Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Optical polarimetry: Methods, Instruments and Calibration Techniques

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Optical polarimetry can reach photon-noise-limited sensitivity below 10 parts per million with double-image CCD instruments, a review argues, and this precision makes recent black-hole X-ray binary polarization measurements credible.

desk verdict A competent, useful review chapter that consolidates optical polarimetry practice; the only substantive caveat is that the sub-10 ppm claim is best read as repeatability, not demonstrated absolute zero-point calibration. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10431 v1 pith:GYPVAUTK submitted 2019-08-27 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Andrei Berdyugin , Vilppu Piirola , Juri Poutanen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords opticalpolarimetryinstrumentalpolarizationcalibrationdouble-imageCCDpolarimeterStokesparametersblackholeX-raybinariesDiPol-2broadband
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review chapter argues that carefully calibrated double-image CCD polarimeters reach detection sensitivities below $10^{-5}$ (less than 10 parts per million) in about an hour on sufficiently bright stars, and that this precision is what makes recent astrophysical polarization measurements credible. The authors present the instrument design and calibration steps—rotatable superachromatic wave plates, a double-beam calcite analyzer, common flat-fielding across all retarder positions, and strong defocusing—that they say leave the instrument photon-noise limited. They apply the technique to black hole X-ray binaries, measuring intrinsic polarization of about 1.1% for V404 Cyg and 0.3–0.5% for MAXI J1820+070, and to early-type binaries, where phase-locked polarization yields orbital parameters. The broader point is that polarimetry, once limited to few-percent effects, can now constrain what emits the optical light in accreting compact objects.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing technique is the double-image CCD polarimeter: a rotatable superachromatic half-wave plate followed by a calcite or Savart plate analyzer that splits each star into two orthogonally polarized images on the same CCD frame. The polarization is recovered from intensity ratios of the extraordinary and ordinary images at four half-wave plate positions ($0^\circ$, $22.5^\circ$, $45^\circ$, $67.5^\circ$), using the ratio of differences to cancel common-mode atmospheric and flat-field effects. The stabilising calibration choices are to rotate the wave plate through a full $360^\circ$ cycle (16 exposures), to apply one common flat field rather than individual flats per retarder angle, and to defocus the star so its light spreads over many pixels, allowing up to $10^8$ electrons per image without saturation. These choices make the reduction nearly insensitive to flat-field imperfections and leave photon statistics as the dominant noise.

What would settle it

Compare the telescope polarization derived from two independent samples of nearby stars selected from different Galactic directions: if the averaged $(q,u)$ values differ by more than about 10 ppm, the cancellation assumption is violated and the calibration recipe inherits a systematic bias. A second check is to observe the same 'unpolarized' standard star with an independent space-based polarimeter; disagreement at the $10^{-5}$ level would indicate unresolved sample-dependent contamination.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The chapter's central claim is that a double-image CCD polarimeter, operated with a full $360^\circ$ rotation of a superachromatic retarder and a single common flat field for all 16 exposure positions, is inherently stable and reaches detection sensitivity better than $10^{-5}$ (less than 10 ppm) in roughly an hour for bright stars; the DiPol-2 instrument is described as photon-noise limited at these levels. In the authors' own examples, this calibration recipe makes possible the measurement of intrinsic polarization $\mathrm{PD}_V = 1.1 \pm 0.1\%$ in V404 Cyg during its 2015 outburst, intrinsic polarization of 0.3–0.5% in MAXI J1820+070, and orbital parameters of massive binaries from phase-locked polarization variations. The chapter presents this as a proven technique, not a proposal: the calibration steps are laid out as practical prescriptions for any similar instrument.

Load-bearing premise

The calibration assumes that the telescope's own polarization is the average Stokes vector of a sample of 5–20 nearby stars ($d < 25$ pc), so any interstellar or intrinsic stellar polarization in individual stars cancels in the average; if that cancellation fails, the quoted intrinsic polarizations carry a systematic bias even when the $10^{-5}$ sensitivity claim holds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any telescope equipped with a rotatable superachromatic retarder and a calcite double-beam analyzer can adopt the common-flat-field, full-rotation calibration and expect sub-10 ppm sensitivity on bright stars.
  • The claimed intrinsic polarization of V404 Cyg ($\mathrm{PD}_V = 1.1 \pm 0.1\%$), if correct, rules out non-thermal jet synchrotron as the dominant optical emission mechanism, favouring scattering in a flattened plasma envelope.
  • The measured 0.3–0.5% intrinsic polarization of MAXI J1820+070 and its step-like change around 2018 April 14 become usable constraints on the transition toward the soft X-ray state.
  • Phase-locked polarization variations of order 0.05–0.1% in early-type binaries turn polarimetry into an orbital-inclination diagnostic independent of eclipses.
  • Because the sensitivity claim is photon-noise limited, longer integrations and larger telescopes extend the method to fainter targets without new calibration physics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sub-10 ppm limit is genuinely set by photon statistics rather than by residual flat-field or retarder errors, then similar precision should be reproducible on any double-image polarimeter that follows the same calibration sequence, including instruments on 1–2 m class telescopes; this is an inference, not stated in the chapter.
  • The same calibration logic could be carried into the near-infrared with emerging Saphira APD arrays, where sky background is higher but the double-image and common-flat-field benefits would still suppress systematic errors.
  • A direct test of the nearby-star assumption would be a stellar sample spread across a range of distances and Galactic latitudes; if the inferred telescope polarization varies with distance, the cancellation premise would need revision.
  • Frame-transfer EMCCDs combined with these calibration steps might bring sub-10 ppm polarimetry to time resolutions of seconds, opening stellar pulsars and quasi-periodic oscillations to precision polarimetry at lower signal levels than current high-speed instruments reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter on optical polarimetry, covering the description of polarization with Stokes parameters, the devices used for modulation and analysis (wave plates, PEMs, FLCs, calcite plates, Savart plates, Wollaston prisms), the detector options (CCDs, PMTs, APDs), and the main observational techniques: broadband, imaging, and spectropolarimetry. A substantial part of the chapter is devoted to calibration: the polarization scale, the position-angle zero point, instrumental polarization, and telescope polarization. The authors also present examples of high-precision polarimetry with their DiPol-2 instrument, including measurements of the black hole X-ray binaries V404 Cyg and MAXI J1820+070 and the early-type binaries HD 48099 and λ Tau. The central performance claim is that the double-image CCD technique, with the calibration prescriptions described, provides detection sensitivity better than 10 ppm in about one hour and that DiPol-2 is photon-noise limited at these levels.

Significance. If the performance claim holds, this is a useful synthesis of modern optical polarimetric techniques and a demonstration of the astrophysical reach of high-precision double-image polarimetry. The review is well grounded in the standard literature (Serkowski, Kemp, Hough, Bailey, Strassmeier, and others), and the reduction formulas and calibration recipes are presented explicitly and reproducibly. The application examples in Section 5 show how high-precision polarimetry can constrain emission mechanisms in X-ray binaries and orbital parameters in massive binaries. The main caveat is that the chapter's headline sensitivity statement needs to be more careful about the distinction between precision and absolute accuracy; the Section 5 science results are largely protected by the use of differential and field-star-subtracted measurements, but the wording in Section 4.3 currently invites an absolute-accuracy reading that is not demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.4.1, Eq. (6)] The text defines σ_{q,u,v} = k N^{-1/2} and states that 'k is the analyzer efficiency.' For an analyzer of efficiency ε < 1, the photon-noise uncertainty in the recovered Stokes parameter scales as σ = N^{-1/2}/ε (up to a factor of order unity), so the multiplier is the inverse efficiency. As written, the formula implies that a less efficient analyzer yields lower noise, which is unphysical. Please correct the definition of k and verify that the subsequent statement that 10^12 ADUs are required for 10^-6 precision remains consistent with the corrected expression.
  2. [Sections 4.1 and 4.3] The sentence in Section 4.3, 'This provides inherently very stable instrument and detection sensitivity better than 10^-5 (< 10 ppm) in ~1 hour for sufficiently bright stars,' and the following claim that DiPol-2 is photon-noise limited at these levels do not distinguish precision from absolute accuracy. The zero-point calibration described in Section 4.1 averages the Stokes parameters of 5–20 nearby stars and assumes that intrinsic stellar and interstellar polarization cancel; the chapter itself notes that chromospheric activity can produce detectable intrinsic polarization even in normal A–G main-sequence stars. Unless the telescope-polarization zero-point is independently verified, the <10 ppm statement should be explicitly restricted to repeatability or to differential measurements (as used in the Section 5 analyses, which rely on field-star and quiescent-state subtraction). Please reword to avoid implying an absolute accuracy of <10 ppm.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] The optical axis is described as 'the direction in which refraction index ne is minimum'; this is only true for negative uniaxial crystals. For positive uniaxial crystals such as quartz, ne > no, so the statement is not generally valid. Please rephrase using the standard definition of the optic axis and the ordinary/extraordinary indices.
  2. [Section 3.1.1, Eqs. (7)–(11)] The symbol Q is used both for the absolute Stokes parameter and for the intensity ratio Ie/Io. This notational collision makes the equations harder to follow; please use a distinct symbol (for example R_i) for the intensity ratios.
  3. [Section 3.1.2] The phrase 'accuracy up to a few times per 10^-5' should read 'accuracy of a few times 10^-5'.
  4. [Abstract and Section 2.4.1] 'charge coupling devices' should be 'charge-coupled devices'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the chapter is a methods review whose calibration prescriptions and performance claims rest on stated empirical procedures, not on a derivation from fitted inputs or on load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

This is a review chapter, not a derivation chain, so the main circularity patterns do not apply. The calibration formulas (Eqs. 7-11) are standard definitions of Stokes parameter extraction from intensity ratios, not outputs that are fed back as inputs. The §4.1 procedure of setting the telescope instrumental polarization to the average Stokes vector of 5-20 nearby stars is an explicit empirical calibration assumption, and the chapter candidly notes that chromospheric activity can produce intrinsic polarization in normal A-G stars; this is a correctness risk about absolute zero-point accuracy, not a circularity, because the quantity being estimated (qtel, utel) is defined independently of the scientific targets and is not then claimed as a prediction. The §4.3 claim of better-than-10-ppm sensitivity and photon-noise-limited performance for DiPol-2 is an empirical performance statement supported by the authors' previously published instrument descriptions and science papers, not a result obtained by substituting the calibrated parameters back into the same equations. While the showcase science examples in Section 5 are drawn largely from the authors' own prior work, those works are cited as external evidence of instrument performance and scientific results, and the central methodological content of the chapter does not reduce to those citations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted parameter is imported from the authors' own work to force a conclusion. The skeptical concern about coherent local interstellar polarization biasing the 5-20 star average is a legitimate systematic-error worry, but it does not make any step of the paper circular. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter contributes no free parameters and introduces no new entities. All physics is standard optics and counting statistics, and all instrument descriptions and example measurements come from prior literature. The single non-universal, load-bearing premise is the star-averaging method for telescope polarization (Section 4.1), on which the Section 5 astrophysical conclusions depend.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Stokes parameters (Eqs. 1-3) provide a complete description of partially polarized light.
    Invoked in Section 1.1 and used in every reduction formula throughout the chapter; standard electromagnetic wave optics.
  • domain assumption Retardance of a wave plate is tau = 2*pi*Delta/lambda with Delta = (ne - no)*s (Eq. 4).
    Section 2.1; standard crystal optics adopted from Serkowski (1974).
  • domain assumption Polarimetric precision follows photon statistics sigma = k N^(-1/2) (Eq. 6).
    Section 2.4.2; Poisson counting statistics with analyzer efficiency k; underlies every precision claim in the chapter.
  • domain assumption Equations (7)-(11) recover normalized Stokes parameters from intensity ratios of the two beams, in the small-polarization limit.
    Sections 3.1.1 and 4.3; the ratios are expanded to first order in q, u, v, which is adequate for the quoted sources with polarization below 1.1%.
  • domain assumption Telescope instrumental polarization equals the average Stokes vector of 5-20 nearby stars, with interstellar contributions canceling.
    Section 4.1; load-bearing for the intrinsic polarization values in Section 5, because residual systematics in the star sample feed directly into the quoted intrinsic PD.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical polarimetry: Methods, Instruments and Calibration Techniques." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GYPVAUTK

@misc{pith2026190810431,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical polarimetry: Methods, Instruments and Calibration Techniques},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GYPVAUTK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10431}
}
read the original abstract

In this chapter we present a brief summary of methods, instruments and calibration techniques used in modern astronomical polarimetry in the optical wavelengths. We describe the properties of various polarization devices and detectors used for optical broadband, imaging and spectropolarimetry, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. The necessity of a proper calibration of the raw polarization data is emphasized and methods of the determination and subtraction of instrumental polarization are considered. We also present a few examples of high-precision measurements of optical polarization of black hole X-ray binaries and massive binary stars made with our DiPol-2 polarimeter, which allowed us to constrain the sources of optical emission in black hole X-ray binaries and measure orbital parameters of massive stellar binaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10431 by the authors.

Figure 10
Figure 10. Detailed description of the instrument can be also found in Ilyin et al. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    389:191--201, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020606

    Bagnulo S, Szeifert T, Wade GA, Landstreet JD, Mathys G (2002) Measuring magnetic fields of early-type stars with FORS1 at the VLT . 389:191--201, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020606

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020606 2002

  2. [2]

    Bagnulo S, Landstreet JD, Mason E, Andretta V, Silaj J, Wade GA (2006) Searching for links between magnetic fields and stellar evolution. I. A survey of magnetic fields in open cluster A- and B-type stars with FORS1 . 450:777--791, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054223, astro-ph/0601516

    arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    405:2570--2578, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16634.x, 1003.1753

    Bailey J, Lucas PW, Hough JH (2010) The linear polarization of nearby bright stars measured at the parts per million level . 405:2570--2578, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16634.x, 1003.1753

    arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    A high-sensitivity polarimeter using a ferro-electric liquid crystal modulator

    Bailey J, Kedziora-Chudczer L, Cotton DV, Bott K, Hough JH, Lucas PW (2015) A high-sensitivity polarimeter using a ferro-electric liquid crystal modulator . 449:3064--3073, doi:10.1093/mnras/stv519, 1503.02236

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Berdyugin A, Piirola V, Sadegi S, Tsygankov S, Sakanoi T, Kagitani M, Yoneda M, Okano S, Poutanen J (2016) High-precision broad-band linear polarimetry of early-type binaries. I. Discovery of variable, phase-locked polarization in HD 48099 . 591:A92, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528020, 1606.00198

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Berdyugin A, Piirola V, Sakanoi T, Kagitani M, Yoneda M (2018) High-precision broad-band linear polarimetry of early-type binaries. II. Variable, phase-locked polarization in triple Algol-type system Tauri . 611:A69, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732163

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732163 2018

  7. [7]

    Polarized reflected light from the exoplanet HD189733b: First multicolor observations and confirmation of detection

    Berdyugina SV, Berdyugin AV, Fluri DM, Piirola V (2011) Polarized Reflected Light from the Exoplanet HD189733b: First Multicolor Observations and Confirmation of Detection . 728:L6, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/728/1/L6, 1101.0059

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    II - Binary and multiple star envelopes and the determination of binary inclinations

    Brown JC, McLean IS, Emslie AG (1978) Polarisation by Thomson scattering in optically thin stellar envelopes. II - Binary and multiple star envelopes and the determination of binary inclinations . 68:415--427

    work page 1978

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Experimental Astronomy 36:479--503, doi:10.1007/s10686-013-9342-5, 1305.6825

    Collins P, Kyne G, Lara D, Redfern M, Shearer A, Sheehan B (2013) The Galway astronomical Stokes polarimeter: an all-Stokes optical polarimeter with ultra-high time resolution . Experimental Astronomy 36:479--503, doi:10.1007/s10686-013-9342-5, 1305.6825

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    467:873--897, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx068, 1701.02890

    Cotton DV, Marshall JP, Bailey J, Kedziora-Chudczer L, Bott K, Marsden SC, Carter BD (2017) The intrinsic and interstellar broad-band linear polarization of nearby FGK dwarfs . 467:873--897, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx068, 1701.02890

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    483:3636--3646, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3318, 1812.00294

    Cotton DV, Marshall JP, Frisch PC, Kedziora-Chudzer L, Bailey J, Bott K, Wright DJ, Wyatt MC, Kennedy GM (2019) The wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization in the Local Hot Bubble . 483:3636--3646, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3318, 1812.00294

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    IV - The triple system Lambda Tauri

    Fekel FC Jr, Tomkin J (1982) Secondaries of eclipsing binaries. IV - The triple system Lambda Tauri . 263:289--301, doi:10.1086/160503

    1982 doi

  5. [13]

    In: Adaptive Optics Systems IV, , vol 9148, p 914817, doi:10.1117/12.2057078

    Finger G, Baker I, Alvarez D, Ives D, Mehrgan L, Meyer M, Stegmeier J, Weller HJ (2014) SAPHIRA detector for infrared wavefront sensing . In: Adaptive Optics Systems IV, , vol 9148, p 914817, doi:10.1117/12.2057078

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    814:112, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/112, 1510.04679

    Frisch PC, Berdyugin A, Piirola V, Magalhaes AM, Seriacopi DB, Wiktorowicz SJ, Andersson BG, Funsten HO, McComas DJ, Schwadron NA, Slavin JD, Hanson AJ, Fu CW (2015) Charting the Interstellar Magnetic Field causing the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Ribbon of Energetic ...

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    In: Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, , vol 9906, p 99065E, doi:10.1117/12.2233461

    Gisler D, Berkefeld T, Berdyugina S (2016) Planet imaging polarimetry with the solar telescope GREGOR . In: Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI, , vol 9906, p 99065E, doi:10.1117/12.2233461

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    349:912--926

    Harjunp \"a \"a P, Kaas AA, Carlqvist P, Gahm GF (1999) Linear polarization and molecular filamentary clouds . 349:912--926

    1999

  9. [17]

    611:A3, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731741, 1802.00224

    Harvey EJ, Redman MP, Darnley MJ, Williams SC, Berdyugin A, Piirola VE, Fitzgerald KP, O'Connor EGP (2018) Polarimetry and spectroscopy of the ``oxygen flaring'' DQ Herculis-like nova: V5668 Sagittarii (2015) . 611:A3, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731741, 1802.00224

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    118:1302--1318, doi:10.1086/507955

    Hough JH, Lucas PW, Bailey JA, Tamura M, Hirst E, Harrison D, Bartholomew-Biggs M (2006) PlanetPol: A Very High Sensitivity Polarimeter . 118:1302--1318, doi:10.1086/507955

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Astronomische Nachrichten 333:213, doi:10.1002/asna.201211652

    Ilyin I (2012) Second-order error propagation in the Mueller matrix of a spectropolarimeter . Astronomische Nachrichten 333:213, doi:10.1002/asna.201211652

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Astronomische Nachrichten 332:753, doi:10.1002/asna.201111600

    Ilyin I, Strassmeier KG, Woche M, Dionies F, Di Varano I (2011) On the design of the PEPSI spectropolarimeter for the LBT . Astronomische Nachrichten 332:753, doi:10.1002/asna.201111600

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    In: Phelan D, Ryan O, Shearer A (eds) High Time Resolution Astrophysics, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 351, p 153

    Kanbach G, Stefanescu A, Duscha S, M \"u hlegger M, Schrey F, Steinle H, Slowikowska A, Spruit H (2008) OPTIMA: A High Time Resolution Optical Photo-Polarimeter . In: Phelan D, Ryan O, Shearer A (eds) High Time Resolution Astrophysics, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, v...

    2008

  14. [22]

    In: Trapani G (ed) Polarizers and applications, , vol 307, pp 83--88

    Kemp JC (1981) Photoelastic-modulator polarimeters in astronomy . In: Trapani G (ed) Polarizers and applications, , vol 307, pp 83--88

    1981

  15. [23]

    529:54--58, doi:10.1038/nature16452, 1607.06195

    Kimura M, Isogai K, Kato T, Ueda Y, Nakahira S, Shidatsu M, Enoto T, Hori T, Nogami D, Littlefield C, Ishioka R, Chen YT, King SK, Wen CY, Wang SY, Lehner MJ, Schwamb ME, Wang JH, Zhang ZW, Alcock C, Axelrod T, Bianco FB, Byun YI, Chen WP, Cook KH, Kim DW, Lee T, Marshall SL, ...

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    468:4362--4373, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx779, 1702.02008

    Kosenkov IA, Berdyugin AV, Piirola V, Tsygankov SS, Pall \'e E, Miles-P \'a ez PA, Poutanen J (2017) High-precision optical polarimetry of the accreting black hole V404 Cyg during the 2015 June outburst . 468:4362--4373, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx779, 1702.02008

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Experimental Astronomy 41:43--66, doi:10.1007/s10686-015-9464-z, 1509.05270

    Kyne G, Lara D, Hallinan G, Redfern M, Shearer A (2016) An investigation of the Eigenvalue Calibration Method (ECM) using GASP for non-imaging and imaging detectors . Experimental Astronomy 41:43--66, doi:10.1007/s10686-015-9464-z, 1509.05270

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    708:1537--1544, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1537, 0912.0605

    Mahy L, Rauw G, Martins F, Naz \'e Y, Gosset E, De Becker M, Sana H, Eenens P (2010) A New Investigation of the Binary HD 48099 . 708:1537--1544, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1537, 0912.0605

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    471:1797--1818, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1699, 1707.01076

    Motta SE, Kajava JJE, S \'a nchez-Fern \'a ndez C, Beardmore AP, Sanna A, Page KL, Fender R, Altamirano D, Charles P, Giustini M, Knigge C, Kuulkers E, Oates S, Osborne JP (2017) Swift observations of V404 Cyg during the 2015 outburst: X-ray outflows from super-Eddington accre...

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    27:383--388

    Piirola V (1973) A double image chopping polarimeter. 27:383--388

    1973

  21. [29]

    Piirola V (1988) Simultaneous five-colour (UBVRI) photopolarimeter . In: Coyne GV, Magalhaes AM, Moffat AF, Schulte-Ladbeck RE, Tapia S (eds) Polarized Radiation of Circumstellar Origin, Vatican Observatory/University of Arizona Press, Vatican City State/Tucson, AZ, pp 735--746

    1988

  22. [30]

    186:120--128

    Piirola V, Reiz A, Coyne GV (1987) Simultaneous five-colour (UBVRI) polarimetry of EF ERI . 186:120--128

    1987

  23. [31]

    235:245--254

    Piirola V, Coyne GV, Reiz A (1990) Simultaneous UBVRI polarimetry of VV Puppis during an active phase . 235:245--254

    1990

  24. [32]

    359:399--401, doi:10.1038/359399a0

    Piirola V, Scaltriti F, Coyne GV (1992) Circumstellar disks deduced from sub-arcsecond polarization observations of two young stars . 359:399--401, doi:10.1038/359399a0

    1992 doi

  25. [33]

    410:L107--L110, doi:10.1086/186891

    Piirola V, Hakala P, Coyne GV (1993) The discovery of variable polarization over the 13.9 minute spin period of the intermediate polar RE 0751 + 14 . 410:L107--L110, doi:10.1086/186891

    1993 doi

  26. [34]

    684:558--568, doi:10.1086/590144, 0805.4289

    Piirola V, Vornanen T, Berdyugin A, Coyne GV, J S (2008) V405 Aurigae: A High Magnetic Field Intermediate Polar . 684:558--568, doi:10.1086/590144, 0805.4289

    2008 arXiv

  27. [35]

    In: Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, , vol 9147, p 91478I, doi:10.1117/12.2055923

    Piirola V, Berdyugin A, Berdyugina S (2014) DIPOL-2: a double image high precision polarimeter . In: Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, , vol 9147, p 91478I, doi:10.1117/12.2055923

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    481:2384--2392, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2407, 1809.01884

    Potter SB, Buckley DAH (2018) Time series photopolarimetry and modelling of the white dwarf pulsar in AR Scorpii . 481:2384--2392, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2407, 1809.01884

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    402:1161--1170, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15944.x, 0911.1198

    Potter SB, Buckley DAH, O'Donoghue D, Romero-Colmenero E, O'Connor J, Fourie P, Evans G, Sass C, Crause L, Still M, Butters OW, Norton AJ, Mukai K (2010) Polarized QPOs from the INTEGRAL polar IGRJ14536-5522 (=Swift J1453.4-5524) . 402:1161--1170, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009....

    2010

  30. [38]

    581:L9, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527043, 1507.06659

    Rodriguez J, Cadolle Bel M, Alfonso-Garz \'o n J, Siegert T, Zhang XL, Grinberg V, Savchenko V, Tomsick JA, Chenevez J, Clavel M, Corbel S, Diehl R, Domingo A, Gouiff \`e s C, Greiner J, Krause MGH, Laurent P, Loh A, Markoff S, Mas-Hesse JM, Miller-Jones JCA, Russell DM, Wilms...

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    In: Carleton NP (ed) Astrophysics

    Serkowski K (1974) Polarization techniques . In: Carleton NP (ed) Astrophysics. Part A: Optical and infrared, Academic Press, New York, pp 361--414

    1974

  32. [40]

    458:759--771, doi:10.1093/mnras/stw309, 1602.02105

    S owikowska A, Krzeszowski K, Zejmo M, Reig P, Steele I (2016) Calibration of the Liverpool Telescope RINGO3 polarimeter . 458:759--771, doi:10.1093/mnras/stw309, 1602.02105

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    a rvinen A, Weber M, Woche M, Barnes SI, Bauer SM, Beckert E, Bittner W, Bredthauer R, Carroll TA, Denker C, Dionies F, DiVarano I, D \

    Strassmeier KG, Ilyin I, J \"a rvinen A, Weber M, Woche M, Barnes SI, Bauer SM, Beckert E, Bittner W, Bredthauer R, Carroll TA, Denker C, Dionies F, DiVarano I, D \"o scher D, Fechner T, Feuerstein D, Granzer T, Hahn T, Harnisch G, Hofmann A, Lesser M, Paschke J, Pankratow S, ...

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A&A, in press 1808.09002

    Veledina A, Berdyugin AV, Kosenkov IA, Kajava JJE, Tsygankov SS, Piirola V, Berdyugina SV, Sakanoi T, Kagitani M, Kravtsov V, Poutanen J (2019) Evolving optical polarization of the black hole X-ray binary MAXI J1820+070 . A&A, in press 1808.09002

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    720:L52--L55, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L52, 1008.3903

    Vornanen T, Berdyugina SV, Berdyugin AV, Piirola V (2010) GJ 841B --- the Second DQ White Dwarf With Polarized CH Molecular Bands . 720:L52--L55, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L52, 1008.3903

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    120:1282, doi:10.1086/595966, 0810.5561

    Wiktorowicz SJ, Matthews K (2008) A High-Precision Optical Polarimeter to Measure Inclinations of High-Mass X-Ray Binaries . 120:1282, doi:10.1086/595966, 0810.5561

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    800:L1, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/800/1/L1, 1412.6117

    Wiktorowicz SJ, Nofi LA (2015) Simultaneous Linear and Circular Optical Polarimetry of Asteroid (4) Vesta . 800:L1, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/800/1/L1, 1412.6117

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mi...

  39. [47]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

  40. [48]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION in...

  41. [49]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or...

  42. [50]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION in...

  43. [51]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.