Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Delicate Wannier insulators

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes delicate Wannier insulators—insulating phases whose delicate topology is carried by hybrid Wannier functions—as a new class invisible to symmetry indicators and bulk homotopy, yet with protected boundary states at sharp…

desk verdict Genuinely new Wannier-band delicate topology, honestly caveated, but the abstract oversells the boundary states. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05179 v1 pith:HDNWGKOK submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

Zoltán Guba , Aris Alexandradinata , Tomáš Bzdušek This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords delicatetopologicalinsulatorshybridWannierfunctionsreturningThoulesspumphigher-orderboundary-obstructedphaseslayeringconstructionbandsboundarystates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a new class of topological insulators, delicate Wannier insulators (DWIs), whose defining property is that a delicate topological invariant lives not in the Bloch energy bands but in the hybrid Wannier functions, i.e., the eigenstates of the projected position operator. In the bulk, and in the presence of any single open face, a DWI can be continuously deformed to a unicellular atomic limit without closing the energy gap, so all standard symmetry indicators and bulk homotopy invariants see it as trivial. Yet when two sharply terminated open boundaries meet at a hinge or corner, the same model develops metallic hinge or corner states that cannot be removed without a gap closing, provided the concurrent-gap condition holds. The paper demonstrates the concept with three model families built by a layering construction that lifts any delicate topological insulator in $d$ dimensions into a DWI in $d+1$ dimensions, and shows that some DWIs carry a quantized hinge Berry phase while others do not. If correct, DWIs form a category of topological matter invisible to the established classification tools but with observable higher-order boundary signatures.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three parts. First, the hybrid Wannier functions: for a slab, one computes eigenstates of the projected position operator $P_z P$ or $P_y P$, and the resulting Wannier bands are gapped and carry their own topology; for the layered RTP model this topology is exactly the RTP invariant of the constituent layers. Second, the layering construction: couple alternating layers of a $d$-dimensional delicate insulator with opposite invariants, following the approach used for boundary-obstructed topological insulators, which forces the Wannier bands of the $(d+1)$-dimensional model to mimic the energy bands of a single layer. Third, the concurrent-gap condition: the claim that surface energy-gap closings occur simultaneously with Wannier-gap closings at $\nu = 1/2$ in the same direction; the paper observes this numerically and uses it to argue that hinge modes persist until a surface gap closes, giving the boundary obstruction.

What would settle it

Add a mirror-symmetric next-nearest-neighbor hopping to the layered RTP model of Eq. (5) and trace the lines where the surface energy gap of a slab closes and where the Wannier gap at $\nu = 1/2$ closes in the $(\alpha, \gamma_{\mathrm{tra}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{ter}})$ phase diagram. If the two sets of lines separate, the concurrent-gap condition fails in this model, and the boundary obstruction—and with it the guaranteed persistence of the helical hinge modes—would no longer follow; the paper cites a generic breakdown of this kind.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that delicate topology can be moved from Bloch energy bands to hybrid Wannier bands, creating insulators that are Wannierizable and homotopically trivial at the level of Bloch states, yet remain topologically obstructed at sharp higher-order boundaries. Concretely, in a DWI the occupied subspace splits into gapped Wannier bands carrying a delicate invariant; for the layered RTP model, the returning Thouless pump invariant of the constituent two-dimensional layers reappears as the invariant of the lower Wannier band. Because that invariant lives in the Wannier spectrum, it is invisible to symmetry indicators and to the homotopy classification of the Bloch Hamiltonian, and the model can be deformed without a gap closing to a unicellular atomic limit under periodic boundary conditions or with a single open surface. The paper argues that with two sharply terminated surfaces meeting at a hinge, the same model instead shows helical hinge modes with a quantized $\pi$ Berry phase, and the phase cannot be trivialized without closing a surface energy gap, an obstruction it compares to boundary-obstructed topological insulators. The same scheme yields two corner modes per corner for the layered 1D chain, while the layered Chern dartboard insulator shows hinge modes that can be gapped by symmetry-preserving bulk perturbations, demonstrating that delicate Wannier topology and boundary protection are not the same thing.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the concurrent-gap condition: at a sharply terminated boundary, the closing of the surface energy gap coincides with the closing of the Wannier gap at $\nu = 1/2$ in the same direction. The paper states that this condition is not generically valid and can fail once additional hoppings are added, in which case the proposed boundary obstruction would no longer protect the hinge modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Symmetry indicators and homotopy invariants of the Bloch Hamiltonian cannot detect DWIs, so these phases occupy a blind spot of the standard classification schemes.
  • The layering construction turns any delicate topological insulator in $d$ dimensions into a DWI in $d+1$ dimensions, giving a systematic route to higher-order boundary states from known delicate models.
  • For DWIs obeying the concurrent-gap condition, the higher-order boundary states are obstructed: they cannot be removed without closing a surface energy gap, in contrast to ordinary delicate edge states which can be gapped by boundary perturbations.
  • Not all DWIs have robust boundary signatures: the layered RTP insulator exhibits a quantized hinge Berry phase, while the layered Chern dartboard insulator does not, so DWI topology and higher-order boundary protection are distinct properties.
  • The topological invariant is insensitive to adding bands to the conduction sector, making the Wannier-band topology less fragile than the original Bloch-band delicate topology and reminiscent of fragile topological insulators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension is to add mirror-symmetric next-nearest-neighbor hoppings to the layered RTP model and check whether the surface-gap and Wannier-gap closing lines separate; the paper itself notes the concurrent-gap condition can fail in generic models, so this would clarify how much of the claimed boundary obstruction survives in realistic settings.
  • The reverse question of whether every DWI can be realized by layering a lower-dimensional delicate insulator is left open; a negative answer would imply genuinely higher-dimensional Wannier invariants with no Bloch-band analog.
  • Iterating the layering construction could produce $(d+2)$-dimensional models whose nested Wilson bands carry the delicate invariant, suggesting a hierarchy of delicate Wannier topology that the paper mentions but does not develop.
  • Because delicate invariants are known to appear in strong photovoltaic responses, DWI hinges might be probed through optical or transport signatures in synthetic acoustic and photonic implementations, though the paper does not make this connection explicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a new class of insulators, termed delicate Wannier insulators (DWIs), defined by elevating delicate topological invariants from Bloch energy bands to hybrid Wannier bands. The authors present a layering construction that stacks alternating layers of a delicate topological insulator with pairwise canceling invariants, and they apply it to three models: a three-dimensional layered Returning Thouless Pump (RTP) insulator, a two-dimensional layered delicate 1D chain, and a three-dimensional layered Chern dartboard insulator. For the layered RTP model they show numerically that the Wannier bands inherit an RTP invariant, that the model is gapped in the bulk and on first-order surfaces, and that sharply terminated hinges host helical modes with what they call an anomalous hinge Berry phase. They also construct a phase diagram and argue that in the DWI region the model is boundary obstructed: it can be deformed to a unicellular atomic limit in slab geometry but not in wire geometry. The layered 1D chain similarly exhibits eight corner-localized zero modes, while the layered Chern dartboard model has a nontrivial Wannier invariant but, as the authors acknowledge, no robust higher-order boundary signature. The manuscript explicitly admits that several key steps, in particular the concurrent-gap condition and the uniqueness of the hinge Berry phase, are not rigorously established and are left as open questions.

Significance. If the main claims are borne out, DWIs occupy a genuinely new position in the classification of insulating phases: they are Wannierizable and homotopy trivial in the bulk, invisible to symmetry indicators and to bulk homotopy, yet they can exhibit boundary obstructions and higher-order boundary states under sharp terminations. The layering construction is simple and likely to be reusable for other delicate invariants, and the explicit models are concrete and reproducible; the authors state that the code is openly accessible. The paper is also commendably candid about its limitations: it explicitly flags the lack of rigorous proofs for the concurrent-gap condition, the ambiguity of the hinge Berry phase, and the absence of a general bulk-hinge correspondence. However, because the boundary-obstruction and hinge-mode claims are central to the abstract and introduction, and because the paper itself shows that one of its own DWI models (layered CDI2) lacks robust hinge modes, the current presentation overstates the generality of the phenomenology.

major comments (3)
  1. [IIID, VI, and abstract] The boundary obstruction and the existence of topological hinge/corner modes are presented in the abstract and in Sec. I as properties of DWIs in general, but the argument relies on the concurrent-gap condition introduced in Sec. IIID. In Sec. IIID the authors state that this condition is 'a stronger statement that has not been mathematically established' and that it breaks down for generic models such as those with next-to-nearest-neighbor hoppings (Ref. [22]); Sec. VI repeats this caveat. Since the phase diagram and the 'boundary obstruction' conclusion in Sec. IIID are derived under this unproven and non-generic condition, the central phenomenological claim should be reformulated as holding for a subclass of DWIs that satisfy the concurrent-gap condition, and the abstract should not assert boundary states as a general consequence of the DWI definition.
  2. [IIIC and VI] The claimed 'anomalous hinge Berry phase' is not shown to be a well-defined topological invariant. In Sec. IIIC the π Berry phase is extracted after applying a particular hinge perturbation (Eq. (7) with μ = 0.2), and Sec. VI explicitly acknowledges that other choices of hinge perturbation might detach additional hinge modes with Berry phase 0 or π, so that the net phase could become trivial. The statement in Sec. IIIC that the determination is 'not biased by the choice of perturbation' is therefore contradicted by the paper's own concluding remarks. To support the claim, the authors need either a unique classification prescription for hinge-localized states, as sketched via projected position operators in Sec. VI, or they should downgrade the hinge Berry phase to a property of a specific termination and perturbation choice.
  3. [V, Sec. VB, and Eq. (23)] The layered Chern dartboard insulator is explicitly a DWI (its Wannier bands carry a sub-Brillouin-zone Chern number), yet its hinge modes are gapped by the symmetry-preserving bulk perturbation in Eq. (23) and the authors find no anomalous hinge Berry phase. This model demonstrates that the DWI definition alone does not imply the existence of robust higher-order boundary states. The paper acknowledges this in Sec. VI ('only some DWIs have robust higher-order modes'), but the abstract and Sec. I state the implication as general ('nevertheless, they exhibit obstructions to such deformations as well as topological boundary states in the presence of sharply terminated hinges and corners'). The introduction and abstract should be rewritten to state explicitly that the boundary-state phenomenology holds for a distinguished subclass of DWIs, with the layered CDI2 model serving as a counterexample to the general implication.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IIID] In the paragraph discussing the α > 2 region, 'irrespective of the choice of γ-ter/λ-tra' appears to be a typo for 'γ-tra/λ-ter'; the ratio is introduced that way earlier in the same section.
  2. [IIIB] The term 'nested Wilson loop' is used in Sec. IIIB to describe the polarization change of the Wannier bands, but 'nested Wilson loop' usually denotes a second-order Wilson loop involving the Wannier bands themselves; please clarify the terminology or use a different phrase such as 'half-BZ polarization'.
  3. [Fig. 5] The phase label 'DWI′' is used in the caption and text, but the prime is easy to miss and is not defined in the caption; please define it explicitly (e.g., 'the phase with swapped dimerization pattern') at its first occurrence in the caption.
  4. [VI] The sentence 'their topology is inivisible to symmetry indicators' contains a typo; it should read 'invisible'.
  5. [IIIB and Fig. 3] The Wannier band topology is verified numerically for a grid of momenta and system sizes; for reproducibility, please state in the figure captions or in the text whether the data are generated with the code in Ref. [59] and provide the exact grid sizes and convergence criteria used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Wannier-band inheritance is an openly designed construction, and the claimed boundary phenomenology is supported by independent numerics plus an explicitly flagged (not hidden) conjecture.

full rationale

The paper does not disguise an input as a prediction. The central construction—stacking alternating layers with pairwise canceling delicate invariants—is explicitly designed so that the hybrid Wannier bands inherit the constituent layers' topology: Sec. IVB states "By design, the wave functions of these Wannier bands have the same symmetry representations at high-symmetry momenta ... as the energy bands of Hchain." This is an acknowledged design feature, not a derived result presented as a surprise. The higher-order boundary states (helical hinge modes, corner zero modes) are obtained by direct numerical diagonalization in wire/flake geometries for concrete parameters; no parameter is fitted to force the modes, and the paper reports their absence in the DWI' regime and their removal by non-sharp terminations. The boundary-obstruction interpretation in Sec. IIID is explicitly conditional on the 'concurrent-gap condition,' which the paper states 'has not been mathematically established' and 'breaks down for generic models' (citing Ref. [22]); this is an openly stated limitation, not a circular reduction. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [15,31,41]) supply previously published definitions, the block-Toeplitz proof for first-order RTP edge states, and Wilson-loop methods; the paper explicitly declines to extend that proof to hinges, relying on numerics instead. No equation is shown to be equivalent to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The gap between the general DWI concept and a proven bulk-hinge correspondence is a correctness/robustness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on model Hamiltonians with tunable parameters (alpha, beta, coupling ratio) that scan, not fit, the phase diagram. The key assumptions are the concurrent-gap condition (explicitly conjectural) and the mutually disjoint condition inherited from delicate topology. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (constituent layer parameter) = alpha=1 (RTP/CDI2), alpha=2 (chain)
    Tuning parameter separating trivial vs delicate-topological regimes; values chosen to illustrate the phases, not fitted to data.
  • gamma_tra/lambda_ter ratio = 0.5/1 = 0.5 in numerics
    Controls intralayer vs interlayer coupling and the dimerization pattern; chosen to realize the DWI phase with hinge/corner modes.
  • beta (layered chain) = beta=2
    Fixed to ensure the occupied band is p-like at high-symmetry points; chosen for convenience.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Concurrent-gap condition: surface energy gap closes iff Wannier gap at nu=1/2 closes in the same direction.
    Assumed in Sec. IIID and used to establish boundary obstruction. The paper admits it is a conjecture that fails for generic models (Ref. [22]).
  • domain assumption Mutually disjoint mirror/inversion eigenvalues of occupied vs unoccupied bands at high-symmetry momenta are required for the quantization of the RTP and half-BZ Berry phases.
    Standard in delicate topology literature (Refs. [15,31]); used to define the invariants.
  • domain assumption Heuristic correspondence between Wannier bands and surface spectra of semi-infinite systems.
    Used in Sec. IIIB to interpret Wannier band topology as a proxy for surface states, citing Refs. [21,53].
  • standard math Standard homotopy theory of classifying spaces of real vector bundles and relative homotopy groups.
    Used in Appendices A and B for the classification of 1D chains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Delicate Wannier insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HDNWGKOK

@misc{pith2026250605179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Delicate Wannier insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HDNWGKOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05179}
}
abstract

The defining feature of topological insulators is that their valence states are not continuously deformable to a suitably defined atomic limit without breaking the symmetry or closing the energy gap. When the atomic limit is given by symmetric exponentially-localized Wannier orbitals, one finds stable and fragile topological insulators characterized by robust bulk-boundary correspondence. More recently, delicate topological insulators (DIs) have been introduced, whose metallic states are guaranteed only at sharply terminated edges and surfaces. Although Wannierizable, their Wannier orbitals necessarily span multiple unit cells, thus refining the notion of the atomic limit. In this work, we extend delicate topological invariants from Bloch states to hybrid Wannier functions. The resulting models, dubbed delicate Wannier insulators (DWIs), are deformable to unicellular atomic limit in the absence of edges and surfaces; nevertheless, they exhibit obstructions to such deformations as well as topological boundary states in the presence of sharply terminated hinges and corners. We present a layering construction that allows us to elevate a DI in $d$ dimensions into a DWI in $(d\,{+}\,1)$ dimensions. We illustrate the phenomenology of DWIs by deploying the layering construction on three concrete models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The RTP model. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Construction of the layered RTP insulator [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy bands and Wannier bands of the layered RTP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Revealing the topological nature of the hinge-localized states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectral gaps of the layered RTP model [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase diagram of the Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Layering of the delicate topological 1D chains. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Layering of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Paths representing the occupied Bloch state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Nelson, T

