Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Enhanced detection of circularly polarized photons with topological materials

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A tight-binding slab model of Bi2Se3 computes the circular photogalvanic effect from first principles, including gate-voltage and magnetic-proximity tuning, and predicts a mid-IR responsivity near 0.17 μA/W.

desk verdict Promising TB-slab framework for CPGE, but the layer-resolved decomposition rests on a false identity, so the quantitative claims—including the responsivity—are not currently supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.00251 v2 pith:GPHYT7YP submitted 2026-01-30 cond-mat.other

Hamideh Sharifpour , Avik W. Ghosh , George J. de Coster This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.other
keywords circularphotogalvaniceffecttopologicalinsulatorBi2Se3slabinjectioncurrentnonlinearopticalconductivityKuboformalismlayer-resolvedphotocurrentmagneticproximity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE) in a topological insulator can be computed directly from a slab tight-binding Hamiltonian using a nonlinear Kubo formula, without resorting to continuum models or DFT-fitting. It claims that this approach captures bulk-to-surface interband transitions a priori and yields layer-resolved contributions, so one can see how the top and bottom surfaces contribute opposite CPGE currents that cancel unless inversion or time-reversal symmetry is broken. The authors then use this tool to predict that gate voltage, Fermi level, photon energy, surface-state chirality, and an out-of-plane magnetic exchange field all tune CPGE, with a mid-wave infrared responsivity of roughly 0.17 μA/W that is comparable to reported topological photodetectors. If correct, the work gives a parameter-free route to designing chiral photodetectors and polarization-sensitive devices operating at room temperature in the THz-to-mid-IR range.

What carries the argument

The central object is the injection-current contribution to the second-order optical conductivity tensor, σ^inj_{µαβ}, derived from the nonlinear Kubo formula with two photon-electron vertices on a single Green's function. Layer resolution is achieved by inserting projection operators P_l into the velocity vertices, so that the contribution from a given layer can be isolated; the block-tridiagonal structure of the slab Hamiltonian is the key assumption that makes this decomposition exact. The Bi2Se3 slab is described by a 4N_z × 4N_z tight-binding Hamiltonian built from four Dirac matrices, with an in-plane on-site part and interlayer hopping; an eight-band 'doubled' Hamiltonian is introduce

What would settle it

Compute σ^inj from the full slab Hamiltonian and compare it numerically with the layer-projected sum Σ_l σ^∆_{µαβ,l}; if they differ at the precision quoted, the central decomposition fails. Alternatively, measure bottom-surface CPGE in a magnetized-top-layer experiment: if the bottom contribution is not simply the sign-flipped top response when M_z is confined to the top surface, the symmetry argument breaks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the injection-current part of the second-order optical conductivity of a topological insulator can be evaluated in a slab geometry from a symmetry-informed tight-binding model, using the nonlinear Kubo formula with layer-resolved projection operators. In contrast to earlier continuum or DFT-based calculations, this slab approach inherently includes all interband transitions between bulk and surface states and allows the authors to separate the top and bottom surface contributions to the CPGE. They find that the top and bottom surface CPGEs have opposite signs and cancel in an inversion-symmetric slab; applying a gate voltage breaks inversion and resonantly enhances

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the layer-resolved contributions to the injection-current tensor add up exactly to the full tensor because the Green's function and velocity operators are block-tridiagonal, so all cross-layer terms in the trace vanish; if this cancellation is not exact, the top/bottom CPGE separation is not a clean decomposition of the total injection current.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gate voltage can act as a switch for the ratio of circular to linear photogalvanic current, because inversion breaking changes Im σ_xxz and Re σ_xxy differently.
  • Proximitizing a magnetic layer on one surface gives a practical, room-temperature knob for tuning or reversing CPGE, which had not been explored experimentally as a CPGE control.
  • Surface states with matched chirality yield additive CPGE contributions across the slab, suggesting that materials with same-chirality surface bands (e.g., certain Bi2Te2Se configurations) will have stronger and more robust circular photocurrents.
  • The slab approach captures bulk-surface transitions a priori, so it can predict photocurrents from terahertz to mid-infrared frequencies without manually enumerating transition channels.
  • The predicted responsivity near 0.17 μA/W indicates that measurable CPGE detection is possible without cryogenic cooling, aligning with several experimental TI photodetectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layer-decomposition identity (Σ_l σ^Δ_{µαβ,l} = σ^Δ_{µαβ}) is load-bearing; if interlayer velocity matrix elements or off-diagonal Green's function blocks make cross-layer terms nonzero, the top/bottom separation becomes approximate. A direct numerical comparison of the full tensor with the layer sum would settle this.
  • The formalism should transfer to other 3D topological insulators (Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3) by adjusting the tight-binding parameters; stronger hexagonal warping is expected to raise the linear photogalvanic (LPGE) response, which the present model predicts to be weak.
  • The magnetic-proximity prediction can be tested directly in a ferromagnet/TI heterostructure: varying the exchange strength should shift the CPGE resonance peak as ℏω ≈ 2|M_z| and suppress the low-energy response, a signature that would confirm the Berry-curvature redistribution mechanism.
  • The eight-band chirality-pairing argument suggests a design principle for selecting materials: ultraviolet or visible excitation between same-chirality surface states, such as in Bi2Te2Se, should produce enhanced CPGE with reduced Fermi-level sensitivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a nonlinear Kubo-formula calculation of the second-order injection conductivity σ^inj_{µαβ}(ω) for a Bi2Se3 slab described by a symmetry-informed tight-binding model. The authors compute the circular and linear photogalvanic currents (Im σ_xxz and Re σ_xxy), study dependence on gate voltage, Fermi level, photon energy, and a magnetic proximity layer, and report a mid-IR responsivity R≈0.169 μA/W. They also introduce a layer-projected decomposition intended to isolate top/bottom surface contributions and use a phenomenological '8-band' model to study chirality-pairing effects.

Significance. This manuscript addresses an important gap: extending nonlinear optical-conductivity calculations for TIs beyond continuum models by using a slab tight-binding Hamiltonian fitted to Bi2Se3's band structure. The Kubo/injection-current framework (Eqs. (12)-(14)) is standard, and the paper is careful to avoid the numerically fragile low-photon-energy region. If the layer-resolved decomposition were correct, the predicted gate-tunable CPGE, the magnetization ridge, and the chirality dependence of the surface currents would be valuable and falsifiable. It is a strength that the tight-binding parameters come from band-structure fitting and that no target conductivity is used to set them. However, the central layer-projection sum rule is not established and is likely false as stated, so the quantitative surface-specific results and the device responsivity estimate are not yet supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II.C, Eq. (24)] The sum-rule claim Σ_l σ^Δ_{µαβ,l} = σ^Δ_{µαβ} is not justified. Only H(k) (and thus v_α = ∂H/∂k_α) is block-tridiagonal; the Matsubara Green's function G(k,iω)=(iω−H(k))^{-1} is generally full in layer space (e.g., any finite 1D chain). Hence terms P_{l1}v_α G P_{l2}v_β with l1≠l2 need not vanish. The layer-resolved quantities in Eq. (24) (with two projected optical vertices) are therefore not a proven decomposition of the total injection conductivity. Because Eq. (25), the top/bottom cancellation argument, and the responsivity R=0.169 μA/W attributed to the first two layers rest on this identity, the central quantitative surface-specific results require a proof or numerical verification of the sum rule, or a reformulation (e.g., projecting only the current vertex v_µ).
  2. [Abstract and Section IV.C] The claim that magnetization 'enables nonlinear conductivity tensor components (e.g., σ_xyz) that are normally forbidden by symmetry' is not backed by a computed σ_xyz or any other normally forbidden component. The magnetic-proximity results compute only Im σ_xxz. Either provide the forbidden-component calculation or revise the abstract to describe what is actually computed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs Section IV.A] The responsivity is quoted as R≈0.170 μA/W in the abstract and R=0.169 μA/W in the text. Reconcile and specify the photon energy and parameters used for the quoted value.
  2. [Section II.B, after Eq. (12)] The fermionic Matsubara frequency is written ω_l = (2n+l)πT; the standard notation is (2l+1)πT. Please correct.
  3. [Fig. 7 caption] Typo: 'sutdies' should be 'studies'.
  4. [General] The main text does not define the constant σ0 used in the figure color scales beyond the figure captions; please state it explicitly in the text or in a common legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Kubo/TB slab calculation is self-contained; one minor self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The tight-binding parameters are fitted to Bi2Se3 band structure (Sec. II.A, 'Band structure parameters are fitted to the conduction and valence bands of Bi2Se3'), not to the computed CPGE/LPGE conductivity or the R≈0.169 μA/W responsivity. The nonlinear Kubo expression in Eq. (12) and its evaluated form in Eq. (14) are standard diagrammatic results taken from external references ([31,32,35]), and the subsequent numerical evaluation is a direct computation from the slab Hamiltonian. Gate voltage, Fermi level, photon energy, and magnetization M_z are inputs; the computed M_z–vs–photon-energy ridge follows from the Dirac mass gap ℏω≈2|M_z|, not from a fitted relation. Experimental comparisons in Fig. 6 are qualitative benchmarks, not fitting targets. The only author self-citation is Ref. [19] (de Coster) in the C3v symmetry relation passage, but the same statement is also supported by Refs. [15,34], so this is not load-bearing. The manuscript's most significant caveat is the layer-resolved sum rule in Section II.C: it asserts 'due to the block tri-diagonal form of G(k,iω) and v_α(k) the product of the last two terms in the trace above would be zero if non-identical projection layers were used'. Since G is generally full in layer space even when H is tridiagonal, this assertion is questionable and the top/bottom decomposition may not cleanly sum to the full σ^Δ. However, this is a mathematical/completeness concern about a defined projection, not a circular reduction: the layer-resolved results and R are computed from the stated layer-projected expression rather than reverse-engineered from a target output. The paper also flags its own ℏω→0 convergence limitation. Overall, no 'prediction' reduces by construction to a fitted input or to the authors' prior results.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitted TB parameters, a chosen broadening, and a standard Kubo formalism; no new particles or forces are introduced. The doubled 8-band Hamiltonian is a phenomenological modeling device for higher-energy surface states, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (5)
  • TB hopping/mass parameters (A0, A11, A12, A14, m11, B0, B11, B12, B14) = Values from Appendix B / Refs. [26-28]
    Band-structure parameters are fitted to the conduction and valence bands of Bi2Se3; all computed CPGE/LPGE results depend on them.
  • broadening δ = 0.005 meV
    Phenomenological relaxation parameter used in the Kubo analytic continuation; choice affects low-frequency behavior and convergence.
  • slab thickness N_z = 15 layers
    Finite slab thickness selected for the layer-resolved calculations; convergence is argued but the thickness is not derived from first principles.
  • Fermi level E_f = 0.2 eV in Section III; scanned elsewhere
    Set to a typical n-type doping level from ARPES and then scanned as an external parameter in the maps.
  • 8-band coupling d coefficient = Symmetry-allowed Γ2 sin(k·a) form
    Phenomenological doubled Hamiltonian used to model higher-energy surface states; the coupling strength is chosen to avoid trivial crossings.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bi2Se3 tight-binding Hamiltonian with Dirac matrices, ABC rhombohedral stacking, and open boundary conditions in z
    The slab Hamiltonian in Eqs. (2)-(8) is assumed to faithfully reproduce the bulk, valence, and topological surface bands of Bi2Se3.
  • standard math Injection-current contribution to the second-order conductivity is computed from the single triangle diagram in Fig. 2 (Matsubara Kubo formula, Eqs. (12)-(14))
    The paper restricts the full second-order response to the injection channel, citing prior derivations; shift current and Fermi-surface terms are not included in the reported tensor elements.
  • domain assumption C3v surface symmetry and the relations j_x,CPGE ∝ Im σ_xxz, j_x,LPGE ∝ Re σ_xxy
    The symmetry analysis in Appendix A maps the polarization dependence to specific tensor elements; this is standard for Bi2Se3 surfaces.
  • domain assumption Low-energy surface Hamiltonian H_surf = v_F(k_x σ_y - k_y σ_x) + M_z σ_z for magnetic proximity
    The effect of an out-of-plane exchange field is assumed to be captured by a Dirac mass term, consistent with the cited topological-insulator literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced detection of circularly polarized photons with topological materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GPHYT7YP

@misc{pith2026260200251,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced detection of circularly polarized photons with topological materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GPHYT7YP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.00251}
}
abstract

