REVIEW 2 cited by
DEXTER: A Benchmark for open-domain Complex Question Answering using LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Open-domain complex Question Answering (QA) is a difficult task with challenges in evidence retrieval and reasoning. The complexity of such questions could stem from questions being compositional, hybrid evidence, or ambiguity in questions. While retrieval performance for classical QA tasks is well explored, their capabilities for heterogeneous complex retrieval tasks, especially in an open-domain setting, and the impact on downstream QA performance, are relatively unexplored. To address this, in this work, we propose a benchmark composing diverse complex QA tasks and provide a toolkit to evaluate state-of-the-art pre-trained dense and sparse retrieval models in an open-domain setting. We observe that late interaction models and surprisingly lexical models like BM25 perform well compared to other pre-trained dense retrieval models. In addition, since context-based reasoning is critical for solving complex QA tasks, we also evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and the impact of retrieval performance on their reasoning capabilities. Through experiments, we observe that much progress is to be made in retrieval for complex QA to improve downstream QA performance. Our software and related data can be accessed at https://github.com/VenkteshV/DEXTER
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs
A new multi-modal RAG benchmark, mmRAG, adds chunk-level retrieval labels and dataset-level routing labels across six question-answering datasets.
-
LLM-based Query Expansion Fails for Unfamiliar and Ambiguous Queries
LLM-based query expansion can hurt retrieval when the LLM lacks knowledge of the query or the query is highly ambiguous.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.