Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Self-Correction is More than Refinement: A Learning Framework for Visual and Language Reasoning Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04055 v3 pith:HBJXVXWG submitted 2024-10-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords self-correctionvlmsmodelsabilitiesduringfine-tuninginferencelanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in visual and language reasoning tasks, they invariably generate flawed responses. Self-correction that instructs models to refine their outputs presents a promising solution to this issue. Previous studies have mainly concentrated on Large Language Models (LLMs), while the self-correction abilities of VLMs, particularly concerning both visual and linguistic information, remain largely unexamined. This study investigates the self-correction capabilities of VLMs during both inference and fine-tuning stages. We introduce a Self-Correction Learning (SCL) approach that enables VLMs to learn from their self-generated self-correction data through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) without relying on external feedback, facilitating self-improvement. Specifically, we collect preferred and disfavored samples based on the correctness of initial and refined responses, which are obtained by two-turn self-correction with VLMs during the inference stage. Experimental results demonstrate that although VLMs struggle to self-correct effectively during iterative inference without additional fine-tuning and external feedback, they can enhance their performance and avoid previous mistakes through preference fine-tuning when their self-generated self-correction data are categorized into preferred and disfavored samples. This study emphasizes that self-correction is not merely a refinement process; rather, it should enhance the reasoning abilities of models through additional training, enabling them to generate high-quality responses directly without further refinement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chart-CoCa: Self-Improving Chart Understanding of Vision LMs via Code-Driven Synthesis and Candidate-Conditioned Answering

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Chart-CoCa makes a vision language model improve its own chart question answering by generating synthetic charts via code, extracting exact answers from that code, and training itself to synthesize a final answer from...

  2. SC-Captioner: Improving Image Captioning with Self-Correction by Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RL framework that trains vision-language models to self-correct captions via a scene-graph-based reward outperforms SFT and DPO on caption quality.

  3. Unveiling the Lack of LVLM Robustness to Fundamental Visual Variations: Why and Path Forward

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    V2R-Bench shows that 21 large vision-language models are markedly less accurate on simple object and direction tasks when object position, scale, orientation, or context is varied, and attributes the failure to multim...

  4. Contemplative Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Prompting LLMs with contemplative principles improved AILuminate safety scores and Prisoner's Dilemma cooperation, and the paper sketches architectural and training paths for embedding these principles intrinsically.

  5. Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DPO-trained VLM critic that critiques and iteratively refines a reasoning VLM improves accuracy on several multimodal benchmarks, with large gains on MathVista and RealWorldQA.

Pith tools