pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04692 · v1 · pith:HFH7BXD3new · submitted 2019-07-09 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall

Multiphoton cross sections of conductive electrons stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene

A.G. Ghazaryan , Kh.V. Sedrakian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 00:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords bilayer graphenestimulated bremsstrahlungmultiphoton cross sectionsterahertz radiationnonlinear responseparabolic dispersiondoped grapheneelectronic transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bilayer graphene exhibits an essentially nonlinear response to terahertz radiation due to its parabolic dispersion, unlike monolayer graphene.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung for conductive electrons on impurity ions in doped bilayer graphene, treating the coherent terahertz field exactly and the impurity potential as a perturbation. It demonstrates that the response to the pump wave is nonlinear and differs substantially from single-layer graphene because of the nonlinear parabolic dispersion relation. This difference suggests a mechanism for controlling the electronic transport properties of bilayer graphene using coherent radiation at terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

Core claim

The quantum theory shows that the multiphoton cross sections for stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene display an essentially nonlinear dependence on the intensity and frequency of the coherent radiation field, originating from the parabolic dispersion of the bilayer, which permits manipulation of the transport properties of conductive electrons by external radiation.

What carries the argument

Exact solution for the interaction with the coherent terahertz electromagnetic wave combined with perturbative treatment of the electrostatic impurity potential to derive the multiphoton transition probabilities.

If this is right

  • The response of bilayer graphene is essentially nonlinear, unlike the linear case in single-layer graphene.
  • Significant differences arise from the nonlinear parabolic dispersion relation.
  • Coherent radiation fields can be used to manipulate electronic transport properties at terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar nonlinear effects might appear in other materials with parabolic band structures under intense radiation.
  • Device applications could include radiation-tunable graphene-based components for transport control.
  • The approach might be extended to examine how varying impurity potentials alter the computed cross sections.

Load-bearing premise

The electrostatic potential due to doped ions acts as a weak perturbation that does not require exact treatment alongside the electromagnetic field.

What would settle it

Observation of linear dependence of the bremsstrahlung rate on radiation intensity in experiments with doped bilayer graphene under terahertz illumination would contradict the predicted nonlinear response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04692 by A.G. Ghazaryan, Kh.V. Sedrakian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) Envelopes of partial absorption-emi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Partial cross sections Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung of charged carriers on an arbitrary electrostatic potential of impurity ion in doped bilayer graphene at the presence of coherent electromagnetic radiation is developed. A terahertz wave field is considered exactly, while the electrostatic potential of doped ions as a perturbation. The essentially nonlinear response of bilayer graphene to a pump wave and significant differences from the case of a single layer graphene are shown, which can be associated to nonlinear parabolic dispersion. The latter opens new way to manipulate with the electronic transport properties of conductive electrons of bilayer graphene by coherent radiation field of terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung for charged carriers scattering on an arbitrary electrostatic impurity potential in doped bilayer graphene, in the presence of a coherent THz electromagnetic field. The THz wave is treated exactly while the impurity potential enters only as a first-order perturbation. The work claims to demonstrate an essentially nonlinear response of bilayer graphene that differs significantly from the monolayer case, attributing this to the nonlinear parabolic dispersion, and suggests this enables manipulation of electronic transport properties via coherent THz or near-IR radiation.

Significance. If the central derivation holds and the perturbative treatment is justified, the result would supply a concrete theoretical route to radiation-controlled transport in bilayer graphene, highlighting the role of its parabolic band structure. The manuscript does not supply machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable numerical predictions in the provided abstract, so these strengths cannot be credited.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (modeling choice): the central claim of nonlinear multiphoton cross-sections and differences from monolayer graphene rests on treating the electrostatic impurity potential perturbatively while solving the THz field exactly. No derivation or numerical check of the validity regime (e.g., ratio of impurity matrix element to THz Rabi frequency or bilayer gap) is supplied for realistic doping densities; if this ratio is O(1), the reported rates and nonlinear signatures cannot be trusted.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the text states that 'a derivation was performed' and 'differences were shown' yet supplies neither the Hamiltonian, the perturbative expansion, the resulting multiphoton matrix elements, nor any comparison to a non-perturbative benchmark. Without these load-bearing elements the association of the nonlinear response to parabolic dispersion cannot be verified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'arbitrary electrostatic potential' is used without specifying the functional form ultimately adopted for numerical or analytic evaluation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the modeling assumptions and presentation. We address each point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (modeling choice): the central claim of nonlinear multiphoton cross-sections and differences from monolayer graphene rests on treating the electrostatic impurity potential perturbatively while solving the THz field exactly. No derivation or numerical check of the validity regime (e.g., ratio of impurity matrix element to THz Rabi frequency or bilayer gap) is supplied for realistic doping densities; if this ratio is O(1), the reported rates and nonlinear signatures cannot be trusted.

    Authors: We agree that explicit justification of the perturbative regime is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) providing order-of-magnitude estimates of the impurity matrix element versus the THz Rabi frequency for realistic doping densities (10^12 cm^-2 range) and typical THz field amplitudes, together with a statement of the bilayer gap values used. This will delineate the parameter window in which the reported nonlinear signatures remain valid. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the text states that 'a derivation was performed' and 'differences were shown' yet supplies neither the Hamiltonian, the perturbative expansion, the resulting multiphoton matrix elements, nor any comparison to a non-perturbative benchmark. Without these load-bearing elements the association of the nonlinear response to parabolic dispersion cannot be verified.

    Authors: The full manuscript already contains the bilayer Hamiltonian (Eq. (1)), the exact treatment of the THz field via the Volkov-like states, the first-order impurity perturbation (Section III), the explicit multiphoton matrix elements (Eqs. (10)–(15)), and a direct comparison with the linear-dispersion monolayer case (Section V) that isolates the role of the parabolic band. The abstract is a concise summary; we will expand it by one sentence to name these elements and point to the relevant sections. A non-perturbative benchmark for arbitrary impurity potentials lies outside the present perturbative framework and would require a separate numerical study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward derivation from dispersion and perturbation assumptions

full rationale

The paper states its modeling choice explicitly (THz field treated exactly, impurity potential as first-order perturbation) and derives multiphoton cross sections and nonlinear response from the bilayer parabolic dispersion. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain carries the central result, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation is self-contained against the stated assumptions; the reader's assessment of score 2.0 is consistent with absence of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the modeling choice of exact radiation field plus perturbative potential is the only identifiable structural assumption.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1151 out tokens · 22644 ms · 2026-05-25T00:20:33.022568+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Microscopic nonlinear quantum theory of absorption of coherent electromagnetic radiation in doped bilayer graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Analytical calculation of the nonlinear inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption rate in doped AB-stacked bilayer graphene under strong coherent EM radiation using Liouville-von Neumann density matrix solution with impurity ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Electr ic field effect in atomically thin carbon films

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zha ng, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, “Electr ic field effect in atomically thin carbon films”, Science 306(5696), 666–669 (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  2. [2]

    The electronic properties of graphene

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselo v, and A. K. Geim, “The electronic properties of graphene”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(1), 109–162 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModP hys.81.109

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodp 2009

  3. [3]

    Graphene: Status and prospects

    A. K. Geim, “Graphene: Status and prospects”, Science 324(5934), 1530–1534 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158877

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1158877 2009

  4. [4]

    Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fer mions in graphene

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. K atsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, “Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fer mions in graphene”, Nature 438, 197–200 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04233

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04233 2005

  5. [5]

    H. K. Avetissian, ”Relativistic Nonlinear Electrodyna mics: The QED Vacuum and Matter in Super-Strong Radiation Fields”, monograph: 978-3-319-26384-7, Springer, New Yor k, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Creation of particle-hole superposition sta tes in graphene at multiphoton resonant excitation by laser rad iation

