Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 197 references

Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-13 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sharing pre-generated LHC Monte Carlo events as open data reduces duplicated computing effort and resource costs across high energy physics.

desk verdict This is a review summarizing open data efforts for LHC Monte Carlo events, with practical examples but no new quantitative results or techniques. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.12229 v1 submitted 2026-05-12 hep-ph hep-ex

Enrico Bothmann , Jon Butterworth , Shu Chen , Eda Erdogan , Giovanni Guerrieri , Christian Gütschow , Martin Habedank , Julie M. Hogan
show 11 more authors
Venus Keus Sabine Kraml Van Dung Le Kati Lassila-Perini Rakhi Mahbubani Zach Marshall Thomas McCauley Tomasz Procter Humberto Reyes-González Andrzej Siodmok Mariana Vivas Albornoz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords LHCMonteCarloeventgenerationopendatahighenergyphysicssimulationsharingresourceefficiencycomputationalsavings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews current projects making Monte Carlo event simulations from the LHC available for public reuse instead of regenerating them each time. It presents this open event generation approach as a way to cut repeated work by different groups and lower overall computing demands. Concrete examples of how users have already benefited are included along with estimates of the financial and environmental gains. The review closes by outlining practical next steps for broader adoption.

What carries the argument

Open Event Generation, the practice of sharing completed Monte Carlo simulation datasets so others can analyze them without rerunning the generation step.

What would settle it

A documented case where reuse of shared events produced measurably worse physics results or higher total computing costs than independent generation would disprove the benefit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Making LHC Monte Carlo events openly available allows the high energy physics community to reuse existing simulations rather than recompute them, directly lowering duplicated effort and resource consumption while maintaining scientific utility.

Load-bearing premise

That sharing the events through new infrastructure can happen without creating major extra work or problems with data accuracy and versioning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Groups can complete analyses faster by starting from existing events rather than waiting for new simulations.
  • Overall electricity use and hardware wear from particle physics computing decreases as redundant runs are avoided.
  • Smaller research teams gain access to high-statistics samples they could not afford to generate themselves.
  • Standard formats and repositories for these shared events become more valuable community resources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Wider adoption could shift funding priorities from raw simulation production toward curation and validation of shared datasets.
  • Combining open events with public analysis frameworks might speed up the path from raw data to published results.
  • Environmental accounting of LHC computing would improve if reuse rates were tracked systematically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews current efforts to share LHC Monte Carlo event simulations as Open Data. It claims that Open Event Generation reduces duplication of effort and resource consumption while benefiting the High Energy Physics community overall. The paper summarizes existing projects, presents use cases and user experiences, discusses qualitative financial and environmental savings, and outlines future directions.

Significance. The review provides a useful overview of ongoing open-data initiatives in LHC Monte Carlo generation and explicitly credits collaborative projects aimed at reducing redundant computations. If the advocated sharing practices are widely adopted, they could yield meaningful reductions in computing costs and environmental impact for the LHC program while improving accessibility across the HEP community.

minor comments (2)
  1. The discussion of financial and environmental savings would be strengthened by adding at least one concrete quantitative estimate or reference to an external study, even if only as an illustrative example.
  2. A summary table listing the key open event generation projects, their current status, and main features would improve readability and allow readers to quickly compare the initiatives described.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript on Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation. The review correctly identifies the value of open data initiatives in reducing redundant simulations, computational costs, and environmental impact within the HEP community. We note the recommendation for minor revision but observe that no specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; review paper with no derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing existing open data efforts for LHC Monte Carlo events, presenting use cases, qualitative savings, and future directions. It contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. Central claims rest on descriptive examples from external efforts rather than any self-referential chain or ansatz. The structure is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems invoked.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no new derivations, fitted parameters, axioms, or postulated entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2605.12229

@misc{pith2026260512229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Open LHC Monte Carlo Event Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2605.12229}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.12229}
}
read the original abstract

The LHC physics programme involves a vast amount of Monte Carlo event simulation. This paper reviews current efforts towards sharing the generated events as Open Data. Open Event Generation helps reduce duplication of effort and resource consumption, and benefits the whole High Energy Physics community. We give examples of use cases and user experiences, discuss financial and environmental savings, and suggest future directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12229 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) CMS Drell-Yan di-electron and (b) dimuon cross section measurements com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlations across all non-empty histograms from 13 TeV ATLAS measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Preliminary plot of “loose” muon pT in a control region consisting of two same-sign muons satisfying all preselection cuts for a proposed LHC search for a two-component scalar dark matter model, for p s = 13 TeV and an integrated luminosity of 300 fb−1 . This control region will be rescaled to p s = 13.6 TeV and used to estimate the rate of non-prompt muon backgrounds to the search. negative or increasing event numb… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of price/performance for installed disk server storage at CERN (2005– 2025), measured in CHF/GB usable space (including mirrored space). The projections ex￾clude recent RAM and storage price fluctuations from AI demand. Figure taken from [123]. reduce the com…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 197 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2504.00256 , archiveprefix =

    J. Butterworth, S. Kraml, H. Prosper et al., Reinterpretation and preservation of data and analyses in HEP (2025), 2504.00256

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Simma, Fair Data and ILDG , Presented at Lattice Practices 2023, DESY, Hamburg, Germany , https://indico.desy.de/event/40590/contributions/149745/ (13 Oct

    H. Simma, Fair Data and ILDG , Presented at Lattice Practices 2023, DESY, Hamburg, Germany , https://indico.desy.de/event/40590/contributions/149745/ (13 Oct. 2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    M. Wilkinson et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016), doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016

  4. [4]

    Karsch, H

    F. Karsch, H. Simma and T. Yoshie, The International Lattice Data Grid -- towards FAIR data , PoS LATTICE2022, 244 (2023), doi:10.22323/1.430.0244, 2212.08392

    work page doi:10.22323/1.430.0244 2023

  5. [5]

    Virgo Consortium , VirgoDB , https://virgodb.dur.ac.uk/

    work page

  6. [6]

    CERN Open Data Portal , https://opendata.cern.ch/ (2026)

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    Blyth,Opticks: GPU optical photon simulation for particle physics with NVIDIA OptiX, EPJ Web Conf.214(2019) 02027, doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921402027

    A. Rizzi, G. Petrucciani and M. Peruzzi, A further reduction in CMS event data for analysis: the NANOAOD format , EPJ Web Conf. 214, 06021 (2019), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921406021

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921406021 2019

  8. [9]

    Dobbs and J

    M. Dobbs and J. B. Hansen, The HepMC C++ Monte Carlo Event Record for High Energy Physics , Tech. Rep. ATL-SOFT-2000-001 https://cds.cern.ch/record/684090, CERN, Geneva (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 197 references
  1. [10]

    cernopendata-client, https://cernopendata-client.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html (2026)

    2026

  2. [11]

    Creative Commons , CC0 1.0 UNIVERSAL , https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

  3. [12]

    The ATLAS Open Data team , Citing ATLAS , https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/documentation/ethical_legal/citation_policy (2025)

    2025

  4. [13]

    CMS Data Preservation and Open Access Group , About CMS , https://opendata.cern.ch/docs/about-cms (2026)

    2026

  5. [14]

    Maguire, L

    E. Maguire, L. Heinrich and G. Watt, HEPData: a repository for high energy physics data , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 898, 102006 (2017), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/898/10/102006, 1704.05473

    2017 doi

  6. [15]

    Bailey et al., Data and Analysis Preservation, Recasting, and Reinterpretation (2022), Contribution to Snowmass 2021, 2203.10057

    S. Bailey et al., Data and Analysis Preservation, Recasting, and Reinterpretation (2022), Contribution to Snowmass 2021, 2203.10057

    2022

  7. [16]

    CERN Open Data , Discussion forum , https://opendata-forum.cern.ch/

  8. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration , DAOD\_PHYSLITE format 2015-2016 Open Data for Research from the ATLAS experiment , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.ATLAS.9HK7.P5SI

    2015 doi

  9. [18]

    ATLAS collaboration , HEPMC format 13 TeV proton-proton Open Data from the ATLAS experiment , 10.7483/OPENDATA.ATLAS.XPJL.4L42 (2025)

    2025 doi

  10. [19]

    Bothmann et al., Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2 , SciPost Phys

    E. Bothmann et al., Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2 , SciPost Phys. 7(3), 034 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.3.034, 1905.09127

    2019 doi

  11. [20]

    Bothmann et al., Event generation with Sherpa 3 , JHEP 12, 156 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156, 2410.22148

    E. Bothmann et al., Event generation with Sherpa 3 , JHEP 12, 156 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)156, 2410.22148

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    Buckley, P

    A. Buckley, P. Ilten, D. Konstantinov, L. L\"onnblad, J. Monk, W. Pokorski, T. Przedzinski and A. Verbytskyi, The HepMC3 event record library for Monte Carlo event generators , Comput. Phys. Commun. 260, 107310 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107310, 1912.08005

    2021 doi

  13. [22]

    Barisits, T

    M. Barisits, T. Beermann, F. Berghaus, B. Bockelman, J. Bogado, D. Cameron, D. Christidis, D. Ciangottini, G. Dimitrov, M. Elsing, V. Garonne, A. di Girolamo et al., Rucio: Scientific data management, Computing and Software for Big Science 3(1) (2019), doi:10.1007/s41781-019-0026-3

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    Nielsen, R

    H. Nielsen, R. T. Fielding and T. Berners-Lee, Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0 , RFC 1945, doi:10.17487/RFC1945 (1996)

    1945 doi

  15. [24]

    Dorigo, P

    A. Dorigo, P. Elmer, F. Furano and A. Hanushevsky, Xrootd - a highly scalable architecture for data access, WSEAS Transactions on Computers 4(4), 348 (2005)

    2005

  16. [25]

    CERN , Computing and networks division, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1540872 (1996)

    1996

  17. [26]

    Bocchi, D

    E. Bocchi, D. Castro, H. Gonzalez, M. Lamanna, P. Mato, J. Moscicki, D. Piparo and E. Tejedor, Facilitating collaborative analysis in swan, EPJ Web Conf. 214, 07022 (2019), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921407022

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    295, 08023 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429508023

    Gazzarrini, Elena , Garcia Garcia, Enrique , Gosein, Domenic and Espinal, Xavier , The virtual research environment: A multi-science analysis platform, EPJ Web of Conf. 295, 08023 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429508023

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    The ATLAS Open Data team , atlasopenmagic, https://github.com/atlas-outreach-data-tools/atlasopenmagic (2025)

    2025

  20. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Using the open event generation data, https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/tutresearch/openevgentut (2025)

    2025

  21. [30]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema \^ tre, A. Mertens and M. Selvaggi, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , JHEP 02, 057 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)057, 1307.6346

    2014 doi

  22. [31]

    CMS Collaboration , CMS Open Data Guide , https://cms-opendata-guide.web.cern.ch (2026)

    2026

  23. [32]

    CMS Simulated Dataset Names , https://opendata.cern.ch/docs/cms-simulated-dataset-names (2026)

    2026

  24. [33]

    CMS Collaboration , Simulated dataset TTToSemiLeptonic\_TuneCP5\_13TeV-powheg-pythia8 in NANOAODSIM format for 2016 collision data , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.4J3Y.1CME, The link under Dataset Semantics directs to the variable listing. (2024)

    2016 doi

  25. [34]

    o nnblad and T. Sj \

    C. Bierlich, L. L \"o nnblad and T. Sj \"o strand, The PYTHIA Facility (2026), 2603.01744

    2026

  26. [35]

    Bellis, J

    M. Bellis, J. Hogan, K. Lassila-Perini, T. McCauley and S. Sekmen, CMS Open Data Workshop 2024 , https://cms-opendata-workshop.github.io/2024-07-29-CERN/ (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    Dainese, M

    A. Dainese, M. Mangano, A. B. Meyer, A. Nisati, G. Salam and M. A. Vesterinen, Report on the Physics at the HL-LHC, and Perspectives for the HE-LHC , Tech. Rep. CERN-2019-007 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2703572, Geneva, Switzerland, doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-007 (2019)

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations , Snowmass White Paper Contribution: Physics with the Phase-2 ATLAS and CMS Detectors , Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-018 https://inspirehep.net/literature/2071542, CMS-PAS-FTR-22-001 https://inspirehep.net/literature/2071528, CERN, Geneva (2022)

    2022

  29. [38]

    Drees, H

    M. Drees, H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall and J. S. Kim, CheckMATE: Confronting your Favourite New Physics Model with LHC Data , Comput. Phys. Commun. 187, 227 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.018, 1312.2591

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    Dercks, N

    D. Dercks, N. Desai, J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall and T. Weber, CheckMATE 2: From the model to the limit , Comput. Phys. Commun. 221, 383 (2017), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.08.021, 1611.09856

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    Conte, B

    E. Conte, B. Fuks and G. Serret, MadAnalysis 5, A User-Friendly Framework for Collider Phenomenology , Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.009, 1206.1599

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    Conte and B

    E. Conte and B. Fuks, Confronting new physics theories to LHC data with MADANALYSIS 5 , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33(28), 1830027 (2018), doi:10.1142/S0217751X18300272, 1808.00480

    2018 doi

  33. [42]

    Bierlich, A

    C. Bierlich, A. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth, C. Gutschow, L. Lonnblad, T. Procter, P. Richardson and Y. Yeh, Robust independent validation of experiment and theory: Rivet version 4 release note , SciPost Phys. Codeb. 36, 1 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.36, 2404.15984

    2024 doi

  34. [43]

    Buckley, J

    A. Buckley, J. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, H. Hoeth, L. Lonnblad, J. Monk, H. Schulz and F. Siegert, Rivet user manual , Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 2803 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.021, 1003.0694

    2013 doi

  35. [44]

    2, 2025 )

    LHC MC WG , LHC Monte Carlo WG subgroup meeting – data sharing and new workflows , https://indico.cern.ch/event/1568443/ ( Oct. 2, 2025 )

    2025

  36. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Improved Common t t Monte-Carlo Settings for ATLAS and CMS , Tech. Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-016 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2862524 (2023)

    2023

  37. [46]

    Frixione, P

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method , JHEP 11, 070 (2007), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, 0709.2092

    2007 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX , JHEP 06, 043 (2010), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, 1002.2581

    2010 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    Buckley et al., Testing new physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit , SciPost Phys

    A. Buckley et al., Testing new physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit , SciPost Phys. Core 4, 013 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.4.2.013, 2102.04377

    2021 doi

  40. [49]

    J. M. Butterworth, D. Grellscheid, M. Kr \"a mer, B. Sarrazin and D. Yallup, Constraining new physics with collider measurements of Standard Model signatures , JHEP 03, 078 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)078, 1606.05296

    2017 doi

  41. [50]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV , JHEP 12, 059 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)059, 1812.10529

    2019 doi

  42. [51]

    Erdogan and J

    E. Erdogan and J. Butterworth, Hepmc access repository, https://gitlab.cern.ch/mcnet/hepmc-access

  43. [52]

    HTCondor , Htcondor documentation, https://htcondor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

  44. [53]

    YODA Collaboration , Yoda: Yet more objects for data analysis, https://yoda.hepforge.org/

  45. [54]

    utschow, S. Prestel, M. Sch\

    E. Bothmann, A. Buckley, C. G\"utschow, S. Prestel, M. Sch\"onherr et al., A standard convention for particle-level monte carlo event-variation weights, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 007 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.1.007, 2203.08230

    2023 doi

  46. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Generator event weights, https://opendata.atlas.cern/docs/data/for_research/evgen_weights (2026)

    2026

  47. [56]

    J. Y. Araz, A. Buckley, B. Fuks, H. Reyes-Gonzalez, W. Waltenberger, S. L. Williamson and J. Yellen, Strength in numbers: Optimal and scalable combination of LHC new-physics searches , SciPost Phys. 14(4), 077 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.077, 2209.00025

    2023 doi

  48. [57]

    Yellen, Selection techniques for optimal meta-analysis of beyond standard model physics , Ph.D

    J. Yellen, Selection techniques for optimal meta-analysis of beyond standard model physics , Ph.D. thesis, Glasgow U., doi:10.5525/gla.thesis.85009 (2025)

    2025 doi

  49. [58]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential cross-sections in the lepton+jets channel in pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , JHEP 11, 191 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)191, 1708.00727

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production in association with jets in pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10, 159 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)159, 1802.06572

    2018 doi

  51. [60]

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production with additional heavy-flavour jets in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 04, 046 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)046, 1811.12113

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    Aad et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential and double-differential cross-sections in the +jets channel with pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Eur

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of top-quark pair differential and double-differential cross-sections in the +jets channel with pp collisions at s =13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(12), 1028 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7525-6, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80,...

    2019 doi

  53. [62]

    Aaboud et al., Measurement of the cross section for isolated-photon plus jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurement of the cross section for isolated-photon plus jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B 780, 578 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.035, 1801.00112

    2018 doi

  54. [63]

    G. Aad et al., Measurement of isolated-photon plus two-jet production in pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 03, 179 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)179, 1912.09866

    2020 doi

  55. [64]

    Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production in leptonic final states at s =13 TeV in ATLAS , Eur

    M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections of t t production in leptonic final states at s =13 TeV in ATLAS , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(5), 382 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6849-6, 1812.01697

    2019 doi

  56. [65]

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections of t t production in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 10, 191 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)191, 2403.09452

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    M. Aaboud et al., Searches for scalar leptoquarks and differential cross-section measurements in dilepton-dijet events in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS experiment , Eur. Phys. J. C 79(9), 733 (2019), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-01...

