Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Interpreting ALMA Multiwavelength Continuum Observations of PDS 70 c: An Optically Thick Dust Ring in the Circumplanetary Disk

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The circumplanetary disk around PDS 70 c is likely dominated by an optically thick dust ring, not a smooth drifting dust disk, and this ring could be where exomoons form.

desk verdict A useful, honest model comparison that makes the dust-ring reading of PDS 70 c concrete, but the ring is put in by hand and the case stops at plausible rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03866 v2 pith:HAECOPLZ submitted 2026-07-04 astro-ph.EP

Yuhito Shibaike , Satoshi Okuzumi , Takahiro Ueda , Kiyoaki Doi , Misato Fukagawa This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords circumplanetarydisksPDS70cdustcontinuumemissionspectralenergydistributionplanetformationnaturalsatellitemillimeterastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the (sub)millimeter continuum emission from the circumplanetary disk (CPD) of PDS 70 c is dominated by an optically thick, narrow dust ring rather than a smooth disk of inwardly drifting dust. The authors model both a conventional 'Drift' disk and a 'Ring' model with a Gaussian dust overdensity, coupled to gas accretion, dust growth, and thermal emission. They find that the Drift model needs an implausibly dust-rich inflow (dust-to-gas ratio above 0.1) to match the observed spectral index α≈2, whereas the Ring model matches over a wide range of parameters. They also find that the ring's dust density could satisfy the criteria for streaming instability and gravitational collapse, making the ring a plausible exomoon formation site. If correct, this reinterprets PDS 70 c's ALMA SED and offers a direct observational handle on dust trapping and satellite formation around young giant planets.

What carries the argument

The central object is a prescribed Gaussian dust surface density enhancement, Σd = Σbase + Σpeak exp(−(r−r_ring)^2/(2w_ring^2)), superimposed on the 'gas-starved' circumplanetary disk model. This ring profile is the mechanism that creates a localized optically thick region; combined with dust coagulation limited by fragmentation (giving a_max ~ 0.3 mm) and radiative transfer including scattering, it converts the ring into a spectral index α≈2 that matches ALMA. The key contrast is with the Drift model, where radial drift removes dust and leaves the disk optically thin with α≈3–4.

What would settle it

A spatially resolved image of PDS 70 c's circumplanetary disk at about 3 mm (e.g., with ngVLA) that shows smooth, extended dust emission rather than a compact ring would falsify the model. A precise measurement of the Band 4–7 spectral index significantly different from 2 (e.g., α > 2.5) at high signal-to-noise would also threaten it, as would a Band 9 detection of optically thick dust emission at the level predicted for smooth drift models.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the multiwavelength ALMA continuum observations of PDS 70 c are best explained by an optically thick, narrow dust ring embedded in the planet's circumplanetary disk. In the proposed picture, the dust ring — a Gaussian overdensity at a radius that can be set equal to the centrifugal radius — has unit dust-to-gas ratio at its peak and a width around 0.04 times its radius. Because the ring is optically thick, its thermal emission produces a disk-integrated spectral index α≈2 over a broad range of wavelengths, matching the observed Band 4–7 slope of 2.01±0.19 and the Band 9 nondetection, whereas a smooth drifting dust disk yields α≈3–4. The paper further claims

Load-bearing premise

The ring's location, width, and peak density are put in by hand via a Gaussian prescription rather than produced by a simulated dust-trapping mechanism; if a real circumplanetary disk cannot sustain such a narrow optically thick overdensity, the whole interpretation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the ring model is correct, the conventional smooth-dust interpretation is ruled out for PDS 70 c unless the inflow dust-to-gas ratio exceeds 0.1, which current dust-depletion arguments disfavor.
  • The ring's existence would point to a dust-trapping mechanism inside the CPD—either a midplane gas outflow or a gas-pressure bump—and thereby constrain the gas accretion process onto giant planets.
  • Because the ring's dust density satisfies the streaming-instability and gravitational-instability criteria, the model identifies PDS 70 c's CPD as a viable exomoon formation site at the present epoch.
  • The model predicts that the dust emission originates from a narrow annulus; future ngVLA observations at 3 mm could spatially resolve this ring and distinguish it from free-free emission originating in the inner CPD.
  • A dust ring with Z_peak ≈ 1 would contain roughly 3 Earth masses of dust, requiring a modest equivalent inflow dust-to-gas ratio x_eq ≲ 0.1 over 5.4 Myr, so the ring is dust-supply-feasible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ring is long-lived, PDS 70 c's CPD could be a scaled-up, actively accreting analog of the ancient circum-Jovian disk, letting us watch satellite formation processes that happened in our own solar system.
  • A gas-pressure bump strong enough to trap dust to Z_peak ≈ 1 might naturally be produced by an already-formed exomoon at the pebble-isolation mass; under that reading, the ring's existence is indirect evidence for a large satellite embedded in the CPD.
  • The optically thick ring interpretation implies that the unresolved flux densities are surface-brightness limited; true dust mass may be higher than inferred from smooth models, which would matter for CPD lifetime estimates.
  • A testable extension: if the ring is an outflow trap, its radius should track the centrifugal radius and thus the planet's accretion rate; monitoring the spectral index and flux over years to decades could reveal ring migration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper interprets ALMA multiwavelength continuum observations of the circumplanetary disk around PDS 70 c. It compares two models: a conventional Drift model, in which dust supplied to the CPD drifts inward, and a Ring model in which a Gaussian dust overdensity (Eq. 1) is placed at a prescribed radius. For a fiducial Ring model with Z_peak=1, r_ring=r_c, and w_ring tuned to the Band 7 flux, the model reproduces the observed spectral index α_B4,B7 ≈ 2.0 and is consistent with the Band 9 upper limit, whereas the Drift model requires inflow dust-to-gas ratios x > 0.1. The paper concludes that the CPD of PDS 70 c likely hosts an optically thick dust ring and that this ring is a potential site for exomoon formation via streaming and gravitational instabilities. The free-free interpretation of the same SED is discussed qualitatively but not modeled.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper offers a new explanation for the puzzling optically thick SED of PDS 70 c without invoking free-free emission, connects the observations to satellite-formation theory, and makes a testable prediction for ngVLA. The paper is honest about its assumptions and includes a broad parameter survey, physically motivated dust opacities, and a two-model comparison. However, the significance is currently limited because the ring is prescribed rather than derived, so the conclusion outruns the evidence: the model shows that a ring with ad hoc properties could explain the data, not that such a ring exists.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (1); §2.5; Abstract] The Ring model is constructed by imposing a Gaussian dust surface-density overdensity with free parameters Z_peak, r_ring, w_ring, and Z_base. In the fiducial case r_ring=r_c and Z_peak=1 are assumed, and w_ring is tuned to reproduce the Band 7 flux. The consistency of the Ring model is therefore not an independent test of the existence of a ring; it demonstrates that a ring of the assumed properties can match the SED. The abstract's claim that the CPD 'hosts' an optically thick dust ring is stronger than the model comparison supports. Please either (a) derive the ring structure from a physical mechanism for the adopted PDS 70 c parameters, or (b) explicitly reframe the result as a proof-of-concept/hypothesis rather than an inferred structure.
  2. [§4.2] The formation mechanisms for the ring (midplane outflows, gas-pressure bumps) are discussed only by citing earlier simulations, not by applying them to the adopted parameters (M_p=10 M_J, Mdot_g=2e-7 M_J/yr, α_tur=1e-4). It is not shown that a ring with Z_peak≈1, width ≈0.037 r_ring, and location r_c can actually form under these conditions. The cited Drazkowska & Szulágyi (2018) simulations use different disk parameters, and Kanagawa et al. (2018) concerns PPD pressure bumps. This is a load-bearing gap because the central interpretation relies on the physical realizability of the prescribed ring. A quantitative estimate of trapping efficiency, ring width, and required dust supply would help; absent that, the conclusion should be explicitly conditional.