Topological insulators (TI) are highly attractive platforms for next-generation optoelectronic and photonic devices. Spin-momentum locking of topological surface states enhances their nonlinear optical responses and sensitivities, especially to circularly polarized light. Until now, theoretical investigations of nonlinear responses in TIs have been limited to microscopic calculations on analytical continuum models, or leveraging density functional theory based Hamiltonians. In this work, we expand beyond these two approaches by employing a nonlinear Kubo formalism to calculate second-order nonlinear optical conductivity in a slab geometry using symmetry informed tight binding models that accurately reproduce the conduction, valence and topological surface bands in Bi$_2$Se$_3$. Our methodology enables us to study the layer resolved contribution to injection currents coupled to the incident electric field. We demonstrate that our technique can reveal how device engineering modifies elements of the nonlinear optical response such as the circular {and linear} photogalvanic effects by breaking inversion and time-reversal symmetry. {In particular, magnetization-induced symmetry breaking enables nonlinear conductivity tensor components (e.g., $\sigma_{xyz}$) that are normally forbidden by symmetry, thereby directly modifying the circular photogalvanic effect.} We find, in line with experiments, that the photogalvanic current is sensitive to field effects, Fermi level energy, gate voltage and the energy of incident light. Our computed midwave infrared (mid-IR) responsivity $R \approx 0.170~\mathrm{\mu A/W}$ is comparable to reported TI and intrinsic 2D-material photodetectors. We simulate experimentally unexplored methods to modify the circular photogalvanic effect such as proximitizing a magnetic field to one of the TI surface materials, suggesting a mechanism for optoelectronic tuning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.00251 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top: In-plane lattice unit cell, inter-plane slab vec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Diagrammatic representation of the injection current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Top: Imaginary part of the second-order nonlinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) Dependence of top surface layer CPGE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Responsivity versus photon energy for a range of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. a) Surface projected band structures of Bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. color map of the imaginary part of the conductiv [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Everything is a Spin: The Secret Lives of SU(2)

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review argues that spin, pseudospin, valley, and polarization obey the same SU(2) geometry and that wavefunction winding can be engineered for memory, switching, actuation, and sensing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Orenstein, J

    J. Orenstein, J. E. Moore, T. Morimoto, D. H. Torchin- sky, J. W. Harter, and D. Hsieh, Topology and symme- try of quantum materials via nonlinear optical responses, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.12, 247 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Keimer and J

    B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, The physics of quantum materials, Nat. Phys.13, 1045 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    De Juan, A

    F. De Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic eect in weyl semimetals, Nat. Commun.8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    K. A. Kuznetsov, S. A. Tarasenko, P. M. Kovaleva, P. I. Kuznetsov, D. V. Lavrukhin, Y. G. Goncharov, A. A. Ezhov, D. S. Ponomarev, and G. K. Kitaeva, Topological insulatorlms for terahertz photonics, Nanomaterials12, 3779 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Y. Xia, D. Qian, D. Hsieh, L. Wray, A. Pal, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Grauer, Y. Hor, R. Cava, et al., Dis- covery (theoretical prediction and experimental observa- tion) of a large-gap topological-insulator class with spin- polarized single-dirac-cone on the surface, arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.3513 (2009)

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    F. K. Wang, S. J. Yang, and T. Y. Zhai, 2d bi 2se3 mate- rials for optoelectronics, iScience24, 103203 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Hsieh, Y

    D. Hsieh, Y. Xia, D. Qian, L. Wray, F. Meier, J. H. Dil, J. Osterwalder, L. Patthey, A. V. Fedorov, H. Lin, et al., Observation of time-reversal-protected single-dirac-cone topological-insulator states in bi 2te3 and sb 2te3, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 146401 (2009)

    2009

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Third Edition) (Aca- demic Press, Burlington, 2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Sheik-Bahae and M

    M. Sheik-Bahae and M. P. Hasselbeck, Third-order opti- cal nonlinearities, Handbook of Optics4, 16 (2000)

    2000

  3. [11]

    Aversa and J

    C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Nonlinear optical susceptibili- ties of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge anal- ysis, Phys. Rev. B52, 14636 (1995)

    1995

  4. [12]

    Y. R. Shen, The principles of nonlinear optics, Wiley classics library (John Wiley & Sons, 2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of non- linear optical eects in solids, Sci. Adv.2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Hsieh, J

    D. Hsieh, J. W. McIver, D. H. Torchinsky, D. R. Gard- ner, Y. S. Lee, and N. Gedik, Nonlinear optical probe of tunable surface electrons on a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 057401 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Pan, Q.-Z

    Y. Pan, Q.-Z. Wang, A. L. Yeats, T. Pillsbury, T. C. 13 Flanagan, A. Richardella, H. Zhang, D. D. Awschalom, C.-X. Liu, and N. Samarth, Helicity dependent photocur- rent in electrically gated (bi 1−xsbx)2te3 thinlms, Nat. Commun.8, 1037 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Braun, G

    L. Braun, G. Mussler, A. Hruban, M. Konczykowski, T. Schumann, M. Wolf, M. M¨ unzenberg, L. Perfetti, and T. Kampfrath, Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator bi 2se3, Nat. Commun.7, 13259 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Plank, J

    H. Plank, J. Pernul, S. Gebert, S. N. Danilov, J. K¨ onig- Otto, S. Winnerl, M. Lanius, J. Kampmeier, G. Mus- sler, I. Aguilera, D. Gr¨ utzmacher, and S. D. Ganichev, Infrared/terahertz spectra of the photogalvanic eect in (bi, sb)te based three-dimensional topological insula...

    2018

  11. [19]

    B. C. Connelly, P. J. Taylor, and G. J. de Coster, Emer- gence of threefold symmetric helical photocurrents in epi- taxial low twinned bi 2se3, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2307425121 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    V. I. Belinicher and B. I. Sturman, The photogalvanic eect in media lacking a center of symmetry, Sov. Phys. Usp.23, 199 (1980)

    1980

  13. [21]

    V. V. Bel’kov, S. D. Ganichev, P. Schneider, C. Back, M. Oestreich, J. Rudolph, D. H¨ agele, L. E. Golub, W. Wegscheider, and W. Prettl, Circular photogalvanic eect at inter-band excitation in semiconductor quantum wells, Solid State Commun.128, 283 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    Hosur, Circular photogalvanic eect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys

    P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic eect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys. Rev. B83, 035309 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Junck, G

    A. Junck, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Photocurrent re- sponse of topological insulator surface states, Phys. Rev. B88, 075144 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Huang and X

    S. Huang and X. Xu, Optical chirality detection using a topological insulator transistor, Adv. Opt. Mater.9, 2002210 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    G. B. Osterhoudt, L. K. Diebel, M. J. Gray, X. Yang, J. Stanco, X. Huang, B. Shen, N. Ni, P. J. W. Moll, Y. Ran, and K. S. Burch, Colossal mid-infrared bulk pho- tovoltaic eect in a type-i weyl semimetal, Nat. Mater. 18, 471 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    S. Mao, A. Yamakage, and Y. Kuramoto, Tight-binding model for topological insulators: Analysis of helical sur- face modes over the whole brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115413 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Liu, X.-L

    C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, Model hamiltonian for topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B82, 045122 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Zhang, C.-X

    H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators in bi 2se3, bi2te3 and sb2te3 with a single dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys.5, 438 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Xie and N

    Y.-M. Xie and N. Nagaosa, Photon-drag photovoltaic ef- fects and quantum geometric nature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2424294122 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Ebihara, K

    K. Ebihara, K. Yada, A. Yamakage, and Y. Tanaka, Fi- nite size eects of the surface states in a lattice model of topological insulator, Physica E44, 885 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Avdoshkin, V

    A. Avdoshkin, V. Kozii, and J. E. Moore, Interactions re- move the quantization of the chiral photocurrent at weyl points, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 196603 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    D. E. Parker, T. Morimoto, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical re- sponse with application to weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B99, 045121 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Nakazawa, H

    K. Nakazawa, H. F. Legg, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, In- terband contributions to nonlinear transport in semicon- ductor nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B111, 125305 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Tanaka, H

    H. Tanaka, H. Watanabe, and Y. Yanase, Nonlinear op- tical responses in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B107, 024513 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    J. Han, Y. Sun, X. Huang, W. Shuai, G. Fang, and Z. Li, Design principles of nonlinear optical materials for tera- hertz lasers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17126 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    W.-X. Yu, B. Liu, W.-Q. Huang, H. Zhou, and S.-Y. Xie, Phase evolution for oxidizing bismuth selenide, J. Phys. Condens. Matter35, 075401 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    J. Cao, M. Wang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Bulk fermi arc transition induced large photogalvanic eect in weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B106, 125416 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer US, 2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    Dhara, E

    S. Dhara, E. J. Mele, and R. Agarwal, Voltage-tunable circular photogalvanic eect in silicon nanowires, Science 349, 726 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Y. Xia, D. Qian, D. Hsieh, L. Wray, A. Pal, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. H. Y. S. Grauer, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, et al., Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys. 5, 398 (2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    Fu, Hexagonal warping eects in the surface states of the topological insulator bi 2te3, Phys

    L. Fu, Hexagonal warping eects in the surface states of the topological insulator bi 2te3, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 266801 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    X. Song, X. Liu, F. Wang, L. Du, H. Zhang, Z. Fu, W. Sun, Y. Sun, J. Zhang, Z. Dai, et al., High- responsivity vis–nir photodetectors based on bi 2te3 thin lms and ag 2s qds heterojunction, Mater. Lett.377, 137518 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    L. Liu, L. Du, E. Pan, X. Liu, J. Chen, L. Yu, Y. Yu, H. Zhang, X. Song, X. Yang, et al., Ptte 2 thinlm pho- todetectors with positive photoconductivity under uv- vis-nir laser irradiation, Chin. Opt. Lett.23, 121601 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, H. Shen, V. Fatemi, S. Wu, T.-R. Chang, G. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, C.-K. Chan, Q. D. Gibson, et al., Electrically switchable berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator wte 2, Nat. Phys.14, 900 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    S. You, R. Zhao, T. Nie, S. Cheng, Y. Lai, Y. Chen, J. Yu, and Z. Diao, Interface-induced 2d ferromagnetism in fe 3gete2/bi2te3 heterostructures studied via the cir- cular photogalvanic eect, Applied Surface Science717, 164741 (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    J. Yu, S. Cheng, Y. Lai, Q. Zheng, and Y. Chen, Spin photocurrent spectra induced by rashba- and dresselhaus-type circular photogalvanic eect at inter- band excitation in ingaas/gaas/algaas step quantum wells, Nanoscale Res. Lett.9, 130 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    C. Li, Y. Li, G. Li, and J. Guo, Circular photogalvanic eect at the surface of hydrogenated perovskite oxides, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 251101 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    L. Liu, Y. Yang, L. Zhu, J. Zhang, K. Chen, and Z. Wei, Chiral non-fullerene acceptor enriched bulk heterojunc- tions enable high-performance near-infrared circularly polarized light detection, Small18, 2202941 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    J. W. McIver, D. Hsieh, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Control over topological insulator pho- tocurrents with light polarization, Nat. Nanotechnol.7, 14 96 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Z. Ji, G. Liu, Z. Addison, W. Liu, P. Yu, H. Gao, Z. Liu, A. M. Rappe, C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, et al., Spatially dis- persive circular photogalvanic eect in a weyl semimetal, Nat. Mater.18, 955 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Kumar, S

    A. Kumar, S. Mukherjee, H. Sharma, D. K. Rana, A. Ku- mar, R. Kumar, and R. K. Choubey, Fabrication of low- cost and fast-response visible photodetector based on zns:mn/p-si heterojunction, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Pro- cess.155, 107226 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Aguilera, C

    I. Aguilera, C. Friedrich, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Many-body cor- rected tight-binding hamiltonians for an accurate quasi- particle description of topological insulators of the bi 2se3 family, Phys. Rev. B100, 155147 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Tu, Y.-C

    C.-M. Tu, Y.-C. Chen, P. Huang, P.-Y. Chuang, M.-Y. Lin, C.-M. Cheng, J.-Y. Lin, J.-Y. Juang, K.-H. Wu, J.-C. A. Huang, W.-F. Pong, T. Kobayashi, and C.-W. Luo, Helicity-dependent terahertz emission spectroscopy of topological insulator sb 2te3 thinlms, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195407 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    J. A. Sobota, S. Yang, J. G. Analytis, Y. L. Chen, I. R. Fisher, P. S. Kirchmann, and Z.-X. Shen, Ultrafast op- tical excitation of a persistent surface-state population in the topological insulator bi 2se3, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 117403 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    V. I. Litvinov, Magnetic exchange interaction in topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. B89, 235316 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.