    A. Nelson, T. Neupert, T. Bzdušek, and A. Alexandradinata, Multicellularity of Delicate Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [22]

    Bouchiat, S

    F.Schindler,Z.Wang,M.G.Vergniory,A.M.C.Cook,A.Mu- rani,S.Sengupta,A.Y.Kasumov,R.Deblock,S.Jeon,I.Droz- dov, H. Bouchiat, S. Guéron, A. Yazdani, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topology in bismuth, Nat. Phys.14, 918 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    For concreteness, we assume that the occupied Bloch eigenstate|𝑢val(𝑘𝑥)⟩ is𝑠-like at𝑘𝑥 = 0 and 𝑝-like at𝑘𝑥 = 𝜋 (the case with flipped eigenvalues ofP can be treated analo- gously)

    Initial two-band model with odd winding number We first consider two-band models whose occupied band obeys𝜉val(0)𝜉val(𝜋) =−1, corresponding to nontrivial Berry phase 𝜙B = 𝜋 (or, equivalently, to an odd winding number 𝜔). For concreteness, we assume that the occupied Bloch eigenstate|𝑢val(𝑘𝑥)⟩ is𝑠-like at𝑘𝑥 = 0 and 𝑝-like at𝑘𝑥 = 𝜋 (the case with flipped ei...

    work page

  4. [2]

    dartboard

    The presence of the metallic hinge mode(withanontrivialhingeBerryphase)isgovernedbythe closingofthesurfaceenergygapsratherthanbytheclosingof theWanniergaps[22]. Thissamephenomenologygeneralizes to the other models of DWIs presented in the next sections. Finally, let us clarify the nature of the layered RTP model when𝛼 <2 and𝛾-tra/𝜆-ter > 1, corresponding ...

    work page

  5. [3]

    Initial two-band model with even winding number Wenextturnourattentiontotwo-bandmodelswhoseoccu- piedbandobeys 𝜉val(0)𝜉val(𝜋)=+1,correspondingtovanish- ing Berry phase𝜙B = 0 (or, equivalently, to an even winding number𝜔). Unlikethecaseofoddwindingnumbers,analyzed inAppendixB1,supplementingthepresentlyconsideredtwo- band models with a third orbital (assume...

    work page

  6. [4]

    X.-L.QiandS.-C.Zhang,Topologicalinsulatorsandsupercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [5]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insula- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  8. [6]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

Show all 72 references
  1. [7]

    C.-K.Chiu,J.C.Y.Teo,A.P.Schnyder,andS.Ryu,Classifica- tionoftopologicalquantummatterwithsymmetries,Rev.Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  2. [8]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.- J. Slager, Topological Classification of Crystalline Insulators throughBandStructureCombinatorics,Phys.Rev.X 7,041069 (2017)

    2017

  3. [9]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C.Felser,M.I.Aroyo,andB.A.Bernevig,Topologicalquantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  4. [10]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. J. Wieder, Z. Song, Y. Xu, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Magnetic topological quantum chemistry, Nat. Com- mun. 12, 5965 (2021)

    2021

  5. [11]

    P.W.BrouwerandV.Dwivedi,Homotopicclassificationofband structures: Stable, fragile, delicate, and stable representation- protected topology, Phys. Rev. B108, 155137 (2023)

    2023

  6. [12]

    Lapierre, L

    B. Lapierre, L. Trifunovic, T. Neupert, and P. W. Brouwer, Topology of ultra-localized insulators and superconductors (2024), arXiv:2407.07957 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024

  7. [13]

    Corbae, J

    P. Corbae, J. D. Hannukainen, Q. Marsal, D. Muñoz-Segovia, andA.G.Grushin,Amorphoustopologicalmatter: Theoryand experiment, EPL142, 16001 (2023)

    2023

  8. [14]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian Topological Phenom- ena: AReview,Annu.Rev.Condens.MatterPhys. 14,83(2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Ohyama, Y

    S. Ohyama, Y. Terashima, and K. Shiozaki, Discrete higher Berry phases and matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035114 (2024)

    2024

  10. [16]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher- order topological insulators, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aat0346

    2018 doi

  11. [17]

    H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, and A. Vishwanath, Fragile Topology andWannierObstructions,Phys.Rev.Lett. 121,126402(2018)

    2018

  12. [19]

    Q. Wu, A. A. Soluyanov, and T. Bzdušek, Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals, Science365, 1273 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Lapierre, T

    B. Lapierre, T. Neupert, and L. Trifunovic,𝑁-band Hopf insu- lator, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033045 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Khalaf, W

    E. Khalaf, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and R. Queiroz, Boundary-obstructed topological phases, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013239 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    W.A.Benalcazar,B.A.Bernevig,andT.L.Hughes,Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science357, 61 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, andchiralhingestatesincrystallineinsulators,Phys.Rev.B 96, 245115 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Y.-B. Yang, K. Li, L.-M. Duan, and Y. Xu, Type-II quadrupole topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033029 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    W.A.Benalcazar,T.Li,andT.L.Hughes,Quantizationoffrac- tional corner charge in𝐶𝑛-symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry-based indicatorsofbandtopologyinthe230spacegroups,Nat.Com- mun. 8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    L.TrifunovicandP.W.Brouwer,Higher-OrderBulk-Boundary Correspondence for Topological Crystalline Phases, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011012 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Alexandradinata, J

    A. Alexandradinata, J. Höller, C. Wang, H. Cheng, and L. Lu, Crystallographic splitting theorem for band representations and fragile topological photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B102, 115117 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    A.Bouhon,A.M.Black-Schaffer,andR.-J.Slager,Wilsonloop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band represen- tations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B100, 195135 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bulk- boundarycorrespondenceoffragiletopology,Science 367,794 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Cano and B

    J. Cano and B. Bradlyn, Band Representations and Topological QuantumChemistry,Annu.Rev.Condens.MatterPhys. 12,225 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    N.Read,CompactlysupportedWannierfunctionsandalgebraic 𝐾-theory, Phys. Rev. B95, 115309 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Nelson, T

    A. Nelson, T. Neupert, A. Alexandradinata, and T. Bzdušek, Delicate topology protected by rotation symmetry: Crystalline Hopf insulators and beyond, Phys. Rev. B106, 075124 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    P. Zhu, J. Noh, Y. Liu, and T. L. Hughes, Scattering theory of delicatetopologicalinsulators,Phys.Rev.B 107,195110(2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    B 108, 125101 (2023)

    H.Lim,S.Kim,andB.-J.Yang,RealHopfinsulator,Phys.Rev. B 108, 125101 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    S. Kim, Y. Choi, H. Lim, and B.-J. Yang, Unconventional topological phase transition of the Hopf insulator (2024), arXiv:2410.04021 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sun, S.-C

    X.-Q. Sun, S.-C. Zhang, and T. Bzdušek, Conversion Rules for Weyl Points and Nodal Lines in Topological Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 106402 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    S. Park, Y. Hwang, H. C. Choi, and B.-J. Yang, Topological acoustic triple point, Nat. Commun.12, 6781 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Bouhon, Y.-Q

    A. Bouhon, Y.-Q. Zhu, R.-J. Slager, and G. Palumbo, Second Euler number in four-dimensional matter, Phys. Rev. B110, 195144 (2024). 20

    2024

  33. [41]

    Zhu and R.-X

    P. Zhu and R.-X. Zhang, Delicate topology of Luttinger semimetal, Phys. Rev. B110, 165120 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Q. Mo, R. Zheng, C. Lu, X. Huang, Z. Liu, and S. Zhang, ObservationofOrientedLandauLevelsandHelicalZeroModes inBerryDipoleAcousticCrystals,Phys.Rev.Lett. 134,116604 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Chen, Y.-P

    Y.-C. Chen, Y.-P. Lin, and Y.-J. Kao, Chern dartboard insu- lator: sub-Brillouin zone topology and skyrmion multipoles, Commun. Phys.7, 32 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    A.Alexandradinata,A.Nelson,andA.A.Soluyanov,Teleporta- tionofBerrycurvatureonthesurfaceofaHopfinsulator,Phys. Rev. B103, 045107 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    J.Cano,L.Elcoro,M.I.Aroyo,B.A.Bernevig,andB.Bradlyn, Topology invisible to eigenvalues in obstructed atomic insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B105, 125115 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Cheng, S

    Z. Cheng, S. Yue, Y. Long, W. Xie, Z. Yu, H. T. Teo, Y. X. Zhao,H.Xue,andB.Zhang,ObservationofreturningThouless pumping (2025), arXiv:2505.06808 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Q. Mo, S. Liang, X. Lan, J. Zhu, and S. Zhang, Demonstration of returning Thouless pump in a berry dipole system (2025), arXiv:2505.08582 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  40. [48]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton excitations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B22, 2099 (1980)

    1980

  41. [49]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semi- conductors, Phys. Rev. B74, 085308 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    62, 2747 (1989)

    J.Zak,Berry’sphaseforenergybandsinsolids,Phys.Rev.Lett. 62, 2747 (1989)

    1989

  43. [51]

    Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and interband Berry phases in the shift current, Phys

    A. Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and interband Berry phases in the shift current, Phys. Rev. B110, 075159 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    D. J. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983)

    1983

  45. [53]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  46. [54]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannierfunctionsforcompositeenergybands,Phys.Rev.B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  47. [55]

    Trifunovic, Bulk-and-edge to corner correspondence, Phys

    L. Trifunovic, Bulk-and-edge to corner correspondence, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043012 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Fidkowski, T

    L. Fidkowski, T. S. Jackson, and I. Klich, Model Characteri- zation of Gapless Edge Modes of Topological Insulators Using Intermediate Brillouin-Zone Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 036601 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Smooth gauge for topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 115415 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Geier, L

    M. Geier, L. Trifunovic, M. Hoskam, and P. W. Brouwer, Second-order topological insulators and superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry, Phys. Rev. B97, 205135 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Alexandradinata,Spatially-protected Topology and Group Cohomology in Band Insulators, Ph.D

    A. Alexandradinata,Spatially-protected Topology and Group Cohomology in Band Insulators, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton Uni- versity (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Takahashi and T

    R. Takahashi and T. Ozawa, Bulk-entanglement spectrum cor- respondence in𝑃𝑇- and𝑃𝐶-symmetric topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033192 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    2002

  54. [62]

    Z. Guba, A. Alexandradinata, and T. Bzdušek, Supplementary data and code for: Delicate Wannier insulators (2025), (to be released upon publication)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Appl.21, 867 (2000)

    M.MirandaandP.Tilli,AsymptoticSpectraofHermitianBlock ToeplitzMatricesandPreconditioningResults,SIAMJ.Matrix Anal. Appl.21, 867 (2000)

    2000

  56. [64]

    Bzdušek, Z

    T. Bzdušek, Z. Guba, and A. Alexandradinata, Boundary- obstructed delicate topological insulators, in APS Global Physics Summit 2025 (Anaheim, CA, 2025) session MAR- G21.11, March 18, 2025

    2025

  57. [65]

    Zhu and A

    P. Zhu and A. Alexandradinata, Anomalous shift and optical vorticity in the steady photovoltaic current, Phys. Rev. B110, 115108 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    W. J. Jankowski and R.-J. Slager, Quantized Integrated Shift Effect in Multigap Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186601 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Bouhon, T

    A. Bouhon, T. Bzdušek, and R.-J. Slager, Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators, Phys. Rev. B 102, 115135 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Bouhon, and F. N. Ünal, Non-Abelian Floquet braidingandanomalousDiracstringphaseinperiodicallydriven systems, Nat. Commun.15, 1144 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Davoyan, W

    Z. Davoyan, W. J. Jankowski, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Three-dimensionalPT-symmetric topological phases with a Pontryagin index, Phys. Rev. B109, 165125 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Bzdušek and M

    T. Bzdušek and M. Sigrist, Robust doubly charged nodal lines and nodal surfaces in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155105 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    A.Hatcher, VectorBundlesandK-Theory (Unpublished,2003)

    2003

  64. [72]

    Alexandradinata, X

    A. Alexandradinata, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Wilson-loop characterization of inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B89, 155114 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.