Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1405.7965 v2 pith:H4VTML6F submitted 2014-05-30 q-bio.NC

classification q-bio.NC
keywords analysiscommoncouplingcross-frequencyinterpretabilityneuralpotentialproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) has been proposed to coordinate neural dynamics across spatial and temporal scales. Despite its potential relevance for understanding healthy and pathological brain function, the standard CFC analysis and physiological interpretation come with fundamental problems. For example, apparent CFC can appear because of spectral correlations due to common non-stationarities that may arise in the total absence of interactions between neural frequency components. To provide a road map towards an improved mechanistic understanding of CFC, we organize the available and potential novel statistical/modeling approaches according to their biophysical interpretability. While we do not provide solutions for all the problems described, we provide a list of practical recommendations to avoid common errors and to enhance the interpretability of CFC analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools