pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.13256 · v4 · pith:HGIPQ6TMnew · submitted 2024-09-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Sulfur on Venus: Atmospheric, Surface, and Interior Processes

Mikhail Zolotov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords Venussulfuratmospheresurface interactionsvolcanismgeological evolutionclouds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sulfur-bearing species play crucial roles in Venus's atmospheric processes, surface chemistry, and geological evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how sulfur compounds drive physical and chemical changes in Venus's atmosphere, interact with surface rocks, and record the planet's formation and later changes. It assembles measurements of sulfur amounts and forms in the air and crust, describes their movement through clouds and lower air layers, and traces their path from volcanic release through reactions at the surface and a possible early water-rich phase. A reader would care because these cycles connect today's observations to Venus's climate history and any past conditions different from the present. The review also flags open questions for future spacecraft to investigate.

Core claim

Sulfur-bearing species play crucial roles in atmospheric physical-chemical processes, atmosphere-surface interactions, and the geological evolution of Venus. This rests on a synthesis of instrumental data on sulfur abundance and speciation in atmospheric and crustal materials, the behavior of sulfur-bearing species in the mesosphere, clouds, and lower atmosphere, chemical and mineralogical aspects of atmosphere-surface interactions, and the fate of sulfur during formation, differentiation, volcanic degassing, gas-solid reactions, a proposed aqueous period, and subsequent evolution.

What carries the argument

The cycling of sulfur-bearing species through atmospheric layers, surface gas-solid reactions, and interior degassing processes.

If this is right

  • Volcanic degassing supplies sulfur that participates in ongoing surface mineral formation.
  • An early aqueous period would have changed how sulfur is stored in the crust.
  • Atmospheric sulfur speciation reflects active processes in the clouds and lower atmosphere.
  • Key open questions about sulfur distribution can guide targeted measurements on future missions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Sulfur pathways could help test models of how Venus lost most of its water.
  • Comparison of these cycles with those on Earth and Mars might clarify why Venus evolved differently.
  • Long-term changes in sulfur abundance could be detectable if future data resolve temporal variations.

Load-bearing premise

The available instrumental data on the abundance and speciation of sulfur in atmospheric and crustal materials accurately represent the current state of Venus.

What would settle it

New spacecraft measurements showing sulfur abundances or chemical forms that differ substantially from the compiled instrumental data would undermine the synthesis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.13256 by Mikhail Zolotov.

Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16.5
Figure 16.5. Figure 16.5: A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p072_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p080_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p105_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p108_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: , [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p110_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p111_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p112_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p115_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sulfur-bearing species play crucial roles in atmospheric physical-chemical processes, atmosphere-surface interactions, and the geological evolution of Venus. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of (1) instrumental data on the abundance and speciation of sulfur in atmospheric and crustal materials, (2) the behavior of sulfur-bearing species in the mesosphere, clouds, and lower atmosphere, (3) chemical and mineralogical aspects of atmosphere-surface interactions, and (4) the fate of sulfur during the formation, differentiation, and geological evolution of Venus, including volcanic degassing, gas-solid reactions at the surface, a proposed aqueous period, and subsequent evolution. The chapter also outlines key questions and discusses further exploration of Venus in the context of sulfur-relevant investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review chapter synthesizing instrumental data, chemical models, and geological scenarios on the roles of sulfur-bearing species in Venus's atmospheric physical-chemical processes, atmosphere-surface interactions, and interior geological evolution. It covers (1) abundances and speciation in atmosphere and crust, (2) behavior in the mesosphere, clouds, and lower atmosphere, (3) chemical and mineralogical aspects of gas-solid reactions, and (4) sulfur fate during formation, differentiation, volcanic degassing, a proposed aqueous period, and subsequent evolution, while outlining key open questions for future exploration.

Significance. If the cited sources are accurately represented, the review provides a consolidated reference that highlights data limitations and open questions, aiding coordination between atmospheric chemistry, surface mineralogy, and interior evolution studies. It explicitly flags instrumental constraints and does not introduce new derivations or models.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the enumerated list of four topics is clear, but a sentence on how the review flags data gaps would better preview the discussion of open questions.
  2. Ensure figure captions for any abundance or speciation plots explicitly note the source missions or instruments (e.g., Pioneer Venus, Venus Express) to aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough summary of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The review accurately captures the scope and intent of the chapter as a synthesis of existing data, models, and open questions on sulfur in Venus.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper: no derivations or self-referential claims present

full rationale

This is a synthesis/overview paper that enumerates external instrumental data, literature models, and open questions on sulfur on Venus. No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or derivation chains are presented. Central claims follow directly from cited external sources without reduction to internal definitions or self-citations. No circular steps identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 917 out tokens · 17126 ms · 2026-05-23T21:14:21.223904+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J Geophys Res 101:12709–12745

    https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AGUFM.P54B..03B/abstract Bertaux JL, Widemann T, Hauchecorne A, Moroz VI, Ekonomov AP (1996) VEGA 1 and VEGA 2 entry probes: An investigation of local UV absorption (220–400 nm) in the atmosphere of Venus (SO 2, aerosols, cloud structure). J Geophys Res 101:12709–12745. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JE0046 Bertaux JL, Kha...

    work page doi:10.1029/96je0046 1996

  2. [2]

    Icarus 150:288–296

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226073 Canup RM, Ward WR, Cameron AGW (2001) A scaling relationship for satellite-forming impacts. Icarus 150:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6581 Canfield DE (2004) The evolution of the Earth surface sulfur reservoir. Am J Sci 304:839–861. https://doi.org /10.2475/ajs.304.10.839 Carn S, Fioletov V, McLinden C, ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1226073 2001

  3. [3]

    Icarus 217:561–569

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.033 Cottini V, Ignatiev NI, Piccioni G, Drossart P, Grassi D, Markiewicz WJ (2012) Water vapor near the cloud tops of Venus from Venus Express/VIRTIS dayside data. Icarus 217:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.06.018 Crovisier J, Bockelée-Morvan D, Colom P, N Biver, D Despois, DC Lis (2004) The compositio...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.033 2005

  4. [4]

    Nature 428:409–412

    https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124322 Frost DJ, Liebske C, Langenhorst F, McCammon CA, Tronnes RG, Rubie DC (2004) Experimental evidence for the existence of iron-rich metal in the Earth’s lower mantle. Nature 428:409–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02413 Fukuhara T, Futagushi M, Hashimoto GL, et al. (2017) Large s...

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124322 2004

  5. [5]

    Earth Planet Sci Lett 403:307–316

    https://sci.esa.int/documents/34375/36249/EnVision_YB_final.pdf Gaillard F, Scaillet B (2014) A theoretical framework for volcanic degassing chemistry in a comparative planetology perspective and implications for planetary atmospheres. Earth Planet Sci Lett 403:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.009 Gaillard F, Bernadou F, Roskosz M, Bouhifd ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.009 2014

  6. [6]

    Lunar Planet Sci Conf 27:253–254

    https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1986LPI....17..255G Garvin JB, Head JW (1986b) Characteristics of Venera and Vega landing sites from Pioneer Venus radar data. Lunar Planet Sci Conf 27:253–254. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1986LPI....17..253G Garvin JB, Head JW, Wilson L (1982) Magma vesiculation and pyroclastic volcanism on Venus. Icarus 52:365-372. ht...

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(82)90119-1 1982

  7. [7]

    Meteorit Planet Sci 35:667–687

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00099-1 Gilmore MS, Head JW (2000) Sequential deformation of plains at the margins of Alpha Regio, Venus: implications for tessera formation. Meteorit Planet Sci 35:667–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100 Gilmore MS, Head JW (2018) Morphology and deformational history of Tellus Regio, Venus: evidence for ass...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99762-1.00099-1 2000

  8. [8]

    J Atmos Sci 31:1137–1160

    https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/113 Hansen VL (2006) Geologic constraints on crustal plateau surface histories, Venus: The lava pond and bolide impact hypotheses: J Geophys Res 111:E11010 Hansen JE, Hovenier JW (1974) Interpretation of the polarization of Venus. J Atmos Sci 31:1137–1160. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1137:iotpov>2.0.c...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/113 2006

  9. [9]

    (2024) Indian Space Research Organisation, Department of Space

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/30079749 I.S.R.O. (2024) Indian Space Research Organisation, Department of Space. https://www.isro.gov.in/UnionCabinetApprovesIndiasMission.html Izidoro A, Bitsch B, Dasgupta R (2021) The effect of a strong pressure bump in the Sun’s natal disk: terrestrial planet formation via planetesimal accretion rather than pebble accreti...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfe0b 2024

  10. [10]

    Icarus 39:192–208

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.231.4744.1417 Lipa B, Tyler L (1979) Statistical and computational uncertainties in atmospheric profiles from radio occultation: Mariner 10 at Venus. Icarus 39:192–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019- 1035(79)90163-5 Liu L, Liu Q, Zhang K, et al. (2023) Thermal decomposition and oxidation of pyrite with different morphologies...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.231.4744.1417 1979

  11. [11]

    Proc Combust Inst 35:3637–3644

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006369831384 Lv W, Yu D, Wu J, Zhang L, Xu M (2015) The chemical role of CO2 in pyrite thermal decomposition. Proc Combust Inst 35:3637–3644. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.066 Luginin MS, Fedorova A, Belyaev D, Montmessin F, Wilquet V, Korablev O, Bertaux JL, Vandaele AC (2016) Aerosol properties in the upper haze ...

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1006369831384 2015

  12. [12]

    Geophys Res Lett 47:e2019GL086126

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00589-8 O’Rourke JG (2020) Venus: a thick basal magma ocean may exist today. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2019GL086126. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086126 O’Rourke JG, Korenaga J (2015) Thermal evolution of Venus with argon degassing. Icarus 260:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.07.009 O'Rourke JG, Smrekar SE (...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00589-8 2020

  13. [13]

    In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd ed, vol 9, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, p 81–104 Solomatov VS, Jain C (2025) On the possibility of convection in the Venusian crust

    https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-5800CCBY Solomatov VS (2015) Magma oceans and primordial mantle differentiation. In: Schubert G (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd ed, vol 9, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, p 81–104 Solomatov VS, Jain C (2025) On the possibility of convection in the Venusian crust. Phys Earth Planet Inter 361:107332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.202...

    work page doi:10.2138/am-2017-5800ccby 2017

  14. [14]

    The rate of pyrite decomposition on the surface of Venus

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(85)90031-2 Walters JB, Cruz-Uribe AM, Marschall HR (2020) Sulfur loss from subducted altered oceanic crust and implications for mantle oxidation. Geochem Perspect Lett 41:36–41. https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2011 Wänke H, Baddenhausen H, Dreibus G, Jagoutz E, Kruse H, Palme H, Spettel B, Teschke F (1973) Multielement...

    work page doi:10.1016/0301-9268(85)90031-2 2020