Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Bias and variance reduction and denoising for CTF Estimation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Recovering several zero-crossing rings of the contrast transfer function from a cryo-EM micrograph — without additional assumptions — yields accurate defocus and astigmatism estimates.

desk verdict A solid CTF-estimation methods paper with one real but fixable flaw: the convex-background justification is mathematically wrong, yet the pipeline and experiments still deserve peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03454 v3 pith:GWJXEBDT submitted 2019-08-09 eess.IV cs.CV

Ayelet Heimowitz , Joakim Andén , Amit Singer This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV MSC 62M1590C05
keywords contrasttransferfunctioncryo-electronmicroscopymultitaperestimatorspectralestimationsteerablebasisexpansionlinearprogrammingbackgroundsubtractiondefocus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

By first estimating the power spectrum with a multitaper method instead of the periodogram, this paper claims, the bias and variance of a cryo-EM micrograph's spectrum drop enough that several zero-crossing rings of the contrast transfer function (CTF) — the microscope's frequency-space distortion — become plainly visible in the low-to-mid frequency range, without additional model assumptions. A linear program subtracts the radial background, and a projection onto a steerable basis removes noise while provably preserving the CTF's structure. The cleaned spectrum feeds two defocus estimators, one correlation-based and one that solves for defocus and astigmatism from the detected ring positions. If the claim is right, accurate CTF parameters can be read off the micrograph — even from raw movie frames before motion correction — in agreement with established tools on the CTF challenge datasets, at a fraction of the runtime. Since particle picking, denoising, class averaging, and 3D refinement all need the CTF corrected first, the payoff propagates through the entire structure-determination pipeline.

What carries the argument

The identity carrying the method is the micrograph power spectrum model $S_y(g) = |H_\varphi(g)|^2 S_x(g) + S_e(g)$: the observed spectrum is the clean projection spectrum modulated by the squared CTF, plus a background. The machinery that runs on it has three parts. The multitaper estimator uses zeroth-order discrete prolate spheroidal sequences as tapers, averaged over half-overlapping blocks, to lower both bias and variance relative to the periodogram. The background model is the non-negative, convex, radially symmetric function, found by linear programming, that is closest to and nowhere larger than the multitaper estimate; the convexity constraint is justified by the claim that the counting-mode background decreases monotonically, or decreases and then increases. The variance-reduction step is the steerable-basis projection: because the CTF's Taylor expansion around zero astigmatism contains only angular frequencies $k = 0, \pm 2$, the cleaned spectrum is projected onto that span, smoothing away noise without removing CTF structure. The final mechanism is the zero-crossing rings: they appear as closed, approximately elliptical local minima of the cleaned spectrum, and each ring obeys $\chi_\varphi(g) = \pi \ell$, giving an overdetermined system of equations solved for the defocus parameters.

What would settle it

Simulate a micrograph from the paper's own model, $S_y = |H_\varphi|^2 S_x + S_e$, with known defocus and a deliberately non-convex background — for instance a radial profile that decreases, rises through a bump, and falls again — or a deliberately non-radial background; run ASPIRE-CTF on it and compare the recovered ring radii and defocus to the ground truth. If the rings shift or disappear whenever the convexity or radial-symmetry premise fails, the claim that several zero-crossing rings are recovered without additional assumptions is falsified. The simulation is fully determined by the paper's model and needs no experimental data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the background-subtracted power spectrum $S_y - S_e = |H_\varphi|^2 S_x$ can be estimated cleanly enough that several zero-crossing rings of the CTF are recovered without additional assumptions. Three reductions carry the argument. First, a multitaper estimator built from discrete prolate spheroidal sequence tapers and averaged over half-overlapping blocks replaces the periodogram, cutting both the bias from frequency leakage and the variance that hides the Thon rings. Second, the radially symmetric background is estimated by a linear program that finds the non-negative, convex radial function closest to, and nowhere larger than, the multitaper estimate, leaving a residual that is non-negative and convex and in which the CTF oscillations survive. Third, because the astigmatic CTF's Taylor expansion around $(\Delta f_1 - \Delta f_2) = 0$ involves only the angular frequencies $k = 0, \pm 2$ of a steerable basis, projecting the square root of the residual onto that span suppresses noise without discarding CTF signal. From the cleaned spectrum, defocus and astigmatism are estimated either by maximizing the Pearson correlation of the square root with simulated CTF magnitudes, or by detecting the closed elliptical zero-crossing rings and solving the overdetermined system $\chi_\varphi(g) = \pi \ell$ for the defocus parameters $\varphi = (\Delta f_1, \Delta f_2, \alpha_f)$.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline's load-bearing premise is that the background noise spectrum is radially symmetric and convex, justified by the claim that a background which decreases, or decreases and then increases, must be convex — a step that rules out wavy or sawtooth-shaped backgrounds, which would bias the subtraction and distort every recovered ring.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The power spectrum can be estimated directly from raw movie frames, so CTF estimation can run in parallel with motion correction and is immune to errors introduced by motion-correction software.
  • A visibly clean spectrum benefits every downstream cryo-EM stage that assumes a known CTF, including particle picking, denoising, class averaging, ab initio reconstruction, and refinement.
  • The zero-crossing-based solver is fast: ASPIRE-CTF takes about 22.5 seconds per micrograph versus about 541 seconds for CTFFIND4 in the paper's comparison, so the cleaner estimate does not cost throughput.
  • Defocus and astigmatism estimates stay consistent as the number of summed frames drops from 43 to 5, a regime where the paper reports that Gctf begins to drift in astigmatism.
  • The two parameter estimators agree on clean data, and the paper recommends the zero-crossings method for clean micrographs and the correlation method for very low-SNR micrographs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The convexity constraint is the component most likely to fail in practice; a natural extension is to test the radial profile for convexity before running the linear program, or to replace the fixed constraint with a monotone-plus-bump model — especially since the paper itself notes that zero-crossing positions are extremely sensitive to the background subtraction.
  • The steerable-basis fact, that the squared CTF lives almost entirely in the $k = 0, \pm 2$ angular frequencies, is a transferable denoising result: the same projection could clean noise power spectra for Wiener filtering or per-particle defocus refinement, not just the CTF estimation step.
  • A testable prediction of the ring-based mechanism is that defocus accuracy degrades once fewer than three closed rings survive, so the method's low-SNR floor could be characterized by counting rings rather than by defocus error alone.
  • The 'first without additional assumptions' claim is comparative; an ablation on simulated micrographs with known ground truth — multitaper alone, multitaper plus background subtraction, and the full pipeline — would isolate how much of the ring recovery comes from the spectral estimator versus the background model, a separation the paper does not perform.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents ASPIRE-CTF, a pipeline for estimating the contrast transfer function in single-particle cryo-EM from micrograph power spectra. The pipeline combines multitaper spectral estimation to reduce bias and variance, a linear-programming background subtraction that models the background as a non-negative convex radial function (Section 2.3.1), projection of the background-subtracted spectrum onto a low-dimensional steerable basis containing squared CTFs (Section 2.3.2), and two CTF parameter estimation schemes, one based on correlation with simulated CTFs and one based on fitting zero-crossing rings (Section 2.4). The paper claims that this is the first method to produce power spectrum estimates in which several zero-crossing rings of the CTF are easily recovered without additional assumptions. The method is validated on EMPIAR datasets and on the CTF challenge datasets by comparing estimated defocus parameters with CTFFIND4 and Gctf, and a runtime comparison shows substantial speedup over CTFFIND4.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the method would be a useful contribution to cryo-EM CTF estimation. The multitaper-based variance reduction is well motivated, the steerable-basis truncation derivation in Eqs. (19)-(21) is sound under a small-astigmatism assumption, and the LP formulation is clearly stated. The open-source implementation, the reproducibility of the experiments on public data, and the systematic comparison with two widely used tools are notable strengths. However, the background model's convexity assumption is mathematically unjustified and, as the paper itself acknowledges in Section 2.4.2, the zero-crossing output is extremely sensitive to the background subtraction. Because background subtraction is a load-bearing component for the headline claim of accurate zero-crossing recovery, this issue must be addressed before the contribution can be fully credited.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3.1, LP (17)]
  2. [Section 2.3.1, radial symmetry assumption]
  3. [Section 3.2, Tables 2-3]
  4. [Section 1 and Section 2.3.1]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (32)]
  2. [Section 2.4.1, Eq. (24)]
  3. [Section 2.4.1]
  4. [Section 3.2, Tables 2-3]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the LP background fit, steerable-basis projection, and parameter estimations are data-driven and externally validated; the false convexity justification is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The multitaper estimate (15) is a standard spectral estimator; the LP background estimate (17) is fit to the multitaper data under non-negativity, upper-bound, and convexity constraints, and the background-subtracted spectrum is then defined as the difference. Zero-crossings of this residual are, by construction, contact points where the fitted convex minorant equals the multitaper estimate, but the paper does not claim these are predicted from the CTF model independently; rather it uses the model (6) to interpret them as CTF zeros, which is a modeling assumption rather than a logical circle. The steerable-basis projection is derived in the paper by Taylor expansion of the CTF (19)-(21) and the expansion coefficients are computed from the data (22); using the same CTF family for subsequent correlation or zero-crossing fitting is model-based inference, not a reduction of the output to the input. The defocus parameters are fitted outputs that are then compared against CTFFIND4 and Gctf on the external CTF challenge datasets, providing independent support. The paper's assertion that a monotonically decreasing (or decrease-then-increase) background 'must be convex' is mathematically false, and Section 2.4.2 itself notes that estimated zero-crossings are 'extremely sensitive to the method of background subtraction'; however, an incorrect or restrictive modeling assumption is a correctness/robustness risk, not circularity. The self-citations to the authors' prior multitaper and steerable-basis work are not load-bearing: the necessary properties are either standard or re-derived here, and the empirical validation is external.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the cryo-EM imaging model (Eqs. 2 and 6), the standard parametric CTF model, and several regularity assumptions (slowly varying S_x, radial and convex background). The paper's specific contribution adds hand-set hyperparameters (L, m/K, block size) and a heuristic zero-crossing rule. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Number of DPSS tapers L = 4 (blocks 512x512), 16 (blocks 1024x1024)
    Controls the bias-variance tradeoff of the multitaper estimator; chosen by hand in Section 3.2, not derived.
  • Radial cutoff m/K = 3/8
    Maximum spatial frequency used in the LP background estimation and correlation fitting; set as the default in Section 2.3.1, above which the power spectrum is assumed noise-dominated.
  • Block size K and overlap = 512 or 1024, half-overlapping
    Determines the number of blocks and the variance reduction; two sizes are tried and the better correlation is selected via Eq. (30).
  • Zero-crossing detection rule = pixel smaller than at least 6 of 8 neighbors; closed-ring and ellipse checks
    Heuristic threshold in Section 2.4.2 used to identify CTF zero-crossings; affects the zero-crossing-based parameter estimate.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The micrograph is y = h_phi * x + e with x and e stationary random fields (weak-phase object approximation, Eq. (2)).
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to derive Eq. (6); standard in cryo-EM but not verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption The power spectrum satisfies S_y = |H_phi|^2 S_x + S_e (Eq. (6)).
    Follows from Eq. (2) for stationary fields; backbone of the whole estimation approach.
  • domain assumption The CTF is H_phi = -sin(chi_phi) with the phase model (4)-(5) and known lambda, C_s, w, p.
    Standard microscope model cited to Rohou and Grigorieff (2015); all parameter estimation is relative to this model.
  • domain assumption S_x and S_e are slowly varying, and S_e is radially symmetric.
    Used to separate CTF oscillations from the background and to justify 1D radial profile estimation in Section 2.3.1.
  • domain assumption Astigmatism is small, so the first-order Taylor expansion (19)-(21) with remainder bounded by ((Delta f1 - Delta f2)/(Delta f1 + Delta f2))^(P+1) is accurate.
    Invoked in Section 2.3.2 to restrict the steerable basis to k=0,±2; stated as 'the case for experimental cryo-EM data' without direct verification.
  • ad hoc to paper The background is non-negative and convex, and the LP constraints (17) are feasible.
    The convexity justification in Section 2.3.1 is mathematically imprecise ('must be convex'), making this a modeling assumption specific to this paper.
  • domain assumption Blocks of the micrograph are independent enough that averaging reduces variance by a factor of roughly 1/B (Section 2.2.2).
    Approximate for half-overlapping blocks; standard in spectral estimation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bias and variance reduction and denoising for CTF Estimation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GWJXEBDT

@misc{pith2026190803454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bias and variance reduction and denoising for CTF Estimation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GWJXEBDT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03454}
}
read the original abstract

When using an electron microscope for imaging of particles embedded in vitreous ice, the objective lens will inevitably corrupt the projection images. This corruption manifests as a band-pass filter on the micrograph. In addition, it causes the phase of several frequency bands to be flipped and distorts frequency bands. As a precursor to compensating for this distortion, the corrupting point spread function, which is termed the contrast transfer function (CTF) in reciprocal space, must be estimated. In this paper, we will present a novel method for CTF estimation. Our method is based on the multi-taper method for power spectral density estimation, which aims to reduce the bias and variance of the estimator. Furthermore, we use known properties of the CTF and of the background of the power spectrum to increase the accuracy of our estimation. We will show that the resulting estimates capture the zero-crossings of the CTF in the low-mid frequency range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03454 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Absolute value of example CTFs. (a) Radially symmet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Pipeline of ASPIRE-CTF. The input is a movie and the outputs are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Power spectrum estimation and zero-crossings of the estimation for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power spectrum estimation and zero-crossings of the estimation for an 80S ribosome micrograph from the EMPIAR-10028 dataset (Wong et al., 2014). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Background estimation for a β-galactosidase micrograph from the EMPIAR-10017 dataset (Scheres, 2015). On the left is the 1D radial profile of the multitaper power spectrum estimate Sˆ (mt) y (r) and the estimated back￾ground Sˆ (lp) e (r). On the right is the backgroun…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Power spectral density estimates. (a) Background-subtracted estimate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Defocus estimation on sample micrographs of the EMPIAR-10028, EMPIAR-10002, EMPIAR-10042 and EMPIAR-10049 datasets. We compare the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visual comparison between the power spectra computed by ASPIRE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Estimated astigmatism vs. defocus of the CTF parameters. The circu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multitaper estimation on arbitrary domains

    author And\'en, J. , & author Romero, J. L. ( year 2019 ). title Multitaper estimation on arbitrary domains . note Submitted to SIAM J. Imag. Sci., arXiv:1812.03225 https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03225

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    , & author Singer, A

    author And\'en, J. , & author Singer, A. ( year 2017 ). title Factor analysis for spectral estimation . In booktitle Proc. SampTA \/ (pp. pages 169--173 ). :10.1109/SAMPTA.2017.8024447

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    , & author Brown , E

    author Babadi , B. , & author Brown , E. N. ( year 2014 ). title A review of multitaper spectral analysis . journal IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. \/ , volume 61 \/ , pages 1555--1564

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    , author Fernandez, I

    author Bai, X.-C. , author Fernandez, I. S. , author McMullan, G. , & author Scheres, S. H. W. ( year 2013 ). title Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo- EM particles . journal eLife \/ , volume 2 \/ , pages e00461

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    , author Matthies, D

    author Bartesaghi, A. , author Matthies, D. , author Banerjee, S. , author Merk, A. , & author Subramaniam, S. ( year 2014 ). title Structure of -galactosidase at 3.2- A resolution obtained by cryo-electron microscopy . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \/ , volume 111 \/ , pages 11709--11714 . :10.1073/pnas.1402809111

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1402809111 2014

  6. [6]

    , author Zhang, T

    author Bhamre, T. , author Zhang, T. , & author Singer, A. ( year 2016 ). title Denoising and covariance estimation of single particle cryo-EM images . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 195 \/ , pages 72--81

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    , author Glaeser, R

    author Cheng, Y. , author Glaeser, R. M. , & author Nogales, E. ( year 2017 ). title How cryo- EM became so hot . journal Cell \/ , volume 171 \/ , pages 1229--1231

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    author Erickson, H. P. , & author Klug, A. ( year 1971 ). title Measurement and compensation of defocusing and aberrations by F ourier processing of electron micrographs . journal Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B \/ , volume 261 \/ , pages 105--118

    work page 1971

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    author Fern\' a ndez, J. J. , author Sanjurjo, J. R. , & author Carazo, J.-M. ( year 1997 ). title A spectral estimation approach to contrast transfer function detection in electron microscopy . journal Ultramicroscopy \/ , volume 68 \/ , pages 267--295

    1997

  2. [10]

