pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02594 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Evidence of ZZγ production and observation of 4ellγ in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords ZZ gamma productionfour lepton photon final stateCMS experiment13 TeV proton-proton collisionsfiducial cross sectionelectroweak gauge bosonsstandard model testmultiboson production
0
0 comments X

The pith

CMS reports the first evidence for ZZ gamma production in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the first evidence for the rare process in which two Z bosons are produced together with a photon in proton-proton collisions. Using the full Run 2 dataset of 138 inverse femtobarns at 13 TeV, the analysis selects events in which both Z bosons decay to leptons and the photon is isolated, yielding a measured fiducial cross section of 60 +27 -22 ab that matches the standard-model prediction of 47.56 ab. The observed excess over background reaches 3.7 standard deviations in a phase-space region that requires the photon to be well separated from the leptons and the Z-gamma invariant mass to exceed 100 GeV. A parallel inclusive measurement of the four-lepton-plus-photon final state, which admits final-state radiation, reaches 5.0 standard deviations. These results test the electroweak gauge structure at higher order and establish a baseline for future multiboson studies.

Core claim

The central claim is that the process pp to ZZ gamma to 4 lepton gamma has been observed for the first time, with an observed significance of 3.7 standard deviations in the fiducial region defined by photon transverse momentum above 20 GeV, absolute pseudorapidity below 2.4, angular separation from leptons greater than 0.5, Z masses between 60 and 120 GeV, and Z-gamma mass above 100 GeV. The measured fiducial cross section is 60 +27 -22 ab while the prediction is 47.56 plus or minus 0.04 ab. Removing the Z-gamma mass cut to include final-state radiation increases the observed significance to 5.0 standard deviations and the measured cross section to 156 +39 -35 ab against a prediction of 99.9

What carries the argument

The fiducial cross-section measurement performed in a kinematic region that isolates the ZZ gamma signal from final-state radiation by imposing m_Z gamma greater than 100 GeV, combined with a likelihood fit that extracts the signal strength relative to the standard-model expectation.

If this is right

  • The measured cross section agrees with the standard-model prediction, confirming the expected rate for triple electroweak boson production.
  • The result supplies a reference point against which future searches for anomalous triple-gauge couplings can be compared.
  • The same selection and fitting technique can be applied to larger data sets to improve precision on the ZZ gamma rate.
  • The inclusive four-lepton-plus-photon observation provides a combined constraint on both ZZ gamma and Z gamma gamma contributions.
  • The fiducial definition allows direct comparison with theoretical calculations performed at the same kinematic boundaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This channel can be combined with other diboson and triboson measurements to tighten limits on effective field theory operators that modify gauge-boson self-interactions.
  • Differential distributions in photon transverse momentum or Z-gamma mass could be extracted with additional data to test higher-order QCD and electroweak corrections.
  • The same final state may become sensitive to beyond-standard-model contributions at higher collision energies or luminosities.
  • Improved lepton identification or photon isolation criteria could reduce the dominant background uncertainties in future analyses.

Load-bearing premise

Background processes and detector response are modeled accurately enough by simulation that the excess in the signal region can be attributed to the ZZ gamma process rather than mismodeling.

What would settle it

A future data set in which the number of events in the signal region, after subtraction of all estimated backgrounds, is statistically consistent with zero would falsify the reported evidence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02594 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative tree-level standard model Feynman diagrams with four isolated lep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Transverse momentum (left) and pseudorapidity (right) of the leading photon passing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Post-fit mass distributions of the ZZγ system in the triboson ZZγ (left) and inclusive pp → 4ℓγ (right) regions, obtained with the cutoff-based and multivariate photon identifica￾tion, respectively. The last bin includes the events exceeding the upper bound of the x-axis. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties in the data. The hatched area represents the statistical uncertainties in the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Evidence of the production of two Z bosons and a photon in proton-proton collisions is reported for the first time in CMS. The analysis uses data collected by the CMS experiment between 2016 and 2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The first evidence for the process pp $\to$ ZZ$\gamma$ $\to$ 4$\ell\gamma$ ($\ell$ = e, $\mu$), with an observed (expected) significance of 3.7 (3.1) standard deviations in a fiducial region defined by $p_\mathrm{T}^\gamma$ $\gt$ 20 GeV, $\lvert\eta^\gamma\rvert$ $\lt$ 2.4, $\Delta R(\ell,\gamma)$ $\gt$ 0.5, $m_\text{Z}$ between 60 and 120 GeV, and the invariant mass of either of the two Z bosons combined with the photon ($m_{\text{Z}\gamma}$) larger than 100 GeV, is reported. The measured (predicted) fiducial cross section is 60$^{+27}_{-22}$ ab (47.56 $\pm$ 0.04 ab). Additionally, the inclusive production of pp $\to$ 4$\ell\gamma$ is studied by removing the $m_{\text{Z}\gamma}$ requirement to include final state radiation where one Z boson decays to 2$\ell\gamma$, yielding an observed (expected) significance of 5.0 (4.2) standard deviations and a measured (predicted) fiducial cross section of 156$^{+39}_{-35}$ ab (99.97 $\pm$ 0.09 ab).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first evidence for ZZγ production in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV in the 4ℓγ final state (ℓ=e,μ) using 138 fb⁻¹ of CMS data collected 2016-2018. It claims an observed (expected) significance of 3.7 (3.1) standard deviations in a fiducial region defined by p_T^γ>20 GeV, |η^γ|<2.4, ΔR(ℓ,γ)>0.5, 60<m_Z<120 GeV, and m_Zγ>100 GeV, with a measured fiducial cross section of 60^{+27}_{-22} ab (predicted 47.56±0.04 ab). It additionally claims observation of inclusive 4ℓγ production (removing the m_Zγ cut) at 5.0 (4.2) standard deviations with measured cross section 156^{+39}_{-35} ab (predicted 99.97±0.09 ab).

Significance. If the central result holds, this provides the first evidence for the rare ZZγ process, which tests electroweak gauge couplings and SM predictions at higher orders. The measured cross sections are consistent with theory within uncertainties, and the inclusive channel result incorporates final-state radiation contributions. The analysis uses a completed statistical framework with reported significances and uncertainties.

major comments (1)
  1. [Fiducial selection and background estimation] Fiducial region and background modeling: The 3.7σ evidence is extracted from an excess in the m_Zγ>100 GeV signal region where dominant backgrounds (ZZ+jet faking photon, Zγ+jet, non-resonant 4ℓ+γ) are taken entirely from MC simulation normalized in sidebands or control regions outside this cut. The extrapolation into the high-mass region rests on the untested assumption that MC correctly predicts both rate and shapes after detector corrections; a 25-30% mismodeling (within typical photon-fake uncertainties) would reduce observed significance below 3σ while leaving expected significance near 3.1σ. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of first evidence.
minor comments (2)
  1. Specify the exact statistical procedure (profile likelihood or counting experiment) and any nuisance parameters used to extract the 3.7σ and 5.0σ significances.
  2. [Fiducial region definition] Clarify how migration effects between signal and background regions are controlled in the fiducial definition, particularly for the m_Zγ>100 GeV cut.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and for identifying the key aspects of our background modeling that require clearer presentation. The analysis relies on a combination of data-driven normalizations and MC shapes, with full systematic uncertainties propagated to the significance. We address the concern point-by-point below and will revise the manuscript to include additional validation material.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Fiducial region and background modeling: The 3.7σ evidence is extracted from an excess in the m_Zγ>100 GeV signal region where dominant backgrounds (ZZ+jet faking photon, Zγ+jet, non-resonant 4ℓ+γ) are taken entirely from MC simulation normalized in sidebands or control regions outside this cut. The extrapolation into the high-mass region rests on the untested assumption that MC correctly predicts both rate and shapes after detector corrections; a 25-30% mismodeling (within typical photon-fake uncertainties) would reduce observed significance below 3σ while leaving expected significance near 3.1σ. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of first evidence.

    Authors: The backgrounds are normalized using data in dedicated control regions and sidebands (e.g., photon identification sidebands for the fake-photon component and low-m_Zγ regions for the non-resonant 4ℓ+γ component), while the shapes are taken from simulation. These normalizations are performed simultaneously in a binned likelihood fit that includes the signal region. The photon fake-rate uncertainty (typically 20–30%) and other background modeling uncertainties are assigned as nuisance parameters and fully propagated; the reported 3.7σ observed significance already incorporates the effect of these variations. We have performed explicit validation of the MC shapes in multiple orthogonal control regions (including m_Zγ < 100 GeV, different lepton p_T spectra, and jet-multiplicity bins), finding agreement within the assigned uncertainties. A 25–30% mismodeling beyond the quoted uncertainties would indeed be problematic, but our data-MC comparisons in the validated regions constrain such effects. To make this extrapolation more transparent, we will add a new subsection (and supplementary figures) detailing the control-region fits, the pull distributions, and the impact on significance when background normalizations are varied by ±1σ. This revision will directly address the referee’s concern without altering the central result. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in the reported ZZγ evidence

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of ZZγ production via an excess in 138 fb⁻¹ of CMS data over simulated backgrounds, yielding 3.7σ observed significance in the m_Zγ > 100 GeV fiducial region. The measured cross section (60^{+27}_{-22} ab) is extracted from data, while the predicted value (47.56 ± 0.04 ab) comes from independent SM calculations. Background modeling uses MC normalized in sidebands outside the signal cut, but this is a standard data-driven correction and does not reduce the central claim to a fitted parameter or self-definition by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the derivation chain. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result relies on Standard Model cross-section predictions and background modeling assumptions that are not independently derived in the abstract; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model calculations accurately predict the ZZ gamma and 4 lepton gamma fiducial cross sections
    The expected significances and predicted cross sections (47.56 ab and 99.97 ab) are taken from theory and used to interpret the observed excess.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5632 in / 1226 out tokens · 39474 ms · 2026-05-13T19:08:46.345536+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Measurement of Zγγproduction in p p collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of Zγγproduction in p p collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C.83(2023) 539, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11579-8,arXiv:2211.14171

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11579-8 2023

  2. [2]

    Observation of Wγγtriboson production in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of Wγγtriboson production in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B.848(2024) 138400, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138400,arXiv:2308.03041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138400 2024

  3. [3]

    Measurements of the pp→W ±γγand pp→Zγγcross sections at√s=13 TeV and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of the pp→W ±γγand pp→Zγγcross sections at√s=13 TeV and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings”,JHEP10(2021) 174, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)174,arXiv:2105.12780

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)174 2021

  4. [4]

    Observation of WZγproduction in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of WZγproduction in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector”,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 021802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.021802,arXiv:2305.16994

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.021802 2024

  5. [5]

    Observation of WZγproduction and constraints on new physics scenarios in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of WZγproduction and constraints on new physics scenarios in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 012009, doi:10.1103/cm24-665b,arXiv:2503.21977

    work page doi:10.1103/cm24-665b 2025

  6. [6]

    Observation of W +W−γproduction in p p collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of W +W−γproduction in p p collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings”,Phys. Lett. B873(2026) 140050, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140050,arXiv:2509.14070

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140050 2026

  7. [7]

    Observation of WWγproduction and search for Hγproduction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of WWγproduction and search for Hγproduction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 121901, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.121901,arXiv:2310.05164. References 9

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.121901 2024

  8. [8]

    Evidence for the production of three massive vector bosons with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Evidence for the production of three massive vector bosons with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134913, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134913,arXiv:1903.10415

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134913 2019

  9. [9]

    Observation of the production of three massive gauge bosons at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of the production of three massive gauge bosons at√s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 151802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.151802,arXiv:2006.11191

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.151802 2020

  10. [10]

    Evidence ofZZγproduction with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Evidence ofZZγproduction with the ATLAS detector”, 2026. arXiv:2602.17165. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model”,Phys. Rep.1116(2024) 301, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.001,arXiv:2403.09292

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.001 2024

  12. [12]

    Stairway to discovery: a report on the CMS programme of cross section measurements from millibarns to femtobarns

    CMS Collaboration, “Stairway to discovery: a report on the CMS programme of cross section measurements from millibarns to femtobarns”,Phys. Rep.1115(2025) 3, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.005,arXiv:2405.18661

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.005 2025

  13. [13]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.167735

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.167735 2026

  14. [14]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  15. [15]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  16. [16]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  17. [17]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  18. [18]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  19. [19]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  20. [20]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  21. [21]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  22. [22]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  23. [23]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification ofτleptons decaying to hadrons andν τ in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005,arXiv:1809.02816

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10005 2018

  24. [24]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  25. [25]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  26. [26]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  27. [27]

    The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations

    R. Frederix et al., “The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations”, JHEP07(2018)doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)185,arXiv:1804.10017

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)185 2018

  28. [28]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  29. [29]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  30. [30]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  31. [31]

    W+W−, WZ andZZproduction in the POWHEG BOX

    T. Melia, P . Nason, R. Rontsch, and G. Zanderighi, “W+W−, WZ andZZproduction in the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP11(2011) 078,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)078, arXiv:1107.5051

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2011)078 2011

  32. [32]

    W+W−, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2

    P . Nason and G. Zanderighi, “W+W−, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG-BOX-V2”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014), no. 1, 2702, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5,arXiv:1311.1365

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2702-5 2014

  33. [33]

    MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, “MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC”,Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.205(2010) 10,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011, arXiv:1007.3492

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011 2010

  34. [34]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  35. [35]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA-8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C.80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020

  36. [36]

    GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  37. [37]

    Ball, et al., JHEP04, 040 (2015)

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849. References 11

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  38. [38]

    Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, CERN, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP08(2023) 040,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)040, arXiv:2305.07532

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)040 2023

  40. [40]

    doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the reconstruction and identification of high-momentum muons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P02027,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/P02027,arXiv:1912.03516

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/02/p02027 2020

  41. [41]

    Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and Z→ℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− branching fraction in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and Z→ℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− branching fraction in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B763 (2016) 280,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.054,arXiv:1607.08834

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.10.054 2016

  42. [42]

    Measurement of vector boson scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings from events with four leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of vector boson scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings from events with four leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 682, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.020,arXiv:1708.02812

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.020 2017

  43. [43]

    Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B812(2020) 135992, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135992,arXiv:2008.07013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135992 2020

  44. [44]

    Measurement of differential ZZ + jets production cross sections in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of differential ZZ + jets production cross sections in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP10(2024) 209,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)209, arXiv:2404.02711

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)209 2024

  45. [45]

    Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state”,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 092007,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.092007, arXiv:1312.5353

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.092007 2014

  46. [46]

    Butterworth, S

    J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”,J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001,arXiv:1510.03865

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001 2016

  47. [47]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C.81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015

  48. [48]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2018) 161,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161, arXiv:1802.02613

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)161 2018

  51. [51]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool:COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big. Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614. 12 13 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, Austria W. Adam , L. Benato ,...

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024