REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 8 references
Controlled Growth of Large-Area Bilayer Tungsten Diselenides with Lateral P-N Junctions
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read By balancing a molecule that sticks tungsten to the surface against a salt that volatilizes it, the paper grows WSe2 as almost pure bilayer flakes whose 1L-2L boundaries act as p-n diodes.
desk verdict A useful bilayer WSe2 growth recipe, undercut by an unverifiable '100% bilayer' claim and a speculative mechanism; still worth refereeing. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the two-component growth promoter, 25 mM sodium cholate plus 250 mM NaCl at a 1:10 molar ratio, spin-coated with the tungsten precursor onto the substrate. It operates by balancing two channels of tungsten delivery: cholate anions enhance adsorption of WOx onto the substrate, while NaCl converts some WOx into volatile WOxCl that raises the vapor-phase tungsten flux. The paper couples this to a thermodynamic criterion, $\varepsilon_{L_1:S} - \varepsilon_{L_1:L_2} > \eta\left(\frac{\gamma}{L_2} - \frac{\gamma}{L_1}\right)$ with $\eta = 4/\sqrt{3}$, taken from a prior vertical-growth model, to predict which stacking orientations are stable: AB and AA' have nearly equal and most-favorable stacking energies, giving the dominant 0°/60° population, while 15° and 30° moiré stackings are less favorable and rarer.
What would settle it
A decisive experiment would place a clean witness substrate downstream during growth and measure the tungsten content arriving in the vapor with cholate-only, 1:10 cholate/NaCl, and NaCl-only promoters under otherwise identical conditions. The proposed mechanism predicts a monotonic increase in vapor-phase tungsten flux as NaCl is added; if the flux does not increase, or if WOxCl is absent from the vapor, the central layer-control mechanism is unsupported.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper claims that a 1:10 molar mixture of sodium cholate and sodium chloride, used as a growth promoter in chemical vapor deposition, produces WSe2 almost exclusively as bilayer flakes: in a survey of more than 500 flakes across a 1×2 cm2 area, all were bilayer, with no monolayer flakes and only rare multilayer spots, at a surface coverage of 67.8 ± 1.5%. The as-grown flakes contain sharp monolayer-bilayer lateral junctions, and electrical devices measured across those junctions show p-n diode rectification (rectification ratio 13.5 at a gate voltage of -80 V) and ambipolar transport. The paper also reports that roughly 84% of bilayer regions adopt 0° (AB) or 60° (AA') stacking, with 15° and 30° moiré twists in the remainder, and uses DFT stacking energies to argue that these populations follow from the relative thermodynamic stability of the orientations.
Load-bearing premise
The paper's layer-control story depends on the idea that sodium chloride boosts tungsten delivery by forming a vapor-borne tungsten oxychloride, but the paper never directly measures that compound or the vapor flux; if the boost comes from some other effect, the recipe could still work but the stated explanation would not be established.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The same 1:10 cholate:NaCl promoter yields preferential bilayer WS2, so the approach is not limited to WSe2.
- Monolayer-bilayer junctions are present as-grown, so lateral p-n diodes can be fabricated without post-growth stacking or transfer.
- The dominance of AB and AA' stacking agrees with the calculated stacking energies, supporting thermodynamic control of interlayer twist during CVD.
- Bilayer devices reach higher carrier mobility than monolayer devices (7.9 vs 3.5-4.3 cm2 V-1 s-1), so the layer control translates directly into a transport benefit.
Reading between the lines
- The paper's WS2 result hints that the 1:10 ratio is transferable across TMDs; a systematic ratio sweep for MoS2 and MoSe2 would show whether this is a general layer-number dial, which the paper leaves untested.
- Because no direct detection of WOxCl or vapor-phase tungsten flux is reported, a surface-chemistry or molten-salt-spreading role for NaCl remains a live alternative; a downstream witness-substrate measurement of tungsten deposition with and without NaCl would settle it.
- The as-grown twist-angle variety (0°, 15°, 30°) makes it possible to test whether the 1L-2L diode's band offset and rectification depend on stacking orientation, a question the paper does not address.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a CVD growth method for bilayer WSe2 using a 1:10 molar mixture of sodium cholate and NaCl as a growth promoter. The authors claim that, after examining more than 500 flakes over a 1×2 cm2 area, 100% of the flakes were bilayer WSe2 with a surface coverage of 67.8 ± 1.5% and lateral sizes of 40–80 μm. The growth produces star-like bilayer flakes with well-defined monolayer–bilayer junctions; these junctions show p-n diode rectification and ambipolar transport in back-gated FETs. The paper also reports a SAED survey of ~100 bilayer flakes showing twist angles of 0°/60° (84%), 30° (12%), and 15° (4%), and presents DFT calculations of stacking energies that predict the dominance of 0° (AB) and 60° (AA') stacking. The work is presented as a method for layer-controlled growth of TMDs, with extension to WS2.
Significance. If the quantitative selectivity claim is supported, this work represents a significant advance over prior reports in which bilayer content did not exceed ~80%, and it provides a scalable route to lateral 1L–2L p-n junctions for atomically thin optoelectronics. The manuscript's strengths include a detailed, reproducible growth recipe; multi-technique validation (AFM, Raman, PL, and atomic-resolution STEM) on selected flakes; twist-angle statistics; and device measurements demonstrating rectification and ambipolar transport. The DFT stacking-energy analysis is consistent with the observed twist distribution, although it is not fitted to it. The main weakness is that the headline statistics—100% bilayer selectivity and 67.8% coverage—are not backed by a transparent counting and coverage protocol, and the text contains an internal inconsistency between the '100% bilayer' statement and the admission of some multilayer regions.
major comments (4)
- [Results and Discussion, paragraph after Fig. 2c-d (main text: 'After examining >500 flakes...')] The sentence 'After examining >500 flakes over an area of 1×2 cm2, it was confirmed that 100% of the flakes were bilayer WSe2' is internally inconsistent with the next sentence, which concedes 'only a few multilayer regions (bright spots in Figure 2c)'. A few multilayer regions are non-bilayer features, so the census either excluded them or the claim should be qualified as applying only to the isolated star-like flakes. The manuscript reports no counting protocol, no sampling plan, and no per-flake layer-number verification; AFM, Raman/PL, and STEM validation are performed on selected flakes only. Because the stated advance over prior work is defined as exceeding ~80% bilayer purity, this unverified '100%' is load-bearing and must be backed by a transparent census, such as optical contrast calibrated against AFM on a random subset, with the number of images and fields counted and a clear rule for handling multilayer regions.
- [Results and Discussion, same paragraph (coverage value)] The surface coverage value '67.8 ± 1.5%' is reported without a measurement procedure: no image analysis method, threshold criterion, number of optical images analyzed, or definition of uncertainty. Please provide the full protocol, representative raw images with labeled analysis, and clarify whether the coverage is the fraction of substrate covered by bilayer WSe2 or includes monolayer and multilayer regions. Without this information, the coverage number cannot be reproduced or evaluated.
- [Results and Discussion, Figure 1 discussion and subsequent mechanism text] The proposed mechanism, in which cholate anions enhance WOx adsorption and NaCl converts WOx into volatile WOxCl to increase the vapor-phase W flux, is stated as fact in the abstract and text, but no direct evidence is presented: there is no measurement of WOxCl formation, vapor-phase W species, or surface adsorption as the NaCl concentration is varied. The observed trend (monolayer with cholate, bilayer with 1:10 mixture, multilayer with pure NaCl) is consistent with the mechanism but does not uniquely confirm it. Please either add supporting measurements (e.g., vapor-phase mass spectrometry or controlled flux measurements) or explicitly present the mechanism as a hypothesis that remains to be tested.
- [Results and Discussion, paragraph on NaCl concentration series] The sentence 'Note that all the above mentioned morphologies for the as-grown WSe2 also showed a selectivity of ~ 100% based on the statistical analysis of >500 flakes over an area of 1×2 cm2' appears immediately after descriptions of growths at 75 mM and 25 mM NaCl that 'yielded a large amount of randomly distributed 2L regions on large 1L WSe2 flakes' and 'nearly exclusively monolayer star-shape WSe2 flakes decorated with a high density of small 2L regions', respectively. As written, the statement contradicts those descriptions. Please clarify what quantity is claimed to be ~100% selective for each promoter composition, and provide the corresponding statistics separately from the optimized growth.
minor comments (4)
- [Figure 3 caption] The caption uses '(d)' twice, once for the Raman spectra and once for the photoluminescence spectra; the labels should be renumbered as (d), (e), and (f).
- [Methods, Characterization] The phrase 'holy-carbon TEM grid' should be 'holey-carbon TEM grid'.
- [Acknowledgments] The text 'E A G E R 1838412' appears to contain a typo; it should likely read 'EAGER 1838412'.
- [Results and Discussion (DFT energetics paragraph)] The reference to 'Table 1' occurs after the table is presented in the text; consider placing the table near its first mention or adjusting the order for readability.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the empirical growth and device claims are self-contained and externally benchmarked, and the twist-angle prediction is a parameter-free application of prior DFT/thermodynamic work rather than a fit to the observed distribution.
full rationale
The paper's central claims—selective bilayer WSe2 growth using a 1:10 sodium cholate:NaCl promoter, formation of 1L-2L junctions, and p-n diode rectification—are supported by direct measurements (AFM step heights, Raman/PL spectra and maps, STEM-HAADF imaging, SAED, and electrical transport). These results are not derived from the model; they are independent empirical findings benchmarked against prior literature. The '>500 flakes ... 100% bilayer' census is an empirical assertion whose counting protocol is under-described and which is partially qualified by the observation of 'only a few multilayer regions'; this is a data-verification concern, not a circular-derivation concern, and it does not make the claim an input to itself. The thermodynamic analysis does rely on the authors' previously developed growth criterion (ref. 20, with overlapping authorship) and on DFT-computed stacking energies and a Na-doped edge energy. However, the predicted dominance of 0°/60° (AB/AA') over 30° and 15° twist angles is not obtained by fitting to the SAED survey of ~100 flakes: the parameters are stated before the comparison, and the observed twist fractions are used only as consistency checks. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citation to the earlier vertical-growth model is present but is not load-bearing for the paper's independent experimental results. Therefore the circularity burden is low: score 1 for a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (2)
- Promoter molar ratio (sodium cholate : NaCl) =
1:10 (25 mM : 250 mM)
- Growth conditions (temperature, time, gas flows, Se mass) =
900 C, 10 min, 350 sccm N2 + 15 sccm H2, 150 mg Se
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption DFT with PBE exchange-correlation and DFT-D3 dispersion gives accurate stacking and edge energies for WSe2.
- domain assumption The thermodynamic criterion epsilon_L1:S - epsilon_L1:L2 > eta(gamma/L2 - gamma/L1) from the authors' prior work applies to WSe2 bilayer growth.
- domain assumption Sodium cholate enhances substrate adsorption of WOx and sodium chloride converts some WOx into volatile WOxCl, shifting W adatom flux.
- domain assumption Layer counts from optical contrast, AFM step heights, Raman shifts, and PL intensity are reliable for all >500 flakes.
