Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The $H_0$ tension: $\Delta G_N$ vs. $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.05049 v2 pith:GSD5JB5B submitted 2020-04-10 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

classification astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords deltaconstraintsextratensionfindmodelparametersplanck
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We investigate whether the $4.4\sigma$ tension on $H_0$ between SH$_{0}$ES 2019 and Planck 2018 can be alleviated by a variation of Newton's constant $G_N$ between the early and the late Universe. This changes the Hubble rate before recombination, similarly to adding $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ extra relativistic degrees of freedom. We implement a varying $G_N$ in a scalar-tensor theory of gravity, with a non-minimal coupling $(M^2+\beta \phi^2)R$. If the scalar $\phi$ starts in the radiation era at an initial value $\phi_I \sim 0.5~M_p$ and with $\beta<0$, a dynamical transition occurs naturally around the epoch of matter-radiation equality and the field evolves towards zero at late times. As a consequence, the $H_0$ tension between SH$_{0}$ES (2019) and Planck 2018+BAO slightly decreases, as in $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ models, to the 3.8$\sigma$ level. We then perform a fit to a combined Planck, BAO and supernovae (SH$_0$ES and Pantheon) dataset. When including local constraints on Post-Newtonian (PN) parameters, we find $H_0=69.08_{-0.71}^{+0.6}~\text{km/s/Mpc}$ and a marginal improvement of $\Delta\chi^2\simeq-3.2$ compared to $\Lambda$CDM, at the cost of 2 extra parameters. In order to take into account scenarios where local constraints could be evaded, we also perform a fit without PN constraints and find $H_0=69.65_{-0.78}^{+0.8}~\text{km/s/Mpc}$ and a more significant improvement $\Delta\chi^2=-5.4$ with 2 extra parameters. For comparison, we find that the $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ model gives $H_0=70.08_{-0.95}^{+0.91}~\text{km/s/Mpc}$ and $\Delta\chi^2=-3.4$ at the cost of one extra parameter, which disfavors the $\Lambda$CDM limit just above 2$\sigma$, since $\Delta N_{\rm eff}=0.34_{-0.16}^{+0.15}$. Overall, our varying $G_N$ model performs similarly to the $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ model in respect to the $H_0$ tension, if a physical mechanism to remove PN constraints can be implemented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hubble tension: the shape wall

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Late-time modifications to the expansion history can raise H0 by at most about 2% (conservative) to 3.7% (permissive) if the CMB acoustic scale is fixed.

  2. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

  3. Illustrating the consequences of a misuse of $\sigma_8$ in cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cosmologists should compare clustering amplitude with the h-independent statistic sigma_12 instead of sigma_8, because sigma_8's smoothing scale shifts with H0 and artificially worsens the growth tension in high-H0 models.

Pith tools