Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Out of Distribution Performance of State of Art Vision Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.10750 v3 pith:GUU43NV7 submitted 2023-01-25 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords performancevisionmodelmodelsresearchrobustnessaccordingattention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The vision transformer (ViT) has advanced to the cutting edge in the visual recognition task. Transformers are more robust than CNN, according to the latest research. ViT's self-attention mechanism, according to the claim, makes it more robust than CNN. Even with this, we discover that these conclusions are based on unfair experimental conditions and just comparing a few models, which did not allow us to depict the entire scenario of robustness performance. In this study, we investigate the performance of 58 state-of-the-art computer vision models in a unified training setup based not only on attention and convolution mechanisms but also on neural networks based on a combination of convolution and attention mechanisms, sequence-based model, complementary search, and network-based method. Our research demonstrates that robustness depends on the training setup and model types, and performance varies based on out-of-distribution type. Our research will aid the community in better understanding and benchmarking the robustness of computer vision models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Expansions in Vision Transformers for Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    KAN-based ViTs show slight average incremental accuracy gains over MLP-ViTs in continual learning, but the paper's own data show worse forgetting on CIFAR-100 and worse last-task accuracy on MNIST.

Pith tools