Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Monolithic Magneto-Optical Mach-Zehnder Isolator Using Laser-Annealed Iron Garnet on a Silicon Waveguide

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A focused 915 nm laser beam crystallizes seed-free Ce:YIG inside a silicon Mach–Zehnder interferometer, giving 13.6 dB isolation at 1540 nm.

desk verdict A real first demonstration of a laser-annealed, seed-free Ce:YIG isolator on a silicon MZI, but the electrode-preservation claim rests on an untested thermal assumption and the numbers lack error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20964 v1 pith:GQZG6B5U submitted 2026-07-23 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

Tomoya Sugita , Reona Motoji , Yuki Yoshihara , Dan Maeda , Hiroki Yamamoto , Hibiki Miyashita , Kazushi Ishiyama , Taichi Goto This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords laserannealingmagneto-opticalisolatorCe:YIGsiliconphotonicsMach-ZehnderinterferometermonolithicintegrationFaradayrotationvacuum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to solve the standing problem of integrating magneto-optical garnets into silicon photonic chips: garnet crystallization normally needs furnace temperatures around 600–750 °C, which damage silicon waveguides and metal electrodes. It proposes local vacuum laser annealing, using a 915 nm beam shaped to a 700 μm square to heat only the Ce:YIG-filled trench to 750 °C. The resulting device shows an isolation ratio of 13.6 dB at 1540 nm, a Faraday rotation of 0.092°/μm, and TEM evidence of crystallized garnet. This matters because if local heating truly spares the rest of the chip, it removes the main thermal obstacle to monolithic isolators and makes the process compatible with co-packaged optics.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is selective vacuum laser annealing: a 915 nm diode-laser beam is shaped into a 700 μm square and directed through an anti-reflection window onto a chip held below 80 Pa. A coaxial thermometer regulates the laser to keep the substrate at 750 °C; the beam covers only the asymmetric Mach–Zehnder interferometer and its garnet-filled trench, so heat is nominally confined to that area. The trench—a micrometer-scale parallelogram etched through the SiO2 cladding to expose the top of the silicon waveguide—holds the Ce:YIG and defines the magneto-optical interaction length. Crystallized Ce:YIG produces a nonreciprocal phase shift; the interferometer's arm-length difference supp

What would settle it

Fabricate the same device but with a metal electrode or a reference waveguide passing through the 700 μm laser spot, anneal at 750 °C, and measure electrode resistance and waveguide transmission; if they degrade measurably, the assumption of thermal confinement fails, and the claimed advantage over furnace annealing collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper demonstrates a monolithic magneto-optical Mach–Zehnder isolator built by crystallizing seed-layer-free Ce:YIG directly on a silicon waveguide with vacuum laser annealing. In a 100 μm trench device, forward and backward transmission differ by 13.6 dB at 1540 nm, corresponding to a Faraday rotation of 0.092°/μm; insertion loss is 20.4 dB and propagation loss 9.5 dB, with the trench process contributing most of the loss. Cross-sectional TEM shows the (420) garnet plane and a roughly 10 nm Ce/Fe/Y/SiO2 boundary layer at the Ce:YIG/Si interface. The paper claims this is the first time seed-free garnet is crystallized locally in a silicon PIC by laser annealing, preserv

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the assumption that the 700 μm laser spot heats only the trench and its immediate surroundings, leaving waveguides and electrodes cool; the paper infers this from the beam shape and a coaxial thermometer rather than from measured temperatures outside the spot.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monolithic optical isolators can be added to silicon photonic circuits without a furnace step, removing the thermal-budget barrier that previously forced trade-offs between garnet performance and waveguide/electrode integrity.
  • Laser-annealed Ce:YIG reaches Faraday rotation comparable to furnace-annealed films (0.092°/μm at 1540 nm), so the local process does not appear to sacrifice magneto-optical strength.
  • Subdividing the garnet region into micrometer-scale trenches avoids cracking seen in larger laser-annealed areas, giving a practical patterning rule for device-scale integration.
  • The loss budget identifies the trench fabrication as the dominant contributor (66% of propagation loss), so improving etch selectivity is the direct path from the demonstrated 20.4 dB insertion loss toward practical values.
  • Because annealing is local and fast, the process is compatible with mass-production flows for co-packaged optics, where sensitive electronics and garnet processing share a chip.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's thermal-confinement claim is asserted from geometry rather than measurement; a direct test would be to route a metal electrode or a reference waveguide through or just outside the 700 μm spot and check for degradation after annealing.
  • The reported dependence of Faraday rotation on annealing uniformity suggests a controllable trade-off: a larger, flatter beam should crystallize a bigger area but with lower peak intensity, so mapping rotation versus spot size could reveal an optimal thermal dose.
  • If local annealing works as claimed, it enables sequential processing not possible with furnace annealing—different garnet components on one chip could be crystallized at different times or temperatures.
  • The observed FR of 0.092°/μm sits mid-range among reported Ce:YIG values; whether that is the ceiling for laser-annealed films or an artifact of the ~10 nm interface layer is an open question that EDS and magneto-optical modeling could answer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a monolithic magneto-optical Mach-Zehnder isolator on a silicon photonic chip in which Ce:YIG is crystallized by vacuum laser annealing. The Ce:YIG is deposited by ion beam sputtering without a seed layer into a trench over a Si waveguide, and a 915 nm laser with a 700 μm square spot is used to anneal the garnet locally. The device shows 13.6 dB isolation at 1540 nm, 20.4 dB insertion loss, 9.5 dB propagation loss, and a deduced Faraday rotation of 0.092°/μm. TEM and EDS indicate crystallized Ce:YIG with a ~10 nm interface layer. The claimed advantage over furnace annealing is that local heating leaves surrounding waveguides and metal electrodes at lower temperature.

Significance. The result is potentially significant for silicon photonics, as monolithic isolators have been challenging due to the high-temperature crystallization of garnets. The paper provides a detailed process flow, a working isolator, and structural evidence of crystallization. If the thermal confinement claim holds, the technique could enable integration with metal-electrode-bearing co-packaged optics. However, the key claim of electrode preservation is not directly demonstrated, and the performance numbers are single-device point values. The paper nevertheless offers a useful data point and a process advance for MO isolators, with sufficient fabrication detail for reproduction.

major comments (2)
  1. [II-B, V, Abstract] The central novelty is the claim that local laser annealing confines heating to the garnet trench and thereby preserves Si waveguides and metal electrodes (abstract; Section II-B; Section V). This claim is not supported by the evidence presented. The laser spot is 700 μm square, whereas the garnet trench is 100×20 μm; the spot consequently irradiates a large surrounding area of the silicon chip directly. No temperature measurement outside the irradiated area, no heat-diffusion calculation, and no device containing metal electrodes are reported. The statement that 'the electrode regions lay outside the irradiated area, so the surrounding circuit and the electrodes were not heated' (Section II-B) ignores thermal conduction through the substrate. Since the ability to preserve metal electrodes is a primary motivation for the local-annealing approach, the manuscript must either provide experi
  2. [IV.A, Fig. 2] The Faraday rotation of 0.092°/μm is a central performance claim. It is derived from the forward–backward peak separation of 4.5 nm and FSR of 44 nm using a method only described by reference to Ref. [12]; the governing relation is not given. The reported isolation (13.6 dB), insertion loss (20.4 dB), and propagation loss (9.5 dB) are single-point values from one sample, with no error bars, repeated measurements, or sample-to-sample variation. For a device demonstration, at least the derivation of FR should be stated and measurement uncertainties should be reported for the key figures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix E] 'Fig. 2(a)' should be 'Fig. 2' (the figure has no subpanels). Also, explain how the 6.1 dB trench-facet loss is obtained from the trench-length dependence (presumably the intercept of the linear fit shown in the Fig. 6 inset); the slope alone is given.
  2. [II.B] The sentence 'The 700 μm square beam covered only the AMZI and its trench' contradicts the fact that the annealed area shown in Fig. 1(b) is a large 700 μm square that includes waveguide regions outside the trench. Rephrase to 'the beam was aligned to cover the AMZI and its trench; the directly irradiated area is 700 μm square.'
  3. [IV.A] The comparison of the measured FR with literature values is helpful, but the origin of the large difference from the previous laser-annealed Ce:YIG value of 0.01°/μm [24] is discussed only qualitatively; consider adding a brief explanation of the effect of spot uniformity on crystallization.
  4. [III] The measurement setup description would benefit from stating the resolution and accuracy of the power meter, the wavelength step, and the magnet field uncertainty, to allow the reader to assess the significance of the 13.6 dB isolation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the isolation and Faraday rotation results rest on direct measured spectra, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims are experimental and self-contained. The isolation ratio of 13.6 dB is a directly measured forward–backward transmission difference at 1540 nm, not a fitted quantity. The Faraday rotation of 0.092°/μm is derived from the measured forward–backward peak separation (4.5 nm), the measured FSR of the AMZI without MO loading (44 nm), and the trench length (100 μm). Although the derivation method is attributed to Ref. [12] by the same group, the underlying quantities are independently measured and the relation is a standard AMZI spectral-shift formula; there is no indication that the claimed FR is used as an input to obtain the isolation ratio. The TEM lattice-spacing and EDS composition comparisons cite prior work by the same authors, but these are auxiliary comparisons to measured structural data, not load-bearing reductions. The loss decomposition uses separate reference waveguides and a separately measured trench-length dependence, so it is not circular. The main weakness of the paper—the inference that the 700-μm beam leaves surrounding electrodes unheated—is an evidence gap (no thermal model, no off-spot temperature measurement, no electrode-bearing device), but it is not circular: the claim is not used as an input to the optical measurements that establish the isolator. Several self-citations occur ([9], [10], [12], [18], [24]), but none of them supplies the central result or forbids alternatives; they are normal prior-work references. Therefore no significant circularity is present, and the score of 2 reflects only the minor reliance on self-cited process/characterization conventions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on process parameters (annealing temperature, spot size) and three main assumptions: heat confinement, the FR extraction from Ref. [12], and representativeness of TEM/EDS. The heat-confinement assumption is the least supported.

free parameters (4)
  • Substrate annealing temperature setpoint = 750 °C
    Chosen by hand as the laser regulator setpoint. The central claim of successful crystallization without damage depends on this value being sufficient to crystallize Ce:YIG yet not damage the surroundings.
  • Laser spot size = 700 μm square
    Chosen to cover the AMZI and trench. The selective-heating claim relies on this spot being small enough to avoid electrodes and uniform enough to crystallize the garnet.
  • Trench-facet loss estimate = 6.1 dB
    Assigned in Appendix E to decompose the propagation loss. It is an estimate derived from the trench-length linear fit, not independently measured.
  • Trench-loss linear-fit slope = -2.4×10⁻³ dB/μm
    Linear regression to trench-length propagation-loss data (0–500 μm) in Appendix E; used to attribute loss contributions.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Heat from the 700-μm laser spot is confined to the garnet region; surrounding waveguides and metal electrodes are not heated to damaging temperatures.
    Asserted in Section II-B, but no temperature measurement outside the spot, no thermal simulation, and no electrode-including device are provided. This is the weakest assumption and central to the claimed advantage.
  • domain assumption The peak-separation method from Ref. [12] correctly relates the forward-backward peak shift to Faraday rotation for this AMZI.
    Invoked in Section IV-A to convert measured peak separation (4.5 nm) and FSR (44 nm) into FR = 0.092°/μm.
  • domain assumption EDS composition Ce:Y:Fe:O = 1:2:5:(12−δ) is accurate and representative; the oxygen deficiency δ is unmeasured.
    Used in Section IV-B to argue the garnet has the intended composition, but δ is not quantified.
  • domain assumption The TEM lamella is representative of the laser-annealed Ce:YIG in the device.
    A single cross-section image is used to conclude crystallization and interface quality across the annealed region.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monolithic Magneto-Optical Mach-Zehnder Isolator Using Laser-Annealed Iron Garnet on a Silicon Waveguide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GQZG6B5U

@misc{pith2026260720964,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monolithic Magneto-Optical Mach-Zehnder Isolator Using Laser-Annealed Iron Garnet on a Silicon Waveguide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GQZG6B5U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20964}
}
abstract

