Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DEXTER: A Benchmark for open-domain Complex Question Answering using LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17158 v1 pith:HGXTSAEZ submitted 2024-06-24 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords retrievalcomplexmodelsopen-domainperformancereasoningtaskscapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Open-domain complex Question Answering (QA) is a difficult task with challenges in evidence retrieval and reasoning. The complexity of such questions could stem from questions being compositional, hybrid evidence, or ambiguity in questions. While retrieval performance for classical QA tasks is well explored, their capabilities for heterogeneous complex retrieval tasks, especially in an open-domain setting, and the impact on downstream QA performance, are relatively unexplored. To address this, in this work, we propose a benchmark composing diverse complex QA tasks and provide a toolkit to evaluate state-of-the-art pre-trained dense and sparse retrieval models in an open-domain setting. We observe that late interaction models and surprisingly lexical models like BM25 perform well compared to other pre-trained dense retrieval models. In addition, since context-based reasoning is critical for solving complex QA tasks, we also evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and the impact of retrieval performance on their reasoning capabilities. Through experiments, we observe that much progress is to be made in retrieval for complex QA to improve downstream QA performance. Our software and related data can be accessed at https://github.com/VenkteshV/DEXTER

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-modal RAG benchmark, mmRAG, adds chunk-level retrieval labels and dataset-level routing labels across six question-answering datasets.

  2. LLM-based Query Expansion Fails for Unfamiliar and Ambiguous Queries

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-based query expansion can hurt retrieval when the LLM lacks knowledge of the query or the query is highly ambiguous.

Pith tools