Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Conformalized Selective Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.16300 v3 pith:HDTOT36G submitted 2024-02-26 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords regressionselectiveapproachpredictionuncertaintyapproachesbiasesconformalized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Should prediction models always deliver a prediction? In the pursuit of maximum predictive performance, critical considerations of reliability and fairness are often overshadowed, particularly when it comes to the role of uncertainty. Selective regression, also known as the "reject option," allows models to abstain from predictions in cases of considerable uncertainty. Initially proposed seven decades ago, approaches to selective regression have mostly focused on distribution-based proxies for measuring uncertainty, particularly conditional variance. However, this focus neglects the significant influence of model-specific biases on a model's performance. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to selective regression by leveraging conformal prediction, which provides grounded confidence measures for individual predictions based on model-specific biases. In addition, we propose a standardized evaluation framework to allow proper comparison of selective regression approaches. Via an extensive experimental approach, we demonstrate how our proposed approach, conformalized selective regression, demonstrates an advantage over multiple state-of-the-art baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evidence aggregation with ignorance in mind: learning what we do (not) know for archetypes discovery

    econ.EM 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A framework jointly learns treatment-effect archetypes and a basin of ignorance, abstaining where generalization is unsupported, with regret and inference guarantees.

  2. UQGNN: Uncertainty Quantification of Graph Neural Networks for Multivariate Spatiotemporal Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UQGNN couples diffusion graph convolution, temporal convolution, and a multivariate Gaussian output head to jointly predict heterogeneous urban phenomena with uncertainty, and it outperforms twelve baselines across fo...

Pith tools