Stable silicon photonic circuits require monolithically integrated optical isolators based on magneto-optical garnet. However, crystallizing the garnet by conventional furnace annealing exposes the entire chip to high temperature and degrades the silicon waveguides and the metal electrodes. Here we avoid this degradation by using local laser annealing in vacuum to crystallize cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet (Ce:YIG), deposited by ion beam sputtering without a seed layer, directly within a silicon-based Mach-Zehnder interferometer. A 915 nm beam heats only the garnet region confined in micrometer-scale trenches, leaving the surrounding circuit and electrodes intact. The device achieves an isolation ratio of 13.6 dB at a wavelength of 1540 nm, corresponding to a Faraday rotation of 0.092$\deg$/$\mu$m, with an insertion loss of 20.4 dB and a propagation loss of 9.5 dB. Transmission electron microscopy reveals the crystallized Ce:YIG and a ~10 nm boundary region at the interface with the Si waveguide. These results demonstrate that thermally sensitive silicon photonic devices and magneto-optical thin films requiring high-temperature processing can be integrated by a high-throughput technique compatible with mass production.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20964 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b) shows the annealed chip, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) is a cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the MO section in the trench. The Ce:YIG layer was 195 nm thick, and the waveguide was 180 nm high and 550 nm wide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the transmission of the reference Si waveguide, the reference AMZI, and the MO AMZI without an external field. The no-field MO AMZI result is identical to the black plot in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references

  1. [12]

    Nanocomposite garnet-enabled monolithically integrated magneto -optical isolator using an asymmetric Mach–Zehnder interferometer,

    T. Sugita, H. Miyashita, R. Motoji, D. Maeda, H. Yamamoto, Y. Yoshihara, K. Ishiyama, and T. Goto, "Nanocomposite garnet-enabled monolithically integrated magneto -optical isolator using an asymmetric Mach–Zehnder interferometer," ACS Appl. Opt. Mater. , vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1813–1820, Jun. 2026

    2026

  2. [1]

    Silicon Photonics for Extreme Scale Systems,

    Y. Shen, X. Meng, Q. Cheng, S. Rumley, N. Abrams, A. Gazman, E. Manzhosov, M. S. Glick, and K. Bergman, "Silicon Photonics for Extreme Scale Systems," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 245–259, Jan. 2019

    2019

  3. [2]

    Co-packaged optics (CPO): status, challenges, and solutions,

    M. Tan, J. Xu, S. Liu, J. Feng, H. Zhang, C. Yao, S. Chen, H. Guo, G. Han, Z. Wen, B. Chen, Y. He, X. Zheng, D. Ming, Y. Tu, Q. Fu, N. Qi, D. Li, L. Geng, S. Wen, F. Yang, H. He, F. Liu, H. Xue, Y. Wang, C. Qiu, G. Mi, Y. Li, T. Chang, M. Lai, L. Zhang, Q. Hao, and M. Qin, "Co-packaged optics (CPO): status, challenges, and solutions," Front. Optoelectron....

    2023

  4. [3]

    Integrated magneto -optical materials and isolators: a review,

    B. J. H. Stadler and T. Mizumoto, "Integrated magneto -optical materials and isolators: a review," IEEE Photon. J., vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2014, Art. no. 0600215

    2014

  5. [4]

    On -chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators,

    L. Bi, J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C. Kimerling, and C. A. Ross, "On -chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators," Nat. Photonics, vol. 5, pp. 758–762, Nov. 2011

    2011

  6. [5]

    Fabrication and characterization of an InGaAsP/InP active waveguide optical isolator with 14.7 dB/mm TE mode nonreciprocal attenuation,

    H. Shimizu and Y. Nakano, "Fabrication and characterization of an InGaAsP/InP active waveguide optical isolator with 14.7 dB/mm TE mode nonreciprocal attenuation," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 38–43, Jan. 2006

    2006

  7. [6]

    Compact magneto-optical isolator by μ-transfer printing of magneto- optical single-crystal film on silicon waveguides,

    D. Minemura, R. Kou, Y. Sutoh, T. Murai, K. Yamada, and Y. Shoji, "Compact magneto-optical isolator by μ-transfer printing of magneto- optical single-crystal film on silicon waveguides," Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 27821–27829, Aug. 2023

    2023

  8. [7]

    Monolithic magneto-optical oxide thin films for on -chip optical isolation,

    Q. Du, T. Fakhrul, Y. Zhang, J. Hu, and C. A. Ross, "Monolithic magneto-optical oxide thin films for on -chip optical isolation," MRS Bull., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 413–418, Jun. 2018

    2018

Show all 30 references
  1. [8]

    Optical nonreciprocal devices based on magneto-optical phase shift in silicon photonics,

    Y. Shoji, K. Miura, and T. Mizumoto, "Optical nonreciprocal devices based on magneto-optical phase shift in silicon photonics," J. Opt., vol. 18, no. 1, Nov. 2016, Art. no. 013001

    2016

  2. [9]

    Vacuum annealed cerium -substituted yttrium iron garnet films on VOLUME XX, 2017 7 non-garnet substrates for integrated optical circuits,

    T. Goto, Y. Eto, K. Kobayashi, Y. Haga, M. Inoue, and C. A. Ross, "Vacuum annealed cerium -substituted yttrium iron garnet films on VOLUME XX, 2017 7 non-garnet substrates for integrated optical circuits," J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 113, no. 17, Apr. 2013, Art. no. 17A939

    2017

  3. [10]

    A nonreciprocal racetrack resonator based on vacuum-annealed magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet,

    T. Goto, M. C. Onbasli, D. H. Kim, V. Singh, M. Inoue, L. C. Kimerling, and C. A. Ross, "A nonreciprocal racetrack resonator based on vacuum-annealed magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet," Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 19047–19054, Aug. 2014

    2014

  4. [11]

    Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization -diverse silicon photonics,

    Y. Zhang, Q. Du, C. Wang, T. Fakhrul, S. Liu, L. Deng, D. Huang, P. Pintus, J. Bowers, C. A. Ross, J. Hu, and L. Bi, "Monolithic integration of broadband optical isolators for polarization -diverse silicon photonics," Optica, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 473–478, Apr. 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Monolithically integrated optical isolator chips with sputter -coated Ce:YIG films on silicon waveguides,

    S. H. Kim, B. Park, J. W. Park, H.- S. Park, J. Moon, S. H. Jang, R. Nambatyathu, R. Chao, S. Gunasagar, H.- Y. Ryu, and K. H. Kim, "Monolithically integrated optical isolator chips with sputter -coated Ce:YIG films on silicon waveguides," Opt. Contin., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1142...

    2026

  6. [14]

    Magneto -optic channel waveguides in Ce-substituted yttrium iron garnet,

    T. Shintaku, T. Uno, and M. Kobayashi, "Magneto -optic channel waveguides in Ce-substituted yttrium iron garnet," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 4877–4881, Jul. 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    Magnetotaxial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and enhanced Faraday rotation in ion beam sputtered cerium -substituted yttrium iron garnet,

    T. Goto, T. Koguchi, Y. Yoshihara, H. Miyashita, K. Mori, T. Watanabe, A. C. Kaczmarek, P. B. Lim, M. Inoue, C. A. Ross, and K. Ishiyama, "Magnetotaxial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and enhanced Faraday rotation in ion beam sputtered cerium -substituted yttrium iron garne...

    2025

  8. [16]

    Strong magneto -optical enhancement in highly Ce -substituted iron garnet films prepared by sputtering,

    M. Gomi, H. Furuyama, and M. Abe, "Strong magneto -optical enhancement in highly Ce -substituted iron garnet films prepared by sputtering," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 7065–7067, Aug. 1991

    1991

  9. [17]

    Integration of bulk -quality thin film magneto -optical cerium-doped yttrium iron garnet on silicon nitride photonic substrates,

    M. C. Onbasli, T. Goto, X. Sun, N. Huynh, and C. A. Ross, "Integration of bulk -quality thin film magneto -optical cerium-doped yttrium iron garnet on silicon nitride photonic substrates," Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 25183–25192, Oct. 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    Thickness -dependent magnetooptical properties of ion beam sputtered polycrystalline Ce 1Y2Fe5O12 films,

    Y. Yoshihara, T. Sugita, P. B. Lim, Y. Tamba, H. Inoue, K. Ishiyama, M. Inoue, C. A. Ross, and T. Goto, "Thickness -dependent magnetooptical properties of ion beam sputtered polycrystalline Ce 1Y2Fe5O12 films," Opt. Mater., vol. 133, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 112967

    2022

  11. [19]

    Magneto -optical properties of cerium substituted yttrium iron garnet films with reduced thermal budget for monolithic photonic integrated circuits,

    T. Goto, M. C. Onbasli, and C. A. Ross, "Magneto -optical properties of cerium substituted yttrium iron garnet films with reduced thermal budget for monolithic photonic integrated circuits," Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 27, pp. 28507–28517, Dec. 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Laser annealing of epitaxial garnet films under controlled atmospheres,

    D. A. Herman, Jr., J. C. DeLuca, and H. J. Vollmer, "Laser annealing of epitaxial garnet films under controlled atmospheres," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2341–2343, Mar. 1981

    1981

  13. [21]

    Selective crystallization of magnetic garnet films on Bragg mirrors by laser annealing,

    Y. Suzuki, T. Goto, Y. Eto, H. Takagi, P. B. Lim, A. V. Baryshev, and M. Inoue, "Selective crystallization of magnetic garnet films on Bragg mirrors by laser annealing," J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 183– 187, May 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Magneto-optic waveguide isolators based on laser annealed (Bi, Ga) YIG films,

    R. Wolfe, J. Hegarty, J. Dillon, L. Luther, G. Celler, and L. Trimble, "Magneto-optic waveguide isolators based on laser annealed (Bi, Ga) YIG films," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1647–1650, 1985

    1985

  15. [23]

    Waveguide magneto -optic isolator fabricated by laser annealing,

    K. Ando, T. Okoshi, and N. Koshizuka, "Waveguide magneto -optic isolator fabricated by laser annealing," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 4–6, Jul. 1988

    1988

  16. [24]

    Vacuum laser annealing of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet films,

    H. Miyashita, Y. Yoshihara, K. Mori, T. Koguchi, P. B. Lim, M. Inoue, K. Ishiyama, and T. Goto, "Vacuum laser annealing of magnetooptical cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet films," Opt. Mater. , vol. 146, Nov. 2023, Art. no. 114530

    2023

  17. [25]

    Localised modification of magnetic anisotropy in LPE iron garnet films by laser annealing,

    K. Ando, Y. Yokoyama, T. Okuda, and N. Koshizuka, "Localised modification of magnetic anisotropy in LPE iron garnet films by laser annealing," J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 35, no. 1-3, pp. 350–352, Mar. 1983

    1983

  18. [26]

    Crystallization of bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet under low-energy high-repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses,

    Y. Sgibnev, A. Shelaev, D. Kulikova, A. Salatov, P. Tananaev, G. Yankovskii, and A. Baryshev, "Crystallization of bismuth-substituted yttrium iron garnet under low-energy high-repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses," Cryst. Growth Des., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1196–1201, Dec. 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Micron-scale crystallization of Bi:YIG by laser rapid thermal annealing at controlled atmosphere,

    A. Shelaev, Y. Sgibnev, S. Efremova, P. Tananaev, and A. Baryshev, "Micron-scale crystallization of Bi:YIG by laser rapid thermal annealing at controlled atmosphere," Opt. Laser Technol. , vol. 155, Nov. 2022, Art. no. 108411

    2022

  20. [28]

    Ce:YIG/silicon-on-insulator waveguide optical isolator realized by adhesive bonding,

    S. Ghosh, S. Keyvavinia, W. Van Roy, T. Mizumoto, G. Roelkens, and R. Baets, "Ce:YIG/silicon-on-insulator waveguide optical isolator realized by adhesive bonding," Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1839– 1848, Jan. 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Silicon Mach –Zehnder interferometer optical isolator having 8 nm bandwidth for over 20 dB isolation,

    Y. Shoji, Y. Shirato, and T. Mizumoto, "Silicon Mach –Zehnder interferometer optical isolator having 8 nm bandwidth for over 20 dB isolation," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 53, no. 2, Jan. 2014, Art. no. 022202

    2014

  22. [30]

    Magneto-optical isolator with silicon waveguides fabricated by direct bonding,

    Y. Shoji, T. Mizumoto, H. Yokoi, I. W. Hsieh, and J. R. M. Osgood, "Magneto-optical isolator with silicon waveguides fabricated by direct bonding," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, no. 7, Feb. 2008, Art. no. 071117. 8 VOLUME XX, 2017 TOMOYA SUGITA received B.S. and M.S . degrees in...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.