Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Re-examination of the Distribution of Galactic Free Electrons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0105416 v1 pith:GTXZPWUG submitted 2001-05-23 astro-ph

A Re-examination of the Distribution of Galactic Free Electrons

classification astro-ph
keywords modeldistributiondistancepulsarsradialdispersiondistanceselectrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a list of 109 pulsars with independent distance information compiled from the literature. Since the compilation of Frail & Weisberg, there are 35 pulsars with new distance estimate and 25 pulsars for which the distance or distance uncertainty have been revised. We used this data to fit a smooth, axisymmetric, two disk model of the distribution of galactic electrons. The two exponential model components have mean local midplane densities at the solar circle of 2.03e-2 cm^-3 and 0.71e-2 cm^-3, and scale heights of 1.07 and 0.053 kpc. The thick component shows very little radial variation, while the second has a radial scale length of only a few kiloparsecs. We also examined a model which varies as sech^2(x), rather than exp(-x), in both the radial and vertical direction. We prefer this model with no midplane cusp, but find that the fit parameters essentially describe the same electron distribution. The distances predicted by this distribution have a similar scatter as the more complex model of Taylor & Cordes. We examine the pulsars that deviate strongly from this model. There are two regions of enhanced dispersion measure, one of which correlates well with the Sagittarius-Carina spiral arm. We find that the scatter of the observed dispersion measure from the model is not fit well by either a normal or log-normal distribution of lump sizes, but may be caused instead by the uncertainties in the distances.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.