Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: Authentic Research Education Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.08966 v5 pith:GX5LANJU submitted 2022-09-19 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords researchstudentsartificialauthenticbenefitseducationframeworkintelligence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report a framework that enables the wide adoption of authentic research educational methodology at various schools by addressing common barriers. The guiding principles we present were applied to implement a program in which teams of students with complementary skills develop useful artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for researchers in natural sciences. To accomplish this, we work with research laboratories that reveal/specify their needs, and then our student teams work on the discovery, design, and development of an AI solution for unique problems using a consulting-like arrangement. To date, our group has been operating at New York University (NYU) for seven consecutive semesters, has engaged more than a hundred students, ranging from first-year college students to master's candidates, and has worked with more than twenty projects and collaborators. While creating education benefits for students, our approach also directly benefits scientists, who get an opportunity to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning for their specific needs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Research Guide: From Informal Role to Profession

    physics.ed-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors argue that guiding non-PhD learners through authentic research requires a dedicated profession with its own training, career structure, and recognition because existing models and programs fall short.

Pith tools