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, Kh. V . Sedrakian, “Creation of particle-hole superposition sta tes in graphene at multiphoton resonant excitation by laser rad iation”, Phys. Rev. B 85(11), 115443(1)-115443(10) (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115443

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.115443 2012

  7. [7]

    Rela tivistic theory of inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption of ultrastrong laser radiation in plasma

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Rela tivistic theory of inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption of ultrastrong laser radiation in plasma”, J. Phys. B 46, 205701(1)-205701(9) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/46/20/205701

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/46/20/205701 2013

  8. [8]

    Microscopic nonlinear relativistic quan- tum theory of absorption of powerful x-ray radiation in plas ma

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, H. H. Matevosyan, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Microscopic nonlinear relativistic quan- tum theory of absorption of powerful x-ray radiation in plas ma”, Phys. Rev. E 92, 043103(1)-043103(8) (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.043103 2015

  9. [9]

    Multiphoton resonant excitation of Fermi- Dirac sea in graphene at the interaction with strong laser fie lds

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, Kh. V . Sedrakian, “Multiphoton resonant excitation of Fermi- Dirac sea in graphene at the interaction with strong laser fie lds”, J. Nanophoton 6, 061702(1)-061702(17) (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061702

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jnp.6.061702 2012

  10. [10]

    Nonlinear theory of graphene interaction with strong laser radiation beyond the Dirac co ne approximation: Coherent control of quantum states in nano-optics

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, K. G. Batrakov, S. A. M aksimenko, A. Hoffmann, “Nonlinear theory of graphene interaction with strong laser radiation beyond the Dirac co ne approximation: Coherent control of quantum states in nano-optics”, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245411(1)-245411(7) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevB.88.245411

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Multiphoton resonant excitations and high-harmonic generation in bilayer graph ene

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, K. G. Batrakov, S. A. M aksimenko, A. Hoffmann, “Multiphoton resonant excitations and high-harmonic generation in bilayer graph ene”, Phys. Rev. B . 88, 165411(1)-165411(9) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.165411

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.165411 2013

  12. [12]

    High harmonic generation in Landau- quantized graphene subjected to a strong electromagnetic r adiation

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, G. F. Mkrtchian, and K h. V. Sedrakian, “High harmonic generation in Landau- quantized graphene subjected to a strong electromagnetic r adiation”, J. Nanophoton 11, 016004(1)-016004(9) (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.11.016004

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jnp.11.016004 2017

  13. [13]

    Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene in the quantum Hall regime

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene in the quantum Hall regime”, Phys. Rev. B 94(4), 045419(1)-045419(7) (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.045419

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Desig n and fabrication of a monolithic optoelectronic integrate d Si CMOS LED based on hot-carrier effect

    K. Xu, S. Liu, W. Sun, Zh. Ma, Z. Li, Qi Yu, and G. Li, “Desig n and fabrication of a monolithic optoelectronic integrate d Si CMOS LED based on hot-carrier effect”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 22, Issue: 6, Nov.-Dec. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2517980

    work page doi:10.1109/jstqe.2016.2517980 2016

  15. [15]

    Landau-level degeneracy an d quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer

    E. McCann and V. I. Fal’ko, “Landau-level degeneracy an d quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086805(1)-086805(4) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.96.086805

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Transport in bilayer graphene: calculations within a self-consistent Born approximation

    M. Koshino and T. Ando, “Transport in bilayer graphene: calculations within a self-consistent Born approximation ”, Phys. Rev. B 73, 245403(1)-245403(8) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.73.245403

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Langevin dynamics of fluctuation-induced first-order phase transitions: Self- consistent Hartree approximation

    I. Snyman and C.W.J. Beenakker, “Ballistic transmissi on through a graphene bilayer”, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045322(1)- 045322(6) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75 .045322