  3. [§3.2; Figs. 3 and 5] The broad-parameter comparison does not include a model-comparison penalty for the larger number of free parameters in the Ring model (Z_peak, Z_base, r_ring, w_ring) relative to the Drift model (x). The scatter plots show qualitative agreement but do not report the fraction of models that satisfy the observed α_B4,B7 and F_B7 within uncertainties. Without this, the statement that the Ring model is 'consistent over a wide range' while the Drift model 'requires more stringent conditions' is not quantitatively established. Reporting e.g. the percentage of prior volume meeting the observational constraints, or an information criterion, would materially strengthen the comparison.
  4. [§2.1; Table 1] The paper excludes the 2017 Band 7 epoch with the justification that its flux is sensitive to the adopted analysis, but includes other Band 7 epochs from D. Fasano et al. (2025). Since reported variability in Band 7 is part of the observational discussion (Casassus et al. 2022, 2026), the model comparison should be robust to this choice. Please show that the derived conclusions are unchanged if the 2017 epoch is included or if the α_B4,B7 index is recalculated with a different epoch combination. As written, the choice to exclude one epoch could bias the spectral index used in the core comparison.
  5. [§4.4] The free-free interpretation by Domínguez-Jamett et al. (2025) is discussed but not modeled. The paper correctly states that its model 'neither supports nor rules out' free-free, but then uses this to argue for dust as the origin. Since a published, viable alternative already explains the same SED with an optically thick free-free component, the dust-ring claim needs a quantitative comparison, e.g. a joint dust+free-free fit or an explicit calculation showing that the free-free contribution is negligible at the adopted accretion rates. Without this, the ring interpretation is not uniquely favored over the existing alternative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.5; Table 2] The fiducial ring width is quoted both as 97 R_J and 0.037 r_ring. Clarify whether the broad-parameter range for w_ring is scaled to r_ring or an absolute value, and specify whether r_ring is always set to r_c in the fiducial case.
  2. [Figure 3] The colored scatter points do not convey the density of calculations in parameter space. A contour or histogram of matching models would make the 'wide range' claim more quantitative and easier to evaluate.
  3. [Abstract; §5] The wording shifts between 'hosts' (Abstract), 'provides a plausible explanation' (§5), and 'likely has a highly concentrated dust ring' (§3.1). Align the language with the level of certainty supported by the model comparison.
  4. [Table 1] The Band 3 reanalysis flux 12.0±4.7 µJy is a marginal detection, but it is not used in the spectral index calculation. Clarify which Band 3 value is used for model comparison (the 3σ upper limit from K. Doi et al. 2024) and how the reanalysis would affect the conclusions if included.
  5. [§4.2; Appendix C] The supply time of 5.4 Myr is equated to the stellar age. The accretion period of the CPD may be shorter; this should be stated more explicitly as a caveat, not just implied by 'the age of PDS 70 c and its accretion period are unknown.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Band 7 flux is used only as a normalization, and the claimed spectral-index agreement is a forward-model output rather than a fitted quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central comparison is not circular in the strict sense. In §2.5 the authors fit the Drift model's inflow dust-to-gas ratio x and the Ring model's width w_ring to the Band 7 flux, but the key claimed observable, the Band 4–7 spectral index α_B4,B7 = 2.01±0.19, is not used to set any model parameter. Instead, it is computed from the radiative-transfer forward model (§2.4, Eq. 3) and then compared with the data. That the Ring model yields α≈2 in the optically thick limit is a physical consequence of assuming a high-Z ring, but the existence and width of the ring are prescribed inputs (Eq. 1), not derived from the SED. The paper frames this explicitly as a hypothesis or interpretation ('we present a new interpretation', 'plausible explanation'), which is a model-selection or underdetermination issue rather than a definitional circularity. The self-citations to Shibaike & Mordasini (2024) and Shibaike et al. (2025a) provide the gas disk model and parameter values, but those are based on prior modeling and observations, not on the target ring detection, and they are not used to claim that the ring exists. The satellite-formation section §4.3 is conditional on the assumed Z_peak=1; because Z_peak is an input, the SI/GI conclusion is a conditional plausibility statement, not a circular derivation. Thus no step reduces the claimed result to its own fitting input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central explanation rests on a prescribed Gaussian dust ring (Eq. 1) with several free parameters, plus a set of standard disk and dust-evolution assumptions. The most important free parameters are the ring width and peak dust-to-gas ratio, which control whether the disk is optically thick, and the drift-model dust-to-gas inflow ratio, which the paper tunes to Band 7. The ring itself is the only genuinely 'new' postulated structure, and it currently lacks independent direct evidence.

