Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Toward a Rational Extended Thermodynamics of dispersive elastic media

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By letting the inertia of an independent fast stress mode vanish, this paper derives the Love–Rosenau dispersive equation from a local symmetric-hyperbolic parent theory, and proves a sharp necessary-and-sufficient realizability condition.

desk verdict Solid RET derivation of Love-Rosenau with a real gap in the necessity proof of the realizability theorem; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07296 v1 pith:HGYISKGF submitted 2026-08-07 math-ph math.MP

Tommaso Ruggeri , Giuseppe Saccomandi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 35L6035Q7474B2074J30
keywords RationalExtendedThermodynamicsdispersiveelasticityLove–Rosenauequationmainfieldsymmetrichyperbolicitysolitarywavessingularlimitconvexsupplementaryenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the one-dimensional Love–Rosenau equation, a dispersive wave equation usually written with fourth-order spatial and mixed space-time derivatives, can be generated from a local first-order system of balance laws rather than postulated as a higher-gradient continuum theory. The construction promotes a generalized stress and a higher internal field to independent balance variables, in the style of Rational Extended Thermodynamics, and fixes their admissible fluxes and productions through a supplementary energy law and the main-field principle. In the linear reversible case, letting the inertia of the fast stress mode vanish eliminates the internal fields and recovers the Love–Rosenau equation exactly; the coefficient inequality $\beta>\rho\alpha/\mu$ turns out to be necessary and sufficient for such a realization under strict convexity. If the derivation is correct, it grounds a phenomenological dispersive equation in a local, symmetric-hyperbolic parent theory and explains why the high-frequency limiting speed must lie below the elastic sound speed. The same architecture also produces an exact nonlinear reduction, a smooth supersonic solitary pulse for a cubic elastic correction, and numerical evidence of finite-time pulse persistence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the canonical two-field balance hierarchy of Rational Extended Thermodynamics: $$\rho v_t-\partial_z[T(F)+\$\sigma$]=0,\quad F_t-v_z=0,\quad \partial_t[Z(\$\sigma$)-F]-a\partial_z\chi=P_1,\quad \partial_t Y(Q)-a\partial_z\$\sigma$=P_2,$$ with main field $(v,T(F)+\sigma,\sigma,\chi(Q))$ and $\chi(Q)=E'_Q(Q)/Y'(Q)$. In the reversible quadratic case $Z(\sigma)=\tau_\sigma\sigma$, $Y(Q)=\tau_Q Q$, $\chi=Q$, $P_1=-\kappa Q$, $P_2=\kappa\sigma$, and the strict convexity of the supplementary energy reduces to $\rho>0$, $W''(F)>0$, $\tau_\sigma>0$, $\tau_Q>0$. The singular fast-stress limit $\tau_\sigma\to0$ turns the first internal balance into an algebraic constraint, and elimination of $\sigma$ and $Q$ reproduces the Love–Rosenau equation with $\alpha=\mu a^2/\kappa^2$, $\beta=(\rho a^2+\tau_Q)/\kappa^2$. The realizability theorem works by bringing an arbitrary linear reversible two-field system with one vanishing inertia to a normal form with inertia matrix $\mathrm{diag}(0,\tau)$, symmetric flux matrix $B$, and antisymmetric production $A$; the characteristic-polynomial computation then yields the identity $\beta-\rho\alpha/\mu=\gamma^2\tau/\kappa^2$.

What would settle it

A direct test is to enumerate all linear reversible two-field systems with one vanishing inertia that cannot be transformed to the normal form $C_0=\mathrm{diag}(0,\tau)$, $B=B^T$, $A=-A^T$, and compute the acoustic branch of each; if any genuinely coupled such system has an exact Love–Rosenau branch with $\beta\le\rho\alpha/\mu$, the necessity claim fails, while otherwise the normal-form assumption gains support for this class.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that dispersive elasticity need not be introduced through spatial gradients: a local first-order hierarchy with a convex supplementary energy can reproduce the Love–Rosenau family in a singular limit. For the quadratic reversible specialization, the canonical two-field hierarchy with balance densities $(\rho v, F, \tau_\sigma\sigma-F, \tau_Q Q)$ and reversible production $(-\kappa Q,\kappa\sigma)$ is symmetric hyperbolic whenever $\rho,\mu,\tau_\sigma,\tau_Q>0$. Setting $\tau_\sigma=0$ and eliminating $\sigma$ and $Q$ yields $\rho u_{tt}-\mu u_{zz}+\frac{\mu a^2}{\kappa^2}u_{zzzz}-\frac{\rho a^2+\tau_Q}{\kappa^2}u_{zztt}=0$, with $\alpha=\mu a^2/\kappa^2$ and $\beta=(\rho a^2+\tau_Q)/\kappa^2$, so $\beta-\rho\alpha/\mu=\tau_Q/\kappa^2>0$. The paper proves that this inequality is not an artifact of the chosen fluxes: for any genuinely coupled convex reversible two-field realization of the singular type, $\beta>\rho\alpha/\mu$ is necessary, and conversely every pair $(\alpha,\beta)$ satisfying it is realizable. For nonlinear elastic stress, the same elimination yields $\rho u_{tt}-[T(u_z)]_z+\frac{a^2}{\kappa^2}[T(u_z)]_{zzz}-\frac{\rho a^2+\tau_Q}{\kappa^2}u_{zztt}=0$, whose travelling-wave first integral gives an exact smooth supersonic pulse for the leading cubic correction and excludes the truncated-cosine compacton.

Load-bearing premise

The necessity part of the realizability theorem rests on the assumption that every linear reversible two-field system with one vanishing inertia can be rewritten, using only a linear change of internal variables, in a single canonical form; if some systems cannot be rewritten that way, the inequality might be a feature of the canonical form rather than a universal requirement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Love–Rosenau equation acquires a local, first-order, symmetric-hyperbolic parent theory, and its realizable coefficient domain is exactly $\alpha>0$, $\beta>\rho\alpha/\mu$; the canonical hierarchy attains every admissible pair.
  • Nonlinear elasticity and the one-field generalized-stress model are principal subsystems of the two-field hierarchy, so the reduced dispersive model inherits the convex supplementary law and subcharacteristic ordering of the parent system.
  • The strict inequality $\beta>\rho\alpha/\mu$ forces the high-frequency limiting phase speed below the elastic sound speed, giving a structural explanation of normal dispersion without any assumption about material length scales.
  • For the first cubic elastic correction, the reduced equation admits an exact smooth solitary-pulse branch for supersonic speeds, and the truncated-cosine compacton is excluded by the same first integral.
  • Direct simulations of the full parent hierarchy show the reduced pulse persists over finite times with shape error decreasing as the fast-stress inertia tends to zero; weak dissipation produces slow metastable decay.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable open question left by the paper is whether the normal-form assumption used in the necessity proof covers every linear reversible two-field system with one vanishing inertia; a counterexample with $\beta\le\rho\alpha/\mu$ would break the necessity half.
  • The same RET architecture might generate other fourth-order dispersive equations, such as Boussinesq-type chains, from local first-order parents; the sign of the mixed-derivative coefficient would then be controlled by the inertia of the highest internal field.
  • Because the local parent energy flux is distinct from the reduced interstitial-working flux, apparently non-local higher-gradient energy balances may be reinterpretable as reductions of local hierarchies; this could guide multidimensional extensions of the present one-dimensional construction.
  • The solitary-pulse analysis covers only hardening corrections ($\mu_n>0$); softening branches, periodic and kink waves, and spectral stability of the pulse remain open and could be approached with the same exact first integral.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a one-dimensional Rational Extended Thermodynamics (RET) framework for dispersive elasticity, promoting a generalized stress σ and a higher internal field Q to independent balance laws in addition to velocity v and deformation gradient F. The Ruggeri–Strumia main-field formalism fixes the admissible stress, fluxes, and production from a supplementary mechanical-energy law. A canonical two-field hierarchy is shown to be symmetric hyperbolic under explicit convexity conditions and to contain nonlinear elasticity and a one-field generalized-stress theory as principal subsystems. In the quadratic reversible specialization, the singular fast-stress limit τσ→0 eliminates σ and Q and reproduces the Love–Rosenau equation exactly, with coefficients α=μa^2/κ^2 and β=(ρa^2+τQ)/κ^2. The paper then states a normal-form theorem asserting that β>ρα/μ is necessary and sufficient for any convex reversible two-field realization of the singular type, proves sufficiency by explicit construction, and derives the inequality from the normal form. The nonlinear extension yields an exact reduced equation with the same fourth-order structure, a travelling-wave first integral, an exact parametric supersonic solitary pulse for the leading cubic elastic correction, exclusion of the truncated-cosine compacton, and direct numerical simulations of pulse persistence in the parent hyperbolic system.

Significance. If the normal-form generality is established, the paper gives a local, symmetric-hyperbolic parent theory for a known dispersive wave equation, with an explicit and falsifiable realizability restriction on the Love–Rosenau coefficients. The strengths are substantial: the linear and nonlinear reductions (Theorems 6.1 and 8.1) are derived explicitly with consistent algebra; the canonical hierarchy realizes the whole admissible coefficient domain; the convexity conditions are explicit; the solitary-pulse construction is exact and parametric; and the numerical section reports a resolution check and distinguishes reversible persistence from dissipative metastability. The discussion of the relation between the parent energy flux k and the reduced interstitial-working flux is careful and conceptually useful. The main weakness is the unproved normal-form assertion in Section 7.1, on which the necessity direction of the central realizability theorem rests.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 7.1, Eq. (7.3)] The necessity direction of Theorem 7.1 rests on the assertion that every linear reversible two-field RET system with one vanishing internal inertia can be written in the normal form (7.3) after a nonsingular linear change of the internal main-field components. This assertion is stated without proof. In particular, the paper does not show that the exactness condition (4.9) eliminates any F-dependence of the internal fluxes at linear order and that all energy cross-terms are encoded in the coupling vector c=(γ,δ). If a residual F_z term or an F-dependent Λ survived the transformation, the characteristic polynomial (7.13) and the coefficient comparison leading to (7.16) would not apply to the full class, and the 'if and only if' in Corollary 7.2 would be conditional on the normal form. I recommend adding a lemma that derives (7.3) from the RET potential structure, or explicitly restricting the theorem and its corollaries to the normal-form class.
  2. [Section 7.1, proof of Theorem 7.1 (converse)] The constructed realization has C0=diag(0,τ), so the temporal matrix is positive semidefinite with a zero eigenvalue and is not strictly convex in the sense of (2.11). The sufficiency claim is therefore meaningful only as a singular limit of strictly convex systems, such as the canonical hierarchy with τσ>0. The theorem and Corollary 7.2 should be rephrased to state that the Love–Rosenau coefficients are realized by a one-parameter family of strictly convex reversible two-field RET systems in the limit τσ→0, rather than by a strictly convex system at the singular point.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'exactparametricsmoothsolitarypulseinasupersonicvelocitywindow, whilethetruncated- cosinecompactonisexcluded' is missing spaces; please correct the typesetting.
  2. [Section 7.1, Eq. (7.13)] The characteristic polynomial is presented as the result of 'direct elimination' without a derivation; a short derivation or an explicit reference to the elimination steps would make the proof easier to check.
  3. [Section 10.2, Data accessibility] The repository link and DOI are promised for the final version but are absent from the arXiv version, so the numerical results are not independently reproducible from the manuscript as submitted.
  4. [Section 6.3, proof of Theorem 6.1] The cancellation of the R_z terms when applying (κ-a∂z) to the differentiated Q-equation is not shown; adding the intermediate line would improve clarity.
  5. [Section 10.1, Proposition 10.1] The statement that the non-vanishing of A0+A2U^2 follows from the window condition is terse; a short verification of U_m^2 < -A0/A2 under (10.18) would strengthen the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the Love–Rosenau reduction and the realizability inequality are computed from an explicit parent hierarchy; the unproved normal-form assertion in Theorem 7.1 is a gap, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The canonical parent hierarchy (5.18) is stated explicitly with balance densities, fluxes, and productions; Theorem 6.1 eliminates σ and Q in the limit τσ=0 and obtains equation (6.18) by direct algebra, so the reduced Love–Rosenau equation is an output, not an input. The realizability inequality β>ρα/μ in Theorem 7.1 follows from a characteristic-polynomial comparison: substituting the assumed Love–Rosenau dispersion into (7.13) and matching coefficients gives (7.16)–(7.17). This is not a fit or a rename; the inequality is derived from convexity (τ>0) and fast-mode coupling (γ≠0). The sufficiency direction explicitly constructs a realization from any admissible (α,β), which is a construction, not a prediction masquerading as a fit. Self-citations to Ruggeri–Strumia and Boillat–Ruggeri provide background structure (main-field/symmetric hyperbolicity, principal subsystems), but the paper recomputes the compatibility (Theorem 4.1, Appendix A) and convexity ((5.11)–(5.12)) directly; the subcharacteristic corollary is a consequence of the already-proved inequality, not a load-bearing imported theorem. One genuine gap, indicated by the paper's phrasing 'After a nonsingular linear change of the internal main-field components, a general normal form ... may be written as (7.3)' in Section 7.1, is that the normal form for the general two-field singular class is asserted rather than proved; if false, the necessity direction would fail. This is an omitted argument, not a circular reduction, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RET framework (Ruggeri-Strumia compatibility, Boillat-Ruggeri subsystem theory), the specific modeling choices for the hierarchy, and the singular-limit and normal-form assumptions. No free parameters are fitted to data; the parameters a, kappa, tau_Q, tau_sigma, mu_n, tau_2, tau_4 are constitutive inputs of the model. The internal fields sigma and Q are introduced as mathematical variables without direct observational evidence, but they are eliminated in the reduction, and the reduced equation provides a falsifiable handle.

free parameters (7)
  • a
    Coupling coefficient in internal fluxes Omega1=-a chi, Omega2=-a sigma; sets alpha = mu a^2/kappa^2. Not determined by the theory.
  • kappa
    Reversible production coupling in P1=-kappa Q, P2=kappa sigma; nonzero by assumption; sets the scale of alpha and beta.
  • tau_Q
    Higher-field inertia in Y(Q)=tau_Q Q; positivity required by convexity; gives beta - (rho/mu) alpha = tau_Q/kappa^2 > 0.
  • tau_sigma = tau_sigma -> 0 in the singular limit
    Fast stress inertia; positive in the parent system, taken to zero in the singular reduction.
  • mu_n
    Coefficient of the cubic elastic correction T(U)=mu U + mu_n U^3 used in the solitary-wave analysis.
  • tau_2
    Quadratic parameter of the non-quadratic higher-field energy Y(Q)=tau_2 Q + tau_4 Q^3, with tau_2>0.
  • tau_4
    Quartic parameter of the non-quadratic higher-field energy Y(Q)=tau_2 Q + tau_4 Q^3, with tau_4>=0.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Ruggeri-Strumia main-field compatibility (Section 2.3): existence of u' with dh^alpha = u' dF^alpha and dual potentials.
    Unproved background of the RET framework, cited to [20].
  • standard math Boillat-Ruggeri principal subsystem theory (Section 5.4): every principal subsystem preserves symmetric hyperbolicity, convexity, and subcharacteristic inequalities.
    Relied upon for the nested structure (5.38) and Corollary 7.3.
  • domain assumption Supplementary energy density (3.10) and flux (3.11) with Omega1, Omega2, k independent of v.
    Isothermal one-dimensional Lagrangian elastodynamics; no heat conduction; used in Theorem 4.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Canonical hierarchy psi1=Z(sigma)-F, psi2=Y(Q) and flux k=-a sigma chi (Section 5).
    Specific modeling choice that realizes the general compatibility theorem and yields the nested principal subsystems.
  • ad hoc to paper Singular fast-stress limit tau_sigma -> 0 with tau_Q, a, kappa fixed (Section 6.3).
    Distinguished limit that produces the Love-Rosenau equation exactly.
  • ad hoc to paper Normal form (7.3) with C0=diag(0,tau), B=B^T, A=-A^T for the general linear reversible two-field class (Section 7.1).
    Unproved generality assumption underlying the necessity part of the realizability theorem.
invented entities (2)
  • Generalized stress field sigma
    purpose: Carries the fast inertial mode; its elimination in the singular limit generates the Love-Rosenau mixed derivative term.
    Internal variable not directly observable; its balance law is postulated to produce dispersion.
  • Higher internal field Q
    purpose: Carries the finite inertia tau_Q that supplies the u_zztt term and the strict realizability inequality.
    Internal variable; no direct measurement is proposed; it is eliminated with sigma in the reduction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward a Rational Extended Thermodynamics of dispersive elastic media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HGYISKGF

@misc{pith2026260807296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward a Rational Extended Thermodynamics of dispersive elastic media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HGYISKGF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07296}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a one-dimensional theory of dispersive elasticity within Rational Extended Thermodynamics, taking local first-order balance laws rather than higher spatial gradients as the fundamental description. A supplementary mechanical-energy law and the Ruggeri--Strumia main-field principle determine the admissible stress, internal fluxes and production. A canonical two-field hierarchy is symmetric hyperbolic under explicit convexity conditions and contains nonlinear elasticity and a generalized-stress theory as principal subsystems. For the reversible linear singular two-field class, elimination of the fast stress mode yields the Love--Rosenau equation exactly, together with a necessary and sufficient realizability condition. Nonlinear elastic stresses and non-quadratic higher-field energies are compatible with the same RET architecture; for the exact nonlinear Love--Rosenau reduction we retain quadratic higher-field inertia while allowing nonlinear elastic stress. The reduced equation admits a travelling-wave first integral. For the leading cubic elastic correction we obtain an exact parametric smooth solitary pulse in a supersonic velocity window, while the truncated-cosine compacton is excluded. Direct simulations of the hyperbolic parent system show finite-time pulse persistence in the reversible regime and slow decay under weak dissipation. The local parent energy flux is kept distinct from interstitial working in the reduced theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07296 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative exact parametric smooth solitary pulse from Proposition 10.1. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Long-time numerical persistence of the reduced pulse in the full hyperbolic parent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024 Revisiting the Love hypothesis for introducing dispersion of longitudinal waves in elastic rods.Eur

    Nobili A, Saccomandi G. 2024 Revisiting the Love hypothesis for introducing dispersion of longitudinal waves in elastic rods.Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids105, 105257

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    1986 Dynamics of nonlinear mass–spring chains near the continuum limit.Phys

    Rosenau P. 1986 Dynamics of nonlinear mass–spring chains near the continuum limit.Phys. Lett. A118, 222–227

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    2004The non-linear field theories of mechanics, 3rd edn

    Truesdell C, Noll W. 2004The non-linear field theories of mechanics, 3rd edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer

    work page

  4. [4]

    1995 Continuum model of dispersion caused by an inherent material characteristic length.J

    Rubin MB, Rosenau P, Gottlieb O. 1995 Continuum model of dispersion caused by an inherent material characteristic length.J. Appl. Phys.77, 4054–4063

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    2006 Solitary and compactlike shear waves in the bulk of solids.Phys

    Destrade M, Saccomandi G. 2006 Solitary and compactlike shear waves in the bulk of solids.Phys. Rev. E73, 065604

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    2008 Nonlinear transverse waves in deformed dispersive solids

    Destrade M, Saccomandi G. 2008 Nonlinear transverse waves in deformed dispersive solids. Wave Motion45, 325–336

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    2024 A constitutive model for transversely isotropic dispersive materials.Proc

    Amendola A, de Castro Motta J, Saccomandi G, Vergori L. 2024 A constitutive model for transversely isotropic dispersive materials.Proc. R. Soc. A480, 20230374

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    1998Rational extended thermodynamics, 2nd edn

    Müller I, Ruggeri T. 1998Rational extended thermodynamics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer

    work page

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    2015Rational extended thermodynamics beyond the monatomic gas

    Ruggeri T, Sugiyama M. 2015Rational extended thermodynamics beyond the monatomic gas. Cham, Switzerland: Springer

  2. [10]

    2021Classical and relativistic rational extended thermodynamics of gases

    Ruggeri T, Sugiyama M. 2021Classical and relativistic rational extended thermodynamics of gases. Cham, Switzerland: Springer

  3. [11]

    2012 Can constitutive relations be represented by non-local equations?Q

    Ruggeri T. 2012 Can constitutive relations be represented by non-local equations?Q. Appl. Math.70, 597–611

    2012

  4. [12]

    2024 A nonlinear approach to viscoelasticity via Rational Extended Thermo- dynamics.Int

    Ruggeri T. 2024 A nonlinear approach to viscoelasticity via Rational Extended Thermo- dynamics.Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.160, 104658

    2024

  5. [13]

    2025 Rational Extended Thermodynamics for non-Newtonian fluids with finite relaxation time.Phys

    Ruggeri T. 2025 Rational Extended Thermodynamics for non-Newtonian fluids with finite relaxation time.Phys. Fluids37, 111702

    2025

  6. [14]

    2026 A symmetric hyperbolic non-isothermal model for viscoelastic solids and non-Newtonian fluids.Int

    Arima T, Ruggeri T. 2026 A symmetric hyperbolic non-isothermal model for viscoelastic solids and non-Newtonian fluids.Int. J. Eng. Sci.222, 104491

    2026

  7. [15]

    1997 Hyperbolic principal subsystems: entropy convex- ity and subcharacteristic conditions.Arch

    Boillat G, Ruggeri T. 1997 Hyperbolic principal subsystems: entropy convex- ity and subcharacteristic conditions.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.137, 305–320. (doi:10.1007/s002050050030)

    1997 doi

  8. [16]

    1982 On relativistic heat conduction in the stationary and nonstationary cases, the objectivity principle and piezoelasticity.Lett

    Bressan A. 1982 On relativistic heat conduction in the stationary and nonstationary cases, the objectivity principle and piezoelasticity.Lett. Nuovo Cimento33, 108–112. (doi:10.1007/BF02725408)

    1982 doi

  9. [17]

    1982 Generators of hyperbolic heat equation in nonlinear thermoelasticity

    Ruggeri T. 1982 Generators of hyperbolic heat equation in nonlinear thermoelasticity. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova68, 79–91

    1982

  10. [18]

    1972 On the frame dependence of stress and heat flux.Arch

    Müller I. 1972 On the frame dependence of stress and heat flux.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 45, 241–250. 32

    1972

  11. [19]

    1976 The principle of material frame-indifference and material equations of gases.Int

    Söderholm LH. 1976 The principle of material frame-indifference and material equations of gases.Int. J. Eng. Sci.14, 523–528

    1976

  12. [20]

    1981 Main field and convex covariant density for quasi-linear hy- perbolic systems: relativistic fluid dynamics.Ann

    Ruggeri T, Strumia A. 1981 Main field and convex covariant density for quasi-linear hy- perbolic systems: relativistic fluid dynamics.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré A34, 65–84

    1981

  13. [21]

    1961 An interesting class of quasilinear systems.Dokl

    Godunov SK. 1961 An interesting class of quasilinear systems.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 139, 521–523

    1961

  14. [22]

    1974 Sur l’existence et la recherche d’équations de conservation supplémentaires pour les systèmes hyperboliques.C

    Boillat G. 1974 Sur l’existence et la recherche d’équations de conservation supplémentaires pour les systèmes hyperboliques.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A278, 909–912

    1974

  15. [23]

    1971 Systems of conservation equations with a convex extension

    Friedrichs KO, Lax PD. 1971 Systems of conservation equations with a convex extension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA68, 1686–1688

    1971

  16. [24]

    1980 Symmetric form of non-linear mechanics equations and entropy growth across a shock.Acta Mech.35, 271–274

    Boillat G, Ruggeri T. 1980 Symmetric form of non-linear mechanics equations and entropy growth across a shock.Acta Mech.35, 271–274

    1980

  17. [25]

    1972 Method of Lagrange multipliers for exploitation of the entropy principle

    Liu I-S. 1972 Method of Lagrange multipliers for exploitation of the entropy principle. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.46, 131–148. (doi:10.1007/BF00250688)

    1972 doi

  18. [26]

    1967 On the entropy inequality.Arch

    Müller I. 1967 On the entropy inequality.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.26, 118–141

    1967

  19. [27]

    1963 The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity.Arch

    Coleman BD, Noll W. 1963 The thermodynamics of elastic materials with heat conduction and viscosity.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.13, 167–178. (doi:10.1007/BF01262690)

    1963 doi

  20. [28]

    1985 On the thermomechanics of interstitial working.Arch

    Dunn JE, Serrin J. 1985 On the thermomechanics of interstitial working.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.88, 95–133

    1985

  21. [29]

    2019 Compact structures as true non-linear phe- nomena.Math

    Cirillo ENM, Saccomandi G, Sciarra G. 2019 Compact structures as true non-linear phe- nomena.Math. Eng.1, 434–446. (doi:10.3934/mine.2019.3.434) 33

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.