Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold-Georg Englert; Hui Khoon Ng; Jibo Dai; Kelvin Horia; Yink Loong Len

arxiv: 1901.05673 · v1 · pith:HG3YNVGVnew · submitted 2019-01-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

Berthold-Georg Englert , Kelvin Horia , Jibo Dai , Yink Loong Len , Hui Khoon Ng This is my paper

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords particlepastquantumvaidmanadditioncommentdefinitionfindings

0 comments

read the original abstract

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "

discussion (0)