free parameters (5)
  • x (Drift-model inflow dust-to-gas mass flux ratio) = 4.7×10^-3 (fiducial); broad range 10^-4–1
    Chosen in §2.5 so the Drift model reproduces the observed Band 7 flux density (≈100 µJy); also the quantity that determines whether the Drift model can produce an optically thick spectrum.
  • w_ring (dust-ring width) = 97 R_J (≈0.037 r_ring) in fiducial; broad range 0.01–0.3 r_ring
    Set in §2.5 to reproduce the Band 7 flux density in the Ring model. The spectral-index comparison is made after this normalization.
  • Z_peak (peak dust-to-gas surface density ratio in the ring) = 1 in fiducial; broad range 10^-4–1
    Assumed in §2.5; controls whether the ring is optically thick. Broad-range runs find consistency only for Z_peak ≳ 3×10^-3, so this parameter is load-bearing.
  • r_ring (ring location) = r_c = 2645 R_J in fiducial; broad range 0.1–1 r_out
    Peak position of the Gaussian dust ring; not constrained by data, chosen for simplicity. Ring location affects surface area and temperature of the emitting region.
  • Z_base (dust-to-gas surface density ratio outside the ring) = 10^-6 or 10^-4 in fiducial; broad range 10^-8 to Z_peak
    Controls the extra-disk emission that steepens the short-wavelength spectral index; lower values are needed to match the Band 9 non-detection (§3.1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The CPD is a steady, gas-starved accretion disk (Canup & Ward 2002; Shibaike & Mordasini 2024) with turbulence parameter α_tur and inner/outer truncation.
    Invoked in §2.2 as the gas background for both dust models; not derived in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Dust surface density in the Ring model is a Gaussian overdensity (Eq. 1) on a uniform base.
    The ring is the central explanatory structure but is prescribed, not produced by the paper's own gas+dust evolution.
  • domain assumption Maximum particle radius is set by fragmentation equilibrium (Eq. 2).
    Standard coagulation/fragmentation result used in §2.3; assumes turbulence-limited growth.
  • domain assumption Dust temperature equals midplane gas temperature; the disk is vertically isothermal and ray-tracing includes absorption and scattering (Sierra et al. 2024, Eq. 3).
    Used in §2.4; the resulting flux depends strongly on T_ring ≈ T_PPD = 22 K.
  • domain assumption ALMA beams are larger than the CPD, so measured peak intensities equal integrated fluxes.
    Stated in §2.1; inherited from the published photometry, and load-bearing for the SED comparison.
  • domain assumption Streaming instability requires ρ_d/ρ_g ≳ 0.4 for small particles and clump densities can reach 10^3 ρ_g (Li & Youdin 2021; Bai & Stone 2010).
    Used in §4.3 to argue exomoon formation; thresholds are from PPD simulations, not CPD-specific.
invented entities (1)
  • Optically thick dust ring in the CPD of PDS 70 c
    purpose: Ad hoc Gaussian overdensity used to reproduce the flat ALMA SED (α≈2) and the Band 9 non-detection.
    The ring is not detected directly; its existence is inferred from the SED it is designed to explain. The paper proposes future ngVLA imaging as a test, so there is no current falsifiable handle outside the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interpreting ALMA Multiwavelength Continuum Observations of PDS 70 c: An Optically Thick Dust Ring in the Circumplanetary Disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HAECOPLZ

@misc{pith2026260703866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interpreting ALMA Multiwavelength Continuum Observations of PDS 70 c: An Optically Thick Dust Ring in the Circumplanetary Disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HAECOPLZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03866}
}
read the original abstract

Giant planets form small gas disks, called circumplanetary disks (CPDs), during gas accretion. The CPD of PDS 70 c has been detected by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in (sub)millimeter continuum emission, which is interpreted as thermal emission from dust in the CPD. The resulting spectral index suggests that the disk is optically thick over a wide range of wavelengths. However, this is inconsistent with previous CPD dust models, which predict that the disk is optically thin because of radial dust drift. Here, we present a new interpretation of the multiwavelength observations: the CPD hosts an optically thick dust ring, whose existence has been discussed in the context of satellite formation. We demonstrate that a dust-ring model that incorporates gas accretion, dust evolution, and dust thermal emission, is consistent with the observations under reasonable conditions, whereas a conventional ring-less model requires more stringent conditions. We also show that the dust ring inferred from the observations potentially satisfies the conditions for exomoon formation via streaming instability and subsequent gravitational instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03866 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flux density of the continuum emission from PDS 70 c obtained from multi-wavelength ALMA observations, together with model predictions for the dust thermal emission from the CPD in the Drift and Ring models. The squares and inverted triangles indicate detections and non-detections listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radial distribution of the dust properties in the CPD of PDS 70 c in the Drift and Ring models for the fiducial case. For the Ring model, the solid and dotted curves indicate Zbase = 10−6 and 10−4 , respectively. The different shades of each color represent the ALMA bands in the right two panels. The dashed curve in the left upper panel is the gas surface density of the CPD, used in both Drift and Ring models. The v… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparisons of the predictions by the Drift model (left panel) and Ring model (right panel) with ALMA observations of PDS 70 c. The parameter ranges of the models are shown in the “Broad-parameter cases” column in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the radial distribution of the midplane temperature in the fiducial case (third column of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PDS 70 c and SR 12 c: Observational Constraints on Giant-Planet and Satellite Formation

    astro-ph.EP 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PDS 70 c's circumplanetary dust disk has a Callisto-scale mass and an au-scale radius that the authors argue fits a quiet, solids-rich, gap-fed satellite-formation model, while SR 12 c shows that a planetary-mass disk...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 35 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    arXiv , author =:2604.24991 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202659553 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2604.24991 , journal =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    arXiv , author =:1706.08977 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7c62 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1706.08977 , journal =

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    arXiv , author =:2401.03018 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad24d2 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2401.03018 , journal =

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    arXiv , author =:1904.03869 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab204d , eid =. arXiv , author =:1904.03869 , journal =

    arXiv 1904

  5. [5]

    arXiv , author =:1609.09250 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/193 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1609.09250 , journal =

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    arXiv , author =:2508.00393 , journal =

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.00393 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2508.00393 , journal =

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.00393

  7. [7]

    arXiv , author =:2303.17899 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245619 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2303.17899 , journal =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2617 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2617 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2617

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    arXiv , author =:2403.04855 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349089 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2403.04855 , journal =

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1086/344437 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/344437 , eprint =

    doi

  3. [11]

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.012 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.012 , eprint =

    2007 doi

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1285 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1285 , eprint =

    doi

  5. [13]

    arXiv , author =:1408.6554 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/16 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1408.6554 , journal =

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912452 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912452 , eprint =

    doi

  7. [15]

