Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Why a System of Three Bosons on Separate Lines Can Not Exhibit the Confinement Induced Efimov Effect

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A system of three bosons moving on one line and two parallel lines in a perpendicular plane has at most finitely many bound states, so the confinement-induced Efimov effect predicted for this geometry does not occur.

desk verdict New result that contradicts a physics prediction, but the proof has a genuine gap for two-body subsystems without zero-energy resonances — worth refereeing, but expect a major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19263 v1 pith:HAXQRPEN submitted 2024-11-28 math-ph math.MP

Dirk Hundertmark , Marvin R. Schulz , Semjon Vugalter This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 81Q1081V70
keywords Efimoveffectconfinement-inducedthree-bosonsystemmixeddimensionszero-energyresonancevirtualleveldiscretespectrumSchrödingeroperator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies three identical bosons confined to three lines in three-dimensional space: two parallel lines in one plane and a third line in a perpendicular plane. Recent physics literature predicted that such a mixed-dimensional system should exhibit the confinement-induced Efimov effect, an infinite staircase of bound states accumulating at zero energy whenever the two-particle subsystems sit at zero-energy resonances. The authors prove the opposite: the Hamiltonian has only finitely many bound states under mild short-range decay of the pair potentials, so no Efimov staircase develops. The result matters because it settles one of the open configurations in the classification of where the Efimov effect can survive geometric confinement, and it shows that mixed dimensionality alone does not restore the effect.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the localization scheme of [Zis74, VZ83]: to prove finiteness of the discrete spectrum it suffices to show the quadratic form is nonnegative on functions supported away from a compact set after subtracting a finite-dimensional subspace. The new mechanism inside that scheme is Lemma 4.3. For a two-body operator $h=-\Delta+V$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ with reflection symmetry $V(x)=V(-x)$ and a zero-energy resonance $\varphi_0$, the projection $P_\perp\varphi_0$ onto the subspace orthogonal to radially symmetric functions satisfies $(1+|x|)^l P_\perp\varphi_0 \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ for some $l(\delta)>0$; this is proven using the weight $G(|x|)=|x|^\kappa/(1+\omega |x|^\kappa \xi(|x|/\beta))$ and the Hardy inequality (4.9) for angular modes. The lemma feeds into Lemma 5.6, where the boundary terms from the partition of unity are absorbed by the decay of $P_\perp\varphi_0$, producing the nonnegativity that yields Theorem 2.1. Along the way the proof uses the one-dimensional trace theorem, Hardy inequalities on cones, and the two-body bound from Lemma 3.2 for the pair (23), completing the chain of estimates.

What would settle it

Compute, for an explicit reflection-symmetric two-body potential satisfying (2.3) with $\nu=3+\delta$, the zero-energy resonance $\varphi_0$; if $(1+|x|)^l P_\perp\varphi_0$ fails to be in $L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ for every $l>0$, Lemma 4.3 is false and the proof's key step breaks. At the full three-body level, a numerical or rigorous construction of a potential in the admissible class for which the three-line Hamiltonian has an infinite sequence of negative eigenvalues accumulating at $0$ would directly refute Theorem 2.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.1: for the operator $H = -\Delta_x + \sum_{\alpha} V_\alpha(|r_\alpha|)$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$ describing three bosons on the three lines, with pair potentials satisfying the decay bounds $|V_{12}(r)| \le C(1+|r|)^{-3-\delta}$, $|V_{13}(r)| \le C(1+|r|)^{-3-\delta}$, $|V_{23}(r)| \le C(1+|r|)^{-2-\delta}$ and with essential spectrum $[0,\infty)$, the discrete spectrum is at most finite. In particular the system has no accumulation of negative eigenvalues at zero, contradicting the confinement-induced Efimov effect predicted in [NE17]. The theorem imposes no condition on whether the two-body subsystems have zero-energy resonances; even with such resonances the bound-state count remains finite. The decisive new ingredient is that the non-radial part of a zero-energy resonance of a reflection-symmetric two-dimensional two-body operator lies in a weighted $L^2$ space (Lemma 4.3), which allows the localization estimate to be closed.