    2019 doi

  58. [67]

    G. Aad et al., Measurement of the t t production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in e dilepton events from pp collisions at s =13\, TeV with the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C 80(6), 528 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7907-9, 1910.08819

    2020 doi

  59. [68]

    G. Aad et al., Measurements of W^+W^-+ 1 jet production cross-sections in pp collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 06, 003 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)003, 2103.10319

    2021 doi

  60. [69]

    G. Aad et al., Inclusive and differential cross-sections for dilepton t t production measured in s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 07, 141 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)141, 2303.15340

    2023 doi

  61. [70]

    Chen et al., in preparation

    S. Chen et al., in preparation

  62. [71]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond , JHEP 06, 128 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128, 1106.0522

    2011 doi

  63. [72]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , JHEP 07...

    2014 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    G. Aad et al., Tools for estimating fake/non-prompt lepton backgrounds with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Journal of Instrumentation 18(11), T11004 (2023), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/11/T11004

    2023 doi

  65. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using \(36\, fb ^ -1 \) of \( s = 13\, TeV \) \(pp\) collision data with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 06, 108 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)108, HE...

    2018 doi

  66. [76]

    Buckley, L

    A. Buckley, L. Corpe, M. Habedank and T. Procter, Enabling stable preservation of ML algorithms in high-energy physics with petrifyML (2025), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.11830, 2509.11830

    2025 doi

  67. [77]

    Baro n , M

    P. Baro n , M. H. Seymour and A. Si \'o dmok, Novel approach to measure quark/gluon jets at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(1), 28 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12363-4, 2307.15378

    2024 doi

  68. [78]

    Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual , Eur

    M. Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual , Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639 (2008), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9, 0803.0883

    2008 doi

  69. [79]

    Bellm et al., Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , Eur

    J. Bellm et al., Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , Eur. Phys. J. C 76(4), 196 (2016), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4018-8, 1512.01178

    2016 doi

  70. [80]

    Bewick et al., Herwig 7.3 release note , Eur

    G. Bewick et al., Herwig 7.3 release note , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(10), 1053 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13211-9, 2312.05175

    2024 doi

  71. [81]

    Bellm et al., The Physics of Herwig 7 (2025), 2512.16645

    J. Bellm et al., The Physics of Herwig 7 (2025), 2512.16645

    2025

  72. [82]

    CMS Collaboration , Jet primary dataset in AOD format from RunB of 2011 (/Jet/Run2011B-12Oct2013-v1/AOD) , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.5JYA.HKSG (2022)

    2011 doi

  73. [83]

    CMS Collaboration , Jet primary dataset in AOD format from Run of 2012 (/Jet/Run2012A-22Jan2013-v1/AOD) , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.WVJ9.YVN2 (2017)

    2012 doi

  74. [84]

    CMS Collaboration , JetHT primary dataset in MINIAOD format from RunH of 2016 (/JetHT/Run2016H-UL2016\_MiniAODv2-v2/MINIAOD) , doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.LT9E.T7RQ (2024)

    2016 doi

  75. [85]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti- k_t jet clustering algorithm , JHEP 04, 063 (2008), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063, 0802.1189

    2008 doi arXiv

  76. [86]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual , Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2, 1111.6097

    2012 doi

  77. [87]

    CMS Collaboration , Pileup Removal Algorithms , Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-JME-14-001 https://cds.cern.ch/record/1751454, CERN, Geneva (2014)

    2014

  78. [88]

    Cowan, A survey of unfolding methods for particle physics, In Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, vol

    G. Cowan, A survey of unfolding methods for particle physics, In Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics, vol. C0203181, pp. 248--257 (2002)

    2002

  79. [89]

    H\"ocker and V

    A. H\"ocker and V. Kartvelishvili, SVD approach to data unfolding , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 372, 469 (1996), doi:10.1016/0168-9002(95)01478-0

    1996 doi

  80. [90]

    Adye, Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold (2011), 1105.1160

    T. Adye, Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold (2011), 1105.1160

    2011

  81. [91]

    CMS Collaboration , Simulated QCD dataset in MINIAODSIM format for 2016 collision data , CERN Open Data Portal, doi:10.7483/OPENDATA.CMS.YYED.6QT9 (2024)

    2016 doi

  82. [92]

    Van Dung Le , Extraction of quark/gluon jets angularities at the LHC using OpenData , Talk at the Cracow Epiphany Conference 2026, https://indico.cern.ch/event/1594628/contributions/6845919/ (2026)

    2026

  83. [93]

    Kasieczka et al., The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics , Rept

    G. Kasieczka et al., The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics , Rept. Prog. Phys. 84(12), 124201 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac36b9, 2101.08320

    2020 doi

  84. [94]

    Amram et al., CaloChallenge 2022: a community challenge for fast calorimeter simulation , Rept

    O. Amram et al., CaloChallenge 2022: a community challenge for fast calorimeter simulation , Rept. Prog. Phys. 88(11), 116201 (2025), doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ae1304, 2410.21611

    2022 doi

  85. [95]

    Adam-Bourdarios, G

    C. Adam-Bourdarios, G. Cowan, C. Germain-Renaud, I. Guyon, B. Kégl and D. Rousseau, The higgs machine learning challenge, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 664(7), 072015 (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/7/072015

    2015 doi

  86. [96]

    Chakkappai et al., Fair Universe Higgs Uncertainty Challenge , In 2nd European AI for Fundamental Physics Conference (2025), 2509.22247

    R. Chakkappai et al., Fair Universe Higgs Uncertainty Challenge , In 2nd European AI for Fundamental Physics Conference (2025), 2509.22247

    2025

  87. [97]

    Aarrestad et al., The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collider , SciPost Phys

    T. Aarrestad et al., The Dark Machines Anomaly Score Challenge: Benchmark Data and Model Independent Event Classification for the Large Hadron Collider , SciPost Phys. 12(1), 043 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.043, 2105.14027

    2022 doi

  88. [98]

    H. Qu, C. Li and S. Qian, Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging (2022), 2202.03772

    2022

  89. [99]

    McKeown, P

    P. McKeown, P. Raikwar and A. Zaborowska, LEMURS dataset: Large-scale multi-detector ElectroMagnetic Universal Representation of Showers (2025), 2509.05108

    2025

  90. [100]

    Elitez, P

    D. Elitez, P. Gessinger, D. Murnane, M. S. Raaholt, A. Salzburger, S. K. Skov, A. Stefl and A. Zaborowska, Colliderml: The first release of an opendatadetector high-luminosity physics benchmark dataset (2025), 2512.15230

    2025

  91. [101]

    W. Bhimji et al., FAIR universe higgs ML uncertainty dataset and competition , In The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, https://openreview.net/forum?id=F48NfH4NFE (2025)

    2025

  92. [102]

    Amram, L

    O. Amram, L. Anzalone, J. Birk, D. A. Faroughy, A. Hallin, G. Kasieczka, M. Kr \"a mer, I. Pang, H. Reyes-Gonzalez and D. Shih, Aspen Open Jets: unlocking LHC data for foundation models in particle physics , Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6(3), 030601 (2025), doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad...

    2025 doi

  93. [103]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Machine-learning techniques for model-independent searches in dijet final states (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.16656501, 2512.20395

    A. Hayrapetyan et al., Machine-learning techniques for model-independent searches in dijet final states (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.16656501, 2512.20395

    2025 doi

  94. [104]

    a mer, L. Lang, R. Mastandrea, L. Moureaux, A. M \

    R. Das, M. Hein, G. Kasieczka, M. Kr \"a mer, L. Lang, R. Mastandrea, L. Moureaux, A. M \"u ck and D. Shih, Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection (2026), 2604.20965

    2026 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Vaselli, A

    F. Vaselli, A. Rizzi, F. Cattafesta and G. Cicconofri, FlashSim: Accelerating HEP simulation with an end-to-end Machine Learning framework , EPJ Web Conf. 295, 09020 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429509020

    2024 doi

  96. [106]

    Agostinelli et al., GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit , Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003), doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  97. [107]

    Vaselli, F

    F. Vaselli, F. Cattafesta, P. Asenov and A. Rizzi, End-to-end simulation of particle physics events with flow matching and generator oversampling , Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5(3), 035007 (2024), doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad563c, 2402.13684

    2024 doi

  98. [108]

    Cappelli, G

    P. Cappelli, G. Grosso, M. Letizia, H. Reyes-Gonz \'a lez and M. Zanetti, Learning to Validate Generative Models: a Goodness-of-Fit Approach (2025), 2511.09118

    2025

  99. [109]

    Amram, L

    O. Amram, L. Anzalone, J. Birk, D. A. Faroughy, A. Hallin, G. Kasieczka, M. Kr \"a mer, I. Pang, H. Reyes-Gonzalez and D. Shih, Aspen open jets: Monte carlo, doi:10.25592/uhhfdm.18610 (2026)

    2026 doi

  100. [110]

    Bhimji, C

    W. Bhimji, C. Harris, V. Mikuni and B. Nachman, OmniLearned: A Foundation Model Framework for All Tasks Involving Jet Physics (2025), 2510.24066

    2025

  101. [111]

    Li et al., Accelerating Resonance Searches via Signature-Oriented Pre-training (2024), 2405.12972

    C. Li et al., Accelerating Resonance Searches via Signature-Oriented Pre-training (2024), 2405.12972

    2024

  102. [112]

    Aad et al., Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector , JINST 19(08), P08018 (2024), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/P08018, 2407.20127

    G. Aad et al., Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector , JINST 19(08), P08018 (2024), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/P08018, 2407.20127

    2024 doi

  103. [113]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Carpe Datum: Scaling Behavior of Transformers for Heavy Hadron Flavor Identification , Tech. Rep. ATL-SOFT-PUB-2026-002 https://inspirehep.net/literature/3114069 (2026)

    2026

  104. [114]

    M. Vigl, N. Hartman, M. Kagan and L. Heinrich, Neural Scaling Laws for Boosted Jet Tagging (2026), 2602.15781

    2026

  105. [115]

    Palmer and B

    C. Palmer and B. Kronheim, Improving statistical precision in monte carlo samples with negative weights via reweighting and uncertainty quantification, Phys. Rev. D 113, 012003 (2026), doi:10.1103/k8w6-wn37, 2510.16217

    2026 doi

  106. [116]

    J. Y. Araz et al., Les Houches guide to reusable ML models in LHC analyses (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCommRep.3, 2312.14575

    2023 doi

  107. [117]

    Bieringer, G

    S. Bieringer, G. Kasieczka, J. Kieseler and M. Trabs, Classifier surrogates: sharing AI-based searches with the world , Eur. Phys. J. C 84(9), 972 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13353-w, 2402.15558

    2024 doi

  108. [118]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Job accounting dashboard, https://monit-grafana.cern.ch/d/000000696/job-accounting-historical-data?orgId=17 (2026)

    2026

  109. [119]

    Giordano et al., HEPScore: A new CPU benchmark for the WLCG , EPJ Web of Conf

    D. Giordano et al., HEPScore: A new CPU benchmark for the WLCG , EPJ Web of Conf. 295, 07024 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429507024, 2306.08118

    2024 doi

  110. [120]

    The HEPIX working group , HEP Benchmark Suite v3 , https://github.com/HEPiX-Forum/hepix-forum.github.io/blob/339dc734fe97f6568ced0ab8fc2ef2607534daf0/_data/HS23scores.csv (2025)

    2025

  111. [121]

    WLCG , Central WLCG Accounting data , https://monit-grafana.cern.ch/d/6rLvYKhZl/central-wlcg-accounting-data?orgId=20 (2026)

    2026

  112. [122]

    F. B. Megino et al., Operational Experience and R&D results using the Google Cloud for High Energy Physics in the ATLAS experiment , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39(13-14), 2450054 (2024), doi:10.1142/S0217751X24500544, 2403.15873

    2024 doi

  113. [123]

    Sciabà, Private communication (2026)

    A. Sciabà, Private communication (2026)

    2026

  114. [124]

    Espinal, Private communication (2026)

    X. Espinal, Private communication (2026)

    2026

  115. [125]

    Schulz, Private communication (2026)

    M. Schulz, Private communication (2026)

    2026

  116. [126]

    Google Cloud service , Compute engine pricing, https://cloud.google.com/compute/all-pricing (2026)

    2026

  117. [127]

    Google Cloud service , Storage pricing, https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing (2026)

    2026

  118. [128]

    Google Cloud service , Networking pricing, https://cloud.google.com/network-tiers/pricing (2026)

    2026

  119. [129]

    Swiss National Bank , Snb data portal, https://data.snb.ch/en/topics/ziredev/cube/devkum (2026)

    2026

  120. [130]

    ATLAS Collaboration , Total Cost of Ownership and Evaluation of Google Cloud Resources for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC , Comput Softw Big Sci 9(2) (2025), doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00128-x

    2025 doi

  121. [131]

    ATLAS Collaboration , ATLAS Software and Computing HL-LHC Roadmap , Tech. Rep. CERN-LHCC-2022-005 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2802918/ (2022)

    2022

  122. [132]

    CMS collaboration , CMS Offline Software and Computing for HL-LHC Conceptual Design Report , Tech. Rep. CERN-LHCC-2026-003 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2957472/, CERN (2026)

    2026

  123. [133]

    World Semiconductor Trade Statistics , Global semiconductor market approaches usd 1 trillion in 2026, https://www.wsts.org/esraCMS/extension/media/f/WST/7310/WSTS_FC-Release-2025_11.pdf (2025)

    2026

  124. [134]

    , Fourth quarter results, https://s2.q4cdn.com/299287126/files/doc_earnings/2025/q4/earnings-result/AMZN-Q4-2025-Earnings-Release.pdf (2025)

    Amazon.com, Inc. , Fourth quarter results, https://s2.q4cdn.com/299287126/files/doc_earnings/2025/q4/earnings-result/AMZN-Q4-2025-Earnings-Release.pdf (2025)

    2025

  125. [135]

    , Fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 results, https://s206.q4cdn.com/479360582/files/doc_financials/2025/q4/2025q4-alphabet-earnings-release.pdf (2025)

    Alphabet Inc. , Fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 results, https://s206.q4cdn.com/479360582/files/doc_financials/2025/q4/2025q4-alphabet-earnings-release.pdf (2025)

    2025

  126. [136]

    Meta Platforms, Inc. , Fourth quarter and full year 2025 results, https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2026/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2025-Results/default.aspx (2025)

    2025

  127. [137]

    Microsoft Corporation , Earnings release fy25 q4, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/earnings/FY-2025-Q4/performance (2025)

    2025

  128. [138]

    Banerjee et al., Environmental sustainability in basic research

    S. Banerjee et al., Environmental sustainability in basic research. A perspective from HECAP+ , JINST 20, P03012 (2025), doi:10.1088/1748-0221/20/03/P03012, 2306.02837

    2025 doi

  129. [139]

    Gupta, Y

    U. Gupta, Y. G. Kim, S. Lee, J. Tse, H. S. Lee, G. Wei, D. Brooks and C. Wu, Chasing carbon: The elusive environmental footprint of computing, CoRR abs/2011.02839 (2020), doi:10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00076, 2011.02839

    2011 doi

  130. [140]

    Dell Technologies , Enterprise Infrastructure Planning Tool , https://eipt.dell.com/#/workspace

  131. [141]

    Britton, S

    D. Britton, S. Campana and B. Panzer-Stradel, A holistic study of the WLCG energy needs for the LHC scientific program , EPJ Web of Conf. 295, 04001 (2024), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429504001

    2024 doi

  132. [142]

    Data Page: Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation

    “Data Page: Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation”, part of the following publication: Hannah Ritchie, Pablo Rosado, and Max Roser (2023) - “Energy”. Data adapted from Ember. Retrieved from https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20260304-094028/grapher/carbon-intens...

    2023

  133. [143]

    DELL Technologies , Product carbon footprint - P ower E dge C6520 , https://www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-us/products/servers/briefs-summaries/poweredge-c6520-pcf-report.pdf (2022)

    2022

  134. [144]

    Aad et al., Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC , Eur

    G. Aad et al., Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC , Eur. Phys. J. C 85(3), 234 (2025), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13701-w, 2404.06335

    2025 doi

  135. [145]

    Google Cloud Platform , Regional carbon intensity data for electricity powering Google Cloud data centres , https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/region-carbon-info/blob/main/data/yearly/2024.csv (2024)

    2024

  136. [146]

    rep., Google, https://sustainability.google/reports/google-2025-environmental-report

    Environmental Report , Tech. rep., Google, https://sustainability.google/reports/google-2025-environmental-report

    2025

  137. [147]

    International Energy Agency , World energy outlook 2025, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2025 (2025)

    2025

  138. [148]

    Alwall et al., A Standard format for Les Houches event files , Comput

    J. Alwall et al., A Standard format for Les Houches event files , Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 300 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.010, hep-ph/0609017

    2007 doi

  139. [149]

    J. R. Andersen et al., Les Houches 2013: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report (2014), 1405.1067

    2013

  140. [150]

    H \"o che, S

    S. H \"o che, S. Prestel and H. Schulz, Simulation of Vector Boson Plus Many Jet Final States at the High Luminosity LHC , Phys. Rev. D 100(1), 014024 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014024, 1905.05120

    2019 doi

  141. [151]

    u tschow, S. H \

    E. Bothmann, T. Childers, C. G \"u tschow, S. H \"o che, P. Hovland, J. Isaacson, M. Knobbe and R. Latham, Efficient precision simulation of processes with many-jet final states at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 109(1), 014013 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014013, 2309.13154

    2024 doi

  142. [152]

    Bothmann, T

    E. Bothmann, T. Childers, W. Giele, S. H \"o che, J. Isaacson and M. Knobbe, A portable parton-level event generator for the high-luminosity LHC , SciPost Phys. 17(3), 081 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.3.081, 2311.06198

    2024 doi

  143. [153]

    Hageb \"o ck, D

    S. Hageb \"o ck, D. Massaro, O. Mattelaer, S. Roiser, A. Valassi and Z. Wettersten, Data-parallel leading-order event generation in MadGraph5 \_ aMC@NLO (2025), 2507.21039

    2025

  144. [154]

    u tschow, S. H \

    E. Bothmann, A. Buckley, I. A. Christidi, C. G \"u tschow, S. H \"o che, M. Knobbe, T. Martin and M. Sch \"o nherr, Accelerating LHC event generation with simplified pilot runs and fast PDFs , Eur. Phys. J. C 82(12), 1128 (2022), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11087-1, 2209.00843

    2022 doi

  145. [155]

    Bishara and M

    F. Bishara and M. Montull, Machine learning amplitudes for faster event generation , Phys. Rev. D 107(7), L071901 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L071901, 1912.11055

    2023 doi

  146. [156]

    Badger and J

    S. Badger and J. Bullock, Using neural networks for efficient evaluation of high multiplicity scattering amplitudes , JHEP 06, 114 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)114, 2002.07516

    2020 doi

  147. [157]

    Aylett-Bullock, S

    J. Aylett-Bullock, S. Badger and R. Moodie, Optimising simulations for diphoton production at hadron colliders using amplitude neural networks , JHEP 08, 066 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)066, 2106.09474

    2021 doi

  148. [158]

    Ma \^ tre and H

    D. Ma \^ tre and H. Truong, A factorisation-aware Matrix element emulator , JHEP 11, 066 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)066, 2107.06625

    2021 doi

  149. [159]

    Danziger, T

    K. Danziger, T. Jan en, S. Schumann and F. Siegert, Accelerating Monte Carlo event generation -- rejection sampling using neural network event-weight estimates , SciPost Phys. 12, 164 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.164, 2109.11964

    2022 doi

  150. [160]

    Winterhalder, V

    R. Winterhalder, V. Magerya, E. Villa, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, A. Butter, G. Heinrich and T. Plehn, Targeting multi-loop integrals with neural networks , SciPost Phys. 12(4), 129 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.4.129, 2112.09145

    2022 doi

  151. [161]

    Badger, A

    S. Badger, A. Butter, M. Luchmann, S. Pitz and T. Plehn, Loop amplitudes from precision networks , SciPost Phys. Core 6, 034 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.2.034, 2206.14831

    2023 doi

  152. [162]

    Jan en, D

    T. Jan en, D. Ma \^ tre, S. Schumann, F. Siegert and H. Truong, Unweighting multijet event generation using factorisation-aware neural networks , SciPost Phys. 15(3), 107 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.107, 2301.13562

    2023 doi

  153. [163]

    Ma \^ tre and H

    D. Ma \^ tre and H. Truong, One-loop matrix element emulation with factorisation awareness , JHEP 05, 159 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)159, 2302.04005

    2023 doi

  154. [164]

    H. Bahl, N. Elmer, L. Favaro, M. Haussmann, T. Plehn and R. Winterhalder, Accurate surrogate amplitudes with calibrated uncertainties , SciPost Phys. Core 8, 073 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.4.073, 2412.12069

    2025 doi

  155. [165]

    Brehmer, V

    J. Brehmer, V. Bres \'o , P. de Haan, T. Plehn, H. Qu, J. Spinner and J. Thaler, A Lorentz-equivariant transformer for all of the LHC , SciPost Phys. 19(4), 108 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.4.108, 2411.00446

    2025 doi

  156. [166]

    Bres \'o -Pla, G

    V. Bres \'o -Pla, G. Heinrich, V. Magerya and A. Olsson, Interpolating amplitudes , SciPost Phys. 19(5), 123 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.5.123, 2412.09534

    2025 doi

  157. [167]

    H. Bahl, N. Elmer, T. Plehn and R. Winterhalder, Amplitude Uncertainties Everywhere All at Once , SciPost Phys. 20, 083 (2026), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.20.3.083, 2509.00155

    2026 doi arXiv

  158. [168]

    Herrmann, T

    T. Herrmann, T. Jan en, M. Schenker, S. Schumann and F. Siegert, Accelerating multijet-merged event generation with neural network matrix element surrogates , SciPost Phys. 20, 071 (2026), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.20.3.071, 2506.06203

    2026 doi

  159. [169]

    Favaro, G

    L. Favaro, G. Gerhartz, F. A. Hamprecht, P. Lippmann, S. Pitz, T. Plehn, H. Qu and J. Spinner, Lorentz-Equivariance without Limitations (2025), 2508.14898

    2025

  160. [170]

    J. M. Villadamigo, R. Frederix, T. Plehn, T. Vitos and R. Winterhalder, FASTColor -- Full-color Amplitude Surrogate Toolkit for QCD (2025), 2509.07068

    2025

  161. [171]

    Beccatini, F

    L. Beccatini, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and R. Winterhalder, Amplitude Surrogates for Multi-Jet Processes (2025), 2512.11036

    2025

  162. [172]

    H. Bahl, J. Braun, G. Heinrich, T. Plehn and R. Revelli, How to Trust Learned Loop Amplitudes (2026), 2601.00950

    2026

  163. [173]

    Bendavid, Efficient Monte Carlo Integration Using Boosted Decision Trees and Generative Deep Neural Networks (2017), 1707.00028

    J. Bendavid, Efficient Monte Carlo Integration Using Boosted Decision Trees and Generative Deep Neural Networks (2017), 1707.00028

    2017

  164. [174]

    M. D. Klimek and M. Perelstein, Neural Network-Based Approach to Phase Space Integration , SciPost Phys. 9, 053 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.4.053, 1810.11509

    2020 doi

  165. [175]

    I.-K. Chen, M. D. Klimek and M. Perelstein, Improved neural network Monte Carlo simulation , SciPost Phys. 10(1), 023 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.1.023, 2009.07819

    2021 doi

  166. [176]

    Bothmann, T

    E. Bothmann, T. Jan en, M. Knobbe, T. Schmale and S. Schumann, Exploring phase space with Neural Importance Sampling , SciPost Phys. 8(4), 069 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.4.069, 2001.05478

    2020 doi

  167. [177]

    C. Gao, S. H\"oche, J. Isaacson, C. Krause and H. Schulz, Event Generation with Normalizing Flows , Phys. Rev. D 101(7), 076002 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.076002, 2001.10028

    2020 doi

  168. [178]

    C. Gao, J. Isaacson and C. Krause, i-flow: High-dimensional Integration and Sampling with Normalizing Flows , Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1(4), 045023 (2020), doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abab62, 2001.05486

    2020 doi

  169. [179]

    Heimel, R

    T. Heimel, R. Winterhalder, A. Butter, J. Isaacson, C. Krause, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Plehn, MadNIS - Neural multi-channel importance sampling , SciPost Phys. 15(4), 141 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.141, 2212.06172

    2023 doi

  170. [180]

    Verheyen, Event Generation and Density Estimation with Surjective Normalizing Flows , SciPost Phys

    R. Verheyen, Event Generation and Density Estimation with Surjective Normalizing Flows , SciPost Phys. 13(3), 047 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.047, 2205.01697

    2022 doi

  171. [181]

    Heimel, N

    T. Heimel, N. Huetsch, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, T. Plehn and R. Winterhalder, The MadNIS reloaded , SciPost Phys. 17(1), 023 (2024), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.023, 2311.01548

    2024 doi

  172. [182]

    Deutschmann and N

    N. Deutschmann and N. G \"o tz, Accelerating HEP simulations with Neural Importance Sampling , JHEP 03, 083 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)083, 2401.09069

    2024 doi

  173. [183]

    Heimel, O

    T. Heimel, O. Mattelaer, T. Plehn and R. Winterhalder, Differentiable MadNIS-Lite , SciPost Phys. 18, 017 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.1.017, 2408.01486

    2025 doi

  174. [184]

    Bothmann, T

    E. Bothmann, T. Jan en, M. Knobbe, B. Schmitzer and F. Sinz, Efficient many-jet event generation with Flow Matching (2025), 2506.18987

    2025

  175. [185]

    Jan en, R

    T. Jan en, R. Poncelet and S. Schumann, Sampling NNLO QCD phase space with normalizing flows , JHEP 09, 194 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)194, 2505.13608

    2025 doi

  176. [186]

    Bothmann, T

    E. Bothmann, T. Jan en, M. Knobbe, B. Schmitzer and F. Sinz, Monte Carlo Event Generation with Continuous Normalizing Flows (2026), 2604.03511

    2026 arXiv

  177. [187]

    Heimel, O

    T. Heimel, O. Mattelaer and R. Winterhalder, MadSpace -- Event Generation for the Era of GPUs and ML (2026), 2602.06895

    2026

  178. [188]

    De Crescenzo, J

    G. De Crescenzo, J. M. Villadamigo, N. Elmer, T. Heimel, T. Plehn, R. Winterhalder and M. Zaro, MadNIS at NLO (2026), 2603.22407

    2026 arXiv

  179. [189]

    G. Guerrieri et al., Current CERN platforms for reproducible and interactive scientific analysis , Invited contribution to the 9th workshop on the Reinterpretation of the LHC Results for New Physics , https://indico.cern.ch/event/1466101/contributions/6363705/ (2025)

    2025

  180. [190]

    Šimko et al., Reana: A system for reusable research data analyses, EPJ Web Conf

    T. Šimko et al., Reana: A system for reusable research data analyses, EPJ Web Conf. 214, 06034 (2019), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921406034

    2019 doi

  181. [191]

    , Gardner, R

    Galewsky, B. , Gardner, R. , Gray, L. , Neubauer, M. , Pivarski, J. , Proffitt, M. , Vukotic, I. , Watts, G. and Weinberg, M. , Servicex a distributed, caching, columnar data delivery service, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 04043 (2020), doi:10.1051/epjconf/202024504043

    2020 doi

  182. [192]

    CERN , CERN joins the build-up phase of EOSC Federation , https://home.cern/news/news/computing/cern-joins-build-phase-eosc-federation (2025)

    2025

  183. [193]

    Mölder et al., Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake , doi:10.12688/f1000research.29032.3 (2021)

    F. Mölder et al., Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake , doi:10.12688/f1000research.29032.3 (2021)

    2021 doi

  184. [194]

    Bernhardsson, E

    E. Bernhardsson, E. Freider and Spotify , Luigi: A python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs (2012)

    2012

  185. [195]

    Rocklin, Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task scheduling, SciPy 2015 (2015), doi:10.25080/Majora-7b98e3ed-013

    M. Rocklin, Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task scheduling, SciPy 2015 (2015), doi:10.25080/Majora-7b98e3ed-013

    2015 doi

  186. [196]

    Czakon, Z

    M. Czakon, Z. Kassabov, A. Mitov, R. Poncelet and A. Popescu, Hightea: High energy theory event analyser (2023), 2304.05993

    2023

  187. [197]

    Kluge, K

    T. Kluge, K. Rabbertz and M. Wobisch, fastNLO: Fast pQCD calculations for PDF fits (2006), hep-ph/0609285v2

    2006

  188. [198]

    Carli et al., A posteriori inclusion of parton density functions in NLO QCD final-state calculations at hadron colliders: The APPLGRID project (2009), 0911.2985

    T. Carli et al., A posteriori inclusion of parton density functions in NLO QCD final-state calculations at hadron colliders: The APPLGRID project (2009), 0911.2985

    2009

  189. [199]

    Carrazza, E

    S. Carrazza, E. R. Nocera, C. Schwan and M. Zaro, PineAPPL: combining EW and QCD corrections for fast evaluation of LHC processes , JHEP 12, 108 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)108, 2008.12789

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.