Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Multiphoton cross sections of conductive electrons stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bilayer graphene exhibits an essentially nonlinear response to terahertz radiation due to its parabolic dispersion, unlike monolayer graphene.

desk verdict This paper sets up a perturbative quantum calculation for multiphoton bremsstrahlung in bilayer graphene but leaves the validity of treating the impurity potential as a small correction unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 1907.04692 v1 pith:HFH7BXD3 submitted 2019-07-09 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

A.G. Ghazaryan , Kh.V. Sedrakian This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords bilayergraphenestimulatedbremsstrahlungmultiphotoncrosssectionsterahertzradiationnonlinearresponseparabolicdispersiondopedelectronictransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung for conductive electrons on impurity ions in doped bilayer graphene, treating the coherent terahertz field exactly and the impurity potential as a perturbation. It demonstrates that the response to the pump wave is nonlinear and differs substantially from single-layer graphene because of the nonlinear parabolic dispersion relation. This difference suggests a mechanism for controlling the electronic transport properties of bilayer graphene using coherent radiation at terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

What carries the argument

Exact solution for the interaction with the coherent terahertz electromagnetic wave combined with perturbative treatment of the electrostatic impurity potential to derive the multiphoton transition probabilities.

What would settle it

Observation of linear dependence of the bremsstrahlung rate on radiation intensity in experiments with doped bilayer graphene under terahertz illumination would contradict the predicted nonlinear response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The quantum theory shows that the multiphoton cross sections for stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene display an essentially nonlinear dependence on the intensity and frequency of the coherent radiation field, originating from the parabolic dispersion of the bilayer, which permits manipulation of the transport properties of conductive electrons by external radiation.

Load-bearing premise

The electrostatic potential due to doped ions acts as a weak perturbation that does not require exact treatment alongside the electromagnetic field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The response of bilayer graphene is essentially nonlinear, unlike the linear case in single-layer graphene.
  • Significant differences arise from the nonlinear parabolic dispersion relation.
  • Coherent radiation fields can be used to manipulate electronic transport properties at terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar nonlinear effects might appear in other materials with parabolic band structures under intense radiation.
  • Device applications could include radiation-tunable graphene-based components for transport control.
  • The approach might be extended to examine how varying impurity potentials alter the computed cross sections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung for charged carriers scattering on an arbitrary electrostatic impurity potential in doped bilayer graphene, in the presence of a coherent THz electromagnetic field. The THz wave is treated exactly while the impurity potential enters only as a first-order perturbation. The work claims to demonstrate an essentially nonlinear response of bilayer graphene that differs significantly from the monolayer case, attributing this to the nonlinear parabolic dispersion, and suggests this enables manipulation of electronic transport properties via coherent THz or near-IR radiation.

Significance. If the central derivation holds and the perturbative treatment is justified, the result would supply a concrete theoretical route to radiation-controlled transport in bilayer graphene, highlighting the role of its parabolic band structure. The manuscript does not supply machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable numerical predictions in the provided abstract, so these strengths cannot be credited.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (modeling choice): the central claim of nonlinear multiphoton cross-sections and differences from monolayer graphene rests on treating the electrostatic impurity potential perturbatively while solving the THz field exactly. No derivation or numerical check of the validity regime (e.g., ratio of impurity matrix element to THz Rabi frequency or bilayer gap) is supplied for realistic doping densities; if this ratio is O(1), the reported rates and nonlinear signatures cannot be trusted.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the text states that 'a derivation was performed' and 'differences were shown' yet supplies neither the Hamiltonian, the perturbative expansion, the resulting multiphoton matrix elements, nor any comparison to a non-perturbative benchmark. Without these load-bearing elements the association of the nonlinear response to parabolic dispersion cannot be verified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'arbitrary electrostatic potential' is used without specifying the functional form ultimately adopted for numerical or analytic evaluation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the modeling assumptions and presentation. We address each point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (modeling choice): the central claim of nonlinear multiphoton cross-sections and differences from monolayer graphene rests on treating the electrostatic impurity potential perturbatively while solving the THz field exactly. No derivation or numerical check of the validity regime (e.g., ratio of impurity matrix element to THz Rabi frequency or bilayer gap) is supplied for realistic doping densities; if this ratio is O(1), the reported rates and nonlinear signatures cannot be trusted.