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75 2007

  18. [18]

    Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2pi in bilayer graphene

    K. Novoselov, E. McCann, S. V. Morozov, V. I. Fal’ko, M. I . Katsnelson, U. Zeitler, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, and A. K. Geim , “Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2pi in bilayer graphene”, Nature Phys. 2, 177–180 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys245

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys245 2006

  19. [19]

    Exploring graphene: research advances

    S. Das Sarma, A. K. Geim, P. Kim, and A. H. MacDonald Recen t, “Exploring graphene: research advances”, A special issue of Solid State Communications 143(1-2), pp. 1-122 Elsevier, New York, 2007

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor

    H. Liu, Y. Li, Y. S. You, Sh. Ghimire, T. F. Heinz, and D. A. Reis, “High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor”, Nature Physics 13, 262–265 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3946. 12

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3946 2017

  21. [21]

    Giant in- trinsic carrier mobilities in graphene and its bilayer

    S. Morozov, K. Novoselov, M. Katsnelson, F. Schedin, D. Elias, J. Jaszczak, and A. Geim, “Giant in- trinsic carrier mobilities in graphene and its bilayer”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016602(1)-016602(4) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.016602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.016602 2008

  22. [22]

    Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices

    J. Oostinga, H. B. Heersche, X. Liu, A. F. Morpurgo, L. M. Vandersypen, “Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices”, Nature Mater. 7, 151-157 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2082

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2082 2008

  23. [23]

    Screening, Kohn anomaly, F riedel oscillation, and RKKY interaction in bilayer graphe ne

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, “Screening, Kohn anomaly, F riedel oscillation, and RKKY interaction in bilayer graphe ne”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156802(1)-156802(4) (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.101.156802

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Nonl inear optical response of doped mono- and bilayer graphene: Length gauge tight-binding model

    F. Hipolito, A. Taghizadeh, and T. Garm Pedersen, “Nonl inear optical response of doped mono- and bilayer graphene: Length gauge tight-binding model”, Phys . Rev. B. 98, 205420(1)-205420(11) (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.205420 2018

  25. [25]

    Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struct ure of bilayer graphene

    E. McCann, “Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struct ure of bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403(1)-161403(6) (2006), https://doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.161403 2006

  26. [26]

    Direct observa- tion of a widely tunable band gap in bilayer graphene

    Y. Zhang, T.-T. Tang, C. Girit, Zh. Hao, M. C. Martin, A. Z ettl, M. F. Crommie, Y. R. Shen, and F. Wang, “Direct observa- tion of a widely tunable band gap in bilayer graphene”, Nature 459, 820-823 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08105

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08105 2009

  27. [27]

    Observati on of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy

    K. F. Mak, Ch. H. Lui, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, “Observati on of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy”, P hys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256405(1)-256405(4) (2009), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.256405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.256405 2009

  28. [28]

    Electronic properties of graphene multilayers

    J. Nilsson, A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, and N. M. R. Pere s, “Electronic properties of graphene multilayers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 266801(1)-266801(4) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.97.266801

    work page 2006

  29. [29]

    Electronic properties of bilayer and multilayer graphe ne

    J. Nilsson, A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, and N. M. R. Pere s, “Electronic properties of bilayer and multilayer graphe ne”, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045405(1)-045405(7) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.78.045405

    work page 2008

  30. [31]

    High-order harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, Kh. V. Sedrakian, and G. F. Mkrtchian, “High-order harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene”, preprint arXiv:19 05.08016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  31. [32]

    Th ird harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene

    A. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, Kh. V. Sedrakian, “Th ird harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene”, prepr int arXiv:1905.08189, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08189

    work page arXiv 1905

  32. [33]

    Interaction of intense optical radiation with free electrons (nonrelat ivistic case)

    F. V. Bunkin, A. E. Kazakov, M. V. Fedorov, “Interaction of intense optical radiation with free electrons (nonrelat ivistic case)”, Sov. Phys.-Usp . 15, 416-435 (1973), http://iopscience.iop.org/0038-5670/ 15/4/R04

    work page 1973

  33. [34]

    Introduction to the theory of laser-a tom interactions

    M. H. Mittleman, “Introduction to the theory of laser-a tom interactions”, Plenum, New York, 1993

    work page 1993

  34. [35]

    Nonlinear electric transpor t in graphene: quantum quench dynamics and the Schwinger mechanism

    B. D´ ora and R. Moessner, “Nonlinear electric transpor t in graphene: quantum quench dynamics and the Schwinger mechanism”, Phys. Rev. B. 81(16), 165431(1)-165431(6) (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevB.81.165431

    work page 2010

  35. [36]

    Bremsstrahlung effect on r elativistic electrons in a strong radiation field

    M. M. Denisov, M. V. Fedorov, “Bremsstrahlung effect on r elativistic electrons in a strong radiation field”, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 779-783 (1968), http:// jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e 022 04 0844.pdf

    work page 1968

  36. [37]

    On the theory of the relativistic cross-sections for stimul ated bremsstrahlung on an arbitrary electrostatic potential in the strong electromagnetic field

    T. R. Hovhannisyan, A. G. Markossian, G. F. Mkrtchian, “ On the theory of the relativistic cross-sections for stimul ated bremsstrahlung on an arbitrary electrostatic potential in the strong electromagnetic field”, Eur. Phys. J. D 20, 17-25 (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2002-00110-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2002-00110-7 2002

  37. [38]

    Screening effect and impurity scattering in mo nolayer graphene

    T. Ando, “Screening effect and impurity scattering in mo nolayer graphene”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 074716(1)–074716(7) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.75.074716

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.75.074716 2006

  38. [39]

    Charged-impurity scattering in graphene

    J.-H. Chen, C. Jang, S. Adam, M. S. Fuhrer, E. D. Williams , and D.M. Ishigami, “Charged-impurity scattering in graphene”, Nature Physics 4, 377-381 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys935

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys935 2008

  39. [40]

    Quantum Hall ferromagne tism in graphene

    K. Nomura and A. H. MacDonald, “Quantum Hall ferromagne tism in graphene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 256602(1)-256602(4) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.256602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.256602 2006

  40. [41]

    Carrier transpor t in two-dimensional graphene layers

    E. H. Hwang, S. Adam, and S. Das Sarma, “Carrier transpor t in two-dimensional graphene layers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186806(1)-186806(4) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103 /PhysRevLett.98.186806

    work page 2007

  41. [42]

    Elastic scattering theory and transpor t in graphene

    D. S. Novikov, “Elastic scattering theory and transpor t in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 76, 245435(1)-245435(17) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.245435 2007

  42. [43]

    Mea- surement of scattering rate and minimum conductivity in gra phene

    Y.-W. Tan, Y. Zhang, K. Bolotin, Y. Zhao, S. Adam, E.H. Hw ang, S. Das Sarma, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, “Mea- surement of scattering rate and minimum conductivity in gra phene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246803(1)-246803(4) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.246803 2007

  43. [44]

    Nonlinear screening of charge impur ities in graphene

    M. I. Katsnelson, “Nonlinear screening of charge impur ities in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B. 74, 201401(R)(1)-201401(R)(3) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.201401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.201401 2006

  44. [46]

    Quantum transport in two-dimens ional graphite system

    N. H. Shon and T. Ando, “Quantum transport in two-dimens ional graphite system”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2421-2429 (1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.67.2421

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.67.2421 1998

  45. [47]

    Crossover from symplectic to or thogonal class in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice

    H. Suzuura and T. Ando, “Crossover from symplectic to or thogonal class in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice”, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266603(1)-266603(4) (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.89.266603

    work page 2002

  46. [48]

    Electro nic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon

    N. M. R. Peres, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, “Electro nic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon”, Phys. Rev. B 73, 125411(1)-125411(23) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.11 03/PhysRevB.73.125411

    work page 2006

  47. [49]

    Impurity spectra of graphene unde r electric and magnetic fields

    S. Sun and J.-L. Zhu, “Impurity spectra of graphene unde r electric and magnetic fields”, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155403(1)- 155403(10) (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB .89.155403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2014

  48. [50]

    Induced nonlinear cross sections of conducti ve electrons scattering on the charged impurities in doped gra phene

    A. K. Avetissian, A.G. Ghazaryan, K. V. Sedrakian, and B . R. Avchyan, “Induced nonlinear cross sections of conducti ve electrons scattering on the charged impurities in doped gra phene”, J. Nanophoton . 11, 036004(1)-036004(11) (2017), 13 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.11.036004

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jnp.11.036004 2017

  49. [51]

    Microscopic nonlinear quantum the- ory of absorption of strong EM radiation in doped graphene

    A. K. Avetissian, A.G. Ghazaryan, K. V. Sedrakian, and B . R. Avchyan, “Microscopic nonlinear quantum the- ory of absorption of strong EM radiation in doped graphene”, J. Nanophoton . 12, 016006(1)-016006(12) (2018), https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.12.016006

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jnp.12.016006 2018

  50. [52]

    Boltzmann transport and resid ual conductivity in bilayer graphene

    S. Adam and S. Das Sarma, “Boltzmann transport and resid ual conductivity in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115436(1)-115436(6) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/P hysRevB.77.115436

    work page doi:10.1103/p 2008

  51. [53]

    Scattering of charge carriers by poi nt defects in bilayer graphene

    M. I. Katsnelson, “Scattering of charge carriers by poi nt defects in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 76, 073411(1)-073411(3) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.073411

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.073411 2007

  52. [54]

    Transport and elastic scattering times as probe s of the nature of impurity scattering in single and bilayer graphene

    M. Monteverde, C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, R. Weil, K. Benna ceur, M. Ferrier, S. Gueron, C. Glattli, H. Bouchiat, J.N. Fu chs, D.Maslov, “Transport and elastic scattering times as probe s of the nature of impurity scattering in single and bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. Lett . 104, 126801(1)-126801(4) (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.104.126801

    work page 2010

  53. [55]

    The screening of charged impurit ies in bilayer graphene

    W. Zhang and L.-J. Li, “The screening of charged impurit ies in bilayer graphene”, New Journal of Physics 12, 103037(1)- 103037(6) (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630 /12/10/103037

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630 2010

  54. [56]

    Electron-impurity scatteri ng rate in doped bilayer graphene

    D. K. Patel, A. C. Sharma, “Electron-impurity scatteri ng rate in doped bilayer graphene”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1447, 973-976 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4710329

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4710329 2012

  55. [57]

    Charged impurity scattering in bilayer graphene

    Sh. Xiao, J.-H. Chen, Sh. Adam, E. D. Williams, and M. S. F uhrer, “Charged impurity scattering in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 82, 041406(1)-041406(4) (2010), https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevB.82.041406

    work page 2010

  56. [58]

    Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems

    T. Ando, A.B. Fowler , F. Stern, “Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 437-672 (1982), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.54.437

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.437 1982

  57. [59]

    Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

    S. D. Sarma, Sh. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, “Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene”, Rev. Mod. Phys . 83, 407-415 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys .83.407

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2011

  58. [60]

    Si light-emitting devi ce in integrated photonic CMOS ICs

    K. Xu, L. W. Snyman, H. Aharoni, “Si light-emitting devi ce in integrated photonic CMOS ICs”, Optical Materials 69, 274-282 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.20 17.03.055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optmat.20 2017

  59. [61]

    Dielectric function, scre ening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, “Dielectric function, scre ening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene ”, Phys. Rev. B. 75, 205418(1)-205418(6) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.75.205418

    work page 2007