Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Practical Learned Indexing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.05117 v2 pith:GVMRZ2HI submitted 2021-08-11 cs.DB cs.LG

classification cs.DBcs.LG
keywords learnedplexsplinebuildepsilonerrorindexlayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Latest research proposes to replace existing index structures with learned models. However, current learned indexes tend to have many hyperparameters, often do not provide any error guarantees, and are expensive to build. We introduce Practical Learned Index (PLEX). PLEX only has a single hyperparameter $\epsilon$ (maximum prediction error) and offers a better trade-off between build and lookup time than state-of-the-art approaches. Similar to RadixSpline, PLEX consists of a spline and a (multi-level) radix layer. It first builds a spline satisfying the given $\epsilon$ and then performs an ad-hoc analysis of the distribution of spline points to quickly tune the radix layer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Learned Indexes in LSM-tree Systems: Benchmarks,Insights and Design Choices

    cs.DB 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark shows learned indexes beat fence pointers on memory-latency tradeoff in LSM-trees, with position boundary and SSTable granularity as the key tuning knobs.

Pith tools