REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluation of Thematic Coherence in Microblogs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Collecting together microblogs representing opinions about the same topics within the same timeframe is useful to a number of different tasks and practitioners. A major question is how to evaluate the quality of such thematic clusters. Here we create a corpus of microblog clusters from three different domains and time windows and define the task of evaluating thematic coherence. We provide annotation guidelines and human annotations of thematic coherence by journalist experts. We subsequently investigate the efficacy of different automated evaluation metrics for the task. We consider a range of metrics including surface level metrics, ones for topic model coherence and text generation metrics (TGMs). While surface level metrics perform well, outperforming topic coherence metrics, they are not as consistent as TGMs. TGMs are more reliable than all other metrics considered for capturing thematic coherence in microblog clusters due to being less sensitive to the effect of time windows.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A document processing pipeline for the construction of a dataset for topic modeling based on the judgments of the Italian Supreme Court
A YOLOv8x, TrOCR, and GLiNER pipeline converts Italian Supreme Court PDFs into an anonymized topic-modeling dataset, but the reported improvement over OCR-only is not supported by the paper's own Table 13.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.