REVIEW 1 cited by
Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: Authentic Research Education Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We report a framework that enables the wide adoption of authentic research educational methodology at various schools by addressing common barriers. The guiding principles we present were applied to implement a program in which teams of students with complementary skills develop useful artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for researchers in natural sciences. To accomplish this, we work with research laboratories that reveal/specify their needs, and then our student teams work on the discovery, design, and development of an AI solution for unique problems using a consulting-like arrangement. To date, our group has been operating at New York University (NYU) for seven consecutive semesters, has engaged more than a hundred students, ranging from first-year college students to master's candidates, and has worked with more than twenty projects and collaborators. While creating education benefits for students, our approach also directly benefits scientists, who get an opportunity to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning for their specific needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Research Guide: From Informal Role to Profession
The authors argue that guiding non-PhD learners through authentic research requires a dedicated profession with its own training, career structure, and recognition because existing models and programs fall short.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.