    Authors: We agree that explicit justification of the perturbative regime is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) providing order-of-magnitude estimates of the impurity matrix element versus the THz Rabi frequency for realistic doping densities (10^12 cm^-2 range) and typical THz field amplitudes, together with a statement of the bilayer gap values used. This will delineate the parameter window in which the reported nonlinear signatures remain valid. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the text states that 'a derivation was performed' and 'differences were shown' yet supplies neither the Hamiltonian, the perturbative expansion, the resulting multiphoton matrix elements, nor any comparison to a non-perturbative benchmark. Without these load-bearing elements the association of the nonlinear response to parabolic dispersion cannot be verified.

    Authors: The full manuscript already contains the bilayer Hamiltonian (Eq. (1)), the exact treatment of the THz field via the Volkov-like states, the first-order impurity perturbation (Section III), the explicit multiphoton matrix elements (Eqs. (10)–(15)), and a direct comparison with the linear-dispersion monolayer case (Section V) that isolates the role of the parabolic band. The abstract is a concise summary; we will expand it by one sentence to name these elements and point to the relevant sections. A non-perturbative benchmark for arbitrary impurity potentials lies outside the present perturbative framework and would require a separate numerical study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: forward derivation from dispersion and perturbation assumptions

full rationale

The paper states its modeling choice explicitly (THz field treated exactly, impurity potential as first-order perturbation) and derives multiphoton cross sections and nonlinear response from the bilayer parabolic dispersion. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain carries the central result, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation is self-contained against the stated assumptions; the reader's assessment of score 2.0 is consistent with absence of the enumerated circular patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the modeling choice of exact radiation field plus perturbative potential is the only identifiable structural assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiphoton cross sections of conductive electrons stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HFH7BXD3

@misc{pith2026190704692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiphoton cross sections of conductive electrons stimulated bremsstrahlung in doped bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HFH7BXD3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1907.04692}
}
read the original abstract

The quantum theory of multiphoton stimulated bremsstrahlung of charged carriers on an arbitrary electrostatic potential of impurity ion in doped bilayer graphene at the presence of coherent electromagnetic radiation is developed. A terahertz wave field is considered exactly, while the electrostatic potential of doped ions as a perturbation. The essentially nonlinear response of bilayer graphene to a pump wave and significant differences from the case of a single layer graphene are shown, which can be associated to nonlinear parabolic dispersion. The latter opens new way to manipulate with the electronic transport properties of conductive electrons of bilayer graphene by coherent radiation field of terahertz or near-infrared frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04692 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) Partial differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) Envelopes of partial absorption-emi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Partial cross sections Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Microscopic nonlinear quantum theory of absorption of coherent electromagnetic radiation in doped bilayer graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Analytical calculation of the nonlinear inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption rate in doped AB-stacked bilayer graphene under strong coherent EM radiation using Liouville-von Neumann density matrix solution with impurity ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S., Geim A

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zha ng, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, “Electr ic field effect in atomically thin carbon films”, Science 306(5696), 666–669 (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896

    work page Pith review doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  2. [2]

    The electronic properties of graphene

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselo v, and A. K. Geim, “The electronic properties of graphene”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(1), 109–162 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModP hys.81.109

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodp 2009

  3. [3]

    Graphene: Status and prospects

    A. K. Geim, “Graphene: Status and prospects”, Science 324(5934), 1530–1534 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158877

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1158877 2009

  4. [4]

    Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fer mions in graphene

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. K atsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, “Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fer mions in graphene”, Nature 438, 197–200 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04233

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04233 2005

  5. [5]

    H. K. Avetissian, ”Relativistic Nonlinear Electrodyna mics: The QED Vacuum and Matter in Super-Strong Radiation Fields”, monograph: 978-3-319-26384-7, Springer, New Yor k, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Creation of particle-hole superposition sta tes in graphene at multiphoton resonant excitation by laser rad iation

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, Kh. V . Sedrakian, “Creation of particle-hole superposition sta tes in graphene at multiphoton resonant excitation by laser rad iation”, Phys. Rev. B 85(11), 115443(1)-115443(10) (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115443

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.115443 2012

  7. [7]

    Rela tivistic theory of inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption of ultrastrong laser radiation in plasma

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Rela tivistic theory of inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption of ultrastrong laser radiation in plasma”, J. Phys. B 46, 205701(1)-205701(9) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/46/20/205701

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/46/20/205701 2013

  8. [8]

    Microscopic nonlinear relativistic quan- tum theory of absorption of powerful x-ray radiation in plas ma

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, H. H. Matevosyan, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Microscopic nonlinear relativistic quan- tum theory of absorption of powerful x-ray radiation in plas ma”, Phys. Rev. E 92, 043103(1)-043103(8) (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.043103 2015

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Multiphoton resonant excitation of Fermi- Dirac sea in graphene at the interaction with strong laser fie lds

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, Kh. V . Sedrakian, “Multiphoton resonant excitation of Fermi- Dirac sea in graphene at the interaction with strong laser fie lds”, J. Nanophoton 6, 061702(1)-061702(17) (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.6.061702

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    Nonlinear theory of graphene interaction with strong laser radiation beyond the Dirac co ne approximation: Coherent control of quantum states in nano-optics

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, K. G. Batrakov, S. A. M aksimenko, A. Hoffmann, “Nonlinear theory of graphene interaction with strong laser radiation beyond the Dirac co ne approximation: Coherent control of quantum states in nano-optics”, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245411(1)-245411(7...

    2013

  3. [11]

    Multiphoton resonant excitations and high-harmonic generation in bilayer graph ene

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, K. G. Batrakov, S. A. M aksimenko, A. Hoffmann, “Multiphoton resonant excitations and high-harmonic generation in bilayer graph ene”, Phys. Rev. B . 88, 165411(1)-165411(9) (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.165411

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    High harmonic generation in Landau- quantized graphene subjected to a strong electromagnetic r adiation

    H. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, G. F. Mkrtchian, and K h. V. Sedrakian, “High harmonic generation in Landau- quantized graphene subjected to a strong electromagnetic r adiation”, J. Nanophoton 11, 016004(1)-016004(9) (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.11.016004

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene in the quantum Hall regime

    H. K. Avetissian, G. F. Mkrtchian, “Coherent nonlinear optical response of graphene in the quantum Hall regime”, Phys. Rev. B 94(4), 045419(1)-045419(7) (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.045419

    2016

  6. [14]

    Desig n and fabrication of a monolithic optoelectronic integrate d Si CMOS LED based on hot-carrier effect

    K. Xu, S. Liu, W. Sun, Zh. Ma, Z. Li, Qi Yu, and G. Li, “Desig n and fabrication of a monolithic optoelectronic integrate d Si CMOS LED based on hot-carrier effect”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 22, Issue: 6, Nov.-Dec. (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109...

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Landau-level degeneracy an d quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer

    E. McCann and V. I. Fal’ko, “Landau-level degeneracy an d quantum Hall effect in a graphite bilayer”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086805(1)-086805(4) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.96.086805

    2006

  8. [16]

    Transport in bilayer graphene: calculations within a self-consistent Born approximation

    M. Koshino and T. Ando, “Transport in bilayer graphene: calculations within a self-consistent Born approximation ”, Phys. Rev. B 73, 245403(1)-245403(8) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.73.245403

    2006

  9. [17]

    Ballistic transmissi on through a graphene bilayer

    I. Snyman and C.W.J. Beenakker, “Ballistic transmissi on through a graphene bilayer”, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045322(1)- 045322(6) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75 .045322

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2pi in bilayer graphene

    K. Novoselov, E. McCann, S. V. Morozov, V. I. Fal’ko, M. I . Katsnelson, U. Zeitler, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, and A. K. Geim , “Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase of 2pi in bilayer graphene”, Nature Phys. 2, 177–180 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys245

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Exploring graphene: research advances

    S. Das Sarma, A. K. Geim, P. Kim, and A. H. MacDonald Recen t, “Exploring graphene: research advances”, A special issue of Solid State Communications 143(1-2), pp. 1-122 Elsevier, New York, 2007

    2007

  12. [20]

    High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor

    H. Liu, Y. Li, Y. S. You, Sh. Ghimire, T. F. Heinz, and D. A. Reis, “High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor”, Nature Physics 13, 262–265 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3946. 12

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    Giant in- trinsic carrier mobilities in graphene and its bilayer

    S. Morozov, K. Novoselov, M. Katsnelson, F. Schedin, D. Elias, J. Jaszczak, and A. Geim, “Giant in- trinsic carrier mobilities in graphene and its bilayer”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016602(1)-016602(4) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.016602

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices

    J. Oostinga, H. B. Heersche, X. Liu, A. F. Morpurgo, L. M. Vandersypen, “Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices”, Nature Mater. 7, 151-157 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2082

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Screening, Kohn anomaly, F riedel oscillation, and RKKY interaction in bilayer graphe ne

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, “Screening, Kohn anomaly, F riedel oscillation, and RKKY interaction in bilayer graphe ne”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156802(1)-156802(4) (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.101.156802

    2008

  16. [24]

    Nonl inear optical response of doped mono- and bilayer graphene: Length gauge tight-binding model

    F. Hipolito, A. Taghizadeh, and T. Garm Pedersen, “Nonl inear optical response of doped mono- and bilayer graphene: Length gauge tight-binding model”, Phys . Rev. B. 98, 205420(1)-205420(11) (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205420

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struct ure of bilayer graphene

    E. McCann, “Asymmetry gap in the electronic band struct ure of bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403(1)-161403(6) (2006), https://doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161403

    2006 doi

  18. [26]

    Direct observa- tion of a widely tunable band gap in bilayer graphene

    Y. Zhang, T.-T. Tang, C. Girit, Zh. Hao, M. C. Martin, A. Z ettl, M. F. Crommie, Y. R. Shen, and F. Wang, “Direct observa- tion of a widely tunable band gap in bilayer graphene”, Nature 459, 820-823 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08105

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    Observati on of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy

    K. F. Mak, Ch. H. Lui, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, “Observati on of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy”, P hys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256405(1)-256405(4) (2009), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.256405

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    Electronic properties of graphene multilayers

    J. Nilsson, A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, and N. M. R. Pere s, “Electronic properties of graphene multilayers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 266801(1)-266801(4) (2006), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.97.266801

    2006

  21. [29]

    Electronic properties of bilayer and multilayer graphe ne

    J. Nilsson, A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, and N. M. R. Pere s, “Electronic properties of bilayer and multilayer graphe ne”, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045405(1)-045405(7) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.78.045405

    2008

  22. [31]

    High-order harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene

    H. K. Avetissian, A. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, Kh. V. Sedrakian, and G. F. Mkrtchian, “High-order harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene”, preprint arXiv:19 05.08016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08016

    1905 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Th ird harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene

    A. K. Avetissian, A. G. Ghazaryan, Kh. V. Sedrakian, “Th ird harmonic generation in gapped bilayer graphene”, prepr int arXiv:1905.08189, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08189

    1905

  24. [33]

    Interaction of intense optical radiation with free electrons (nonrelat ivistic case)

    F. V. Bunkin, A. E. Kazakov, M. V. Fedorov, “Interaction of intense optical radiation with free electrons (nonrelat ivistic case)”, Sov. Phys.-Usp . 15, 416-435 (1973), http://iopscience.iop.org/0038-5670/ 15/4/R04

    1973

  25. [34]

    Introduction to the theory of laser-a tom interactions

    M. H. Mittleman, “Introduction to the theory of laser-a tom interactions”, Plenum, New York, 1993

    1993

  26. [35]

    Nonlinear electric transpor t in graphene: quantum quench dynamics and the Schwinger mechanism

    B. D´ ora and R. Moessner, “Nonlinear electric transpor t in graphene: quantum quench dynamics and the Schwinger mechanism”, Phys. Rev. B. 81(16), 165431(1)-165431(6) (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevB.81.165431

    2010

  27. [36]

    Bremsstrahlung effect on r elativistic electrons in a strong radiation field

    M. M. Denisov, M. V. Fedorov, “Bremsstrahlung effect on r elativistic electrons in a strong radiation field”, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 779-783 (1968), http:// jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e 022 04 0844.pdf

    1968

  28. [37]

    On the theory of the relativistic cross-sections for stimul ated bremsstrahlung on an arbitrary electrostatic potential in the strong electromagnetic field

    T. R. Hovhannisyan, A. G. Markossian, G. F. Mkrtchian, “ On the theory of the relativistic cross-sections for stimul ated bremsstrahlung on an arbitrary electrostatic potential in the strong electromagnetic field”, Eur. Phys. J. D 20, 17-25 (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epj...

    2002 doi

  29. [38]

    Screening effect and impurity scattering in mo nolayer graphene

    T. Ando, “Screening effect and impurity scattering in mo nolayer graphene”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 074716(1)–074716(7) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.75.074716

    2006 doi

  30. [39]

    Charged-impurity scattering in graphene

    J.-H. Chen, C. Jang, S. Adam, M. S. Fuhrer, E. D. Williams , and D.M. Ishigami, “Charged-impurity scattering in graphene”, Nature Physics 4, 377-381 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys935

    2008 doi

  31. [40]

    Quantum Hall ferromagne tism in graphene

    K. Nomura and A. H. MacDonald, “Quantum Hall ferromagne tism in graphene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 256602(1)-256602(4) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.256602

    2006 doi

  32. [41]

    Carrier transpor t in two-dimensional graphene layers

    E. H. Hwang, S. Adam, and S. Das Sarma, “Carrier transpor t in two-dimensional graphene layers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186806(1)-186806(4) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103 /PhysRevLett.98.186806

    2007

  33. [42]

    Elastic scattering theory and transpor t in graphene

    D. S. Novikov, “Elastic scattering theory and transpor t in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 76, 245435(1)-245435(17) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245435

    2007 doi

  34. [43]

    Mea- surement of scattering rate and minimum conductivity in gra phene

    Y.-W. Tan, Y. Zhang, K. Bolotin, Y. Zhao, S. Adam, E.H. Hw ang, S. Das Sarma, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, “Mea- surement of scattering rate and minimum conductivity in gra phene”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246803(1)-246803(4) (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246803

    2007 doi

  35. [44]

    Nonlinear screening of charge impur ities in graphene

    M. I. Katsnelson, “Nonlinear screening of charge impur ities in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B. 74, 201401(R)(1)-201401(R)(3) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.201401

    2006 doi

  36. [46]

    Quantum transport in two-dimens ional graphite system

    N. H. Shon and T. Ando, “Quantum transport in two-dimens ional graphite system”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2421-2429 (1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.67.2421

    1998 doi

  37. [47]

    Crossover from symplectic to or thogonal class in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice

    H. Suzuura and T. Ando, “Crossover from symplectic to or thogonal class in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice”, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266603(1)-266603(4) (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.89.266603

    2002

  38. [48]

    Electro nic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon

    N. M. R. Peres, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, “Electro nic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon”, Phys. Rev. B 73, 125411(1)-125411(23) (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.11 03/PhysRevB.73.125411

    2006

  39. [49]

    Impurity spectra of graphene unde r electric and magnetic fields

    S. Sun and J.-L. Zhu, “Impurity spectra of graphene unde r electric and magnetic fields”, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155403(1)- 155403(10) (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB .89.155403

    2014 doi

  40. [50]

    Induced nonlinear cross sections of conducti ve electrons scattering on the charged impurities in doped gra phene

    A. K. Avetissian, A.G. Ghazaryan, K. V. Sedrakian, and B . R. Avchyan, “Induced nonlinear cross sections of conducti ve electrons scattering on the charged impurities in doped gra phene”, J. Nanophoton . 11, 036004(1)-036004(11) (2017), 13 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.11.036004

    2017 doi

  41. [51]

    Microscopic nonlinear quantum the- ory of absorption of strong EM radiation in doped graphene

    A. K. Avetissian, A.G. Ghazaryan, K. V. Sedrakian, and B . R. Avchyan, “Microscopic nonlinear quantum the- ory of absorption of strong EM radiation in doped graphene”, J. Nanophoton . 12, 016006(1)-016006(12) (2018), https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.12.016006

    2018 doi

  42. [52]

    Boltzmann transport and resid ual conductivity in bilayer graphene

    S. Adam and S. Das Sarma, “Boltzmann transport and resid ual conductivity in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115436(1)-115436(6) (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/P hysRevB.77.115436

    2008 doi

  43. [53]

    Scattering of charge carriers by poi nt defects in bilayer graphene

    M. I. Katsnelson, “Scattering of charge carriers by poi nt defects in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 76, 073411(1)-073411(3) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.073411

    2007 doi

  44. [54]

    Transport and elastic scattering times as probe s of the nature of impurity scattering in single and bilayer graphene

    M. Monteverde, C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, R. Weil, K. Benna ceur, M. Ferrier, S. Gueron, C. Glattli, H. Bouchiat, J.N. Fu chs, D.Maslov, “Transport and elastic scattering times as probe s of the nature of impurity scattering in single and bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. Lett . 104, 1...

    2010

  45. [55]

    The screening of charged impurit ies in bilayer graphene

    W. Zhang and L.-J. Li, “The screening of charged impurit ies in bilayer graphene”, New Journal of Physics 12, 103037(1)- 103037(6) (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630 /12/10/103037

    2010 doi

  46. [56]

    Electron-impurity scatteri ng rate in doped bilayer graphene

    D. K. Patel, A. C. Sharma, “Electron-impurity scatteri ng rate in doped bilayer graphene”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1447, 973-976 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4710329

    2012 doi

  47. [57]

    Charged impurity scattering in bilayer graphene

    Sh. Xiao, J.-H. Chen, Sh. Adam, E. D. Williams, and M. S. F uhrer, “Charged impurity scattering in bilayer graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 82, 041406(1)-041406(4) (2010), https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevB.82.041406

    2010

  48. [58]

    Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems

    T. Ando, A.B. Fowler , F. Stern, “Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 437-672 (1982), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.54.437

    1982 doi

  49. [59]

    Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

    S. D. Sarma, Sh. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, “Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene”, Rev. Mod. Phys . 83, 407-415 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys .83.407

    2011 doi

  50. [60]

    Si light-emitting devi ce in integrated photonic CMOS ICs

    K. Xu, L. W. Snyman, H. Aharoni, “Si light-emitting devi ce in integrated photonic CMOS ICs”, Optical Materials 69, 274-282 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.20 17.03.055

    2017 doi

  51. [61]

    Dielectric function, scre ening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene

    E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, “Dielectric function, scre ening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene ”, Phys. Rev. B. 75, 205418(1)-205418(6) (2007), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.75.205418

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.