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1168 , journal =

    doi

  8. [16]

    arXiv , author =:2101.04187 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abdb2d , eid =. arXiv , author =:2101.04187 , journal =

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    arXiv , author =:2103.12128 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac32d1 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2103.12128 , journal =

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    arXiv , author =:1705.08444 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7515 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1705.08444 , journal =

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3428 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3428 , eprint =

    doi

  12. [20]

    arXiv , author =:2404.14298 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449522 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2404.14298 , journal =

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    doi:10.1006/icar.1998.5933 , journal =

    1998

  14. [22]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066899 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066899 , eprint =

    doi

  15. [23]

    arXiv , author =:1806.11567 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833584 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1806.11567 , journal =

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    arXiv , author =:2404.11857 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4035 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2404.11857 , journal =

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    arXiv , author =:2602.05247 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558612 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2602.05247 , journal =

  18. [26]

    arXiv , author =:2105.06042 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9f , eid =. arXiv , author =:2105.06042 , journal =

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    arXiv , author =:1902.07639 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935034 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1902.07639 , journal =

    1902 arXiv

  20. [28]

    arXiv , author =:1806.11568 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832957 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1806.11568 , journal =

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    arXiv , author =:1810.05635 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae837 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1810.05635 , journal =

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5 , eprint =

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5 , eprint =

    doi

  23. [31]

    arXiv , author =:1402.6091 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/101 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1402.6091 , journal =

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    arXiv , author =:1812.04044 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1812.04044 , journal =

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    arXiv , author =:1807.02638 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae0fd , eid =. arXiv , author =:1807.02638 , journal =

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    arXiv , author =:2408.09216 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7f51 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2408.09216 , journal =

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    arXiv , author =:1812.04043 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1812.04043 , journal =

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    arXiv , author =:1803.07106 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aab54e , eid =. arXiv , author =:1803.07106 , journal =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    arXiv , author =:2208.00211 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2208.00211 , journal =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    arXiv , author =:1202.1802 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118296 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1202.1802 , journal =

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    ascl , author =:2104.010 , howpublished =

  32. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1164 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1164 , eprint =

    doi

  33. [41]

    arXiv , author =:2507.21970 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554485 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2507.21970 , journal =

  34. [42]

    arXiv , author =:2008.01727 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd4d9 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2008.01727 , journal =

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1131 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1131 , eprint =

    doi

  36. [44]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1437 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1437 , eprint =

    doi

  37. [45]

    arXiv , author =:1912.04765 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936804 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1912.04765 , journal =

    1912 arXiv

  38. [46]

    arXiv , author =:2408.15407 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7460 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2408.15407 , journal =

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Growth efficiency of dust aggregates through collisions with high mass ratios , volume =

    Koji Wada and Hidekazu Tanaka and Satoshi Okuzumi and Hiroshi Kobayashi and Toru Suyama and Hiroshi Kimura and Tetsuo Yamamoto , date-added =. Growth efficiency of dust aggregates through collisions with high mass ratios , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , keywords =. 2013 ...

    2013 doi

  40. [48]

    arXiv , author =:2412.03923 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b21 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2412.03923 , journal =

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    doi:10.1086/344684 , journal =

    doi

  42. [50]

    arXiv , author =:2506.11709 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554959 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2506.11709 , journal =

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    arXiv , author =:1909.00285 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab46a7 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1909.00285 , journal =

    1909 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Machida , date-added =

    Takayuki Tanigawa and Keiji Ohtsuki and Masahiro N. Machida , date-added =. Distribution of Accreting Gas and Angular Momentum onto Circumplanetary Disks , url =. The Astrophysical Journal , number =. 2012 , bdsk-file-1 =

    2012

  45. [53]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12 , eid =

    2019 , bdsk-url-1 =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2a12 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1906.06308 , journal =

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    arXiv , author =:2108.07123 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0f83 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2108.07123 , journal =

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.