Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Exact WKB of solutions by Borel summation and open TBA

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Borel-summed exact WKB solution of a quantum Seiberg-Witten Schrödinger equation is fixed by its discontinuities at minus BPS soliton central charges and minus 4d BPS central charges, which reproduce the GMN open…

desk verdict The first real test of GMN open TBA beyond Airy, with honest qualifications: the numerics are substantial and the conjectures are clearly labeled, so the paper deserves a serious referee despite the load-bearing unproven steps. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06922 v1 pith:H5NU2U4H submitted 2025-07-09 hep-th

Qianyu Hao This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 34E2081Q20 PACS 03.65.Sq
keywords exactWKBBorelsummationGMNopenTBAquantumSeiberg-WittencurveBPSsoliton4dstateWeberequationmodifiedMathieu
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the exact WKB solution of a Schrödinger equation arising from a quantum Seiberg-Witten curve is fixed by its Borel-plane discontinuities, and that those discontinuities are physically meaningful: they sit at minus BPS soliton central charges and at minus 4d BPS state central charges. Together with the leading asymptotic behavior of the solution, these discontinuities are claimed to reproduce the Gaiotto-Moore-Neitzke (GMN) open TBA integral equations. The author checks this matching numerically in two nontrivial cases, the Weber equation and the modified Mathieu equation of pure $SU(2)$ at $u=0$, by comparing Padé-Borel summation with iterative solution of the open TBA. If the claim is right, the conjectural open TBA becomes a working exact-WKB method for solutions—not only for quantum periods—and the proposed discontinuity formulae extend to higher-order ODEs in the same correspondence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the regularized WKB integral $\Upsilon^{(i)}(z,\epsilon)=\sum_n \operatorname{Reg}\!\big(\int_{b_0}^{z}Y_n^{(i)}dz\big)\epsilon^n$, whose contour from the branch point $b_0$ to $z$ is defined as half of the BPS soliton charge $-\gamma_{ji}^1$; the reduced solution $\Psi_{\rm red}^{(i)}=e^{\Upsilon_{\rm red}^{(i)}/\epsilon}$ removes the leading-order term. The Borel transform of this series has poles at the two types of central charges, and the discontinuity formulae (2.21) and (2.30) convert those poles into a Riemann-Hilbert problem. The GMN open TBA integral equation $g_1(\epsilon)=(-\sqrt{P(z,0)})^{-1/2}+\sum_n\mu(\gamma_{21}^n)\frac{\epsilon}{2\pi}\int_{\ell_{\gamma_{21}^n}}\frac{d\epsilon'}{\epsilon'}\frac{1}{\epsilon'-\epsilon}g_1(-\epsilon')X_{\gamma_{21}^n}(\epsilon')$ solves the same Riemann-Hilbert problem, with the matching $g_1=\Psi_{\rm red}^{(1)}N_{\rm GMN}$ established through the quantum periods $X_\gamma$. In short, the BPS discontinuities are the mechanism that carries the argument, and the open TBA is the integral-equation form of those discontinuities.

What would settle it

At a point such as $z=5i$ in region 3 of the pure $SU(2)$ example, compute the lateral Borel sums with increasing Padé order and test the predicted discontinuity (2.21) at $\arg(\epsilon)=\arg(-Z_{\gamma_{21}^n})$ for each of the three solitons; if the difference between the two lateral sums does not approach the proposed expression, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the reduced exact WKB solution $\Psi_{\rm red}^{(i)}(z,\epsilon)=e^{\Upsilon_{\rm red}^{(i)}(z,\epsilon)/\epsilon}$ has exactly two kinds of Borel singularities: at minus soliton central charges $-Z_{\gamma_{ji}^n}$, with discontinuity $\operatorname{disc}(\Psi_{\rm red}^{(i)})=\mu(\gamma_{ji}^n)\Psi_{\rm red}^{(j)}e^{Z_{\gamma_{ji}^n}/\epsilon+\frac{1}{\pi i}\sum_{\gamma>0}\langle\gamma_n,\gamma\rangle\Omega(\gamma)I_\gamma(\epsilon)}$, and at minus 4d BPS central charges $-Z_\gamma$, with discontinuity $\operatorname{disc}(\Upsilon_{\rm red}^{(i)}/\epsilon)=\frac{1}{2}\langle-\gamma_{ji}^1,\gamma\rangle\Omega(\gamma)\log(1-\sigma(\gamma)X_\gamma)$. These discontinuities, together with the asymptotics $\Psi_{\rm red}\sim(-\sqrt{P(z,0)})^{-1/2}$, are precisely what the GMN open TBA equations encode, so the Borel-summed solution and the open-TBA solution agree up to an $\epsilon$-dependent normalization factor $N_{\rm GMN}(\epsilon)=e^{\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{\gamma>0}\langle\gamma_{21}^1,\gamma\rangle\Omega(\gamma)I_\gamma(\epsilon)}$. The paper gives numerical evidence for this agreement in the Weber equation and in the pure $SU(2)$ modified Mathieu equation at $u=0$, in regions supporting two and three BPS solitons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the GMN open TBA equations, which are conjectural, correctly describe the Borel-summed solution; the identification of $g_1$ with $\Psi_{\rm red}N_{\rm GMN}$ in (1.13) is itself stated to rest on that conjecture, so if it fails the central matching claim collapses even though the Borel discontinuities could still be correct.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The modified Mathieu equation at $u=0$, the pure $SU(2)$ strong-coupling case, gains an exact solution computed by iterating the GMN open TBA, independent of the formal WKB expansion.
  • For any second-order ODE in the correspondence, the solution can in principle be computed from BPS data: soliton degeneracies, central charges, and quantum periods supplied by the closed TBA.
  • The discontinuity expressions (2.21) and (2.30) are proposed to hold for higher-order ODEs in the same framework, so the method should extend beyond second order.
  • The 4d BPS-state discontinuities are exactly cancelled by the normalization factor $N_{\rm GMN}$, which is why the open-TBA solution sees only the soliton jumps; this explains the role of the normalization in matching the two methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the open-TBA conjecture is proved, the numerical agreement here indicates that the Borel discontinuity data are complete—the solution is uniquely fixed by its jumps and leading asymptotics, reducing exact WKB for solutions to a well-posed Riemann-Hilbert problem.
  • Inference: the same Borel-plane analysis could be run at nonzero $u$ in pure $SU(2)$, where the soliton count changes across walls of marginal stability and the closed TBA involves additional quantum periods; agreement there would strengthen the claim beyond the symmetric point.
  • Inference: the pole positions of the Padé approximants could serve as a numerical BPS spectrometer, mapping soliton and 4d BPS spectra from the solution alone without first knowing the spectral network.
  • Inference: in the 5d/difference-equation analogue, exponential networks and BPS KK-modes should play the role that Stokes graphs and soliton charges play here, so the same discontinuity-based strategy might transfer to $q$-difference equations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies exact WKB solutions of the quantum Seiberg-Witten Schr\"odinger equation (1.1), with the solution normalized at a branch point and regularized by BPS soliton charges. The author proposes that the Borel-summed reduced solution \Psi_red^(i)(z,\epsilon) has two types of discontinuities: at minus BPS soliton central charges with the exponential kernel (2.21), and at minus 4d BPS central charges with the Kontsevich-Soibelman-type jump (2.30). The paper then connects these discontinuities to the GMN open TBA integral equation through the normalization factor (1.13), and tests the matching numerically for the Weber equation (Section 4) and for the modified Mathieu equation at u=0 (Section 5), including a claimed exact solution of the modified Mathieu equation obtained from the open TBA. Throughout, the open TBA conjecture, the identification (1.13), and several auxiliary relations are explicitly flagged as conjectural, and the paper provides convergence tables showing agreement with Pad\'e-Borel summation.

Significance. The potential significance is substantial. This appears to be the first nontrivial numerical test of GMN open TBA for equations beyond the Airy example, and it gives concrete proposals for Borel-plane discontinuities of the exact WKB solution in terms of BPS central charges and BPS indices, with a claimed generalization to higher-order ODEs. The numerical work is careful: tables report stable digits, step-size and cutoff dependence, and the pure SU(2) computation feeds X_\gamma from a separate closed TBA computation rather than fitting the answer. The author also honestly labels the open TBA, the identification (1.13), and the relation (2.27) as conjectural or unproven. If the conjectures and the uniqueness question are settled, this would be a genuine advance. In its current form, however, the central matching claim rests on unproven input, so the paper is best read as strong numerical evidence for a conjecture rather than a proof of that conjecture.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1.7; Eqs. (3.13), (5.23), (5.24)] The stress-test concern about well-posedness lands. In §1.7 the author writes that 'to discuss the uniqueness of solutions to the TBA equations, it is important to specify the boundary behavior as \epsilon \to \infty' and that an analogous boundary condition for the GMN open TBA 'might be useful', but no such condition is imposed in (3.13), (4.16), (4.20), (5.23), or (5.24). Since (3.13) is a linear integral equation for g1 at fixed z and fixed input X_\gamma, the constant-seed iteration in §4.2 and §5.3 demonstrates the existence of one solution but not its uniqueness; other solutions could share the \epsilon\to 0 asymptotics and the discontinuities (1.11). The headline claim of an 'exact solution' of the modified Mathieu equation via open TBA therefore remains conditional on a boundary condition and a uniqueness argument. Please either supply these, or explicitly restate the result as a numerical solution of a conjecturally well-posed integral equation.
  2. [§2.5.1, Eq. (2.27)] Equation (2.27), which relates \Psi_red^(i) to the n-th normalized solution via (X_{\gamma_n})^{1/2} \exp(-Z_{\gamma_n}/(2\epsilon)), is stated without proof or citation. It is the essential step that converts the proven n=1 discontinuity (2.25) into the proposed generic soliton discontinuity (2.21). As written, (2.21) for n\neq 1 is not a consequence of (2.25); it is an additional assumption. The author should provide a derivation or a reference for (2.27), or explicitly label (2.21) for n\neq 1 as conjectural and supported only by the numerical checks in Tables 2-3 and 14-15.
  3. [§§1.5, 3.3; Eqs. (1.13), (3.21), (3.18)] The central identification g1(z,\epsilon) = \Psi_red^(1)(z,\epsilon) N_GMN(\epsilon) is derived in §3.3 from the conjecture (3.18), \phi_i = \Psi^(i), which is stated as a new proposal rather than proven. The numerical agreement in Tables 4, 5, 9, and 10 is therefore consistency evidence for the whole package of proposals - Borel discontinuities, closed TBA input, and the open TBA conjecture - but it does not independently verify the open TBA conjecture. The paper partially concedes this in §1.5, but the abstract and §5.3 phrase the result as an exact solution of the modified Mathieu equation. I recommend a clearer separation between the verified statements (the n=1 soliton discontinuity, the numerical matching of the two methods) and the conjectural statements (open TBA well-posedness, the identification (1.13), and the generic discontinuity formulas).
  4. [§5.1, footnote 8; Table 8] In region 3 of the pure SU(2) example, the individual soliton discontinuities collected in Table 8 are not checked directly; the text explains in footnote 8 that the Pad\'e-Borel approximation cannot cleanly resolve the three nearby singularities. The only evidence for (2.21) in this region is the aggregate comparison between the open TBA solution and the Pad\'e-Borel solution in Table 10. This is a substantially weaker check than in region 1, and the general statement in §2.5.1 that (2.21) applies to the examples should be qualified accordingly, for instance by explicitly marking region 3 as a partial test.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.5.2, below Eq. (2.30)] The text 'parallel to the Vorus symbol' should read 'parallel to the Voros symbol'.
  2. [§1.3] The word 'dicon-tinuities' is a typo for 'discontinuities'.
  3. [Appendix B, Table 13] The header of Table 13 is garbled: 'disc( \Upsilon_{norm1,(1)}^{red}(8+9i, i/10) i/10 )(8 + 9i, i/10)' makes it hard to see which quantity is being evaluated; please fix the typesetting.
  4. [Figures 7 and 9] The red dots marking true singularities are easy to miss in grayscale; consider adding labels or arrows to make the matching between singularities and soliton charges immediately visible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Borel-discontinuity proposals and open-TBA matching rest on independent numerical evaluation and external or separately checked inputs; the load-bearing identification (1.13) is openly conjectural and tested numerically rather than forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce any of its central claims to its own inputs. The Borel-discontinuity formulas are not fitted to the open TBA output: (2.25) is an independently proven n=1 statement [19,38,39], and the generic soliton discontinuity (2.21) is obtained by combining (2.26), (2.27), and the closed TBA relation (2.29); (2.30) is proposed and then checked directly against Padé-Borel numerics (Tables 1, 13), with prior fixed-singularity work [46] as external support. The GMN open TBA equations (3.13) are taken from the independent conjectural framework of [10,18], and their input X_γ is computed from the closed TBA equations (3.8)/(5.21)-(5.22), not adjusted to match the Borel solution. The identification g1(z,ϵ)=Ψ_red(z,ϵ) N_GMN(ϵ) in (1.13)/(3.21) is explicitly stated to be based on the conjecture φ_i=Ψ^(i) in §3.3, and the paper itself describes the numerical checks as 'preliminary evidence supporting the conjectured GMN open TBA equations' (§1.5) — the correct evidentiary direction rather than a circular reduction. The acknowledged absence of a boundary condition at ϵ→∞ (§1.7) is a well-posedness/rigor gap and the unproved relation (2.27) is a derivation gap; neither makes a prediction equal to its input by construction. Self-citations such as [13] are used for a physical identification that is also verified numerically in this paper, not invoked to forbid alternatives or to supply the central result on their own.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central matching relies on the conjectural open TBA and closed TBA equations, and on an unproven relation (2.27) between normalizations. No free parameters are fitted; numerical examples set masses and couplings to 1 by convention. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption GMN open TBA equations (3.13), (4.16), (5.23) correctly describe the solution g1(z,ε) of the Schrödinger equation.
    Conjectured in [10,18]; this paper provides numerical evidence but no proof. Invoked in Sections 1.4, 3.2, 4.2, and 5.3.
  • domain assumption Quantum periods X_γ are given by the closed TBA expression (2.29)/(3.8).
    Conjectured in [12-16]; used to define the kernel X_γjin in the open TBA and the discontinuity formulas. Invoked in Sections 2.5.1 and 3.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Normalization-change relation (2.27): Ψ_red^(i)/Ψ_red,n^(i) = (X_γn)^{1/2} e^{-Z_γn/(2ε)}.
    Stated without proof in Section 2.5.1 and used to derive the generic soliton discontinuity (2.21). Load-bearing for the claim.
  • domain assumption Padé approximant poles of the Borel transform approximate true singularities; only the first pole in each series is physical.
    Standard Padé-Borel practice; the paper notes this in Section 2.2 and footnotes 6 and 8.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact WKB of solutions by Borel summation and open TBA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5NU2U4H

@misc{pith2026250706922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact WKB of solutions by Borel summation and open TBA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5NU2U4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06922}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the exact WKB methods for solutions of the Schr\"{o}dinger equations corresponding to quantum Seiberg-Witten curves in 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories with surface defects. The tools are Borel summation and Gaiotto-Moore-Neitzke (GMN) open TBA, which is a conjecture that has largely stayed unexplored so far. We study the Borel plane of the solution regularized by a BPS soliton charge and find that its poles on the Borel plane have the physical meaning of BPS soliton central charges and 4d BPS state central charges. We discuss in detail the discontinuities associated with the singularities and propose general expressions for these discontinuities which also apply to higher-order ODEs. We apply the open TBA to genuinely nontrivial examples -- the 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory with a single flavor BPS state corresponding to the Weber equation and an example of the pure $SU(2)$ theory corresponding to the modified Mathieu equation -- and show how to match it with Borel summation. We provide numerical evidence for the matching of the two exact WKB methods and also for an exact solution to the modified Mathieu equation via open TBA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TBA equations for $SU(r+1)$ quantum Seiberg-Witten curve: higher-order Mathieu equation

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    TBA equations are derived for the higher-order Mathieu equation of the SU(r+1) quantum Seiberg-Witten curve, with an analytic effective central charge and subleading agreement with the WKB method.

  2. Eigenfunctions of deformed Schr\"odinger equations

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Explicit entire eigenfunctions are constructed for the difference operators 2Λ^N cosh(p)+V_N(x) with arbitrary polynomial potential; they become square-integrable only at a discrete set of energies.

  3. TBA equations for $SU(r+1)$ quantum Seiberg-Witten curve: higher-order Mathieu equation

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives TBA equations for the higher-order Mathieu equation of the SU(r+1) quantum Seiberg-Witten curve, obtains an analytic effective central charge from Y-function boundary conditions at theta to -infinity, and veri...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Voros, The return of the quartic oscillator

    A. Voros, The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method , Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique Th´ eorique39 (1983) 211–338

    work page 1983

  2. [2]

    Balian, G

    R. Balian, G. Parisi and A. Voros, Quartic oscillator , in Feynman Path Integrals, vol. 106, pp. 337–360. Springer–Verlag, 1979

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    Voros, Exact resolution method for general 1d polynomial Schr¨ odinger equation, J.Phys

    A. Voros, Exact resolution method for general 1d polynomial Schr¨ odinger equation, J.Phys. A32 (1999) 5993

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Delabaere, H

    E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger and F. Pham, Exact semiclassical expansions for one-dimensional quantum oscillators , J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997) 6126–6184

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Delabaere, H

    E. Delabaere, H. Dillinger and F. Pham, R´ esurgence de Voros et p´ eriodes des courbes hyperelliptiques, Annales de l’Institut Fourier 43 (1993) 163. – 35 –

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167–197, [ 0906.3219]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, S. Gukov, Y. Tachikawa and H. Verlinde, Loop and surface operators in N=2 gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry , JHEP 01 (2010) 113, [ 0909.0945]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories, in 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics , pp. 265–289, 2010. 0908.4052. DOI

    arXiv 2010

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Nekrasov, A

    N. Nekrasov, A. Rosly and S. Shatashvili, Darboux coordinates, Yang-Yang functional, and gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 216 (2011) 69–93, [ 1103.3919]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gaiotto, Opers and TBA , 1403.6137

    D. Gaiotto, Opers and TBA , 1403.6137

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Jeong and N

    S. Jeong and N. Nekrasov, Opers, surface defects, and Yang-Yang functional , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24 (2020) 1789–1916, [ 1806.08270]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Grassi, J

    A. Grassi, J. Gu and M. Mari˜ no,Non-perturbative approaches to the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve , JHEP 07 (2020) 106, [ 1908.07065]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Grassi, Q

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao and A. Neitzke, Exact WKB methods in SU(2) N f = 1 , JHEP 01 (2022) 046, [2105.03777]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation, Adv. Math. 234 (2013) 239–403, [ 0907.3987]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Spectral networks, Annales Henri Poincare 14 (2013) 1643–1731, [1204.4824]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Hollands and A

    L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, Exact WKB and abelianization for the T3 equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 380 (2020) 131–186, [ 1906.04271]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Kawai and Y

    T. Kawai and Y. Takei, Algebraic analysis of singular perturbation theory , vol. 227. American Mathematical Soc., 2005

    2005

  10. [18]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Wall-Crossing in Coupled 2d-4d Systems , JHEP 12 (2012) 082, [ 1103.2598]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Iwaki and T

    K. Iwaki and T. Nakanishi, Exact WKB analysis and cluster algebras , J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 474009, [1401.7094]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dumas and A

    D. Dumas and A. Neitzke, Opers and Non-Abelian Hodge: Numerical Studies , Exper. Math. 33 (2024) 27–68, [ 2007.00503]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Imaizumi, Quantum periods and TBA equations for N = 2 SU (2) Nf = 2 SQCD with flavor symmetry, Phys

    K. Imaizumi, Quantum periods and TBA equations for N = 2 SU (2) Nf = 2 SQCD with flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136270, [ 2103.02248]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Yan, Exact WKB and the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve for 4d N = 2 pure SU(3) Yang-Mills

    F. Yan, Exact WKB and the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve for 4d N = 2 pure SU(3) Yang-Mills. Abelianization, JHEP 03 (2022) 164, [ 2012.15658]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ito and H

    K. Ito and H. Shu, TBA equations and exact WKB analysis in deformed supersymmetric quantum mechanics, JHEP 03 (2024) 122, [ 2401.03766]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    K. Ito, T. Kondo and H. Shu, Wall-crossing of TBA equations and WKB periods for the third order ODE, Nucl. Phys. B 979 (2022) 115788, [ 2111.11047]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Marino and M

    M. Marino and M. Schwick, Large N instantons, BPS states, and the replica limit , 2403.14462. – 36 –

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bridgeland, Riemann-Hilbert problems from Donaldson-Thomas theory , Invent

    T. Bridgeland, Riemann-Hilbert problems from Donaldson-Thomas theory , Invent. Math. 216 (2019) 69–124, [ 1611.03697]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Fioravanti, M

    D. Fioravanti, M. Rossi and H. Shu, QQ-system and non-linear integral equations for scattering amplitudes at strong coupling , JHEP 12 (2020) 086, [ 2004.10722]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aganagic, M

    M. Aganagic, M. C. N. Cheng, R. Dijkgraaf, D. Krefl and C. Vafa, Quantum Geometry of Refined Topological Strings, JHEP 11 (2012) 019, [ 1105.0630]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Mironov and A

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals , JHEP 04 (2010) 040, [ 0910.5670]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Grassi, Q

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao and A. Neitzke, Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String , SIGMA 19 (2023) 064, [ 2201.11594]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Del Monte and P

    F. Del Monte and P. Longhi, The threefold way to quantum periods: WKB, TBA equations and q-Painlev´ e, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 112, [ 2207.07135]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Rella, Resurgence, Stokes constants, and arithmetic functions in topological string theory , Commun

    C. Rella, Resurgence, Stokes constants, and arithmetic functions in topological string theory , Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 17 (2023) 709–820, [ 2212.10606]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gu and M

    J. Gu and M. Marino, On the resurgent structure of quantum periods , SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 035, [2211.03871]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gu, A.-K

    J. Gu, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, A. Klemm and M. Marino, Non-perturbative topological string theory on compact Calabi-Yau 3-folds , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 079, [ 2305.19916]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gu, Relations between Stokes constants of unrefined and Nekrasov-Shatashvili topological strings , JHEP 05 (2024) 199, [ 2307.02079]

    J. Gu, Relations between Stokes constants of unrefined and Nekrasov-Shatashvili topological strings , JHEP 05 (2024) 199, [ 2307.02079]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gu and M

    J. Gu and M. Marino, Peacock patterns and new integer invariants in topological string theory , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 058, [ 2104.07437]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mari˜ no,Advanced Topics in Quantum Mechanics

    M. Mari˜ no,Advanced Topics in Quantum Mechanics . Cambridge University Press, 12, 2021, 10.1017/9781108863384

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Voros, The return of the quartic oscillator

    A. Voros, The return of the quartic oscillator. the complex wkb method , Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique39 (1983) 211–338

    1983

  31. [39]

    T. Aoki, T. Kawai and Y. Takei, The bender-wu analysis and the voros theory , in ICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings (M. Kashiwara and T. Miwa, eds.), (Tokyo), pp. 1–29, Springer Japan, 1991

    1991

  32. [40]

    Hollands and A

    L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, BPS states in the Minahan-Nemeschansky E6 theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 353 (2017) 317–351, [ 1607.01743]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Longhi, Wall-Crossing Invariants from Spectral Networks , Annales Henri Poincare 19 (2018) 775–842, [1611.00150]

    P. Longhi, Wall-Crossing Invariants from Spectral Networks , Annales Henri Poincare 19 (2018) 775–842, [1611.00150]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Q. Hao, L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, BPS states in the Minahan-Nemeschansky E7 theory, JHEP 04 (2020) 039, [ 1905.09879]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Neitzke and F

    A. Neitzke and F. Yan, q-nonabelianization for line defects , JHEP 09 (2020) 153, [ 2002.08382]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hao and A

    Q. Hao and A. Neitzke, A new construction of c = 1 Virasoro blocks, 2407.04483

  37. [45]

    Delabaere and F

    E. Delabaere and F. Pham, Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics , Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare Physique Theorique 71 (1999) 1–94. – 37 –

    1999

  38. [46]

    Takei, Sato’s conjecture for the weber equation and transformation theory for schr¨ odinger equations with a merging pair of turning points , RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu(01, 2008)

    Y. Takei, Sato’s conjecture for the weber equation and transformation theory for schr¨ odinger equations with a merging pair of turning points , RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu(01, 2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Jeong and X

    S. Jeong and X. Zhang, BPZ equations for higher degenerate fields and nonperturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 125006, [ 1710.06970]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Jeong, Splitting of surface defect partition functions and integrable systems , Nucl

