Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Quantum Belief Propagation for LDPC Decoding in Wireless Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.11069 v2 pith:H2M2APMC submitted 2020-07-21 cs.NI eess.SPquant-ph

classification cs.NIeess.SPquant-ph
keywords ldpcerrorquantumratedesignhardwarebeliefcodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present Quantum Belief Propagation (QBP), a Quantum Annealing (QA) based decoder design for Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) error control codes, which have found many useful applications in Wi-Fi, satellite communications, mobile cellular systems, and data storage systems. QBP reduces the LDPC decoding to a discrete optimization problem, then embeds that reduced design onto quantum annealing hardware. QBP's embedding design can support LDPC codes of block length up to 420 bits on real state-of-the-art QA hardware with 2,048 qubits. We evaluate performance on real quantum annealer hardware, performing sensitivity analyses on a variety of parameter settings. Our design achieves a bit error rate of $10^{-8}$ in 20 $\mu$s and a 1,500 byte frame error rate of $10^{-6}$ in 50 $\mu$s at SNR 9 dB over a Gaussian noise wireless channel. Further experiments measure performance over real-world wireless channels, requiring 30 $\mu$s to achieve a 1,500 byte 99.99$\%$ frame delivery rate at SNR 15-20 dB. QBP achieves a performance improvement over an FPGA based soft belief propagation LDPC decoder, by reaching a bit error rate of $10^{-8}$ and a frame error rate of $10^{-6}$ at an SNR 2.5--3.5 dB lower. In terms of limitations, QBP currently cannot realize practical protocol-sized ($\textit{e.g.,}$ Wi-Fi, WiMax) LDPC codes on current QA processors. Our further studies in this work present future cost, throughput, and QA hardware trend considerations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools