Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Regret Minimizing Equilibria and Mechanisms for Games with Strict Type Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1207.4147 v1 pith:H7OVJYCV submitted 2012-07-11 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords uncertaintygamesmechanismtyperegretagentsconsidercriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mechanism design has found considerable application to the construction of agent-interaction protocols. In the standard setting, the type (e.g., utility function) of an agent is not known by other agents, nor is it known by the mechanism designer. When this uncertainty is quantified probabilistically, a mechanism induces a game of incomplete information among the agents. However, in many settings, uncertainty over utility functions cannot easily be quantified. We consider the problem of incomplete information games in which type uncertainty is strict or unquantified. We propose the use of minimax regret as a decision criterion in such games, a robust approach for dealing with type uncertainty. We define minimax-regret equilibria and prove that these exist in mixed strategies for finite games. We also consider the problem of mechanism design in this framework by adopting minimax regret as an optimization criterion for the designer itself, and study automated optimization of such mechanisms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Search results diversification in competitive search

    cs.IR 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues, via game theory and student ranking competitions, that diversity-based search ranking reduces 'mimicking the winner' herding, but the equilibrium proof and the empirical test are both flawed.

Pith tools