Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Subspace Packings -- Constructions and Bounds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.06081 v2 pith:HH26QPCD submitted 2019-09-13 math.CO cs.ITmath.IT

classification math.COcs.ITmath.IT
keywords mathcalsubspacecodespackingsanalogsboundscalleddesigns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Grassmannian $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ is the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of the vector space $\mathbb{F}_q^n$. K\"{o}tter and Kschischang showed that codes in Grassmannian space can be used for error-correction in random network coding. On the other hand, these codes are $q$-analogs of codes in the Johnson scheme, i.e., constant dimension codes. These codes of the Grassmannian $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ also form a family of $q$-analogs of block designs and they are called subspace designs. In this paper, we examine one of the last families of $q$-analogs of block designs which was not considered before. This family, called subspace packings, is the $q$-analog of packings, and was considered recently for network coding solution for a family of multicast networks called the generalized combination networks. A subspace packing $t$-$(n,k,\lambda)_q$ is a set $\mathcal{S}$ of $k$-subspaces from $\mathcal{G}_q(n,k)$ such that each $t$-subspace of $\mathcal{G}_q(n,t)$ is contained in at most $\lambda$ elements of $\mathcal{S}$. The goal of this work is to consider the largest size of such subspace packings. We derive a sequence of lower and upper bounds on the maximum size of such packings, analyse these bounds, and identify the important problems for further research in this area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools