

    Kurihara et al

    Y. Kurihara et al. , QCD event generators with next-to-leading order matrix- el ements and parton showers, Nucl. Phys. B654 (2003) 301–319, [ hep-ph/0212216]

  24. [24]

    Belanger et al

    G. Belanger et al. , Automatic calculations in high energy physics and Grace at o ne-loop, Phys. Rept. 430 (2006) 117–209, [ hep-ph/0308080]. – 56 –

  25. [25]

    R. K. Ellis, W. T. Giele, and Z. Kunszt, A numerical unitarity formalism for evaluating one-loop amplitudes, 0708.2398

  26. [26]

    Ossola, C.G

    G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos, and R. Pittau, CutTools: a program implementing the OPP reduction method to compute one-loop amplitudes , JHEP 03 (2008) 042, [ 0711.3596]

  27. [27]

    Binoth, J

    T. Binoth, J. P. Guillet, G. Heinrich, E. Pilon, and T. Reiter, Golem95: a numerical program to calculate one-loop tensor integrals with up to six extern al legs , Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 2317–2330, [ 0810.0992]

  28. [28]

    C. F. Berger et al. , An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Methods for One-Lo op Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 036003, [ 0803.4180]

  29. [29]

    Lazopoulos, Multi-gluon one-loop amplitudes numerically , 0812.2998

    A. Lazopoulos, Multi-gluon one-loop amplitudes numerically , 0812.2998

  30. [30]

    Winter and W

    J.-C. Winter and W. T. Giele, Calculating gluon one-loop amplitudes numerically , 0902.0094

  31. [31]

    Amsler et al

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, C. Amsler et al. , Review of particle physics , Phys. Lett. B667 (2008) 1

  32. [32]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni, and T. Stelzer, Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: the FKS subtraction , JHEP 10 (2009) 003, [ 0908.4272]

  33. [33]

    Kunszt, A

    Z. Kunszt, A. Signer, and Z. Trocsanyi, One loop helicity amplitudes for all 2 → 2 processes in QCD and N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B411 (1994) 397–442, [hep-ph/9305239]

  34. [34]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour, A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NL O QCD, Nucl. Phys. B485 (1997) 291–419, [ hep-ph/9605323]

  35. [35]

    Frixione, Z

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, and A. Signer, Three-jet cross sections to next-to-leading order , Nucl. Phys. B467 (1996) 399–442, [ hep-ph/9512328]

  36. [36]

    Frixione, A general approach to jet cross sections in QCD , Nucl

    S. Frixione, A general approach to jet cross sections in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 295–314, [ hep-ph/9706545]

  37. [37]

    Nason, MINT: a Computer Program for Adaptive Monte Carlo Integrati on and Generation of Unweighted Distributions , 0709.2085

    P. Nason, MINT: a Computer Program for Adaptive Monte Carlo Integrati on and Generation of Unweighted Distributions , 0709.2085

  38. [38]

    Boos et al., in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Physi cs at TeV Colliders, Les Houches, France, 21 May - 1 Jun 2001 [hep-ph/0109068]

    E. Boos et al. , Generic user process interface for event generators , hep-ph/0109068

  39. [39]

    Frederix, private communication

    R. Frederix, private communication. – 57 –