    S. Jeong, Splitting of surface defect partition functions and integrable systems , Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 775–806, [ 1709.04926]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee and N. Nekrasov, Parallel surface defects, Hecke operators, and quantum Hitchin system, 2304.04656

  42. [50]

    Marino and S

    M. Marino and S. Zakany, Exact eigenfunctions and the open topological string , J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 325401, [ 1606.05297]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Fran¸ cois and A

    M. Fran¸ cois and A. Grassi,On the open TS/ST correspondence , 2503.21762

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Eager, S

    R. Eager, S. A. Selmani and J. Walcher, Exponential Networks and Representations of Quivers , JHEP 08 (2017) 063, [ 1611.06177]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Banerjee, P

    S. Banerjee, P. Longhi and M. Romo, Exploring 5d BPS Spectra with Exponential Networks , Annales Henri Poincare 20 (2019) 4055–4162, [ 1811.02875]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Banerjee, P

    S. Banerjee, P. Longhi and M. Romo, Exponential BPS graphs and D-brane counting on toric Calabi-Yau threefolds: Part II , 2012.09769

    2012 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Gupta and P

    K. Gupta and P. Longhi, Vortices on cylinders and warped exponential networks , Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 123, [ 2407.08445]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gupta and P

    K. Gupta and P. Longhi, Linking disks, spinning vortices and exponential networks of augmentation curves, 2412.14901

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. R. Douglas, B. Fiol and C. Romelsberger, The Spectrum of BPS branes on a noncompact Calabi-Yau, JHEP 09 (2005) 057, [ hep-th/0003263]

    2005 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Longhi, Instanton Particles and Monopole Strings in 5D SU(2) Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys

    P. Longhi, Instanton Particles and Monopole Strings in 5D SU(2) Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 211601, [ 2101.01681]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Closset and M

    C. Closset and M. Del Zotto, On 5D SCFTs and their BPS quivers. Part I: B-branes and brane tilings, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 26 (2022) 37–142, [ 1912.13502]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Bonelli, F

    G. Bonelli, F. Del Monte and A. Tanzini, BPS Quivers of Five-Dimensional SCFTs, Topological Strings and q-Painlev´ e Equations, Annales Henri Poincare 22 (2021) 2721–2773, [ 2007.11596]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Grassi, Y

    A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda and M. Marino, Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics, Annales Henri Poincare 17 (2016) 3177–3235, [ 1410.3382]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Codesido, A

    S. Codesido, A. Grassi and M. Marino, Spectral Theory and Mirror Curves of Higher Genus , Annales Henri Poincare 18 (2017) 559–622, [ 1507.02096]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Del Monte and P

    F. Del Monte and P. Longhi, Monodromies of Second Order q-difference Equations from the WKB Approximation, 2406.00175

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Takei, WKB analysis and Stokes geometry of differential equations , in Analytic, algebraic and geometric aspects of differential equations , Trends Math., pp

    Y. Takei, WKB analysis and Stokes geometry of differential equations , in Analytic, algebraic and geometric aspects of differential equations , Trends Math., pp. 263–304. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2017. – 38 –

    2017

  57. [65]

    Nikolaev, Exact solutions for the singularly perturbed Riccati equation and exact WKB analysis , 2008.06492

    N. Nikolaev, Exact solutions for the singularly perturbed Riccati equation and exact WKB analysis , 2008.06492

    2008 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Spectral networks, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e14 (2013) 1643–1731

    2013

  59. [67]

    Dumitrescu, L

    O. Dumitrescu, L. Fredrickson, G. Kydonakis, R. Mazzeo, M. Mulase and A. Neitzke, Opers versus nonabelian Hodge, 1607.02172

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Collier, L

    B. Collier, L. Fredrickson and R. Wentworth, Conformal limits for parabolic SL(n,C)-Higgs bundles, 2407.16798

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Iwaki and O

    K. Iwaki and O. Kidwai, Topological recursion and uncoupled BPS structures I: BPS spectrum and free energies, Adv. Math. 398 (2022) 108191, [ 2010.05596]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Longhi, The BPS Spectrum Generator In 2d-4d Systems , JHEP 11 (2012) 107, [ 1205.2512]

    P. Longhi, The BPS Spectrum Generator In 2d-4d Systems , JHEP 11 (2012) 107, [ 1205.2512]. – 39 –

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.