REVIEW 1 cited by
Markov-Nash equilibria in mean-field games under model uncertainty
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose and analyze a framework for mean-field Markov games under model uncertainty. In this framework, a state-measure flow describing the collective behavior of a population affects the given reward function as well as the unknown transition kernel of the representative agent. The agent's objective is to choose an optimal Markov policy in order to maximize her worst-case expected reward, where worst-case refers to the most adverse scenario among all transition kernels considered to be feasible to describe the unknown true law of the environment. We prove the existence of a mean-field equilibrium under model uncertainty, where the agent chooses the optimal policy that maximizes the worst-case expected reward, and the state-measure flow aligns with the agent's state distribution under the optimal policy and the worst-case transition kernel. Moreover, we prove that for suitable multi-agent Markov games under model uncertainty the optimal policy from the mean-field equilibrium forms an approximate Markov-Nash equilibrium whenever the number of agents is large enough.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Stationary Mean-Field Games of Singular Control under Knightian Uncertainty
A unique stationary mean-field equilibrium exists for one-dimensional singular control games under Knightian uncertainty, with a barrier-type optimal policy and an explicit stationary density.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.