Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DATE: Detecting Anomalies in Text via Self-Supervision of Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.05591 v1 pith:H75I2NVF submitted 2021-04-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords methodsdatetextanomaliesanomalydatadeepend-to-end
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Leveraging deep learning models for Anomaly Detection (AD) has seen widespread use in recent years due to superior performances over traditional methods. Recent deep methods for anomalies in images learn better features of normality in an end-to-end self-supervised setting. These methods train a model to discriminate between different transformations applied to visual data and then use the output to compute an anomaly score. We use this approach for AD in text, by introducing a novel pretext task on text sequences. We learn our DATE model end-to-end, enforcing two independent and complementary self-supervision signals, one at the token-level and one at the sequence-level. Under this new task formulation, we show strong quantitative and qualitative results on the 20Newsgroups and AG News datasets. In the semi-supervised setting, we outperform state-of-the-art results by +13.5% and +6.9%, respectively (AUROC). In the unsupervised configuration, DATE surpasses all other methods even when 10% of its training data is contaminated with outliers (compared with 0% for the others).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Text-ADBench: Text Anomaly Detection Benchmark based on LLMs Embedding

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM embeddings improve text anomaly detection, shallow detectors match deep ones only under oracle embedding selection, and AUROC matrices are low-rank enough to support fast model evaluation.

Pith tools