Load-bearing premise

The whole proof hinges on Lemma 4.3, the new estimate that the non-radial part of a zero-energy resonance of a reflection-symmetric two-body potential decays fast enough to lie in a weighted $L^2$ space; if that estimate failed for some allowed potential, the finiteness argument would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The three-line geometry (1D-1D-1D with perpendicular planes) has only finitely many negative eigenvalues, so no infinite Efimov ladder can form.
  • The absence holds even when the two-particle subsystems have zero-energy resonances (virtual levels), the same regime that produces the Efimov effect in three dimensions.
  • The bound-state count is finite for all angles $\zeta\in(0,\pi/2]$ between the line and the perpendicular plane, uniformly in the geometry.
  • The result fills one of the open rows of the mixed-dimensional Efimov table: the predicted confinement-induced Efimov effect case is now mathematically ruled out.
  • Together with earlier results (dimensions 1, 2, 4, and $N\ge 4$ bosons), the known landscape of Efimov-absent systems now includes this mixed-dimensional configuration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof's reliance on the decay exponent $\nu_{12}=\nu_{13}=3+\delta$ suggests a possible threshold: if the pair potentials decay only as $|r|^{-2-\delta}$, the weight estimate in Lemma 4.3 would not close, and the confinement-induced Efimov effect might reappear in that regime; testing this threshold is a natural follow-up.
  • The decay estimate for the non-radial part of the resonance is the only place where reflection symmetry is used; one could try to relax Lemma 4.3 to potentials with just a finite number of angular Fourier modes, which would extend the finiteness result to other mixed-dimensional geometries in Table 1 of [NE17].
  • A numerical experiment on a model potential with a tunable zero-energy resonance could test the finite-bound-state prediction directly and probe how the number of bound states grows as the potential approaches the threshold of the decay condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a system of three bosons confined to three lines: two parallel lines in one plane and a third line in a perpendicular plane. Under short-range decay assumptions (2.3) and the assumption σ_ess(H)=[0,∞), the main result Theorem 2.1 asserts that H has at most finitely many discrete eigenvalues, thereby disproving the prediction of a confinement-induced Efimov effect for this geometry made in [NE17]. The proof follows a Zhislin-type finite-dimensional reduction: it suffices to prove the local energy bound (3.2), which is decomposed into local functionals L_α on the cones K_α(γ). Lemmas 3.1–3.4 reduce the problem to boundary integrals controlled by kinetic energy, with Lemma 3.1 being the delicate two-dimensional pair contribution. That lemma is proved in Section 5 using a decomposition of the test function into a component parallel to a zero-energy resonance φ0 and an orthogonal component F, and it relies on the new decay estimate Lemma 4.3 for the non-radial part of a zero-energy resonance of a reflection-symmetric two-body operator. The supporting lemmas are proved in Section 5 and the appendices.

Significance. If the proof is completed as indicated below, the result resolves a specific open question in mixed-dimensional Efimov physics: the (1D-1D×1D) geometry predicted to exhibit a confinement-induced Efimov effect in [NE17] is shown not to have one. The main technical novelty is Lemma 4.3, which controls the decay of the non-radially-symmetric part of a zero-energy resonance under reflection symmetry; this goes beyond the rotation-invariant cases treated in previous work and is the key new analytic ingredient. The proof is structured as a sequence of lemmas with proofs provided, contains no fitted or free parameters, and yields a directly falsifiable statement about finiteness of the discrete spectrum. The central gap identified below is local and repairable, but it currently blocks the theorem for a class of potentials explicitly admitted by the hypotheses.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5.1 and §5.2.2, Eq. (5.36)] Lemma 5.4 and its proof use assertion (2) of Lemma 4.1 to obtain the coercive bound (5.36), but Lemma 4.1 is stated and proved only under the assumption that the two-body operator h_{12} has a virtual level. Theorem 2.1 explicitly allows potentials without two-body resonances (Remark 2.2), and in that branch the paper sets Φ≡0 and F=ψ~2 after (5.11). In this branch h_{12}≥0 alone gives only ∫(|∇12F|²+V12|F|²)≥0, not the strict μ-coercivity needed in (5.13) and used in Lemma 5.6, where ε<μ/8 is required for the positivity of the first three terms in (5.14). The proof as written therefore does not cover admissible potentials for which h_{12} or h_{13} has no virtual level. This is repairable within the manuscript's scope: from the absence of a virtual level it follows that there exists ε0>0 such that h_{12}+ε0Δ_{12}≥0 (otherwise h_{12}+εΔ_{12} would have a negative eigenvalue for every sufficiently small ε>0, which is exactly the virtual-level condition), giving h_{12}≥ε0(−Δ_{12}) and hence (5.36) with μ=ε0. This missing argument should be stated and proved or cited before Lemma 5.4 is used for the no-resonance branch.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3–§4.5, proof of Lemma 4.3] There is a notational collision for the exponent κ: in (4.27) κ is fixed to 1+δ/4 for estimating the third term, while the concluding paragraph says the proof establishes (4.10) 'with κ=l+1'. Since Lemma 4.3 only needs some positive exponent, the proof is valid with l=δ/4; please rephrase the conclusion to avoid claiming an arbitrary l.
  2. [§5.2.3, Eq. (5.67)] The citation to (4.9) is not directly justified for P⊥F, because (4.9) requires the vanishing of the first Fourier mode (condition (4.8)), which is not established for P⊥F. However, the standard two-dimensional Hardy inequality for functions with zero angular average gives ∫|P⊥F|²/|(x1,x2)|² ≤ ||∇12(P⊥F)||², and this weaker constant is already sufficient for the positivity claimed in (5.68); please correct the cited inequality.
  3. [§5.4, proof of Lemma 3.3] The proof estimates boundary integrals with exponent 1+δ, while the statement uses 1+τ. Since τ<δ and b can be taken large, the factor b^{-(δ-τ)} can be absorbed into the small constant ε, but this passage should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'eingenvalues' in §1.2, '(κττ)^{-1}' in (5.41) should presumably be '(κ^τ τ)^{-1}', and the reference key [Efi70] is inconsistent with the spelling 'Efimov' in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained; the main theorem follows from new estimates and independently published lemmas, not from fitted inputs.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain: Theorem 2.1 is proved by min-max, reducing to the positivity condition (3.1), which reduces to Lemmas 3.1-3.4. Lemma 3.1 is proved in Section 5.1 through Lemmas 5.2, 5.4, and 5.6, using the decay estimate for P_perp phi_0 proved in Lemma 4.3 inside the paper. Lemma 4.3 is derived from the resonance equation (4.4), the two-dimensional Hardy inequality (4.9), the reflection symmetry V(x)=V(-x), and the decay assumption (2.3), not assumed as a target conclusion. The proof branches on whether the two-body operator has a virtual level; in the no-resonance branch it sets Phi=0 and proceeds without importing any resonance input. The only imported ingredient is Lemma 4.1, quoted from [BBV21, Theorem 2.2], which is a parameter-free published statement about two-body zero-energy resonances in R^2 whose assumptions do not include the target three-line geometry or the finiteness result. Although one author overlaps with [BBV21], the cited result is independent support for the coercivity (4.5), not a circular restatement of the conclusion. Lemma 3.2 uses a one-dimensional bound originally from [BBV21, Lemma 6.2], but the paper reproduces and proves that bound in Appendix D, so the argument is self-contained. Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 are proved directly via trace theorems and Hardy inequalities. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the target result, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. The text at Remark 2.2 explicitly allows potentials with or without two-body resonances; the possible use of Lemma 4.1 in the no-resonance branch is a correctness risk, not circularity. Therefore the central claim is not equivalent to any input and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on standard Hardy inequalities, a finite-rank localization criterion, and a published two-body resonance theorem from [BBV21]. The only added domain assumptions beyond normal short-range decay are the stronger 3+delta decay for V_12 and V_13 and the reflection symmetry implied by the geometry; both are stated in the paper. No free parameters or invented entities appear.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Zhislin criterion: finiteness follows if there exists a finite-dimensional subspace M such that <psi,H psi> >= 0 for all psi orthogonal to M (Eq. 3.1).
    Used in Section 3 to reduce Theorem 2.1 to local energy estimates; standard min-max/finite-rank argument from [Zis74].
  • standard math Hardy inequalities: one-dimensional (A.1), two-dimensional with angular mean zero (A.3), radial on conical sets (A.5).
    Invoked throughout Sections 5 and Appendices A-D to control weighted L2 terms by kinetic energy.
  • standard math Lemma 4.1 from [BBV21, Theorem 2.2]: at a virtual level there is a unique non-negative phi_0 in dot H^1 solving the resonance equation, with coercivity away from phi_0.
    Load-bearing for the decomposition psi_2 = Phi phi_0 + F in Section 5.1; proved in cited published work with an overlapping author.
  • standard math One-dimensional trace theorem (Evans 2010) on conical boundaries.
    Used to estimate boundary integrals in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4.
  • domain assumption HVZ-type structure: sigma_ess(H) = [0, infinity) (assumed in Theorem 2.1) and sigma_ess(H) = [Sigma, infinity) in general.
    Theorem 2.1 explicitly assumes the essential spectrum starts at zero; the remark invokes the constrained HVZ analog without proof.
  • domain assumption Strong decay of V_12 and V_13 with exponent 3+delta (condition (2.3)), stronger than the usual 2+delta short-range decay.
    Needed for the weighted decay estimates on zero-energy resonances in Lemma 4.3; without it the proof of Lemma 3.1 is not established.
  • domain assumption Reflection symmetry V(x)=V(-x) for two-body potentials in Lemma 4.3.
    Ensures the resonance is even, so the non-radial part has zero angular mean and satisfies Hardy inequality (4.9); this symmetry holds for the geometric model via (2.8).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Why a System of Three Bosons on Separate Lines Can Not Exhibit the Confinement Induced Efimov Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HAXQRPEN

@misc{pith2026241119263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Why a System of Three Bosons on Separate Lines Can Not Exhibit the Confinement Induced Efimov Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HAXQRPEN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19263}
}
read the original abstract

We study a system of three bosons interacting with short-range potentials which can move along three different lines. Two of these lines are parallel to each other within one plane. The third line is constrained to a plane perpendicular to the first one. Recently it was predicted in physics literature that such a system exhibits the so-called confinement induced Efimov effect. We prove that this prediction is not correct by showing that this system has at most finitely many bound-states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19263 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Predictions on the confinement induced Effimov effect. Graphic taken from [NE17, page 44, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Geometrically constrained configuration space of particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left–hand side: sketch of the sets 𝐾12 (𝛾) and 𝐾12 (𝛾˜) used in the proof of Lemma 3.1. Right–hand side: sketch of the sets 𝐾12 (𝛾) and 𝐾12 (𝛾1) where the angles 𝜃0 and 𝜃1 are defined as 𝜃0 = arcsin(𝛾) and 𝜃1 = arcsin(𝛾1) and used in Lemma 3.3. We proceed by studying the term ∫ 𝐾12 (𝛾)  [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sketch of the set 𝐾23 (𝛾). In the circular blue area, the function 𝜓 vanishes. For fixed 𝑞 ∈ R the horizontal red line indicates the path of integration used in Lemma 5.9. 5.3.2. Proof of Lemma 5.9. This lemma mainly follows the ideas of [BBV21, Lemma 6.7]. We introduc…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sketch of the sets 𝐾23 (𝛾) and 𝐾23 (𝛾1) and their relation to the constants 𝜅0 and 𝜅1. This construction is used in Lemma 3.4. is determined by |𝑞| = 𝜅0 (𝑥 2 1 + 𝜉 2 ) 1/2 (5.123) with 𝜅0 defined in (5.82). We introduce spherical coordinates as follows: 𝑥1 = |𝑥 | sin(𝜑…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. D. Amado and F. C. Greenwood. There is no E fimov effect for four or more particles. Phys. Rev. D (3) , 7:2517--2519, 1973

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    L ectures on E xponential D ecay of S olutions of S econd-- O rder E lliptic E quations : B ounds on E igenfunctions of N --body S chr \"o dinger O perations

    Shmuel Agmon. L ectures on E xponential D ecay of S olutions of S econd-- O rder E lliptic E quations : B ounds on E igenfunctions of N --body S chr \"o dinger O perations. 1983

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    On the virtual level of two-body interactions and applications to three-body systems in higher dimensions

    Simon Barth and Andreas Bitter. On the virtual level of two-body interactions and applications to three-body systems in higher dimensions . Journal of Mathematical Physics , 60(11):113504, 11 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Decay properties of zero-energy resonances of multi-particle Schr\"odinger operators and why the Efimov effect does not exist for systems of $N\geq 4$ particles

    Simon Barth, Andreas Bitter, and Semjon Vugalter. Decay properties of zero-energy resonances of multi-particle schr\"odinger operators and why the efimov effect does not exist for systems of N 4 particles, 2020. arXiv Version: arXiv:1910.04139v3

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    The absence of the E fimov effect in systems of one-and two-dimensional particles

    Simon Barth, Andreas Bitter, and Semjon Vugalter. The absence of the E fimov effect in systems of one-and two-dimensional particles. J. Math. Phys. , 62(12):Paper No. 123502, 46, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Hartig, Dirk Hundertmark, and Semjon Vugalter

    Jean-Marie Barbaroux, Michael C. Hartig, Dirk Hundertmark, and Semjon Vugalter. van der W aals-- L ondon interaction of atoms with pseudorelavistic kinetic energy. Anal. PDE , 15(6):1375--1428, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Barontini, C

    G. Barontini, C. Weber, F. Rabatti, J. Catani, G. Thalhammer, M. Inguscio, and F. Minardi. Observation of H eteronuclear A tomic E fimov R esonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:043201, Jul 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Courteille, R

    Ph. Courteille, R. S. Freeland, D. J. Heinzen, F. A. van Abeelen, and B. J. Verhaar. O bservation of a F eshbach R esonance in C old A tom S cattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 81:69--72, Jul 1998

    work page 1998

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Weakly bound states of three resonantly interacting particles

    V N Efimov. Weakly bound states of three resonantly interacting particles. Yadern. Fiz. , 12:1080--91, 1 1970

    1970

  2. [10]

    L. C. Evans. Partial Differential Equations . American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    F orty years of E fimov physics: H ow a bizarre prediction turned into a hot topic

    Francesca Ferlaino and Rudolf Grimm. F orty years of E fimov physics: H ow a bizarre prediction turned into a hot topic. Physics , 3:9, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    R. L. Frank, A. Laptev, and T. Weidl. Schrödinger Operators: Eigenvalues and Lieb–-Thirring Inequalities . Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Dmitry K. Gridnev. Why there is no Efimov effect for four bosons and related results on the finiteness of the discrete spectrum . Journal of Mathematical Physics , 54(4):042105, 04 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    Observation of U niversality in U ltracold ^ 7 Li T hree-- B ody R ecombination

    Noam Gross, Zav Shotan, Servaas Kokkelmans, and Lev Khaykovich. Observation of U niversality in U ltracold ^ 7 Li T hree-- B ody R ecombination. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:163202, Oct 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    O bservation of U niversality in U ltracold ^ 7 Li T hree-- B ody R ecombination

    Noam Gross, Zav Shotan, Servaas Kokkelmans, and Lev Khaykovich. O bservation of U niversality in U ltracold ^ 7 Li T hree-- B ody R ecombination. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:163202, Oct 2009

    2009

  8. [16]

    G\"orlitz, J

    A. G\"orlitz, J. M. Vogels, A. E. Leanhardt, C. Raman, T. L. Gustavson, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, S. Gupta, S. Inouye, T. Rosenband, and W. Ketterle. R ealization of B ose- E instein C ondensates in L ower D imensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 87:130402, Sep 2001

    2001

  9. [17]

    Quantum systems at the brink: Helium-type systems, 2021

    Dirk Hundertmark, Michal Jex, and Markus Lange. Quantum systems at the brink: Helium-type systems, 2021. arXiv Version: arXiv:1908.04883v2

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Quantum systems at the brink

    Dirk Hundertmark, Michal Jex, and Markus Lange. Quantum systems at the brink. In Michele Correggi and Marco Falconi, editors, Quantum Mathematics I , pages 259--273, Singapore, 2023. Springer Nature Singapore

    2023

  11. [19]

    Shin Inouye, M. R. Andrews, M. R. Andrews, J. B. Stenger, H. J. Miesner, Dan M. Stamper-Kurn, and Wolfgang Ketterle. O bservation of F eshbach resonances in a B ose– E instein condensate. Nature , 392:151--154, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    D. R. Jafaev. On the theory of the discrete spectrum of the three-particle S chr\"odinger operator. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) , 94(136):567--593, 655--656, 1974

    1974

  13. [21]

    D. R. Jafaev. The virtual level of the S chr\"odinger equation. Zap. Nau cn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) , 51:203--216, 220, 1975. Mathematical questions in the theory of wave propagation, 7

    1975

  14. [22]

    Kraemer, M

    T. Kraemer, M. Mark, P. Waldburger, J. G. Danzl, C. Chin, B. Engeser, A. D. Lange, K. Pilch, A. Jaakkola, H.-C. N \"a gerl, and R. Grimm. E vidence for E fimov quantum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms. Nature , 440(7082):315--318, Mar 2006

    2006

  15. [23]

    Klaus and B

    M. Klaus and B. Simon. Binding of S chr\"odinger particles through conspiracy of potential wells. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Sect. A (N.S.) , 30(2):83--87, 1979

    1979

  16. [24]

    A. I. Nazarov. H ardy- S obolev I nequalities in a C one. Journal of Mathematical Sciences , 132(4):419--427, Jan 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Naidon and S

    P. Naidon and S. Endo. Efimov physics: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics , 80(5):056001, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    U niversal F ermi G ases in M ixed D imensions

    Yusuke Nishida and Shina Tan. U niversal F ermi G ases in M ixed D imensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:170401, Oct 2008

    2008

  19. [27]

    Confinement-induced E fimov resonances in F ermi- F ermi mixtures

    Yusuke Nishida and Shina Tan. Confinement-induced E fimov resonances in F ermi- F ermi mixtures. Phys. Rev. A , 79:060701, Jun 2009

    2009

  20. [28]

    Liberating efimov physics from three dimensions

    Yusuke Nishida and Shina Tan. Liberating efimov physics from three dimensions. Few-Body Systems , 51(2):191--206, Nov 2011

    2011

  21. [29]

    Number of bound states of three-body systems and efimov's effect

    Yu.N Ovchinnikov and I.M Sigal. Number of bound states of three-body systems and efimov's effect. Annals of Physics , 123(2):274--295, 1979

    1979

  22. [30]

    Pollack, Daniel Dries, and Randall G

    Scott E. Pollack, Daniel Dries, and Randall G. Hulet. U niversality in T hree- and F our- B ody B ound S tates of U ltracold A toms. Science , 326(5960):1683--1685, 2009

    2009

  23. [31]

    On the localization of binding for S chr\" o dinger operators and its extension to elliptic operators

    Yehuda Pinchover. On the localization of binding for S chr\" o dinger operators and its extension to elliptic operators. J. Anal. Math. , 66:57--83, 1995

    1995

  24. [32]

    Pinchover

    Y. Pinchover. Binding of S chr\" o dinger particles through conspiracy of potential wells in ^4 , volume 345 of Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. , pages 118--133. Longman, Harlow, 1996

    1996

  25. [33]

    A. V. Sobolev. The E fimov effect. D iscrete spectrum asymptotics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 156(1):101--126, Sep 1993

    1993

  26. [34]

    Solomyak

    M. Solomyak. A R emark on the H ardy I nequalities. Integral Equations and Operator Theory , 19:120--124, 1994

    1994

  27. [35]

    Simon and M

    B. Simon and M. Reed. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: Vol.: 4. : Analysis of Operators . Academic Press, 1978

    1978

  28. [36]

    The E fimov effect of three-body S chrödinger operators

    Hideo Tamura. The E fimov effect of three-body S chrödinger operators. Journal of Functional Analysis , 95(2):433--459, 1991

    1991

  29. [37]

    Taglieber, A.-C

    M. Taglieber, A.-C. Voigt, T. Aoki, T. W. H\"ansch, and K. Dieckmann. Q uantum D egenerate T wo- S pecies F ermi- F ermi M ixture C oexisting with a B ose- E instein C ondensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 100:010401, Jan 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    Tiesinga, B

    E. Tiesinga, B. J. Verhaar, and H. T. C. Stoof. Threshold and resonance phenomena in ultracold ground-state collisions. Phys. Rev. A , 47:4114--4122, May 1993

    1993

  31. [39]

    Vugal'ter and G.M

    S.A. Vugal'ter and G.M. Zhislin. On the finiteness of discrete spectrum in the n --particle problem. Reports on Mathematical Physics , 19(1):39--90, 1984

    1984

  32. [40]

    S. A. Vugalter and G. M. Zhislin. O n the finiteness of the discrete spectrum of H amiltonians for quantum systems of three one-- or two--dimensional particles. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 25(4):299--306, Aug 1992

    1992

  33. [41]

    S. A. Vugalter and G. M. Zhislin. The symmetry and E fimov's effect in systems of three-quantum particles. Comm. Math. Phys. , 87(1):89--103, 1982/83

    1982

  34. [42]

    Van de Graaff, Roman Chapurin, Matthew D

    Xin Xie, Michael J. Van de Graaff, Roman Chapurin, Matthew D. Frye, Jeremy M. Hutson, Jos\'e P. D'Incao, Paul S. Julienne, Jun Ye, and Eric A. Cornell. O bservation of E fimov U niversality across a N onuniversal F eshbach R esonance in ^ 39 K . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125:243401, Dec 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Zaccanti, B

    M. Zaccanti, B. Deissler, C. D'Errico, M. Fattori, M. Jona-Lasinio, S. M \"u ller, G. Roati, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno. O bservation of an E fimov spectrum in an atomic system. Nature Physics , 5(8):586--591, Aug 2009

    2009

  36. [44]

    G. M. Zislin. Finiteness of the D iscrete S pectrum in the Q uantum P roblem of n \ P articles. Teoret. Mat. Fiz. , 21:60--73, 1974. English Translation: Finiteness of the D iscrete S pectrum in the Q uantum n -- P article P roblem, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Volume...

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.