- domain assumption The SAED survey of ~100 flakes is representative of the entire growth and the 0/60 degree ambiguity does not affect the frequency conclusions.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Controlled Growth of Large-Area Bilayer Tungsten Diselenides with Lateral P-N Junctions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GO2DVLXP
@misc{pith2026190809013,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Controlled Growth of Large-Area Bilayer Tungsten Diselenides with Lateral P-N Junctions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GO2DVLXP}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09013}
}
read the original abstract
Bilayer two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) materials are attracting increasing attention due to their predicted high quality electronic and optical properties. Here we demonstrate dense, selective growth of WSe2 bilayer flakes by chemical vapor deposition with the use of a 1:10 molar mixture of sodium cholate and sodium chloride as the growth promoter to control the local diffusion of W-containing species. A large fraction of the bilayer WSe2 flakes showed a 0 and 60o twist between the two layers, while moire 15 and 30o-twist angles were also observed. Well-defined monolayer-bilayer junctions were formed in the as-grown bilayer WSe2 flakes, and these interfaces exhibited p-n diode rectification and an ambipolar transport characteristic. This work provides an efficient method for the layer-controlled growth of 2D materials, in particular, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides and promotes their applications in next-generation electronic and optoelectronic devices.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
(1) Cai, Z.; Liu, B.; Zou, X.; Cheng, H.-M., Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth and Applications of Two-Dimensional Materials and Their Heterostructures. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6091-6133. (2) Frisenda, R.; Molina-Mendoza, A. J.; Mueller, T.; Castellan os-Gomez, A.; van der Zant, H. S. J., Atomically Thin P–N Junctions Based on Two-Dimensional Materials. Chem...
work page 2018
- [2]
-
[26]
S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K
(15) Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H. S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K. P.; Zhang, H., The Chemistry of Two- Dimensional Layered Transition M etal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets. Nature Chemistry 2013, 5, 263-275. (16) Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh , K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S., Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogeni...
work page 2013
-
[50]
(14) You, J.; Hossain, M. D.; Luo, Z., Synthesis of 2d Transiti on Metal Dichalcogenides by Chemical Vapor Deposition with Controlled Layer Number and Morphology. Nano Converg. 2018, 5,
work page 2018
-
[84]
(13) Cao, Y.; Fatemi, V.; Fang, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T. ; Kaxiras, E.; Jarillo-Herrero, P., Unconventional Superconductivity in Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices. Nature 2018, 556, 43-
work page 2018
-
[1608]
(51) Zhao, W.; Ghorannevis, Z.; Chu, L.; Toh, M.; Kloc, C.; Tan , P.-H.; Eda, G., Evolution of Electronic Structure in Atomically Thin Sheets of WS2 and WSe2. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 791-797. (52) Thiruraman, J. P.; Fujisawa, K.; Danda, G.; Das, P. M.; Zhang, T.; Bolotsky, A.; Perea-López, N.; Nicolaï, A.; Senet, P.; Terrones, M.; Drndić, M., Angstrom- Size Def...
work page 2013
-
[1866]
H.; Chubarov, M.; Xiang, Y.; Jari wala, B.; Zhang, F.; Alem, N.; Wang, G.-C.; Robinson, J
(36) Zhang, X.; Choudhury, T. H.; Chubarov, M.; Xiang, Y.; Jari wala, B.; Zhang, F.; Alem, N.; Wang, G.-C.; Robinson, J. A.; Redwing, J. M., Diffusion-Control led Epitaxy of Large Area Coalesced WSe2 Monolayers on Sapphire. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 1049-1056. (37) Liu, B.; Fathi, M.; Chen, L.; Abbas, A.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, C., Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of M...
work page 2018
-
[4216]
(24) Zhang, Y.; Tang, T.-T.; Girit, C.; Hao, Z.; Martin, M. C.; Zettl, A.; Crommie, M. F.; Shen, Y. R.; Wang, F., Direct Observation of a Widely Tunable Bandgap in Bilayer Graphene. Nature 2009, 459, 820-823. (25) Hong, X.; Kim, J.; Shi, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, C.; Sun, Y.; Tongay, S.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F., Ultrafast Charge Transfer in Atomically Th...
work page 2009
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.