    ( year 1996 )

    author Frank, J. ( year 1996 ). title Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies \/ . publisher Academic Press

    1996

  3. [11]

    , author Rohou, A

    author Grant, T. , author Rohou, A. , & author Grigorieff, N. ( year 2018 ). title cisTEM , user-friendly software for single-particle image processing . journal eLife \/ , volume 7 \/ , pages e35383

    2018

  4. [12]

    , author And \'e n, J

    author Heimowitz, A. , author And \'e n, J. , & author Singer, A. ( year 2018 ). title APPLE picker: A utomatic particle picking, a low-effort cryo- EM framework . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 204 \/ , pages 215--227

    2018

  5. [13]

    author Herzik, M. A. , author Wu, M. , & author Lander, G. C. ( year 2019 ). title High-resolution structure determination of sub-100 kDa complexes using conventional cryo- EM . journal Nat. Commun. \/ , volume 10 \/ , pages 1032 . :10.1038/s41467-019-08991-8

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    , author Baldwin, P

    author Huang, Z. , author Baldwin, P. R. , author Mullapudi, S. , & author Penczek, P. A. ( year 2003 ). title Automated determination of parameters describing power spectra of micrograph images in electron microscopy . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 144 \/ , pages 79--94

    2003

  7. [15]

    , author Korir, A

    author Iudin, A. , author Korir, A. K. , author Salavert-Torres, J. , author Kleywegt, G. J. , & author Patwardhan, A. ( year 2016 ). title EMPIAR : A public archive for raw electron microscopy image data . journal Nat. Methods \/ , volume 13 \/

    2016

  8. [16]

    , & author Shkolnisky, Y

    author Landa, B. , & author Shkolnisky, Y. ( year 2017 ). title Approximation scheme for essentially bandlimited and space-concentrated functions on a disk. journal Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. \/ , volume 43 \/ , pages 381--403

    2017

  9. [17]

    , & author Shkolnisky, Y

    author Landa, B. , & author Shkolnisky, Y. ( year 2018 ). title Steerable principal components for space-frequency localized images . journal SIAM J. Imaging Sci. \/ , volume 10 \/ , pages 508--534

    2018

  10. [18]

    , author Zheng, S

    author Li, X. , author Zheng, S. Q. , author Egami, K. , author Agard, D. A. , & author Cheng, Y. ( year 2013 ). title Influence of electron dose rate on electron counting images recorded with the K2 camera . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 184 \/ , pages 251--260

    2013

  11. [19]

    , author Carragher, B

    author Marabini, R. , author Carragher, B. , author Cheni, S. , author Chen, J. , author Cheng, A. , author Downing, K. H. et al. ( year 2015 ). title CTF C hallenge: R esult summary . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 190 \/ , pages 348--359

    2015

  12. [20]

    author Mindell, J. A. , & author Grigorieff, N. ( year 2003 ). title Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 142 \/ , pages 334--347

    2003

  13. [21]

    author Oppenheim, A. V. , & author Schafer, R. W. ( year 1989 ). title Discrete-Time Signal Processing \/ . ( edition 1st ed.). publisher Prentice Hall

    1989

  14. [22]

    author Percival, D. B. , & author Walden, A. T. ( year 1993 ). title Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications \/ . publisher Cambridge University Press

    1993

  15. [23]

    author Powell, M. J. D. ( year 1970 ). title Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations \/

    1970

  16. [24]

    , author Rubinstein, J

    author Punjani, A. , author Rubinstein, J. L. , author Fleet, D. J. , & author Brubaker, M. A. ( year 2017 ). title cryoSPARC : algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination . journal Nat. Methods \/ , volume 14 \/ , pages 290

    2017

  17. [25]

    , & author Grigorieff, N

    author Rohou, A. , & author Grigorieff, N. ( year 2015 ). title CTFFIND4 : Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 192 \/ , pages 216--221

    2015

  18. [26]

    author Scheres, S. H. ( year 2015 ). title Semi-automated selection of cryo-EM particles in RELION-1.3 . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 189 \/ , pages 114--122 . :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2014.11.010

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    author Scheres, S. H. W. ( year 2012 ). title RELION : Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 180 \/ , pages 519--530

    2012

  20. [28]

    ( year 1978 )

    author Slepian, D. ( year 1978 ). title Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis, and uncertainty--- V : The discrete case . journal Bell Syst. Tech. J. \/ , volume 57 \/ , pages 1371--1430

    1978

  21. [29]

    , author Jonic, S

    author Sorzano, C. , author Jonic, S. , author N\' u \ n ez-Ram\' i rez , R. , author Boisset, N. , & author Carazo, J. M. ( year 2007 ). title Fast, robust, and accurate determination of transmission electron microscopy contrast transfer function . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/...

    2007

  22. [30]

    , author Peng, L

    author Tang, G. , author Peng, L. , author Baldwin, P. R. , author Mann, D. S. , author Jiang, W. , author Rees, I. et al. ( year 2007 ). title EMAN2 : An extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 157 \/ , pages 38--46

    2007

  23. [31]

    , author Sasab, H

    author Tani, K. , author Sasab, H. , & author Toyoshima, C. ( year 1996 ). title A set of computer programs for determining defocus and astigmatism in electron images . journal Ultramicroscopy \/ , volume 65 \/ , pages 31--44

    1996

  24. [32]

    author Thomson , D. J. ( year 1982 ). title Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis . journal Proc. IEEE \/ , volume 70 \/ , pages 1055--1096

    1982

  25. [33]

    ( year 1971 )

    author Thon, F. ( year 1971 ). title Phase contrast electron microscopy . In editor U. Valdr\' e (Ed.), booktitle Electron Microscopy in Material Science \/ . publisher Academic Press

    1971

  26. [34]

    , author Franken, E

    author Vulovic, M. , author Franken, E. M. , author Ravelli, R. B. G. , author van Vliet, L. J. , & author Rieger, B. ( year 2012 ). title Precise and unbiased estimation of astigmatism and defocus in transmission electron microscopy . journal Ultramicroscopy \/ , volume 116 \...

    2012

  27. [35]

    author Welch, P. D. ( year 1967 ). title The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms . journal IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. \/ , volume 15 \/ , pages 70--73

    1967

  28. [36]

    , author Bai, X.-C

    author Wong, W. , author Bai, X.-C. , author Brown, A. , author Fernandez, I. S. , author Hanssen, E. , author Condron, M. et al. ( year 2014 ). title Cryo- EM structure of the Plasmodium falciparum 80S ribosome bound to the anti-protozoan drug emetine . journal eLife \/ , volume 3 \/

    2014

  29. [37]

    , author Li, K

    author Yan, R. , author Li, K. , & author Jiang, W. ( year 2017 ). title Real-time detection and single-pass minimization of TEM objective lens astigmatism . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 197 \/ , pages 210--219

    2017

  30. [38]

    ( year 2016 )

    author Zhang, K. ( year 2016 ). title G ctf: R eal-time CTF determination and correction . journal J. Struct. Biol. \/ , volume 193 \/ , pages 1--12

    2016

  31. [39]

    , author Falcon, B

    author Zhang, W. , author Falcon, B. , author Murzin, A. G. , author Fan, J. , author Crowther, R. A. , author Goedert, M. et al. ( year 2019 ). title Heparin-induced tau filaments are polymorphic and differ from those in A lzheimer's and P ick's diseases . journal eLife \/ , ...

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    , author Shkolnisky, Y

    author Zhao, Z. , author Shkolnisky, Y. , & author Singer, A. ( year 2016 ). title Fast steerable principal component analysis . journal IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging \/ , volume 2 \/ , pages 1--12

    2016

  33. [41]

    , & author Singer, A

    author Zhao, Z. , & author Singer, A. ( year 2013 ). title F ourier-- B essel rotational invariant eigenimages . journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. A \/ , volume 30 \/ , pages 871--877 . :10.1364/JOSAA.30.000871

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    author Zheng, S. Q. , author Palovcak, E. , author Armache, J.-P. , author Verba, K. A. , author Cheng, Y. , & author Agard, D. A. ( year 2017 ). title MotionCor2 : anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy . journal Nat. Methods \/ , ...

    2017

  35. [43]

    , author Penczek, P

    author Zhu, J. , author Penczek, P. A. , author Schr\" o der, R. , & author Frank, J. ( year 1997 ). title Three-dimensional reconstruction with contrast transfer function correction from energy-filtered cryoelectron micrographs: Procedure and application to the 70S Escherichi...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.