Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ReSi: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Representational Similarity Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00531 v2 pith:GNOQ3H24 submitted 2024-08-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords similaritybenchmarkarchitecturesmeasuresneuralresearchrepresentationalresi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Measuring the similarity of different representations of neural architectures is a fundamental task and an open research challenge for the machine learning community. This paper presents the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating representational similarity measures based on well-defined groundings of similarity. The representational similarity (ReSi) benchmark consists of (i) six carefully designed tests for similarity measures, (ii) 24 similarity measures, (iii) 14 neural network architectures, and (iv) seven datasets, spanning over the graph, language, and vision domains. The benchmark opens up several important avenues of research on representational similarity that enable novel explorations and applications of neural architectures. We demonstrate the utility of the ReSi benchmark by conducting experiments on various neural network architectures, real world datasets and similarity measures. All components of the benchmark are publicly available and thereby facilitate systematic reproduction and production of research results. The benchmark is extensible, future research can build on and further expand it. We believe that the ReSi benchmark can serve as a sound platform catalyzing future research that aims to systematically evaluate existing and explore novel ways of comparing representations of neural architectures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Linear Representation Transferability Hypothesis: Leveraging Small Models to Steer Large Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An affine map trained on The Pile transfers steering vectors from Gemma-2B to Gemma-9B and reproduces much of the large model's native steering behavior.

Pith tools