Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Sanity checks for patch visualisation in prototype-based image classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16120 v1 pith:GT5G23CG submitted 2023-10-25 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords methodsimagemodelvisualisationanalysisbehaviourbiaschecks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we perform an analysis of the visualisation methods implemented in ProtoPNet and ProtoTree, two self-explaining visual classifiers based on prototypes. We show that such methods do not correctly identify the regions of interest inside of the images, and therefore do not reflect the model behaviour, which can create a false sense of bias in the model. We also demonstrate quantitatively that this issue can be mitigated by using other saliency methods that provide more faithful image patches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools