REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimal empirical Bayes estimation for the Poisson model via minimum-distance methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The Robbins estimator is the most iconic and widely used procedure in the empirical Bayes literature for the Poisson model. On one hand, this method has been recently shown to be minimax optimal in terms of the regret (excess risk over the Bayesian oracle that knows the true prior) for various nonparametric classes of priors. On the other hand, it has been long recognized in practice that the Robbins estimator lacks the desired smoothness and monotonicity of Bayes estimators and can be easily derailed by those data points that were rarely observed before. Based on the minimum-distance distance method, we propose a suite of empirical Bayes estimators, including the classical nonparametric maximum likelihood, that outperform the Robbins method in a variety of synthetic and real data sets and retain its optimality in terms of minimax regret.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Besting Good--Turing: Optimality of Non-Parametric Maximum Likelihood for Distribution Estimation
An NPMLE-based empirical Bayes estimator is shown to be competitively optimal (up to log factors) for KL-risk distribution estimation, while Good-Turing is provably suboptimal.
-
Solving Empirical Bayes via Transformers
A transformer pre-trained on synthetic Poisson data can beat the classical NPMLE estimator on several empirical Bayes tasks and run about 100x faster.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.